Skip to main content
Download PDF

Comparison of the effect of melatonin, dexmedetomidine, and gabapentin on reduction of postoperative pain and anxiety following laminectomy: a randomized clinical trial

BMC Anesthesiology volume 22, Article number: 318 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to compare the effects of melatonin, dexmedetomidine, and gabapentin on postoperative pain and anxiety following laminectomy.

Methods

In this randomized clinical trial, 99 patients aged 40–60 years old with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II undergoing laminectomy were divided into three groups receiving 600mg gabapentin (group G), 10mg melatonin (group M), or starch tablets (group D). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was used to measure postoperative anxiety while a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was employed to measure pain severity. Patients’ satisfaction with pain treatment was also measured together with the frequency of nausea and vomiting.

Results

The postoperative HADS decreased in all groups over time. Time and group had no significant interaction effect on the HADS score. Patients in the melatonin group had lower HADS at 2 and 6h after surgery. According to the VAS, the groups significantly differed in pain scores 6 and 24h after surgery. Lower VAS scores were observed 6h after surgery in the dexmedetomidine group compared with the gabapentin group and 24h after surgery in the dexmedetomidine group compared with the gabapentin and melatonin groups. Narcotic requirements, patients’ satisfaction, and vital sign changes did not significantly vary among the groups. Notably, patients in the melatonin group had less nausea and vomiting.

Trial registration:

This study was registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (No. IRCT20141009019470N82, 29.06.2019) where the trial protocol could be accessed.

Conclusion

Melatonin is effective as a postoperative anti-anxiety drug. Dexmedetomidine is useful in reducing postoperative pain.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Spinal procedures are associated with intense pain in the postoperative period, mostly in the first few days after surgery. Effective pain management leads to improved functional outcomes, early discharge, early ambulation, and prevention of chronic pain [1]. The activation of various pain mechanisms such as nociceptive, neuropathic, and inflammatory pathways may result in postoperative pain [2]. Back pain originates from diverse tissues such as vertebrae, ligaments, nerve root sleeves, dura, facet joint capsules, fascia, intervertebral discs, and muscles. Various nociceptors and mechanoreceptors are capable of stimulating pain transmission. Back pain is mostly localized in subjects when the referred pain persists in the postoperative period [3]. The intensity of postoperative pain is directly related to the number of vertebrae involved in the surgery [4]. The site of the surgery does not seem to have any effect on pain severity, which remains similar across lumbar spine, thoracic, and cervical operations [5, 6].

Various medications such as morphine (delivered by an intravenous patient-controlled analgesia pump), fentanyl (continuous injection through an epidural catheter), N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists, corticosteroids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), clonidine, capsaicin, and tapentadol are used to relieve post-laminectomy pain. The mechanism of each of the above drugs is different and they have several side effects such as nausea, vomiting, platelet dysfunction, hemorrhage, gastric ulceration, renal toxicity, and respiratory depression [1, 7,8,9].

Dexmedetomidine is a selective α2 adrenergic receptor agonist that is metabolized in the liver and is primarily excreted via the kidneys. Dexmedetomidine facilitates arousable sedation with no effect on the respiratory drive; it also reduces the need for inhaled anesthetics. However, due to hemodynamic changes, the drug should be used carefully for conscious sedation (CS), monitored anesthetic care (MAC), or general anesthesia. [9,10,11,12,13,14]. Despite being an imidazole compound, dexmedetomidine possesses analgesic effects and minimizes postoperative opioid consumption as well as nausea, vomiting, and anxiety [15, 16].

Melatonin is mainly secreted from the pineal gland by the suprachiasmatic nucleus. This neurohormone possesses a circadian secretion pattern and regulates the biological clock; it also offers antiemetic, analgesic, and anxiolytic effects. Due to its effect on both acute and chronic pain, melatonin fulfills a beneficial role in reducing postoperative opioid consumption while minimizing nausea and vomiting. In addition, melatonin can be used to moderate the effect of light on the autonomic system [15, 17,18,19,20].

Several studies have reported that melatonin, as an analgesic, anti-inflammatory, anxiolytic, and anti-agitation premedication, is associated with sedation and anxiolysis without adverse effects on recall and driving performance. Furthermore, some studies have found confirmed the effects of melatonin on pain and anxiety, though a consensus is yet to be reached in this regard [21, 22].

