Skip to main content

Characterization of self-anticipated pain score prior to elective surgery - a prospective observational study

Abstract

Background

Current principles of postoperative pain management are primarily based on the types and extent of surgical intervention. This clinical study measured patient’s self-anticipated pain score before surgery, and compared the anticipated scores with the actual pain levels and analgesic requirements after surgery.

Methods

This prospective observational study recruited consecutive patients who received elective surgery in the E-Da Hospital, Taiwan from June to August 2018. Patients were asked to subjectively rate their highest anticipated pain level (numeric rating scale, NRS 0–10) for the scheduled surgical interventions during their preoperative anesthesia assessment. After the operation, the actual pain intensity (NRS 0–10) experienced by the patient in the post-anesthesia care unit and the total dose of opioids administered during the perioperative period were recorded. Pain scores ≥4 on NRS were regarded as being unacceptable levels for anticipated or postoperative pain that required more aggressive intervention.

Results

A total of 996 patients were included in the study. Most of the patients (86%) received general anesthesia and 73.9% of them had a history of previous operation. Female anticipated significantly higher overall pain intensities than the male patients (adjusted odd ratio 1.523, 95% confidence interval 1.126–2.061; P = 0.006). Patients who took regular benzodiazepine at bedtime (P = 0.037) and those scheduled to receive more invasive surgical procedures were most likely to anticipate for higher pain intensity at the preoperative period (P < 0.05). Higher anticipated pain scores (preoperative NRS ≥ 4) were associated with higher actual postoperative pain levels (P = 0.007) in the PACU and higher total equivalent opioid use (P < 0.001) for acute pain management during the perioperative period.

Conclusion

This observational study found that patients who are female, use regular benzodiazepines at bedtime and scheduled for more invasive surgeries anticipate significantly higher surgery-related pain. Therefore, appropriate preoperative counseling for analgesic control and the management of exaggerated pain expectation in these patients is necessary to improve the quality of anesthesia delivered and patient’s satisfaction.

Peer Review reports

Background

Inadequate postoperative pain management can lead to physical and psychological distress in patients as well as impact surgical wound healing [1,2,3,4,5] and increase the risk of developing postoperative delirium [6] and cardiopulmonary and thromboembolic events [7]. Although numerous clinical pathways and strategies have been implemented to improve postoperative pain management, such as the introduction of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program and multimodal analgesia (MMA), rates of inadequate postoperative pain management remain as high as 40–56.4% in the general surgical population [8,9,10,11].

Several perioperative factors such as age, catastrophic pain scores, gender, psychological distress, and operation type have been suggested to be closely associated with the postoperative pain intensity and analgesic usage [12,13,14]. It has been found that for breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomies or conserving surgeries, higher postoperative pain expectations and high preoperative distress can predict more intense postoperative pain [15, 16]. A prospective observational study conducted in females undertaking hysterectomies also showed that pre-surgical fears of the immediate consequences of surgery was associated with increased postoperative rescue analgesia requirements [odds ratio (OR), 1.306; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.031–1.655] [17]. However, very few large scale clinical studies have investigated the relationship between the surgical patient’s preoperative anticipated pain and the actual pain intensity experienced after operations in the general surgical population. Therefore, this clinical observational study aimed to determine the patient characteristics and perioperative factors influencing the subjective anticipated pain intensities in patients scheduled for common elective surgical procedures (specific aim 1); Fig. 1. The anticipated pain scales were also compared with the actual pain intensity experienced and analgesia required by the patients after surgery (specific aim 2); Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure1

Specific aims of the study. The clinical variables that might be associated with increased anticipated pain were defined as patient’s characteristics, anesthesia-related and surgical related factors

