Skip to main content

A pre-anesthetic bolus of ketamine versus dexmedetomidine for prevention of postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing emergency surgery: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study

Abstract

Background

We aimed to evaluate whether a single dose of ketamine or dexmedetomidine before induction of general anesthesia could reduce the incidence of postoperative delirium (primary outcome) or cognitive dysfunction (secondary outcome) in elderly patients undergoing emergency surgery.

Patients and methods

This randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial included 60 elderly patients who were scheduled for emergency surgery. The patients were randomly assigned into one of three groups (n = 20): group I received 0.9% normal saline, group II received 1 µg/kg dexmedetomidine, and group III received 1 mg/kg ketamine right before anesthesia induction. Patients were observed for three days after surgery and tested for postoperative delirium and cognitive dysfunction using the delirium observation screening scale and the mini-mental state examination score, respectively.

Results

The dexmedetomidine group had the lowest incidence of delirium (p = 0.001) and cognitive dysfunction (p = 0.006) compared to the ketamine and placebo groups. The multivariate logistic regression model revealed that dexmedetomidine reduced the incidence of postoperative delirium by 32% compared to placebo (reference) (OR = 0.684, 95% CI: 0.240–0.971, p = 0.025), whereas ketamine increased the risk by threefold (OR = 3.012, 95% CI: 1.185–9.681, p = 0.013). Furthermore, dexmedetomidine reduced the incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction by 62% (OR = 0.375, 95% CI: 0.091–0.543, p = 0.012), whereas ketamine increased the risk by 4.5 times (OR = 4.501, 95% CI: 1.161–8.817, p = 0.006).

Conclusion

A single pre-anesthetic bolus of dexmedetomidine is a practical choice for preventing postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing emergency surgery.

Trial registration

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Aswan University Hospital (approval number: aswu/548/7/2021; registration date: 06/07/2021) and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05341154) (22/04/2022).

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Delirium is an acute, fluctuating mental state characterized by impaired awareness and attention disturbance that develops over a short period (usually hours to days). Postoperative delirium (POD) is a serious postoperative complication that can last up to 5 days after surgery and has negative consequences such as increased mortality and financial cost. POD is frequently associated with deteriorating cognition, known as postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) [1]. Even though the pathophysiology of delirium remains poorly understood, many studies have identified advanced age and emergency surgery as risk factors for POD. Approximately 80% of elderly people undergoing surgery develop POD, which is 1.5 to three times more likely after emergency surgery than non-emergency surgery [2,3,4]. Thus, preventive interventions are especially important since they form the foundation for POD management [5]. A variety of pharmacological therapies are utilized to prevent or minimize POD [6]. Dexmedetomidine is an alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonist with analgesic and neuroprotective effects. These neuroprotective characteristics may explain the growing evidence of the preventative effect of dexmedetomidine on POD [7]. Similarly, ketamine is an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist that has been demonstrated to have neuroprotective benefits in a variety of experimental tests, mostly through its ability to inhibit apoptosis and inflammation [8]. As a result, clinical trials are increasingly being utilized to assess the efficacy of ketamine on POD and neurocognition. Nevertheless, POD outcomes are still uncertain due to discrepancies in the interventions used to reduce them. There is a need for a consensus on the most effective way to prevent POD, especially among elderly people, whose incidence and prevalence rates are higher, and thereby alleviate the financial burden associated with POD.

This randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial aimed to evaluate whether a single dose of ketamine or dexmedetomidine before induction of general anesthesia could reduce postoperative delirium incidence (primary outcome), postoperative cognitive dysfunction, postoperative pain, and opioid consumption (secondary outcome) in elderly patients undergoing emergency surgery.

Patients and methods

Ethics and registration

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Aswan University Hospital (approval number: aswu/548/7/2021; registration date: 06/07/2021) and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05341154) (22/04/2022). It was held between May 2022 and May 2023 and followed the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines. The study’s objectives and risks were explained to participants, and they signed written informed consent. All methods were carried out according to the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and its amendments.

Patient inclusion and exclusion criteria

The study included all patients aged 60 or older with an ASA I or II who were scheduled for emergency gastrointestinal, orthopedic, vascular, obstetric, urologic, or plastic surgery. Patients with preoperative delirium determined by the Delirium Observation Screening Scale (DOSS) [9] or cognitive impairment as measured by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores [10], a history of dexmedetomidine or ketamine intolerance, a lack of collaboration or communication, Parkinson’s disease, epilepsy, or a high probability of postoperative care in the intensive care unit (ICU) were excluded from the study.