Gabapentin is an anticonvulsant drug classified under the category of gabapentinoids, which are prescribed for diabetic and post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN) patients. Preemptive use of gabapentin reduces the severity of postoperative pain, thereby minimizing the use of analgesics such as narcotics. On the other hand, gabapentin reduces postoperative stress, anxiety, nausea, and vomiting. The amount of anesthetic required for general anesthesia is also reduced when gabapentin is administered [18, 23,24,25].

Based on the mentioned data, the present study aimed to compare the effects of melatonin, dexmedetomidine, and gabapentin on post-laminectomy pain, and anxiety.

Materials and methods

After procurement of the institutional ethics committee’s approval and registration with the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (No. IRCT20141009019470N82, 29.06.2019), written informed consent was obtained from all patients who met the inclusion criteria at Abu Ali Sina Hospital (a teaching hospital affiliated to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran). We performed the study from August 2019 to November 2019. Ninety-nine patients aged 40–60 years old with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II scheduled for laminectomy at one or two levels were recruited.

Patients with a history of allergic reactions to melatonin, dexmedetomidine, and gabapentin ; history of cardiovascular disease (heart failure, heart block, or bradycardia); history of kidney disease (plasma creatinine level > 1.5mg/dl or glomerular filtration rate < 50 ml/min/1.73m2); liver disease (aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase, and bilirubin levels more than twice the upper limit of normal); psychological and cognitive disorders; dementia; major depression; circadian rhythm disorders such as chronic fatigue syndrome and drowsiness; or patients who had difficulty in communication were excluded from the study.

Anesthesia technique:

After the patients’ arrived in the operating room, routine monitoring such as non-invasive blood pressure measurement, heart rate monitoring, electrocardiogram, and pulse oximetry was done. Since our patients avoided drinking water for 2–3h before entering the operating room, they were slightly dehydrated. Therefore, all patients were injected with approximately 10 ml/kg of isotonic fluid based on the history-wise and clinical conditions. Midazolam (0.04mg/kg), fentanyl (2 mic/kg), and morphine (0.1mg/kg) were injected as premedication after entering to operation room as a routine of our experiences. Anesthesia was induced using propofol (1.5-2mg/kg) and cis-atracurium (0.15mg/kg). Intubation was performed with size 7 (women) or 8 (men) endotracheal tubes. Isoflurane and nitrous oxide-oxygen (50% /50%) were used for maintenance of anesthesia (1.2–2.5%) and repeated cis-atracurium for muscle relaxation during operation based on clinical judgment and monitoring.

Randomization and interventions:

The sample size was calculated based on a study conducted by Cheghazardi et al. [18], which showed a difference in the overall mean Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score between patients receiving dexmedetomidine (4.80 ± 1.00) and gabapentin (4.08 ± 1.03) and determined an optimal sample size of 33 patients (without dropout) in each group to provide a power of 80% with an alpha error of 0.05. Since the current study had three groups, 33 patients were assigned to each group using block randomization with 4, 6, and 8 blocks. The list of the blocks was extracted from www.sealedenvelope.com, with both the investigators and patients being kept blind to the size of the blocks. Before the study, 99 closed envelopes were prepared to contain oral tablets in non-specified boxes. Each envelope had a specific number provided by a pharmacist who was blinded to the study groups. Two hours before the operation, a nurse randomly selected one of the envelopes and gave the pills to the patient.

In the melatonin group (M), 10mg (two 5mg tablets) of melatonin (Natrol, USA) were given to the patients, while in the dexmedetomidine group (D), starch tablets, and in the gabapentin group (G), 600mg (two 300mg tablets) of gabapentin (RAZAK, Iran) were administered.

To deliver the dexmedetomidine (PFIZER, USA) while keeping the patients blinded, a nurse received a 20 ml syringe from a second nurse according to the patients’ code and weight. In the melatonin and gabapentin groups, the syringe contained normal saline, while in the dexmedetomidine group, it contained a diluted solution of dexmedetomidine (1µg/kg). All three syringes contained 20 ml of clear solution and were injected in the prone position within ten minutes after induction of anesthesia. Information was recorded by another nurse during the operation using forms included in the envelopes. The patients and nurses were unaware of the type of prescription drugs and the nature of the study group.

Assessments:

All patients were visited by an anesthesiologist the night before surgery; a medical history was taken and a clinical examination was performed. Also, a green mark was placed on the patient’s file if he/she met the inclusion criteria and entered the study.