Methods

Study population and study protocol

This prospective observational study was approved by the ethics committee and the institutional review board of E-Da Hospital, Taiwan (approval number EMRP107018). Consecutive patients who received elective surgery under general or regional anesthesia during June 2018 to August 2018 were included in this study and patients scheduled for emergency operations or those who required postoperative intensive care were excluded (Fig. 2). Patients were invited to voluntarily respond to a quantitative question during their preoperative anesthesia assessment. The patients were asked to rate their highest subjective anticipated postoperative pain intensity (numeric rating scale (NRS) 0–10). After their operations, patients were admitted to the postoperative care unit (PACU). The nurse specialists in the PACU recorded the pain levels by asking the patient’s subjective NRS (1–10) at 15-min intervals. The severity of postoperative pain assessed in the PCAU was defined as low (NRS 1–3) or moderate-to-severe (NRS ≥4). The total analgesic dosages administered in the operating room and in the PACU were also recorded. All anesthetic and surgical interventions administered in this study, including procedures and medications, followed standard clinical practice protocol or physician’s decision. The anesthesia and surgical team members were blinded to the patients’ preoperative anticipated pain scales. The equivalent doses of opioids used during the perioperative period was calculated according to the updated practical opioid rotation and equianalgesic tables [18]. A culturally relevant depression screening questionnaire, the Taiwanese Depression Questionnaire (TDQ), was used to assess for depression in patients admitted to the surgical wards [19]. This 18-item screening tool has a reported sensitivity of 0.89 and a specificity of 0.92 at a cutoff score of 19 for depression screening in the general Taiwanese public [19].

Fig. 2
figure2

Study flow diagram

Statistics

In clinical care, NRS greater than 4 are defined as unacceptable surgical pain levels that required analgesic intervention [20]. Furthermore, patients who reported an expected NRS ≥4 in the preoperative period were associated with a significantly increased risk of postoperative pain up to postoperative day 4 [21]. Therefore, this study categorized the severity of anticipated or the actual postoperative pain surgical pain intensities into low (NRS 1–3) or moderate-to-severe (NRS ≥4), and analyzed the relationships between the moderate-to-severe surgical pain intensities and the clinical variables. Types of surgical procedures that were associated with different levels of expected postoperative pain intensity were graded according to a clinical prediction rule established by Jessen et al. [22]. The risk of developing severe postoperative pain was graded by the invasiveness of the procedure, clinical observation, current practice, and opinions of surgeons and anesthesiologists. A total of 27 groups of surgical procedures were classified into 5 levels, as lowest, low, moderate, high and highest expected pain (supplementary Table 1) [22]. Variance inflation factors (VIF) were computed for the covariates that are potentially affected the preoperative anticipated pain intensities. A VIF of 1.0 indicates that the particular variable of interest is not significantly correlated to the other covariates. The values of NRS for different types of surgery were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by the Dunn’s post-hoc test. The values of continuous variables were compared using an Wilcoxon rank-sum test or Kruskal-Wallis test, as appropriate. Categorical variables were compared using chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. A stepwise regression model was adopted to evaluate the factors of interest (patient demographic and clinical variables) and the preoperative anticipated pain scales. Statistical significance was accepted at a level of P < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using the SAS software, version 9.1 (SPSS software, version 24.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY).

Results

General outcomes

A total of 996 eligible patients were included in the study, as one patient was excluded due to incomplete data (Fig. 2). Most of the patients underwent a preoperative pain assessment 7 days before surgery (Table 1). Majority of the patients in this study were middle aged and there were no significant gender imbalances (Table 1). More patients received general anesthesia for their procedures and only 1 in 4 patients did not have previous any surgeries (Table 1). Types of operation are listed in Table 1. More than 70% of the patients anticipated moderate-to-severe pain (NRS < 4) after surgery with a mean predicted NRS of 4.9 (Table 1).