Randomization

Computer-generated randomization tables were used to establish randomization. The group assignment was concealed in serially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes. Patients were assigned at random to one of three equal groups (n = 20): group I (placebo group) received 0.9% normal saline, group II (dexmedetomidine group) received 1 µg/kg dexmedetomidine, and group III (ketamine group) received 1 mg/kg ketamine. An investigator who was not involved in patient anesthesia or outcome evaluation prepared the study drug in a standardized syringe with the same volume (50 ml) for all groups. The patients, the researcher who performed anesthesia, and the data collectors were blinded to the group assignment.

Anesthesia

Before proceeding to the operating room, the authors assessed the patient’s eligibility for the study through history-taking, physical examination, and evaluation of basal laboratory studies. Standard monitoring was connected upon arrival in the operating room, including ECG, non-invasive arterial blood pressure, and pulse oximetry. All patients received the study drug over 10 min right before anesthesia induction, followed by a consistent general anesthetic regimen. Fentanyl (1 µg/kg body weight) was used for analgesia, propofol (1–2 mg/kg body weight) was used to induce anesthesia, rocuronium (1 mg/kg body weight) was used to allow insertion of the endotracheal tube, and isoflurane in 50% O2 / air was used to maintain anesthesia. The mechanical ventilation was set to keep the end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure (EtCO2) level between 35 and 40 mmHg. Isoflurane was stopped at the end of the procedure, and the residual neuromuscular block was reversed with neostigmine and atropine.

Outcome measures

The primary endpoint was the incidence of delirium within three days after surgery. Patients were examined for delirium twice a day (after 6.00 a.m. and again after 6.00 p.m.). The secondary outcomes included postoperative cognitive dysfunction, duration of surgery (measured from incision to wound closure), duration of anesthesia (measured from anesthesia induction to anesthetic drug discontinuation), time to extubation (measured from anesthetic drug discontinuation to extubation), and the total doses of fentanyl used during the operation. Postoperative pain was assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (0 = no pain, 10 = most severe pain) at the 30th minute (t1), 1st hour (t2), 4th hour (t3), 12th hour (t4), and 24th hour (t5) after surgery. The time to first postoperative request for analgesia (nalbuphine 0.05 mg/kg) when VAS was ≥ 3 was recorded, and the total nalbuphine consumption in the first 24 h was calculated.

Sample size and statistical analysis

The sample size was calculated using G*Power 3 software, with a power of 80% and a type I error of 5% (α = 0.05 and β = 80%) on the one-tailed test, to detect an effect size of 0.4 to 0.5 in the incidence of postoperative delirium, which is the primary outcome measure of this study. The minimum required sample size was 60 patients admitted and scheduled for emergency surgery under general anesthesia (divided into three equal groups of 20 patients each).

The data were verified, coded by the researchers, and analyzed using SPSS version 24. Descriptive statistics: means, standard deviations (SD), and percentages were calculated. The chi-square test was used to compare the difference in the distribution of postoperative delirium incidence among different groups. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to test data normality. For continuous variables with more than two categories, the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was calculated to test the mean differences of the data that follow a normal distribution, and an independent post-hoc test was calculated using Bonferroni corrections. The multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to detect the independent association between treatment drugs and the incidence of postoperative delirium and cognitive dysfunction. A p-value equal to or less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Seventy patients were eligible for this study. The authors excluded ten patients because four refused to participate and six did not meet the inclusion criteria (two due to preoperative delirium, and four were at high risk of postoperative care in the ICU). Finally, 60 patients were enrolled in this study based on intention to treat and randomly assigned to one of three equal groups (Fig. 1). The baseline patient characteristics and laboratory studies were comparable across the study groups. In terms of surgical data, the type of surgery and total fentanyl consumption during the operation were not significantly different between groups, but the length of surgery, duration of anesthesia, and time to extubation were significantly shorter in the ketamine group compared to the dexmedetomidine and placebo groups (Table 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

CONSORT flow diagram of study participants

Table 1 Baseline patient characteristics and surgical data

Primary and secondary outcomes

The incidence of postoperative delirium was lower (p = 0.001) in the dexmedetomidine group compared to the ketamine and placebo groups. Delirium occurred in one patient (5%) in the dexmedetomidine group, two patients (10%) in the ketamine group, and 15 patients (75%) in the placebo group (Table 2). After adjusting for all predictors, the dexmedetomidine group had a 32% lower incidence of postoperative delirium than the placebo group (reference) (OR = 0.684, 95% CI: 0.240–0.97, p = 0.025). In contrast, the ketamine group had three times the risk of postoperative delirium as the placebo group (OR = 3.012, 95% CI: 1.185–9.68, p = 0.013). The multivariable logistic regression model of the independent predictors of postoperative delirium revealed that male patients were significant predictors of developing postoperative delirium as they had four times the risk of postoperative delirium as females (OR = 3.950, 95% CI: 1.461–6.064, p = 0.003) (Table 3). However, surgery duration, anesthetic duration, extubation time, and age were not found to be statistically significant predictors of POD.