In this study, we compared the effects of melatonin, dexmedetomidine, and gabapentin on the primary outcomes of postoperative pain and anxiety and the secondary outcomes of the occurrence of nausea and vomiting, required amount of analgesics after surgery, patients’ satisfaction, and hemodynamic changes. Psychological tests were validated for the Iranian study populations used in this study.

To measure the severity of pain, a VAS was used; the patients’ pain levels were measured at 2, 6, and 24h after surgery. The total consumption of analgesics (morphine, acetaminophen, and meperidine) was also recorded. In the recovery room, the patients were trained to inform the nurses whenever their pain score was four or higher on the VAS. At such times, the patients received an IV bolus of 0.02mg/kg morphine and were re-evaluated after 20min. If the patient’s pain score was four or above again, the same dose of morphine was injected with/under respiratory monitoring (rate and depth of breathing). In the ward, patients with pain (VAS score ≥ 4) were given an IV infusion of 1g acetaminophen (Apotel®). The patient was re-evaluated after an hour and given a 25mg meperidine injection if the pain score remained greater than or equal to four.

The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was used to measure postoperative anxiety 2, 6, and 24h after surgery [26]. Scores of zero to seven were regarded as normal, 8 to 10 signified borderline cases, and 11 to 21 indicated abnormal anxiety [26]. The patients’ satisfaction with postoperative pain treatment was measured based on a Likert scale [27]. At the time of discharge from recovery, patient satisfaction was measured on a five-point scale (Score 1: Very poor, Score 2: Poor, Score 3: Satisfactory, Score 4: Good, Score 5: Very good). All psychological tests were conducted by an expert psychologist. The occurrence of nausea (yes or no) and vomiting (yes or no) was also measured among the secondary outcomes. All data were recorded in predefined forms before being transferred in sealed envelopes to a statistician who was blinded to the study groups.

Data Analysis

In this study, continuous variables were reported as mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range (IQR). Categorical variables were reported as numbers and percentage. Differences between groups were examined by analysis of variance (ANOVA); the Tukey post hoc test was utilized to analyze parametric variables and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for non-parametric variables. Also, the chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test was applied to assess differences in categorical variables. We accessed the repeated measure ANOVA test for comparing the HADS within groups over time. Data were analyzed using SPSS 21 (IBM, USA) and P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

In our study, 115 patients were screened for eligibility. Among them, eight were excluded due to a lack of inclusion criteria and three declined to participate. Therefore, 104 patients were enrolled and divided into three groups melatonin (N = 35), dexmedetomidine (N = 35), and gabapentin (N = 34). In the follow-up, five patients were excluded (two due to opioid intake in the melatonin group, one due to opioid intake and one due to missing data in the dexmedetomidine group, and one due to withdrawal in the gabapentin group). A total of ninety-nine patients completed the study (Fig.1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Consort Flow Diagram

Full size image

No significant differences were found in demographic and baseline data including duration of surgery, bleeding level, recovery stay, and morphine and meperidine administration (Table1). The amount of bleeding was 230 (140–500) in the melatonin group, 200 (150–490) in the dexmedetomidine group, and 230 (150–450) in the gabapentin group (P = 0.907).

Table 1 Demographic characteristics and baseline data
Full size table

At the VAS score, there was no significant difference between the groups before and two hours after surgery (P = 0.081, P = 0.507, respectively); however, significant differences were observed between the groups at 6 and 24h after surgery (P = 0.049, P < 0.0001, respectively). The patients had a lower VAS score in the dexmedetomidine group compared with the gabapentin group at 6h (P = 0.046) and the gabapentin(p = 0.018) and melatonin groups in 24h (p < 0.001) (Table2) after the operation. Due to the interaction between group and time (Fig.2), we only reported the ANOVA test.

Table 2 VAS scores for pain in the three intervention groups at different times
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Change in pain over time in the three groups according to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).

Full size image

Postoperative HADS decreased in all groups over time (P < 0.001). Time and group did not have a significant interaction effect on the HADS score (P = 0.065). In general, the melatonin group had a lower mean HADS score compared with the other two groups (P < 0.001) (Fig.3). According to the ANOVA test, there were significant differences in HADS between the groups, two and six hours after surgery (P = 0.001 and P = 0.010, respectively). In other words, patients in the melatonin group had lower HADS compared with those in the dexmedetomidine (P = 0.001) and gabapentin (P = 0.007) groups two hours after surgery. Also, patients in the melatonin group had inferior HADS compared with the dexmedetomidine (P = 0.017) and gabapentin (P = 0.035) groups at the sixth postoperative hour (Table3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Change in anxiety over time in the three groups according to the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS).