Table 1 Patient demographical data (n = 996)

Patient characteristics and perioperative factors

Table 2 presences the univariate analysis of patient characteristics and perioperative factors that associated with moderate-to-severe anticipated pain before operation. Some of these clinically relevant factors with optimally low values of VIF (supplementary Table 2) were processed for conditional multivariate logistic regression analysis (Table 3). Multivariate analysis showed that female gender was associated with significantly higher anticipated pain intensity with an OR of 1.523 (95% CI) 1.126–2.061; P = 0.006) (Table 3). Furthermore, patients who took regular benzodiazepines at bedtime reported significantly higher anticipated pain intensities (AOR 1.670; 95% CI 1.032–2.702, P = 0.037) (Table 3). Compared with those who were younger, less patients over 40 years of age anticipated moderate-to-severe surgical-related pain before operation (AOR 0.739; 95% CI 0.518–1.056, P = 0.097) (Table 3). Although univariate analysis found that regional anesthesia was associated with significantly higher anticipation for moderate-to-severe surgical pain (Table 2), the effects of different anesthesia techniques (regional vs general) on anticipated moderate-to-severe pain levels were unsignificant in multivariate analysis (Table 3).

Table 2 Univariate analysis of the associations between patient’s anticipated pain intensity and the perioperative factors
Table 3 Multivariate analysis of the predicting factors for anticipated moderate-to-severe pain

There were 27 different surgical procedures, which could be categorized into 5 classes (supplementary Table 1). Patients scheduled for lowest expected pain procedures anticipated of a mean NRS of 3.3 ± 2.5; while the anticipated NRS for those scheduled for highest expected pain procedures were 5.3 ± 2.5 (P < 0.001) (Fig. 3). Multivariate analysis suggested that patients scheduled to receive surgical procedures with low to highest expected pain were more likely to anticipate for higher pain intensity at preoperative period than those who scheduled for the lowest expected pain procedures (P < 0.05) (Table 3). In addition, there was a linear relationship of increasing intensity of anticipated pain with different classifications of surgical procedures (Fig. 3, Tables 2 and 3).

Fig. 3
figure3

Graphical presentation of relationships between types of the scheduled surgery and patient’s anticipated pain. The invasiveness of surgical procedures graded by a clinical prediction model established by Janssen and his colleageus [22], as types of operation were grouped into the lowest, low, moderate, high and highest expected pain surgery. The median value of anticipated numeric rating scale (NRS) in the lowest expected pain surgery group was significantly increased in comparison to the other groups (*P < 0.05 and **P < 0.001; as analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by the Dunn’s post-hoc test). Results are presented as box-and-whisker plots, in which the horizontal solid lines of boxes indicate the 75th percentile, median and 25th percentile of the distribution, and the upper and lower whiskers indicate the maximal and minimal values. Dotted lines indicate the mean values

Association between preoperative anticipated pain and postoperative pain

Before surgery, 71.2% of patients anticipated moderate-to-severe pain intensity (NRS ≥4) (Table 4), but the actual NRS recorded by PACU nurses showed that 58.2% of patients had adequate pain control (highest NRS < 4) within 1 h after surgery (Table 4). Patients who anticipated high NRS during preoperative period were associated with significantly higher actual NRS in PACU (P = 0.007) and also received significantly higher total equivalent opioid doses during the perioperative period (P < 0.001) (Table 5).

Table 4 Comparison between patient’s preoperative self-anticipated pain and postoperative pain score measured in PACU
Table 5 Analysis of the associations between patient’s preoperative self-anticipated pain intensity and the actual postoperative pain at PACU or analgesic requirement during perioperative period (n = 996)

Discussion

A major limitation in postoperative pain management has been the fact that a patient’s personal perception of pain may not always be taken into account during preoperative pain counseling. Acute postoperative pain is a subjective and multidimensional experience that is extremely hard to measure and manage optimally. In fact, a previous study found that pre-exposure to a stressed or anxious condition significantly increased the subjective pain perception to a standard noxious stimulation than those who were pre-exposed to a happy condition [23].

Gender is commonly considered as a strong predictor for pain perception and analgesic requirements after surgery [24, 25]. However, some systematic reviews have not found gender to be an independent predictor for postoperative pain levels or analgesic requirements [14]. The results of our survey suggest that female patients anticipated significantly higher pain levels preoperatively than male patients, the difference remained statistically significant following a multivariate regression analysis with an odds ratio of 1.523 (95% CI 1.126–2.061). These results support the findings of numerous previous studies [26,27,28]. The univariate analysis also found that patients over 40 years of age anticipated a lesser degree of surgery-related pain during their preoperative assessments as compared to those who were younger. This observation is consistent with previous prospective observational studies in patients receiving breast surgery, indicating that age had a negative impact on the prediction of acute postoperative pain [16, 29], and previous studies also found that the elderly are usually associated with less preoperative anxiety [30, 31]. However, difference in age groups became an insignificant factor for increased anticipation of moderate-to-severe pain during preoperative period in multivariate analysis, probably due to the neutralization effect of surgical types with different expected pain levels in these two age groups.

