Skip to main content
Download PDF

Micro- and macrocirculatory effects of norepinephrine on anaesthesia-induced hypotension: a prospective preliminary study

BMC Anesthesiology volume 23, Article number: 374 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Intraoperative arterial hypotension (IOH) leads to increased postoperative morbidity. Norepinephrine is often use to treat IOH. The question regarding the mode of administration in either a bolus or continuous infusion remains unanswered. The aim of the present study was to describe and compare the effects on macrocirculation and microcirculation of a bolus and a continuous infusion of norepinephrine to treat IOH.

Methods

We conducted a prospective observational study with adult patients who underwent neurosurgery. Patients with invasive arterial blood pressure and cardiac output (CO) monitoring were screened for inclusion. All patients underwent microcirculation monitoring by video-capillaroscopy, laser doppler, near-infrared spectroscopy technology, and tissular CO2. In case of IOH, the patient could receive either a bolus of 10 µg or a continuous infusion of 200 µg/h of norepinephrine. Time analysis for comparison between bolus and continuous infusion were at peak of MAP. The primary outcome was MFI by videocapillaroscopy.

Results

Thirty-five patients were included, with 41 boluses and 33 continuous infusion.

Bolus and continuous infusion induced an maximal increase in mean arterial pressure of +30[20-45] and +23[12-34] %, respectively (P=0,07). For macrocirculatory parameters, continuous infusion was associated with a smaller decrease in CO and stroke volume (p<0.05).

For microcirculatory parameters, microvascular flow index (-0,1 vs. + 0,3, p=0,03), perfusion index (-12 vs. +12%, p=0,008), total vessel density (-0,2 vs. +2,3 mm2/mm2, p=0,002), showed significant opposite variations with bolus and continuous infusion, respectively.

Conclusions

These results on macro and microcirculation enlighten the potential benefits of a continuous infusion of norepinephrine rather than a bolus to treat anaesthesia-induced hypotension.

Trial registration

(NOR-PHARM: 1-17-42 Clinical Trials: NCT03454204), 05/03/2018

Key points

At the macrocirculatory level continuous infusion resulted in a smaller decrease in CO and SV and a smaller increase in afterload than bolus administration.

At the microcirculatory level continuous infusion enhanced blood flow and vessel density while these variables were impaired with a bolus.

These results on macro and microcirculation enlighten the potential benefits of a continuous infusion of norepinephrine rather than a bolus to treat anaesthesia-induced hypotension.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Intraoperative arterial hypotension (IOH) leads to increased postoperative morbidity [1,2,3]. During the induction and maintenance of anaesthesia, IOH is often related to a decrease in vascular tone induced by hypnotic and morphinomimetic drugs [4]. This condition, vasoplegia, is also associated with impaired microcirculatory perfusion [4, 5].

Vasopressor agents, especially norepinephrine, are commonly administered to correct IOH [6]. In the operating room, norepinephrine is sometimes administered in a bolus even though continuous infusion may be preferred [7,8,9,10]. In fact, even when effective in rapidly restoring adequate arterial blood pressure (ABP), the bolus mode of administration is also associated with a decrease in heart rate (HR) and cardiac output (CO). This comes with increased arterial stiffness and left ventricular afterload [7, 9, 11]. As CO is an important determinant of tissue perfusion [12], one could imagine that those effects could be transposed at the microcirculatory level and therefore lead to impaired tissue perfusion and oxygenation [13].

These constatations could have clinical implications: recently, continuous infusion of norepinephrine has been associated with better control of peroperative ABP and better renal postoperative outcomes than boluses [8].

Microcirculation monitoring has been intensely developed since it became a topic of interest more than 20 years ago. Indeed, microcirculation has proven to be strongly associated with organ dysfunction and outcome in various shock models [12, 14, 15]. Even once macrohemodynamics are restored, microcirculation can remain altered, and this condition is also associated with a worse outcome [16]. These results have only been published on populations of ICU patients. However, links between microcirculation and postoperative outcomes have been established [17].

Devices now available for microcirculatory monitoring present each advantages and disadvantages. Nowadays laser doppler, near-infrared spectroscopy technology (NIRS), tissular CO2 and videocapillaroscopy are mostly used [18]. Again, initially more frequent in ICUs, their use in the operating room becomes increasingly common [13, 19].

Despite these elements, the effects of norepinephrine in boluses and continuous infusion remains unknown in patients undergoing anaesthesia. To our knowledge, the combined description of macro- and microcirculatory effects of norepinephrine has only been studied in shocked patients, showing various and heterogeneous results [20,21,22].

The aim of the present study was then to describe and compare the effects of a bolus and a continuous infusion of norepinephrine on macrocirculation and microcirculation to treat anaesthesia-induced hypotension.