Table 2 Primary and secondary outcomes
Table 3 Multivariable logistic regression analysis of the independent predictors of postoperative delirium

The incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction was lower (p = 0.006) in the dexmedetomidine group compared to the ketamine and placebo groups. No patients reported cognitive dysfunction in the dexmedetomidine group compared to two patients (10%) in the ketamine group and seven patients (35%) in the placebo group (Table 2). After adjusting for all predictors, the effect of the study drugs on the incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction was 62% lower in the dexmedetomidine group compared to the placebo group (reference) (OR = 0.375, 95% CI: 0.091–0.543, p = 0.012). In contrast, the ketamine group had 4.5 times the risk of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (OR = 4.501, 95% CI: 1.161–8.817, p = 0.006) when compared to the placebo group (reference). The multivariable logistic regression model of the independent predictors of postoperative cognitive dysfunction revealed that surgery duration, anesthetic duration, extubation time, age, and gender were not found to be statistically significant predictors of postoperative cognitive impairment (Table 4).

Table 4 Multivariable logistic regression analysis of the independent predictors of postoperative cognitive dysfunction

Postoperative pain scores were lower in the ketamine group (0.00 ± 0.0, 0.00 ± 0.0) at 30 and 60 min after surgery compared to the placebo (1.1 ± 0.2, p < 0.001; 2.3 ± 0.1, p < 0.001) and dexmedetomidine (0.7 ± 0.2, p = 0.001; 1.8 ± 0.2, p < 0.001) groups. However, the dexmedetomidine group had lower VAS scores (1.30 ± 0.2; 1.75 ± 0.1) than the placebo group (2.20 ± 0.1, p < 0.001; 2.30 ± 0.2, p = 0.022) at 60 min and 4 h after surgery (Fig. 2). Additionally, the ketamine group had a longer time to first postoperative request for analgesia and a lower postoperative nalbuphine requirement than the placebo (p < 0.001, p = 0.002) and dexmedetomidine (p < 0.001, p = 0.025) groups, respectively.

Fig. 2
figure 2

VAS score differences among the studied groups over time

The length of hospital stay was shorter in the placebo group than in the dexmedetomidine (p = 0.034) and ketamine (p = 0.016) groups. In contrast, there was no significant difference in the length of hospital stay between the ketamine and dexmedetomidine groups (p = 0.757) (Table 2).

Discussion

In the context of preventing postoperative delirium and cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients, we found that patients who received dexmedetomidine had the lowest incidence of postoperative delirium and cognitive dysfunction compared to ketamine and placebo. A single pre-induction dosage of dexmedetomidine reduced the incidence of postoperative delirium by 32% and cognitive dysfunction by 62% compared to the placebo. However, ketamine use increased the risk of postoperative delirium three times and cognitive dysfunction 4.5 times more than placebo.

Notably, abnormally high levels of pro-inflammatory markers, abnormal neurotransmitter levels, physiologic stresses, and metabolic derangements are the most important pathophysiologic contributors to postoperative delirium [11, 12]. A recent meta-analysis found that proper postoperative pain control is the most effective strategy for reducing POD occurrence in elderly patients undergoing surgery [13]. Dexmedetomidine is a novel sedative-analgesic with neuroprotective properties. Numerous trials have indicated that dexmedetomidine suppresses neuroendocrine and systemic inflammatory processes in response to surgery and significantly lowers proinflammatory cytokines interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-), as well as microglial activation and neuroapoptosis [14, 15]. Likewise, growing experimental and clinical evidence suggests that ketamine may be neuroprotective because it inhibits NMDA-receptor activation and excitotoxic signaling, as well as decreasing neuronal apoptosis (programmed cell death) [16]. Several studies have demonstrated that intraoperative ketamine has an anti-inflammatory impact, significantly lowering circulating concentrations of the proinflammatory cytokine IL-6 and raising concentrations of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 following surgery [17, 18]. Ketamine additionally helps to minimize postoperative pain and opioid consumption [19]. Our clinical trial aimed to determine whether a pre-anesthetic bolus of ketamine or dexmedetomidine could reduce the incidence of postoperative delirium and cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients undergoing emergency surgery.