Previous studies have suggested that patients with psychosomatic and behavioral disorders (e.g. major depression, insomnia, and catastrophizing pain) can have a decreased tolerances for postoperative pain [32,33,34,35]. Our study has found that regular benzodiazepine use at bedtime is an independent risk factor for high anticipated postoperative pain intensity during preoperative assessments. In addition to hypnosis, benzodiazepines are also commonly used to manage anxiety and other anxiety-related disorders. However, we did not specify the clinical indications for the regular use of benzodiazepines for individual patients. According to our questionnaire design, the use of benzodiazepines at bedtime was more likely considered as hypnotic agents to improve sleeping quality at night, rather than surrogate indicators for anxiety or other psychosomatic disorders. Furthermore, no differences were found in preoperative pain anticipation between surgical patients with and without depression, which was screened by the Taiwanese Depression Questionnaire during preoperative assessment. This study also did not find significant effects of other patient characteristic variables, such as educational levels, marital and socioeconomic status on the anticipation of surgical pain intensity.

Classification of type of surgery has been shown as a clinical meaningful predictor for prediction of acute postoperative pain, as the invasiveness and incision size of surgical procedure correlate with the anticipated pain intensity [22]. We used the clinical prediction rule established by Janssen et al., in which types of surgery were graded from the lowest to the highest expected pain procedures [22]. Our analysis showed a clear positive relationship between type of operation and patient’s anticipated pain intensity, suggesting that the invasiveness and complexity of procedure affects patients’ anticipated perception of surgical-related pain in the preoperative period [14, 22]. Previous studies also indicate that anesthetic techniques play a major role in the risk of developing severe acute postoperative pain, as the odds ratio of NRS > 4 was higher in patients receiving only general anesthesia without regional block techniques immediately after operation and on postoperative day 2 [21]. Consistently, our univariate analysis suggested that the proposed administration of regional blocks significantly reduced patient concerns regarding postoperative pain. However, techniques of anesthesia (regional or general anesthesia) were not significantly associated with the anticipation of moderate-to-severe pain in multivariate analysis, which was also most likely affected by differences in types of surgery.

Preoperative anticipated pain intensity was compared with the highest postoperative pain intensity recorded in PACU and the total equivalent dose of opioids prescribed perioperatively. Our analysis found that patients who anticipated moderate-to-severe pain intensity before operations were associated with significantly higher actual pain scores in the PACU and also required significantly higher doses of analgesics during the perioperative period compared to those who reported a lower preoperative pain anticipation. In current practice, anesthesiologists are more likely to prescribe postoperative analgesics based on the type and duration of the operation rather than the patient’s subjective perception of pain [36, 37]. Our results suggest that patient’s self-anticipated pain intensity may provide complementary clinical considerations for adequate management of acute pain after surgery.

After extensively reviewing 48 studies, Ip et al. identified several independent perioperative factors for predicting actual levels of postoperative pain and analgesic usage [14]. These predictive factors include the presence of preoperative pain, anxiety, age, and type of surgery (i.e. major joint, thoracic, and open abdominal surgery) and are associated with higher postoperative pain scores. Surgery type, age, and psychological distress were found to be significant predictors of analgesic usage. Ip and colleagues’ systematic review found that gender had a neutral effect on postoperative pain levels and analgesic requirements, but the results of our study indicated that females anticipated more postoperative pain preoperatively. This major discrepancy could be due to the general understanding that female patients can react more emotionally to physical distress, but the distress is no less authentic and they are not less ill than the male patients [38,39,40].