The hypothesis was that continuous infusion could result in an improved global cardiovascular adaptation than a bolus on both macro- and microcirculatory parameters.

Material and methods

Ethics

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Agence Régionale de Santé Occitanie (FRANCE, president D. Benayoun) (NOR-PHARM: 1-17-42 Clinical Trials: NCT03454204) (05/03/2018). This prospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care of the University Hospital of Lariboisière, Paris, France. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects, and/or their legal guardian(s), participating in the trial.

Patients

The inclusion criteria were as follows: adult patients (> 18 and older) undergoing major surgery (mostly neurosurgical interventions). Only patients for whom preoperative anaesthesia consultation indicated continuous ABP and CO monitoring were screened for inclusion.

The exclusion criteria were as follows: patients aged under 18 years old, pregnancy, haemodynamic instability caused by acute bleeding, critical haemodynamic instability, sitting position and preoperative doses of norepinephrine > 500 µg/hour.

Patients’ characteristics and management

All cardiovascular, respiratory, and neurologic comorbidities, ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) scores, usual medications, clinical abnormalities, and results of preoperative diagnostic tests were recorded on the anaesthesiology report. Patients were treated in accordance with local care protocols.

All general anaesthesia were conducted under intravenous administration of propofol and remifentanil guided by AIVOC mode (with Schneider model for propofol and Minto model for remifentanil). The bispectral index guided the deepness of anaesthesia with objectives between 40 and 60. Patients’ lungs were mechanically ventilated in volume control mode (tidal volume: 6 ml/kg) with an O2/air mixture (FiO2 0.4) and a positive end expiratory pressure of 5 cmH2O. The respiratory rate was adjusted to keep end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure (EtCO2) between 35 and 40 mmHg.

Standard monitoring included HR, pulsed oximetry (SpO2), perfusion index (PI) [23], invasive ABP, temperature, and ventilatory settings, including end tidal CO2 (EtCO2). CO and SV monitoring was performed via oesophageal Doppler (Deltex Medical Limited, Chichester, UK).

All variables, including CO and stroke volume (SV) were recorded continuously and extracted via the Xtrend Logiciel from Philips® (Amsterdam, Netherlands) scopes.

Cardiac afterload was monitored via the Global After Load Angle (GALA). Its value was visualized on the transoesophageal Doppler screen and calculated from the velocity pressure loops (VP loops) as previously described [24].

Microcirculation monitoring

Microcirculation monitoring was performed simultaneously with 5 different devices. All the devices and the main scope monitor were connected and synchronized, allowing to find retrospectively all the desired events as the peak of MAP.

  • Videocapillaroscopy using incident dark field imaging device (Braedius®, Netherlands) : intraoperative sublingual video allowed direct visualization of sublingual blood flow in microvascular networks. Images acquisition and analysis were performed according to international guidelines [25]. Care was provided to avoid pressure artefacts and saliva was removed as much as possible before acquisition.

If a bolus was administered, all the sequences were recorded in the same zone one after the other. First sequence was considered as the basal state of patient’s microcirculation. When the peak of MAP was reached, the sequence corresponding was kept apart to be analyzed after. This is in line with the new guidelines [25].

In case a continuous infusion was administered, 5 sequences were recorded in 5 different zones at basal state and 5 supplementary ones were recorded when the arterial blood pressure was stabilized at the next level (plateau). Sequences duration was between 8 and 10 seconds.

Two trained operators (MK, FV) recorded the clips.

Analysis was made by four trained investigators (MK, FV, JM, JJ), independently, and blinded from other’s investigator’s results. They were assisted by the last version of the software CytoCamTools Study Manager provided by Braedius® only concerning the total vessel density score. Vessels were added or removed manually if the detection proposed by the software was not satisfactory.

Clips were not randomized before analysis, but analysis was made blinded from the identity of the patient, the intervention (bolus or continuous infusion), and the level of arterial blood pressure at the time of the recording.

Four microcirculatory parameters have been analyzed:

  1. 1)

    The microvascular flow index (MFI), which is a qualitative evaluation of the microvascular flow. The image is divided into four quadrants, and the predominant type of flow in very small vessels is assessed in each quadrant using an ordinal score (0 = no flow, 1 = intermittent flow, 2 = sluggish flow, 3 = normal flow). The overall score, called microvascular flow index, is the sum of each quadrant score divided by the number of quadrants.

  2. 2)

    The total vessel density (TVD)

  3. 3)

    The perfused vessel density (PVD), which is calculated using the formula: PVD = PPVxTVD.