Full size image
Table 3 HADS in the three intervention groups at different times
Full size table

The median change in HADS score between the second and twenty-fourth hours varied significantly between the groups (P = 0.007); there was significantly less change in the melatonin group compared with the dexmedetomidine (P = 0.04) and gabapentin (P = 0.01) groups. A significant difference also existed in the median change in HADS score between 2 and 6h (P = 0.017), with the melatonin group having less change relative to the gabapentin group (P = 0.025). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of median change in HADS score between 6 and 24h (P = 0.228) (Table4).

Table 4 Comparison of median changes in HADS over time in the three intervention groups
Full size table

Differences in requirement of narcotics (P = 0.457), patient satisfaction (P = 0.193), and vital sign changes (P = 0.451) among the groups were not statistically significant. However, the occurrence of nausea and vomiting was significantly different among the groups (P = 0.002 and P = 0.001, respectively). In other words, patients who received melatonin had less nausea and vomiting compared with those receiving dexmedetomidine or gabapentin (Table5).

Table 5 Comparison of clinical variables and patient satisfaction between the three study groups
Full size table

Discussion:

Pain and anxiety are two pivotal postoperative complications that can affect patient satisfaction [1, 2]. According to the findings of this study, dexmedetomidine was more effective in controlling postoperative pain than the other two drugs, while anxiety occurred less among patients receiving melatonin.

The level of early postoperative anxiety was lower in the melatonin group than in the other two groups, with the rate of reduction in drug effectiveness of the drug also being lower. The results of our study showed that the level of early postoperative anxiety at 2 and 6h after surgery was lower in the melatonin group relative to the dexmedetomidine and gabapentin groups. However, 24h after the surgery, this difference persisted but lost its statistical significance. In other studies, similar findings have been reported after melatonin administration [28, 29].

A novel finding of this study was the greater efficacy of melatonin compared with dexmedetomidine and gabapentin in minimizing early postoperative anxiety. Due to the duration of the effect of melatonin (approximately 5h), as we approached the end of the first day after surgery, the effectiveness of the drug decreased. It is likely that by re-administering the drug after surgery, its effect can be sustained.

The anxiolytic effect of melatonin and gabapentin was also reported in a study by Marzieh-Beigom Khezri et al. However, in our study, 2 and 6h after surgery, the anti-anxiety effect of melatonin was significantly greater than dexmedetomidine and gabapentin, while in the mentioned study, no significant difference in postoperative anxiety was observed between patients receiving melatonin and gabapentin [30]. Anti-anxiety effects are among the features of dexmedetomidine, a specific α2 agonist. Perhaps the difference in anxiety findings between the mentioned study and ours is due to differences in dose, method, and timing of drug administration [30, 31]. In the study of Lim and colleagues on patients undergoing central neuroaxial blockade, the effect of the infusion of propofol and dexmedetomidine was compared; the researchers reported that dexmedetomidine caused a greater reduction in postoperative anxiety compared with propofol [32].

As far as we know, no other study has compared the efficacy of melatonin, dexmedetomidine, and gabapentin in terms of postoperative pain and anxiety. Here, we conclude that melatonin is more effective in reducing postoperative anxiety than the other two drugs.

In our study, the closer we got to 24h after surgery, the less pain there was in all three groups. However, what is important was the greater analgesic efficacy of dexmedetomidine at 6h relative to gabapentin (P = 0.046), and at 24h compared with both melatonin and gabapentin (P = 0.001 and P = 0.018, respectively).

The analgesic effects of each of the above drugs have been studied in several studies and the effectiveness of each in reducing postoperative pain has been proven [33]. Gabapentin is an amino acid with the structure of the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) neurotransmitter. This drug can be used as a strong analgesic for reducing postoperative pain [34]. Studies have shown that gabapentin stimulates analgesia by stimulating peripheral, spinal, and supraspinal a2A-adenosine receptors [35]. In the study of Clark et al., it was observed that with the administration of 1200mg of gabapentin, the level of postoperative pain significantly fell in comparison with the control group [36]. However, in a cohort study by Jennifer Hah et al., it was found that despite its analgesic properties, gabapentin was not effective in postoperative pain control [37].