The results of this study must be interpreted in light of several limitations. Firstly, patients were invited to voluntarily rate the anticipated pain intensity during their preoperative anesthesia assessment. Therefore, the knowledge, educational levels and motives of the individual patient might impact the response to the quantitative question. Secondly, patients’ preoperative psychological conditions are routinely assessed using a culturally relevant depression screening questionnaire, the Taiwanese Depression Questionnaire (TDQ) in our hospital. This short questionnaire were designed to be simple and practical so that it could be applied to the general population in a time-efficient manner. The comprehensive versions for diagnosing depression and chronic insomnia were not used in this study. Furthermore, the use of a structured self-rating Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire may also provide higher sensitivity to predict the development of acute postoperative pain [16, 41]. Thirdly, several potential predicting factors, such as patient’s pain catastrophism, pain sensitivity, preoperative opioid intake, full history of past surgeries and traumas, and ethnicity were not determined in this study. Although total equianalgesic doses of opioid administered during perioperative period were calculated, the use of non-opioid analgesics were not taken into account for the overall surrogate indicator for postoperative pain. Lastly, our results were not generalized to critically ill patients who were scheduled for postoperative intensive care or emergent surgery.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated that female gender, regular benzodiazepine use at bedtime and who scheduled to receive more invasive surgical procedures anticipate significantly higher pain intensity before surgery, and they are associated with higher actual pain scores and increased analgesic requirements during the perioperative period. Therefore, these patients may require additional assessments and pain management counseling during their pre-anesthesia consultation. Appropriate preoperative counseling for analgesic control (especially the introduction of multimodal analgesia) and the management of unnecessary anticipated pain levels could improve the quality of anesthesia delivery and patient perioperative satisfaction.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AOR:

Adjusted odds ratio

ASA PS:

American Society for Anesthesiologist physical statuses

BMI:

Body mass index

CI:

Confidence interval

ERAS:

Enhanced recovery after surgery

MMA:

Multimodal analgesia

NRS:

Numeric rating scale

PACU:

Postanesthesia care unit

TDQ:

The Taiwanese Depression Questionnaire

VAS:

Visual analogue scale

References

  1. 1.