The results from this study are generally in line with a previous meta-analysis of 108 RCTs on delirium pharmacotherapy, which confirmed the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine in reducing the incidence of delirium in postoperative patients (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.32–0.66, high strength of evidence) [20]. Furthermore, a recent meta-analysis of 21 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concluded that dexmedetomidine decreased the occurrence of delirium (risk ratio [RR] = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.45 to 0.67) in elderly surgical patients [21]. More studies concluded that perioperative dexmedetomidine administration significantly reduced the incidence of POD in elderly patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery compared to placebo [22,23,24]. Deiner et al. [25], on the other hand, found that dexmedetomidine did not affect delirium incidence compared to placebo (12.2% [23 of 189] vs. 11.4% [23 of 201], P = 0.94) in elderly patients after noncardiac surgery. This discrepancy could be attributed to differences in treatment drug dosage and timing, as well as differing anesthetic regimens. Furthermore, Lee et al. [26] found that dexmedetomidine dose and timing appeared to be crucial in delirium in elderly patients after laparoscopic major non-cardiac surgery. They discovered that a preoperative dexmedetomidine bolus followed by an infusion reduced the incidence and duration of delirium when compared to a dexmedetomidine bolus administered at the end of surgery. Earlier studies investigated the potential efficacy of a perioperative low dose (0.1 µg/kg/hour) dexmedetomidine infusion on the incidence of POD. Su et al. [27] found that using a low dose dexmedetomidine infusion for elderly patients admitted to intensive care units after non-cardiac surgery reduced the occurrence of postoperative delirium in the dexmedetomidine group (32 [9%] of 350 patients) compared to the placebo group (79 [23%] of 350 patients; odds ratio [OR] 0·35, 95% CI 0·22–0·54; p < 0·0001). In contrast, another study revealed no significant difference in delirium incidence between the dexmedetomidine group and the control group with a low dose dexmedetomidine infusion during anesthesia until the second postoperative day in elective living-donor liver transplant (9% vs. 5.9%; P = 0.44) [28]. Discrepancies in results may be related to variances in the severity of the preoperative disease between patients in the two studies, as well as the different surgical procedures.

Our study showed that ketamine raised the risk of postoperative delirium three times more than placebo. In line with our findings, Hollinger et al. [29] discovered no proof that ketamine helped avoid postoperative delirium or cognitive impairment in the Baden PRIDe study. In addition, a retrospective analysis of 138 patients undergoing spine correction surgery revealed that intraoperative ketamine administration increased the incidence of postoperative delirium compared to the no-ketamine group (OR: 9.475, 95% CI: 1.026–87.508, P = 0.047) [30]. Six randomized controlled studies demonstrated that the incidence of POD did not differ significantly between intraoperative ketamine administration and no intervention in adults undergoing surgery under general anesthesia [31]. Avidan et al. [32] found no difference in postoperative delirium incidence between those who received intraoperatively low dose ketamine (0.5 mg/kg), high dose ketamine (1 mg/kg), or placebo (19.45% vs. 19.82%, respectively; absolute difference, 0.36%; 95% CI, − 6.07–7.38%; p = 0.92). In contrast to the previous unfavorable outcomes with ketamine, Hudetz et al. [18] found in an earlier trial that an intravenous bolus of ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) during anesthetic induction reduced postoperative delirium by 30% following heart surgery. Furthermore, postoperative C-reactive protein concentrations in ketamine-treated patients were significantly lower (p < 0.05) than in placebo-treated patients, indicating that ketamine’s anti-inflammatory activity may be responsible for the neuroprotective impact in this trial.

The results of our study showed that patients in the ketamine group had a long time to first postoperative request for analgesia and less postoperative nalbuphine requirement than the placebo and dexmedetomidine, which could be attributed to ketamine’s analgesic impact [19]. Importantly, the 2016 guidelines on postoperative pain prevention advocate considering intraoperative ketamine as an analgesic adjuvant [33]. Patients who received ketamine had a shorter length of surgery, anesthesia duration, and time to extubation compared to dexmedetomidine and placebo. However, these variables were not statistically significant predictors of POD or POCD. Our data found that the length of hospital stay was shorter in the placebo group than in the dexmedetomidine and ketamine groups. This outcome could be attributable to the fact that patients underwent different surgical procedures with significantly varying postoperative care.