In a study by Borazan et al., the analgesic effects of melatonin after surgery were shown [38]. In Caumo’s study, preoperative melatonin administration gave rise to analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects [39]. The mechanism of action of melatonin is through binding to its plasma receptors, intracellular receptors (e.g., Calmodulin), and orphan nuclear receptors, with anti-inflammatory effects also being prominent [40]. Another possible reason for the reduction of pain through the use of melatonin is its anxiolytic effects through a neurobiological mechanism; it is hypothesized that anxiety activates the behavioral inhibition system, which prevents postoperative pain by consuming melatonin and intervening with this mechanism [41].

Dexmedetomidine exerts its analgesic effects by reducing the expression of the glucocorticoid receptor. The elevation of glucocorticoids during surgery causes an increase in the incidence of pain resistance due to anxiety. In fact, dexmedetomidine probably mitigates this destructive effect of glucocorticoids, thereby minimizing postoperative pain. In the study of Lu Li et al. on mice, the possible mechanism behind the reduction of anxiety-induced persistent pain by dexmedetomidine was a decrement in the expression of the glucocorticoid receptor [42]. On the other hand, Maze et al., in an animal study, reported that injecting high doses of dexmedetomidine reduced the secretion of cortisol, with the response of cortisol to adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) being blunt for three hours after injection [43]. These investigations were performed on animals, but this effect has not been clinically evaluated in humans to date. Although our study revealed that the analgesic effects of dexmedetomidine were greater relative to the other two drugs, further clinical and laboratory studies are needed to confirm and explain this finding.

In our study, the comparison between the three drugs showed that dexmedetomidine was more effective than the other two in postoperative pain management. However, no significant difference was found in the amount of postoperative narcotic consumption between the three groups. This can probably be explained by the duration of the drugs’ action, their different mechanisms in pain control, as well as their anti-anxiety effects.

In our study, the rate of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was lower in the melatonin group than in the other two groups. In the study of Hyunjeong Kwak et al., the effects of administering a single dose of dexmedetomidine at the end of the operation on PONV were reported. However, in our study, dexmedetomidine was administered at the beginning of the operation as a single dose, meaning that a pronounced effect on postoperative PONV probably could not be observed considering the onset time and duration of the drug’s 15-minute peak effect [44]. In the study of Lafli Tanay, postoperative PONV levels were significantly lower in the melatonin group than in the vitamin C group due to decreased use of narcotics. However, since the number of narcotics used in our study was not different among the three groups, this factor could not explain the decreased PONV occurrence in the melatonin group [20]. In Esmat’s study, less nausea and vomiting were observed in the melatonin group than in the control group, which is consistent with our study [19]. A systemic review of the effects of melatonin in cancer patients confirmed its anti-nausea effects [45], but the mechanism of this effect of melatonin on PONV is yet to be elucidated. Therefore, more studies are needed to explain this phenomenon.

Our study has some limitations. If this study had been performed on larger sample size, there would probably have been more significant results in terms of the analgesic and anti-anxiety effects of the drugs. On the other hand, the use of dexmedetomidine as an infusion during the operation and oral reingestion of melatonin after surgery could have led to more pronounced results. To measure narcotic consumption after surgery, the use of a patient-controlled infusion pump may be better as it prevents bolus administration and its possible side effects while facilitating more accurate recordings.

In conclusion, melatonin is effective as a postoperative anxiolytic, while dexmedetomidine can be used to reduce postoperative pain. Furthermore, nausea and vomiting occurred less in the melatonin group compared with the dexmedetomidine and gabapentin groups. The mechanism of action behind these effects of melatonin should be investigated further.

In conclusion, melatonin is more effective than dexmedetomidine and gabapentin groups as a postoperative anxiolytic and nausea - vomiting medication. However, the mechanism of the antiemetic of melatonin should be investigated further. Dexmedetomidine in reducing postoperative pain is more effective than two others.

Data Availability

All data will be available on request. Dr, Reza jouybar is responsible to provide data. If someone wants to request the data from this study can contact Dr. Reza Jouybar (jouybarr@gmail.com).

