Skip to main content

Persistent incisional pain at 1 year after craniotomy: a retrospective observational study

Abstract

Background

There have been few reports on persistent incisional pain at 1 year after craniotomy. Hence, this study aimed to explore the distribution of pain at 1 year after elective craniotomy and its related factors.

Methods

This retrospective study included data prospectively collected to assess postoperative functional disability. We included patients aged > 55 years at the time of recruitment for our initial study and who had complete data regarding the pain numeric rating scale (NRS) score at 1 year post craniotomy. The primary outcome was the pain NRS score, which was assessed at the postanesthetic clinic as well as at 3 months and 1 year after craniotomy. Multivariable negative binomial regression analysis was performed to analyze the relationship between the pain NRS score at 1 postoperative year and 12 clinically meaningful covariates. These included the Short Form-8 scores for bodily pain and mental health, with higher scores indicating better health.

Results

We analyzed data from 102 patients. The mean (95% confidence interval) pain NRS scores at the three measurement points were 2.8 (2.3–3.3), 1.2 (0.8–1.6), and 0.6 (0.3–0.8), respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed that preoperative bodily pain (risk ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.88–0.98) and the pain NRS score at the postanesthetic clinic (risk ratio, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.14–1.52) were associated with the risk of persistent pain at 1 postoperative year.

Conclusions

The pain score at 1 year after elective craniotomy was minor; however, preoperative bodily pain and postoperative pain scores were significantly related factors.

Peer Review reports

Background

Chronic postoperative pain is generally defined as pain persisting for ≥ 3 postoperative months that is localized to the surgical incision area or a referred dermatome; furthermore, it varies according to the surgery type and follow-up period [1,2,3,4]. Additionally, racial and ethnic differences influence postoperative pain intensity, with Asians having an increased risk of postoperative pain [2, 5]. Craniotomy is widely performed for brain tumors and cerebral aneurysms; however, a recent study revealed that the incidence of persistent pain after craniotomy, which was defined as a pain numeric rating scale (NRS) score ≥ 1 after 1 year, was approximately 4.5% and was ranked within the top 10 [2]. Factors related to acute pain after craniotomy include preoperative depression and anxiety, infratentorial craniotomy, and extended surgical duration [6,7,8]. Although there have been studies on persistent incisional pain after craniotomy [2, 8], the factors associated with it remain unclear.

Accordingly, this study aimed to evaluate factors related to the pain NRS score at 1 postoperative year using data prospectively collected from Japanese patients at three points (immediately after surgery, 3 months after surgery, and 1 year after surgery) after elective craniotomy, including supra- and infra-tentorial approaches.

Methods

Our previous prospective observational study [9] was approved by the institutional ethics committee of Nara Medical University on October 20, 2015. The statistical protocol for this secondary analysis was approved on February 24, 2022, which waived the requirement for informed consent given the retrospective nature of the study. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Patients

We analyzed patients aged ≥ 55 years who underwent elective craniotomy between April 2016 and December 2018 at our hospital (Nara Medical University Hospital, Kashihara, Nara, Japan). The exclusion criteria were as follows: insufficient data regarding the pain NRS score at 1 year post craniotomy, having previously undergone craniotomy or additional surgical treatments for cerebrospinal fluid leakage or wound infection, and preoperatively presenting headaches.

Postoperative pain assessment

Postoperative pain was assessed thrice using the NRS, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst imaginable pain. The initial assessment was conducted at our postanesthetic clinic, which was within an average of 6 postoperative days, followed by at 3 months and 1 year after surgery. The participants completed a questionnaire regarding incisional pain and returned it to our department. We did not evaluate the nature of pain, e.g., neuropathic pain.

Covariates

We extracted the following information from the hospital’s computerized database. The patients’ baseline characteristics included sex, age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status, pre-existing medical conditions (hypertension, ischemic heart disease, symptomatic stroke, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, peripheral arterial disease, pacemaker or defibrillator use, and asthma), pulmonary function (obstructive or restrictive lung disease), plasma albumin and plasma creatinine levels, disorders (aneurysm, tumor, or others), and surgical site. The preoperative medications included beta-blockers, steroids, statins, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and opioids. Additionally, we collected information regarding preoperative bodily pain and mental health, which were assessed using the Short Form-8 (SF-8) [10] comprising eight items concerning physical functioning, physical role, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health. The normbase score was calculated based on the manual for using the SF-8, with the mean score for each item among the Japanese general population being 50. A higher score indicates better status. The intraoperative data included scalp nerve block, anesthetics (inhalation agents or propofol), fentanyl, remifentanil, surgery duration, and blood loss. For postoperative data, we recorded pain medications, focusing on dexmedetomidine, acetaminophen, and NSAIDs.

Outcomes

The primary outcome was the pain NRS score evaluated at the postanesthetic clinic as well as at 3 months and 1 year after elective craniotomy. The secondary outcome was factors related to chronic pain at 1 postoperative year.