  4. 4)

    The Heterogeneity Index (HI), calculated as the difference between extreme values of MFI between the five recordings divided by its mean value for the continuous infusion recordings; and as the difference between the best and the worst flow divided on the average flow for bolus recordings.

    • Laser Doppler (Transonic System®, Ithaca, USA) : This technique is based on the reflection of a beam of laser light that undergoes a change in wavelength (Doppler shift) when moving blood cells are encountered. The magnitude and frequency distribution of these changes are related to the number and velocity of red cells. The quantitative value derived from these measurements (red blood cell flow) is expressed in arbitrary perfusion units (Tissular Perfusion Unit, TPU).

    • Near-Infrared Spectroscopy technology (NIRS), providing tissular saturation in O2 (StO2) (InSpectra®, Hutchinson Technology, Minnesota, USA) : two sensors placed on the patients’ thenar eminence emit near-infrared light in four specific wavelengths (690, 780, 805 and 850 nm), which is then partially absorbed and partially reflected to the sensors, based on the ratio of oxygenated to deoxygenated hemoglobin in the tissue. NIRS also measures THI (tissular hemoglobin index), an index of microcirculatory volume of hemoglobin, with values ranging from 0 to 100.

    • Tissular CO2 measure (TOSCA 500, Radiometer®,Copenhague, Danemark) : Transcutaneous measurement of PCO2 is based on the phenomenon of CO2 gas diffusing very easily throughout the body tissue and skin, which can thus be detected by a sensor on the skin surface. tPCO2 reflects tissue perfusion by an evaluation of the difference between tPCO2 and artPCO2, so-called « CO2gap » [26].

    • Perfusion Index (PI) by photoplethysmography (Two devices : Phillips® and Masimo®)

Examination of microcirculation with an incident dark field imaging, laser Doppler, NIRS technology and transcutaneous CO2 captor is completely noninvasive and respects the noninterventional study design.

Laser Doppler and tissular CO2 probes were each placed on one ear as previously described in other publications [23]. The NIRS probe was placed on the thenar eminence [27], contralateral to the arterial catheter. Photoplethysmography by Philips® was placed on one index contralateral to the arterial catheter.

Protocolized management of IOH

The mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) reference was the average between MAP at anaesthesia consultation and MAP the day before surgery. IOH episode was defined as a decrease in MAP under 65 mmHg or below 20% of the MAP reference in the absence of clear hypovolemia. Hypovolemia was defined in our institution by the conjunction of a significant decrease in CO compared to the CO target value obtained after CO optimization before surgical incision, a DeltaPP >15% and/or an acute bleeding episode.

When a patient presented an IOH episode, the anaesthesiologist in charge could:

  • Either administered a bolus of 2 mL (10 µg) of norepinephrine diluted at 5 µg/mL.

  • Or either introduce a continuous infusion of the same treatment at speed 40 mL/hour (i.e., 200 µg/hour or 16 µg/5 min). If a continuous infusion was already started, an elevation of 40 ml/hour more was added.

The protocol was not randomized. As explained, the decision of a bolus or a continuous infusion was not made by the investigators of the study, but by the anaesthesiologist in charge of all the intervention. Often but not systematically, continuous infusion is given if the arterial pressure continues to be low despite some one or two first boluses. Patients could receive two boluses but it had to be with an interval of more than 10 minutes. Patients receiving a bolus directly followed by a continuous infusion were not included.

Collection of macro- and microcirculatory parameters over time:

For the bolus, the analysis times were T0, T15, T30, T45, T60 seconds and at peak of MAP. This choice derives from a study we are conducting (nonpublished data) which shows that the peak in MAP is reached at approximately 50 seconds. For videocapillaroscopy sequence analysis, the times were T0 and at the peak of ABP increase.

For the continuous infusion, the analysis times were T0, T180, T300 seconds and at peak of MAP. For videocapillaroscopy, times were T0 and at the ABP plateau (plateau being defined by less than 5% variations in PAM for more than 20 seconds).

Values of each parameter at peak of effect and time to reach this peak were also recorded.

Outcomes

The primary outcome MFI measured by videocapillaroscopy. Secondary outcomes were CO, MAP, SV, TVD, PPV, HI, PI, TPU, StO2 and tPCO2.

Statistics

Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism® software (La Jolla, California, USA). The significance level was α= 0,05. Data with a normal distribution are presented as the mean ± standard deviation, and those with a nonnormal distribution are presented as the median ± interquartile range. The normality of the population distribution was determined using a Shapiro test. Variations in the parameters over time were always compared with the baseline value using a Wilcoxon test and expressed as a percentage. To compare the values obtained with a bolus and with a continuous infusion at each time point including the peak of effect (peak of MAP), we performed a Mann–Whitney test. As the number of boluses and continuous infusion varied from one patient to another, we used weighted methods to compare those average values, with the weights being the number of measures per subject.