Our research has some limitations. First, it is a single-center study with a small sample size limited to elderly patients scheduled for emergency surgery; therefore, it cannot be extended to all surgical patients. Second, the intraoperative hemodynamic data were collected but not analyzed because the study groups were not sufficiently powered to detect statistically significant changes in hemodynamic parameters. Third, the delirium assessment could only be done twice a day on a regular basis. This could contribute to an underestimation of the incidence of delirium; also, details on the duration and severity of delirium, as well as the treatment offered to delirium patients, were not gathered. Lastly, patients in the study underwent surgeries of several disciplines with greatly different postoperative treatments.

In summary, a considerable body of evidence supports the use of a single pre-induction bolus of dexmedetomidine as a practical choice for preventing postoperative delirium and cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients undergoing emergency surgery.

Data Availability

All data used and analyzed in this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

POD:

postoperative delirium

POCD:

postoperative cognitive dysfunction

DOSS:

Delirium Observation Screening Scale

MMSE:

Mini-Mental State Examination

VAS:

Visual Analog Scale

ASA:

American Society of Anesthesiologists

BMI:

Body Mass Index

References

  1. Aldecoa C, Bettelli G, Bilotta F, et al. European Society of Anaesthesiology evidence-based and consensus-based guideline on postoperative delirium. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017;34(4):192–214. https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000000594.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang H, Lu Y, Liu M, et al. Strategies for prevention of postoperative delirium: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Crit Care. 2013;17(2). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12566.

  3. Ansaloni L, Catena F, Chattat R, et al. Risk factors and incidence of postoperative delirium in elderly patients after elective and emergency Surgery. Br J Surg. 2010;97(2):273–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6843.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chaiwat O, Chanidnuan M, Pancharoen W, et al. Correction to: postoperative delirium in critically ill surgical patients: incidence, risk factors, and predictive scores (BMC Anesthesiology (2019) 19 (39) 10.1186/s12871-019-0694-x). BMC Anesthesiol. 2019;19(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0732-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cortés-Beringola A, Vicent L, Martín-Asenjo R, et al. Diagnosis, prevention, and management of delirium in the intensive cardiac care unit. Am Heart J. 2021;232:164–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2020.11.011.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee JM, Cho YJ, Ahn EJ, Choi GJ, Kang H. Pharmacological strategies to prevent postoperative delirium: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Anesth Pain Med. 2021;16(1):28–48. https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.20079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Likhvantsev VV, Landoni G, Grebenchikov OA, et al. Perioperative Dexmedetomidine supplement decreases Delirium Incidence after adult cardiac Surgery: a Randomized, Double-Blind, controlled study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021;35(2):449–57. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2020.02.035.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bell JD. In vogue: ketamine for neuroprotection in acute neurologic injury. Anesth Analg. 2017;124(4):1237–43. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000001856.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gavinski K, Nguyen C, Weckmann M. Validation of the Delirium Observation Screening Scale in Hospitalized Elderly patients (FR417-A). J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013;45(2):375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.10.100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Folstein M, Folstein S. Mini-mental state. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6.

  11. Naeije G, Pepersack T, Inouye SK, Westendorp RGJ, Saczynski JS. Delirium in elderly people. Lancet. 2014;383(9934):2044–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60993-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jin Z, Hu J, Ma D. Postoperative delirium: perioperative assessment, risk reduction, and management. Br J Anaesth. 2020;125(4):492–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.063.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Igwe EO, Nealon J, Mohammed M, et al. Multi-disciplinary and pharmacological interventions to reduce post-operative delirium in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2020;67(June 2020):110004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Li B, Li Y, Tian S, et al. Anti-inflammatory effects of Perioperative Dexmedetomidine administered as an Adjunct to General Anesthesia: a Meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep12342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Perez-Zoghbi JF, Zhu W, Grafe MR, Brambrink AM. Dexmedetomidine-mediated neuroprotection against sevoflurane-induced neurotoxicity extends to several brain regions in neonatal rats. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119(3):506–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aex222.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hudetz JA, Pagel PS. Neuroprotection by ketamine: a review of the experimental and clinical evidence. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010;24(1):131–42. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2009.05.008.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dale O, Somogyi AA, Li Y, Sullivan T, Shavit Y. Does intraoperative ketamine attenuate inflammatory reactivity following Surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2012;115(4):934–43. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182662e30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hudetz JA, Patterson KM, Iqbal Z, et al. Ketamine attenuates Delirium after cardiac Surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009;23(5):651–7. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2008.12.021.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Radvansky BM, Shah K, Parikh A, Sifonios AN, Le V, Eloy JD. Role of ketamine in Acute Postoperative Pain Management: a narrative review. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/749837.