    Kehlet H, Jensen TS, Woolf CJ. Persistent postsurgical pain: risk factors and prevention. Lancet. 2006;367(9522):1618–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68700-X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Macrae WA. Chronic pain after surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2001;87(1):88–98. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/87.1.88.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Macrae WA. Chronic post-surgical pain: 10 years on. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101(1):77–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aen099.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bechert K, Abraham SE. Pain management and wound care. J Am Col Certif Wound Spec. 2009;1(2):65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcws.2008.12.001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Woo KY. Exploring the effects of pain and stress on wound healing. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2012;25(1):38–44; quiz 5-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000410689.60105.7d.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Lynch EP, Lazor MA, Gellis JE, Orav J, Goldman L, Marcantonio ER. The impact of postoperative pain on the development of postoperative delirium. Anesth Analg. 1998;86(4):781–5. https://doi.org/10.1213/00E000539-199804000-00019.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Breivik H, Borchgrevink PC, Allen SM, Rosseland LA, Romundstad L, Hals EK, Kvarstein G, Stubhaug A. Assessment of pain. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101(1):17–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aen103.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Apfelbaum JL, Chen C, Mehta SS, Gan TJ. Postoperative pain experience: results from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged. Anesth Analg. 2003;97(2):534–40. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ANE.0000068822.10113.9E.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    El-Aqoul A, Obaid A, Yacoub E, Al-Najar M, Ramadan M, Darawad M. Factors associated with inadequate pain control among postoperative patients with Cancer. Pain Manag Nurs. 2018;19(2):130–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2017.10.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Meyer LA, Lasala J, Iniesta MD, Nick AM, Munsell MF, Shi Q, Wang XS, Cain KE, Lu KH, Ramirez PT. Effect of an enhanced recovery after surgery program on opioid use and patient-reported outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(2):281–90. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002735.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Gan TJ. Poorly controlled postoperative pain: prevalence, consequences, and prevention. J Pain Res. 2017;10:2287–98. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S144066.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Pavlin DJ, Sullivan MJ, Freund PR, Roesen K. Catastrophizing: a risk factor for postsurgical pain. Clin J Pain. 2005;21(1):83–90. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002508-200501000-00010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Banka TR, Ruel A, Fields K, YaDeau J, Westrich G. Preoperative predictors of postoperative opioid usage, pain scores, and referral to a pain management service in total knee arthroplasty. HSS J. 2015;11(1):71–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-014-9418-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ip HY, Abrishami A, Peng PW, Wong J, Chung F. Predictors of postoperative pain and analgesic consumption: a qualitative systematic review. Anesthesiology. 2009;111(3):657–77. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181aae87a.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Sipila RM, Haasio L, Meretoja TJ, Ripatti S, Estlander AM, Kalso EA. Does expecting more pain make it more intense? Factors associated with the first week pain trajectories after breast cancer surgery. Pain. 2017;158(5):922–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000859.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Rehberg B, Mathivon S, Combescure C, Mercier Y, Savoldelli GL. Prediction of acute postoperative pain following breast Cancer surgery using the pain sensitivity questionnaire: a cohort study. Clin J Pain. 2017;33(1):57–66. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000380.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Pinto PR, McIntyre T, Fonseca C, Almeida A, Araújo-Soares V. Pre- and post-surgical factors that predict the provision of rescue analgesia following hysterectomy. Eur J Pain. 2013;17(3):423–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1532-2149.2012.00205.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Treillet E, Laurent S, Hadjiat Y. Practical management of opioid rotation and equianalgesia. J Pain Res. 2018;11:2587–601. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S170269.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Lee Y, Yang MJ, Lai TJ, Chiu NM, Chau TT. Development of the Taiwanese depression questionnaire. Chang Gung Med J. 2000;23(11):688–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Gerbershagen HJ, Rothaug J, Kalkman CJ, Meissner W. Determination of moderate-to-severe postoperative pain on the numeric rating scale: a cut-off point analysis applying four different methods. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107(4):619–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aer195.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Sommer M, de Rijke JM, van Kleef M, Kessels AG, Peters ML, Geurts JW, Patijn J, Gramke HF, Marcus MA. Predictors of acute postoperative pain after elective surgery. Clin J Pain. 2010;26(2):87–94. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181b43d68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Janssen KJ, Kalkman CJ, Grobbee DE, Bonsel GJ, Moons KG, Vergouwe Y. The risk of severe postoperative pain: modification and validation of a clinical prediction rule. Anesth Analg. 2008;107(4):1330–9. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e31818227da.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Lefebvre JC, Jensen MP. The relationships between worry, happiness and pain catastrophizing in the experience of acute pain. Eur J Pain. 2019;23(7):1358–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Cepeda MS, Carr DB. Women experience more pain and require more morphine than men to achieve a similar degree of analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2003;97(5):1464–8. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000080153.36643.83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Chia YY, Chow LH, Hung CC, Liu K, Ger LP, Wang PN. Gender and pain upon movement are associated with the requirements for postoperative patient-controlled iv analgesia: a prospective survey of 2,298 Chinese patients. Can J Anaesth. 2002;49(3):249–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03020523.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Palmeira CC, Ashmawi HA, Posso IP. Sex and pain perception and analgesia. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2011;61(6):814–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-7094(11)70091-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Unruh AM. Gender variations in clinical pain experience. Pain. 1996;65(2–3):123–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(95)00214-6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Samulowitz A, Gremyr I, Eriksson E, Hensing G. "Brave men" and "emotional women": a theory-guided literature review on gender Bias in health care and gendered norms towards patients with chronic pain. Pain Res Manag. 2018:6358624.

  29. 29.