Inter- and intraindividual variability for videocapillaroscopy analysis was assessed by calculating the kappa coefficient of concordance.

Results

Patients

Forty-one patients were selected between January 2019 and March 2020. Six were excluded: five due to lack of recording and one due to preoperative doses of norepinephrine > 500 µg/h. Thirty-five patients undergoing neurosurgery (32 patients) or neuroradiology (3 patients) procedures were prospectively included: 27/35 (77%) patients underwent intracranial surgery, and 5/35 (14%) underwent spinal surgery. We had for intracranial surgery : 4 aneuvrism clipping, 9 meningioma removal, 8 single or multiple metastasis removal, 4 high grade tumor removal and 2 schwanomma removal. Main operation duration was 5h30. Spinal surgery was represented bay arthrodesis (4/5) of at least three stages. Patient characteristics are reported in Table 1.

Table 1 Patient characteristics
Full size table

In those patients, we analysed 41 bolus and 33 continuous infusion sequences with complete recording of macrocirculation and microcirculatory devices. Every patient received at least one bolus, 6 patients received two boluses and no patient received more than two boluses. For videocapillaroscopy, 30 bolus sequences were analysed in 30 patients (5 recorded sequences presented insufficient quality), and only 9 sequences of continuous infusion were analysed (over 18 recorded), for the same reason (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart

Full size image

There were no differences between haemodynamic baseline values when comparing bolus and continuous infusion populations. This was consistent for macro and microcirculatory parameters.

Time to reach maximal effect

Concerning microcirculatory parameters, the maximal effect on MAP occurred 52 [47-55] seconds after the bolus. The time to reach the MAP plateau was 260 [160-303] seconds after continuous infusion started.

Macrocirculatory parameters

Before bolus and continuous infusion, patients presented a median MAP of 67 (60-74) mmHg, a CO of 4,8 [2, 3, 3-6] L/min and an SV of 74 [49-86] mL, for an HR of 70 [61-77] pulse/min. Variations of pulsed pressure (ΔPP) was 10 [5-12] %. Macrocirculatory parameters before bolus and continuous infusion were not different.

Effects of a bolus of norepinephrine: Norepinephrine boluses were associated with a 30 [20-45] % increase in MAP (p<0,0001) and a decrease in HR and SV of 6 [1-11] % (p<0,0001) and 12 [4-16] % (p<0,0001), respectively, leading to a decrease in CO of 15 [16-29] % (p<0,0001). GALA increased by +12 [6-15]° (p=0,008) in median (Table 2).

Table 2 Bolus parameters evolution over time
Full size table

Effects of a continuous infusion: Norepinephrine continuous infusions were associated with a median increase of 23[12-34]% in MAP (p<0,0001). This was coupled with a drop in HR of -10[-14; -6]% (p<0,001) but not in SV, in which variations remained nonsignificant +2[-7 ;+4]%). However, a significant decrease in CO was observed, of 7 [0-14] % (p<0,0001). GALA increased by +7 [3-12]° (p=0,007) (Table 3)

Table 3 Continuous infusion parameters evolution over time
Full size table

Comparison between bolus and continuous infusion at peak of MAP: For a smaller (but nonsignificantly different) increase in MAP (p=0,07), continuous infusion was associated with a more limited decrease in CO of 0,6 L/min (p< 0,001). As changes in HR were similar, this implies that differences in CO were attributed to differences in the decrease in SV. Indeed, we observed a smaller decrease in SV of 4 ml (p=0,009). This was associated with a smaller increase in the GALA of 7° (p=0,04). The results are exposed in Table 4 and Fig. 2.

Table 4 Comparison between bolus mode and continuous infusion.
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Comparison between the effect of a bolus (in red) and a continuous infusion (in blue). MAP = mean arterial pressure (mmHg); SV = stroke volume (mL); CO = cardiac output (L/min); GALA = global afterload angle (°); MFI = microvascular flow index; TVD = total vessel density (in mm2/mm2); PVD = perfused vessel density (mm2/mm2); PI = perfusion index

Full size image

Microcirculatory parameters

Intra- and interindividual variability for the assessment of the MFI score was good, with kappa coefficients of concordance of 0.82 and 0.87, respectively (p<0.05). Microcirculatory parameters before bolus and continuous infusion were not different.