Statistical analysis

Continuous and categorical background variables are presented as median [first quartile, third quartile] and number (%), respectively. Differences in each variable between patients with and without persistent pain at 1 postoperative year were assessed using Fisher’s exact test or Mann–Whitney U test. The pain NRS score was presented as the mean (standard deviation). Multivariable negative binomial regression analysis was used to evaluate secondary outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), Windows version 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. The sample size was not calculated since this was a secondary analysis based on our original study.

Results

Among 2797 cases from the original study, 105 patients underwent elective craniotomy. Among them, two patients underwent repeat craniotomy and one had incomplete data at the postanesthetic clinic. Accordingly, 102 participants were included in the final analysis (Fig. 1). The clinical and demographic characteristics are shown in Table 1. The median age was 68.5 years, and most patients were female. The median score of preoperative bodily pain was 52.4, with a significant difference between the non-persistent pain (60.3) and persistent pain groups (46.1). Furthermore, the median score for mental health was 50.7, with the non-persistent pain group having a better preoperative score (50.7) than the persistent pain group (44.9). Regarding postoperative outcomes, the mean (95% confidence interval) pain NRS score was 2.8 (2.3–3.3), 1.2 (0.8–1.6), and 0.6 (0.3–0.8) at the postanesthetic clinic, 3 postoperative months, and 1 postoperative year, respectively. Additionally, 22.5% (23/102) of the patients had persistent pain at 1 postoperative year (Table 1 and Fig. 2). The preoperative bodily pain score (risk ratio 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.88–0.98) and the pain NRS score at the postanesthetic clinic (risk ratio 1.32, 95% confidence interval 1.14–1.52) were significant risk factors for persistent pain at 1 year post craniotomy (Table 2). Preoperative mental health was not significantly associated with the pain NRS score at 1 postoperative year.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow diagram for the inclusion and exclusion of participants

Table 1 Patients demographics
Fig. 2
figure 2

Pain score on the numeric rating scale at 1 postoperative year

Table 2 Risk ratio for pain NRS one year after craniotomy

Discussion

In our study, 22.5% of the patients experienced persistent pain at 1 year post craniotomy. A recent multicenter trial by Khan et al. [2] with a similar patients’ mean age and sex predominance as our study, as well as a similar measurement tool (NRS) and definition of persistent pain, reported that the incidence of persistent incisional pain at 1 year post craniotomy was only 4.5%. This difference could be attributed to several reasons. First, Khan et al. [2] focused on pain localized to the surgical incision and excluded pain projected to a nerve innervation territory or dermatome. Second, they performed assessments through telephone follow-up calls, possibly leading to a slight variation in the definitions and validity of the test, and thus underestimation of the actual incidences. Third, our study included Japanese patients who are at increased risk of experiencing pain.

Previous studies have shown a decreasing trend in the prevalence of persistent pain after craniotomy [11,12,13]. This is consistent with our findings of a decreasing trend in the severity of pain across the three measurement points (Table 3). However, the severity of persistent pain at 1 year after craniotomy remains unclear. Determining the risk factors for chronic postoperative pain could inform prevention measures.

Table 3 Pain score on the numerical rating scale at each assessment

Consistent with a previous study [14], we examined risk factors for chronic postsurgical pain. We identified two factors significantly associated with persistent pain at 1 year post craniotomy. The first one was the preoperative bodily pain score, which was assessed using the SF-8. The second one was the pain NRS score at the postanesthetic clinic, which is consistent with previous reports that the severity of acute postsurgical pain can predict the incidence of chronic postsurgical pain [14, 15]. Consistent with other studies, our findings suggest that decreasing acute post-craniotomy pain might help mitigate chronic post-craniotomy pain [16]. However, regional scalp infiltration with a local anesthetic drug that decreases acute post-craniotomy pain [17] was not significantly associated with persistent pain. This could be attributed to the small number of patients receiving scalp nerve blocks, which were performed at the discretion of the anesthesiologist.

Preoperative anxiety and depression have been shown to increase the risk of post-craniotomy pain [6,7,8, 18]. Although the preoperative mental health score showed a significant between-group difference in the univariate analysis, there was no significant relationship in the multivariate analyses. However, the exact reason for this remains unclear. Preoperative bodily pain may more strongly contribute to postoperative chronic pain than preoperative mental health; however, there was a weak relationship between bodily pain and mental health (Spearman's correlation coefficient was 0.37, p < 0.001).

Some drugs, including dexmedetomidine and acetaminophen, decrease post-craniotomy pain [19, 20], which was inconsistent with our results. This could be attributed to our small sample size.

This study has several limitations. First, this was a single-center study with a limited sample size and did not include cases of emergency surgery; therefore, our results cannot be generalized. Furthermore, we retrospectively analyzed data collected in our prospective study, which were limited in terms of the collected number of patients as well as other baseline and perioperative variables (e.g., baseline pain catastrophizing, persistent opioid use, the characteristics of postoperative pain, and the pain management after hospital discharge). The lack of pain-specific data could have led to potential confounding factors, as indicated by our findings regarding preoperative mental health. We cannot evaluate the details of pain except for pain NRS due to a secondary analysis; thus, future studies require to assess these, including the nature and cause of pain. Further multicenter comparative studies that analyze all important factors are required to elucidate the risk factors for chronic postoperative pain, effects on long-term postoperative neurological outcomes, and appropriate interventions for these patients.