    Schreiber KL, Zinboonyahgoon N, Xu X, Spivey T, King T, Dominici L, Partridge A, Golshan M, Strichartz G, Edwards RR. Preoperative psychosocial and psychophysical phenotypes as predictors of acute pain outcomes after breast surgery. J Pain. 2019;20(5):540–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2018.11.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Celik F, Edipoglu IS. Evaluation of preoperative anxiety and fear of anesthesia using APAIS score. Eur J Med Res. 2018;23(1):41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-018-0339-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Erkilic E, Kesimci E, Soykut C, Doger C, Gumus T, Kanbak O. Factors associated with preoperative anxiety levels of Turkish surgical patients: from a single center in Ankara. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017;11:291–6. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S127342.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Taenzer P, Melzack R, Jeans ME. Influence of psychological factors on postoperative pain, mood and analgesic requirements. Pain. 1986;24(3):331–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(86)90119-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    De Cosmo G, Congedo E, Lai C, Primieri P, Dottarelli A, Aceto P. Preoperative psychologic and demographic predictors of pain perception and tramadol consumption using intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. Clin J Pain. 2008;24(5):399–405. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181671a08.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Papaioannou M, Skapinakis P, Damigos D, Mavreas V, Broumas G, Palgimesi A. The role of catastrophizing in the prediction of postoperative pain. Pain Med. 2009;10(8):1452–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00730.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Khan RS, Skapinakis P, Ahmed K, Stefanou DC, Ashrafian H, Darzi A, Athanasiou T. The association between preoperative pain catastrophizing and postoperative pain intensity in cardiac surgery patients. Pain Med. 2012;13(6):820–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01386.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Gerbershagen HJ, Aduckathil S, van Wijck AJ, Peelen LM, Kalkman CJ, Meissner W. Pain intensity on the first day after surgery: a prospective cohort study comparing 179 surgical procedures. Anesthesiology. 2013;118(4):934–44. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e31828866b3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Shoar S, Esmaeili S, Safari S. Pain management after surgery: a brief review. Anesth Pain Med. 2012;1(3):184–6. https://doi.org/10.5812/kowsar.22287523.3443.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Colameco S, Becker LA, Simpson M. Sex bias in the assessment of patient complaints. J Fam Pract. 1983;16(6):1117–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Etherton J, Lawson M, Graham R. Individual and gender differences in subjective and objective indices of pain: gender, fear of pain, pain catastrophizing and cardiovascular reactivity. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2014;39(2):89–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-014-9245-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Vambheim SM, Øien RA. Sex differences in fear of pain: item-level analysis of the fear of pain questionnaire III. J Pain Res. 2017;10:825–31. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S128850.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Ruscheweyh R, Marziniak M, Stumpenhorst F, Reinholz J, Knecht S. Pain sensitivity can be assessed by self-rating: development and validation of the pain sensitivity questionnaire. Pain. 2009;146(1–2):65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2009.06.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to express our deepest gratitude to Ms. Tzu-Ting Cheng for assistance in preparation of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded, in part by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan (grant number MOST 109-2314-B-650-007-MY2 to CFL) and institutional grants from the E-Da Hospital, Taiwan (EDPJ108033 to CFL). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

WSC, SCC, YCT and CFL designed the study. WSC, YTH, MCC, and YCC collected the questionnaires and data acquisition. WSC, TSC, YCT and CFL contributed to the statistical analysis and interpretation of data. WSC, YTH, MCC, YCT and CFL contributed to drafting the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of manuscript. YCT and CFL contributed equally to the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chen-Fuh Lam.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of the E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan (EMRP107018). Written informed consents were obtained from the patients or their legal representatives.

Consent for publication

not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplementary table 1.

Surgical procedures with different levels of expected pain [19]

Additional file 2: Supplementary table 2.

Variance inflation factors (VIF) for the degree of multicollinearity among patient’s characteristic and surgical-related variables that associated with preoperative anticipated pain. ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists. *A total of 27 groups of surgical procedures were classified into 5 levels, as lowest, low, moderate, high and highest expected pain [22]

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, WS., Hsieh, YT., Chen, MC. et al. Characterization of self-anticipated pain score prior to elective surgery - a prospective observational study. BMC Anesthesiol 21, 85 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01303-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Numeric rating scale
  • Pain expectation
  • Pre-anesthesia assessment, post-anesthesia care unit
  • Surgery-related pain