Effect of a bolus of norepinephrine (Table 2): Norepinephrine boluses led to a downward but not significant trend in MFI from 2,16 [1,72-2,64] to 2,06 [4] (p = 0,09) and TVD from 14,1 [1, 9-11, 11-16] to 13,9 [4, 7-11, 11-15] (p=0.22). PVD also increased significantly from 10,1 [5, 9-11] to 11,8 [1, 7-10, 10-13] mm2/mm2 (p=0,01). This was associated with a significant decrease in PI of -12 [1-9, 9-24] % (p=0,006). Concomitantly, we observed an early and transient increase in TPU at T30s (+14 [2, 2-9, 9-26] % (p=0,003)). No significant variation concerning the remaining parameters was observed.

Effect of a continuous infusion (Table 3): Norepinephrine continuous infusions were associated with an upwards but nonsignificant trend in MFI from 1,8 [1,7-2] to 2,1 [4] (p = 0,07) and a significant increase in TVD from 15,1 [1-5, 5-14, 14, 15]  to 17,4 [6, 7, 7-15, 15-18] mm2/mm2 (p = 0,007). Concomitantly, PI also increased but not significantly by + 12 (4-20)%. In contrast, we observed a decrease in StO2 at thenar eminence (p=0,03).

Comparison between bolus and continuous infusion at peak of MAP: bolus and continuous infusion showed overall opposite variations in microcirculatory parameters, as MFI (-0,1(-0,24;-0,06) vs. +0,3(0,1-0,4), p=0,03), PI (-12(-24;0) vs. +12(4-20)%, p=0,008), TVD (-0,2(-0,2-0,7) vs. +2,3(1,5-3,2)mm2/mm2, p=0,002), for bolus and continuous infusion, respectively. The results are exposed in Table 4 and Fig. 2.

Discussion

Our results showed that bolus and continuous infusion of norepinephrine had different macro- and microcirculatory effects.

  1. (1)

    At the macrocirculatory level, continuous infusion resulted in a smaller decrease in CO and SV and a smaller increase in afterload than bolus administration.

  2. (2)

    At the microcirculatory level, continuous infusion enhanced blood flow and vessel density, while these variables were impaired with a bolus.

These results on macro and microcirculation enlighten the potential benefits of a continuous infusion of norepinephrine rather than a bolus to treat anaesthesia-induced hypotension.

We believe these results are important : in daily practice, the use of vasopressors to correct IOH is still mainly administered in a bolus [13, 28, 29], as IOH often occur at specific and usually short operative times (postinduction period, prone positioning, transient increase in hypovolemia, etc.), where the result of a bolus of vasopressors provides a concrete response on ABP in terms of both effectiveness and practicality. In a recent study, among 410 anesthesiologists and anesthetic nurses, 90% of the responders used norepinephrine at low dilution (16 gammas/ml or less). 26% reported using exclusively boluses and 54% revealed using both bolus and continuous infusion [30].

Even though the level of MAP reached with a continuous infusion could be slightly lower, those results argue for the preferential use of a continuous infusion of norepinephrine, rather than a bolus, to treat IOH.

Norepinephrine and macrocirculation

Our work shows that norepinephrine could have deleterious effects on macrocirculation. Its use leads to a substantial decrease in CO and SV and to increased arterial stiffness. This is in line with previously published studies [6, 7, 9]. However, it must be mentioned that those effects are described in a very specific population: patients undergoing a scheduled neurosurgery/neuroradiology procedure, without hypovolemia and any previous circulatory failure.

Interestingly, we found that continuous infusion might lead to a smaller decrease in CO and SV than bolus infusion. It would allow a lesser increase in arterial stiffness and a conservation of SV via a lesser increase in afterload reflected by GALA angle variations.

Mechanisms explaining norepinephrine’s effects on CO remain uncertain, but hypotheses could be made of an association between the following:

  • Increased cardiac inotropism driven by Norepinephrine’s beta agonist effect

  • Venous constriction, increased mean circulatory filling pressure and ventricular preload

These mechanisms must be essentially present in continuous infusion administration, and it can potentially be argued that the rapid and acute increase in MAP during bolus administration involves other compensatory and protective mechanisms, such as the baroreflex, which are not, or are less involved, in continuous infusion administration.

Norepinephrine and microcirculation

Because of its α1-adrenoreceptor agonist properties, norepinephrine appears to lead to decreased tissue perfusion when a bolus is administered. This is consistent with the results published by Poterman et al. [13].

Interestingly, the effects of continuous perfusion did not seem to reproduce this deleterious effect, and instead we observed a tendency to improve microcirculatory flow and density. In a prospective study, Flick et al. were using norepineprhrine in continuous infusion on patients having surgery with moderate blood loss. The moderate blood loss and the introduction of catecholamines in continuous infusion had not detrimental effect on sublingual microcirculation either [31].