Conclusions

Preoperative bodily pain (as measured by the SF-8) and the pain NRS score at the postanesthetic clinic can predict persistent pain at 1 year post craniotomy. Future studies evaluating proper pain management during the perioperative period could help mitigate the severity of chronic persistent pain are needed.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

NRS:

Numeric rating scale

NSAIDs:

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

SF-8:

Short Form-8

SPSS:

Statistical Package for Social Sciences

References

  1. Treede RD, Rief W, Barke A, Aziz Q, Bennett MI, Benoliel R, et al. Chronic pain as a symptom or a disease: the IASP Classification of Chronic Pain for the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). Pain. 2019;160:19–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Khan JS, Sessler DI, Chan MTV, Wang CY, Garutti I, Szczeklik W, et al. Persistent incisional pain after noncardiac surgery: an international prospective cohort study. Anesthesiology. 2021;135:711–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sugiyama Y, Iida H, Amaya F, Matsuo K, Matsuoka Y, Kojima K, et al. Prevalence of chronic postsurgical pain after thoracotomy and total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective multicenter study in Japan (Japanese Study Group of Subacute Postoperative Pain). J Anesth. 2018;32:434–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fletcher D, Stamer UM, Pogatzki-Zahn E, Zaslansky R, Tanase NV, Perruchoud C, et al. Chronic postsurgical pain in Europe: an observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015;32:725–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Al-Hashimi M, Scott S, Griffin-Teall N, Thompson J. Influence of ethnicity on the perception and treatment of early post-operative pain. Bri J Pain. 2015;9:167–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rocha-Filho PAS. Post-craniotomy headache: a clinical view with a focus on the persistent form. Headache. 2015;55:733–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Subbarao BS, Fernández-de Thomas RJ, Eapen BC. Post craniotomy headache. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing; 2022. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29493922/.

  8. Bello C, Andereggen L, Luedi MM, Beilstein CM. Postcraniotomy headache: etiologies and treatments. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2022;26:357–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ida M, Naito Y, Tanaka Y, Inoue S, Kawaguchi M. Factors associated with functional disability or mortality after elective noncardiac surgery: a prospective cohort study. Can J Anaesth. 2022;69:704–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fukuhara S, Suzukamo Y. Manual of the SF-8 Japanese edition. Kyoto: Institute for Health Outcomes & Process Evaluation Research. 2004:7–31.

  11. Kaur A, Selwa L, Fromes G, Ross DA. Persistent headache after supratentorial craniotomy. Neurosurgery. 2000;47:633–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rocha-Filho PA, Gherpelli JL, De Siqueira JT, Rabello GD. Post-craniotomy headache: characteristics, behaviour and effect on quality of life in patients operated for treatment of supratentorial intracranial aneurysms. Cephalalgia. 2008;28:41–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gee JR, Ishaq Y, Vijayan N. Postcraniotomy headache. Headache. 2003;43:276–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Thapa P, Euasobhon P. Chronic postsurgical pain: current evidence for prevention and management. Korean J Pain. 2018;31:155–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Sinatra R. Causes and consequences of inadequate management of acute pain. Pain Med. 2010;11:1859–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Batoz H, Verdonck O, Pellerin C, Roux G, Maurette P. The analgesic properties of scalp infiltrations with ropivacaine after intracranial tumoral resection. Anesth Analg. 2009;109:240–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bala I, Gupta B, Bhardwaj N, Ghai B, Khosla VK. Effect of scalp block on postoperative pain relief in craniotomy patients. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2006;34:224–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Valencia L, Becerra Á, Ojeda N, Domínguez A, Prados M, González-Martín JM, et al. Effect of preoperative anxiety on postoperative pain after craniotomy. J Clin Med. 2022;11:556.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Syrous NS, Sundstrøm T, Søfteland E, Jammer I. Effects of intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion on postoperative pain after craniotomy: a narrative review. Brain Sci. 2021;11:1636.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ebada MA, Ali AS, Elshakankiry A, Essa T, Khater AG, Hossam M, et al. Should intravenous acetaminophen be considered for post craniotomy pain management? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Neurosurg Sci. 2022;66:413–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SP: data collection and writing of draft. MI: study coordinator, study conception and design, interpretation of data, revising of draft. YN: study conception and design, interpretation of data, and revision of manuscript. MK: study conception and design, interpretation of data, and revision of manuscript. All authors: critical review of manuscript, approval of final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitsuru Ida.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Our previous prospective observational study was approved by the institutional ethics committee of Nara Medical University on October 20, 2015. The statistical protocol for this secondary analysis was approved on February 24, 2022. The requirement for informed consent was waived given the retrospective nature of the study.

Consent for publication

Not available.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Phoowanakulchai, S., Ida, M., Naito, Y. et al. Persistent incisional pain at 1 year after craniotomy: a retrospective observational study. BMC Anesthesiol 23, 115 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02068-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02068-2

Keywords