  20. Kim MS, Rhim HC, Park A, et al. Comparative efficacy and acceptability of pharmacological interventions for the treatment and prevention of delirium: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Psychiatr Res. 2020;125(March 2020):164–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.03.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lin C, Tu H, Jie Z, Zhou X, Li C. Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Delirium in Elderly Surgical patients: a Meta-analysis of Randomized controlled trials. Ann Pharmacother. 2021;55(5):624–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1060028020951954.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. NShe Qhong, Li Hfang, Zhou Xyan. Yuan X zhong. Dexmedetomidine in the prevention of postoperative delirium in elderly patients following non-cardiac Surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2020;47(8):1333–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1681.13312.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zeng H, Li Z, He J, Fu W. Dexmedetomidine for the prevention of postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing noncardiac Surgery: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(8):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218088.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Qin C, Jiang Y, Lin C, Li A, Liu J. Perioperative dexmedetomidine administration to prevent delirium in adults after non-cardiac Surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2021;73(April):110308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110308.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Deiner S, Luo X, Lin HM, et al. Intraoperative infusion of dexmedetomidine for prevention of postoperative delirium and cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients undergoing major elective noncardiac Surgery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(8):e171505. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.1505.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee C, Lee CH, Lee G, Lee M, Hwang J. The effect of the timing and dose of dexmedetomidine on postoperative delirium in elderly patients after laparoscopic major non-cardiac Surgery: a double blind randomized controlled study. J Clin Anesth. 2018;47(December 2017):27–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.03.007.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Su X, Meng ZT, Wu XH, et al. Dexmedetomidine for prevention of delirium in elderly patients after non-cardiac Surgery: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;388(10054):1893–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30580-3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lee H, Yang SM, Chung J et al. Effect of Perioperative Low-Dose Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Delirium After Living-Donor Liver Transplantation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Transplant Proc. 2020;52(1):239–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.11.015.

  29. Hollinger A, Rüst CA, Riegger H, et al. Ketamine vs. haloperidol for prevention of cognitive dysfunction and postoperative delirium: a phase IV multicentre randomised placebo-controlled double-blind clinical trial. J Clin Anesth. 2021;68(May 2020):110099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110099.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Elsamadicy AA, Charalambous LT, Sergesketter AR, et al. Intraoperative ketamine may increase risk of post-operative delirium after complex spinal fusion for adult deformity correction. J Spine Surg. 2019;5(1):79–87. https://doi.org/10.21037/jss.2018.12.10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Hovaguimian F, Tschopp C, Beck-Schimmer B, Puhan M. Intraoperative ketamine administration to prevent delirium or postoperative cognitive dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018;62(9):1182–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13168.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Avidan M, Maybrier H, Arbi A, Jacobsohn E. Intraoperative ketamine does not affect postoperative delirium or pain after major Surgery in older adults: an international, multicentre, double-blinded, randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 2015;390(10091):267–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31467-8.Intraoperative.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Avidan MS, Maybrier HR, Abdallah A, Ben, et al. Intraoperative ketamine for prevention of postoperative delirium or pain after major Surgery in older adults: an international, multicentre, double-blind, randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 2017;390(10091):267–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31467-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all of the nurses in the operating room at Aswan University Hospital for their assistance throughout the study.

Funding

The authors received no outside funding.

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

H.G. designed the study and wrote the manuscript. T.H. reviewed the manuscript results. Z.Z. reviewed the manuscript text. O.E. gathered the patients’ clinical data. and S.H. analyzed and interpreted the patient’s data. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huda F. Ghazaly.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Aswan University Hospital (approval number: aswu/548/7/2021; registration date: 06/07/2021) and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05341154) (22/04/2022). It was held between May 2022 and May 2023 and followed the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines. The study’s objectives and risks were explained to participants, and they signed written informed consent. All methods were carried out in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and subsequent amendments.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghazaly, H.F., Hemaida, T.S., Zaher, Z.Z. et al. A pre-anesthetic bolus of ketamine versus dexmedetomidine for prevention of postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing emergency surgery: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. BMC Anesthesiol 23, 407 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02367-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02367-8

Keywords