These results could be explained by various reasons:

  • First, as already discussed, the rapid increase in MAP during the bolus administration might enhance an adaptive mechanism of protection and autoregulation, such as intense vasoconstriction.

  • Second, the bolus mode of administration provokes a greater increase in norepinephrine plasma concentration levels compared to continuous administration, even if the total dose (10 vs. 16 gammas) is smaller. This could be at the origin of a greater stimulation of α1-adrenoreceptors and precapillary sphincters.

  • Third, CO is a major determinant of tissue perfusion even if mechanisms of autoregulation exist at the cellular scale.

At the end of the process, the combined decrease in CO and greater tissue vasoconstriction may explain the decrease in flow and vessel density.

StO2 and videocapillaroscopy seem to show contradictory results when looking at continuous infusion effects.

One could argue that variations in regional blood flow at the administration of norepinephrine should be considered differently depending on the organ of focus. Consequently, we can logically suppose that norepinephrine leads to cutaneous vasoconstriction, which is responsible for the decrease in microcirculatory parameters reflecting capillary density in that particular territory (StO2 and/or THI). On the other hand, in the central location (as the sublingual area), the effects could be opposite, with a central redistribution of blood consecutive to peripheral vasoconstriction.

Study limits

This study had some limitations

This is an observational study with a small sample size of patients, and clinical implications should be carefully considered. The smaller size of continuous infusion sequences analysed in videocapillaroscopy could be responsible for selection bias. This small sample is partially due to difficulties encountered during recording attempts, with restricted access to the mouth. These limitations are also linked to the device (which requires a very precise use and permanent removal of saliva) and explain why videocapillaroscopy, even if very intriguing, is not an easily used bedside tool for daily practice, at least in the operating room. Difficulty in recording is accountable to a certain power in our study.

Our results cannot be generalized to other types of shock as we studied a population of carefully selected patients who only presented anaesthesia-induced hypotension. As previously published, the effects on macro- and microcirculatory parameters of norepinephrine could be different depending on the haemodynamic state of the patient before infusion [32, 33].

The absence of randomization might be responsible of selection bias. Because the intervention (bolus or continuous infusion) is at the discretion of the anaesthesiologist, boluses and infusions could be compared in different physiologic situations.

As mentioned earlier, the increase in MAP appears to be greater, although not significant, with the bolus mode of administration, which could have influenced our results on the macro- and microcirculatory parameters. The differences observed may be slightly overestimated.

It could also be argued that the comparison between different moments (T60, T180 and T300 seconds) is not relevant. More than the comparison of two moments (T60 vs T300), we tried to compare two ways of administrating the same drug when the effect on MAP was at its maximal. Those times were decided before we started the protocol, and are based on a study we are about to publish, focusing precisely on pharmacodynamics/pharmacokinetics effects of norepinephrine.

We decided to put in light the results offered by the videocapillaroscopy more than the other monitors : PI seems to have the same variations but it is true that laser Doppler, tissular CO2 and the StO2 are not always going the same way. The main reason we decided to present the results that way is that today videocapillaroscopy is seen as the gold standard monitor of microcirculation since several years, and the most precise device, even if recording might be difficult. The recent publication of the consensus of 2018 is a reflection of the interest showed by the scientific community. We decided to present all the results, even those evolving in a opposite way, because we found it interesting for the readers. Our final experience remains that some of the monitors we used (tissular CO2, StO2) have not the capacity of detecting such rapid moves as we wanted to study. Their time of reaction doesn’t allow to make a sure and certain conclusion.

Last, we do not report the post-operatives outcomes of the patients we studied. The reason is the study design was not powered for this, as it was a preliminary work. Our results pave the way for an randomized trial.

Conclusion

These results on macro and microcirculation enlighten the potential benefits of a continuous infusion of norepinephrine rather than a bolus to treat anaesthesia-induced hypotension.

Indeed, continuous infusion of norepinephrine appears to preserve microcirculatory flow and capillary density and results in a smaller decrease in CO compared with the bolus mode of administration. Future studies are still warranted to confirm these results in a larger sample of patients.

Availability of data and materials

Data will be available on reasonable request formulated to corresponding author.

References

  1. Walsh, et al. Relationship between Intraoperative Mean Arterial Pressure and Clinical Outcomes after Noncardiac SurgeryToward an Empirical Definition of Hypotension. Anesthesiology. 2013;119(3):507–15.

  2. Bijker JB, van Wolfswinkel L. Intraoperative hypotension and 1-year mortality after noncardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 2009;111(6):1217–26.

  3. Monk TG, Mangione MP, Nguyen JD, Hammermeister KE. Association between Intraoperative Hypotension and Hypertension and 30-day Postoperative Mortality in Noncardiac Surgery. Anesthesiology. 2015;123(2):307–19.

  4. Hoka S, Yamaura K, Takenaka T, Takahashi S. Propofol-induced Increase in vascular capacitance is due to inhibition of sympathetic vasoconstrictive activity. Anesthesiology. 1998;89(6):1495–500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Koch M, De Backer D, Vincent JL, Barvais L, Hennart D, Schmartz D. Effects of propofol on human microcirculation. Br J Anaesthesia. 2008;101(4):473–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mets B. Should Norepinephrine, Rather than Phenylephrine, Be Considered the Primary Vasopressor in Anesthetic Practice? Anesth Analg. 2016;122(5):1707–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vallée F, Passouant O, Le Gall A, Joachim J, Mateo J, Mebazaa A, et al. Norepinephrine reduces arterial compliance less than phenylephrine when treating general anesthesia-induced arterial hypotension. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2017;61(6):590–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Futier E, Lefrant JY, Guinot PG, Godet T, Lorne E, Cuvillon P, et al. Effect of individualized vs standard blood pressure management strategies on postoperative organ dysfunction among high-risk patients undergoing major surgery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318(14):1346.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kee WDN, Lee SWY, Tan PE, Phil M, Khaw KS. Randomized double-blinded comparison of norepinephrine and phenylephrine for maintenance of blood pressure during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology. 2015;122(4):736–45.

  10. Ngan Kee WD, Lee SWY, Ng FF, Lee A. Norepinephrine or phenylephrine during spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean delivery: a randomised double-blind pragmatic non-inferiority study of neonatal outcome. Br J Anaesth. 2020;125(4):588–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vallée F, Le Gall A, Joachim J, Passouant O, Matéo J, Mari A, et al. Beat-by-beat assessment of cardiac afterload using descending aortic velocity–pressure loop during general anesthesia: a pilot study. J Clin Monit Comput. 2018;32(1):23–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Siegenthaler N, Giraud R, Piriou V, Romand JA, Bendjelid K. Altérations de la microcirculation dans les états de choc: physiopathologie, surveillance et traitement. Annales Françaises d’Anesthésie et de Réanimation. 2010;29(2):135–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Poterman M, Vos JJ, Vereecke HEM, Struys MMRF, Vanoverschelde H, Scheeren TWL, et al. Differential effects of phenylephrine and norepinephrine on peripheral tissue oxygenation during general anaesthesia: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015;32(8):571–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. De Backer D, Donadello K, Sakr Y, Ospina-Tascon G, Salgado D, Scolletta S, et al. Microcirculatory alterations in patients with severe sepsis: impact of time of assessment and relationship with outcome*. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(3):791–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. De Backer D, Creteur J, Dubois MJ, Sakr Y, Vincent JL. Microvascular alterations in patients with acute severe heart failure and cardiogenic shock. Am Heart J. 2004;147(1):91–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Trzeciak S, McCoy JV, Phillip Dellinger R, Arnold RC, Rizzuto M, Abate NL, et al. Early increases in microcirculatory perfusion during protocol-directed resuscitation are associated with reduced multi-organ failure at 24 h in patients with sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34(12):2210–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim TK, Cho YJ, Min JJ, Murkin JM, Bahk JH, Hong DM, et al. Microvascular reactivity and clinical outcomes in cardiac surgery. Crit Care. 2015;19(1):316.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Losser MR, Payen de la Garanderie D. Évaluation de la microcirculation en pratique clinique. Anesthésie Réanimation. 2019;5(3):193‑9.

  19. Bouattour K, Teboul JL, Varin L, Vicaut E, Duranteau J. Preload dependence is associated with reduced sublingual microcirculation during major abdominal surgery. Anesthesiology. 2019;130(4):541–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dubin A, Pozo MO, Casabella CA, Pálizas F, Murias G, Moseinco MC, et al. Increasing arterial blood pressure with norepinephrine does not improve microcirculatory blood flow: a prospective study. Critical Care. 2009;13(3):R92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Jhanji S, Stirling S, Patel N, Hinds CJ, Pearse RM. The effect of increasing doses of norepinephrine on tissue oxygenation and microvascular flow in patients with septic shock*. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(6):1961–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fiorese Coimbra KT, de Freitas FGR, Bafi AT, Pinheiro TT, Nunes NF, de Azevedo LCP, et al. Effect of increasing blood pressure with noradrenaline on the microcirculation of patients with septic shock and previous arterial hypertension. Crit Care Med. 2019;47(8):1033–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vallée F, Nougué H, Mari A, Vodovar N, Dubreuil G, Damoisel C, et al. Variations of cutaneous capnometry and perfusion index during a heating challenge is early impaired in septic shock and related to prognostic in non-septic shock. Shock. 2019;51(5):585–92.

  24. Hong A, Joachim J, Buxin C, Levé C, Le Gall A, Millasseau S, et al. Using velocity-pressure loops in the operating room: a new approach of arterial mechanics for cardiac afterload monitoring under general anesthesia. Am J Physiol-Heart Circulatory Physiol. 2019;317(6):H1354–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. On behalf of the Cardiovascular Dynamics Section of the ESICM, Ince C, Boerma EC, Cecconi M, De Backer D, Shapiro NI, et al. Second consensus on the assessment of sublingual microcirculation in critically ill patients: results from a task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44(3):281–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mari A, Nougue H, Mateo J, Vallet B, Vallée F. Transcutaneous PCO2 monitoring in critically ill patients: update and perspectives. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11(Suppl 11):S1558–67.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Bezemer R, Lima A, Myers D, Klijn E, Heger M, Goedhart PT, et al. Assessment of tissue oxygen saturation during a vascular occlusion test using near-infrared spectroscopy: the role of probe spacing and measurement site studied in healthy volunteers. Crit Care. 2009;13(Suppl 5):S4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Ferré F, Martin C, Bosch L, Kurrek M, Lairez O, Minville V. Control of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in adults. Local Reg Anesth. 2020;13:39–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Ueda K, Janiczek DM, Casey DP. Arterial Stiffness Predicts General Anesthesia-Induced Vasopressor-Resistant Hypotension in patients taking angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021;35(1):73–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lionet L, Descamps R, Nguyen TM, Goyer I, Gerard JL. Utilisation de la noradrénaline très diluée au bloc opératoire : enquête de pratique et mise au point. Anesth Réanim. 2022;8(2):107–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Flick M, Briesenick L, Peine S, Scheeren TWL, Duranteau J, Saugel B. The effect of moderate intraoperative blood loss and norepinephrine therapy on sublingual microcirculatory perfusion in patients having open radical prostatectomy: an observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021;38(5):459–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cannesson M, Jian Z, Chen G, Vu TQ, Hatib F. Effects of phenylephrine on cardiac output and venous return depend on the position of the heart on the Frank-Starling relationship. J Appl Physiol. 2012;113(2):281–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Maas JJ, Pinsky MR, de Wilde RB, de Jonge E, Jansen JR. Cardiac output response to norepinephrine in postoperative cardiac surgery patients: interpretation with venous return and cardiac function curves. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(1):143–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Mr José Serrano for his assistance in the collection of the data. We would like to thank Franck Messie from Braedius for his valuable help.

Funding

Support was provided solely from institutional and/or departmental sources.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Lariboisière - Saint Louis Hospitals, 02 rue Ambroise Paré, 75010, Paris, France

    Manuel Kindermans, Jona Joachim, Elsa Manquat, Charlotte Levé, Alex Hong, Joachim Mateo, Alexandre Mebazaa, Etienne Gayat & Fabrice Vallée

  2. Inserm, UMRS-942, Paris Diderot University, 02, rue Ambroise Paré, 75010, Paris, France

    Jona Joachim, Elsa Manquat, Alexandre Mebazaa, Etienne Gayat & Fabrice Vallée

  3. CHIREC, Brussels, Belgium

    Daniel De Backer

  4. Intensive Care Department, CHIREC Hospitals, Brussels, Belgium

    Daniel De Backer

  5. Inria Saclay Ile-de-France, Palaiseau, France

    Fabrice Vallée

  6. LMS, École Polytechnique, CNRS, Paris, France

    Fabrice Vallée

Authors
  1. Manuel Kindermans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jona Joachim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Elsa Manquat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Charlotte Levé
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Alex Hong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Joachim Mateo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Alexandre Mebazaa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Etienne Gayat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Daniel De Backer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Fabrice Vallée
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

FV, AM and EG conceptualized and designed the research; MK, FV, EM, AH, CL, JM and JJ included patients and recorded the data; MK and FV analysed the data; MK prepared the figures; MK, FV, DDB wrote and corrected the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel Kindermans.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Agence Régionale de Santé Occitanie (FRANCE, president D. Benayoun) (NOR-PHARM: 1-17-42 Clinical Trials: NCT03454204) (05/03/2018). This prospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care of the University Hospital of Lariboisière, Paris, France. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects, and/or their legal guardian(s), participating in the trial.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kindermans, M., Joachim, J., Manquat, E. et al. Micro- and macrocirculatory effects of norepinephrine on anaesthesia-induced hypotension: a prospective preliminary study. BMC Anesthesiol 23, 374 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02342-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02342-3

Keywords

BMC Anesthesiology

ISSN: 1471-2253

Contact us