References

  1. Bajwa SJS, Haldar R. Pain management following spinal surgeries: an appraisal of the available options. J craniovertebral junction spine. 2015;6(3):105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mathiesen O, Dahl B, Thomsen BA, Kitter B, Sonne N, Dahl JB, et al. A comprehensive multimodal pain treatment reduces opioid consumption after multilevel spine surgery. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(9):2089–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Klimek M, Ubben JF, Ammann J, Borner U, Klein J, Verbrugge SJ. Pain in neurosurgically treated patients: a prospective observational study. J Neurosurg. 2006;104(3):350–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bernard J, Surbled M, Lagarde D, Trennec A. Analgesia after surgery of the spine in adults and adolescents. Cah Anesthesiol. 1995;43(6):557–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bajwa S, Kulshrestha A. Spine surgeries: Challenging aspects and implications for anaesthesia. J Spine Neurosurg. 2013;2(3):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jaffe RASS. Anesthesiologist’s Manual of Surgical Procedures. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Joshi GP, McCarroll S, O’Rourke K. Postoperative analgesia after lumbar laminectomy: epidural fentanyl infusion versus patient-controlled intravenous morphine. Anesth Analgesia. 1995;80(3):511–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Vadivelu N, Mitra S, Narayan D. Recent advances in postoperative pain management. Yale J Biol Med. 2010;83(1):11.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Rudra A, Chaterjee S, Ray S, Ghosh S. Pain management after spinal surgery. Indian J Pain. 2015;29(1):9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Colin P, Hannivoort LN, Eleveld DJ, Reyntjens KM, Absalom AR, Vereecke HE, et al. Dexmedetomidine pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic modelling in healthy volunteers: 1. Influence of arousal on bispectral index and sedation. BJA: British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2017;119(2):200 – 10.

  11. Li A, Yuen VMY, Goulay-Dufay S, Kwok PCL. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dexmedetomidine. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2016;42(12):1917–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Boysen PG, Pappas MM, Evans B. An evidence-based opioid-free anesthetic technique to manage perioperative and periprocedural pain. Ochsner J. 2018;18(2):121–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ahuja V, Thapa D, Chander A, Gombar S, Gupta R, Gupta S. Role of dexmedetomidine as adjuvant in postoperative sciatic popliteal and adductor canal analgesia in trauma patients: a randomized controlled trial. Korean J Pain. 2020;33(2):166.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim KH. Safe sedation and hypnosis using dexmedetomidine for minimally invasive spine surgery in a prone position. Korean J pain. 2014;27(4):313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bhana N, Goa KL, McClellan KJ. Dexmedetomidine Drugs. 2000;59(2):263–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pfeffer M, Korf H-W, Wicht H. Synchronizing effects of melatonin on diurnal and circadian rhythms. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2018;258:215–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Song Y, Shim J-K, Song J-W, Kim E-K, Kwak Y-L. Dexmedetomidine added to an opioid-based analgesic regimen for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in highly susceptible patients: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol (EJA). 2016;33(2):75–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Javaherforooshzadeh F, Amirpour I, Janatmakan F, Soltanzadeh M. Comparison of effects of melatonin and gabapentin on post operative anxiety and pain in lumbar spine surgery: A randomized clinical trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2018;8(3).

  19. Esmat IM, Kassim DY. Comparative study between transdermal fentanyl and melatonin patches on postoperative pain relief after lumber laminectomy, a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Egypt J Anaesth. 2016;32(3):323–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tunay DL, Ilgınel MT, Ünlügenç H, Tunay M, Karacaer F, Biricik E. Comparison of the effects of preoperative melatonin or vitamin C administration on postoperative analgesia. Bosnian J basic Med Sci. 2020;20(1):117.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Capuzzo M, Zanardi B, Schiffino E, Buccoliero C, Gragnaniello D, Bianchi S, et al. Melatonin does not reduce anxiety more than placebo in the elderly undergoing surgery. Anesth Analgesia. 2006;103(1):121–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Andersen LPH, Kücükakin B, Werner MU, Rosenberg J, Gögenur I. Absence of analgesic effect of intravenous melatonin administration during daytime after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized trial. J Clin Anesth. 2014;26(7):545–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Nakhli MS, Kahloul M, Jebali C, Frigui W, Naija W. Effects of gabapentinoids premedication on shoulder pain and rehabilitation quality after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: pregabalin versus gabapentin. Pain Research and Management. 2018;2018.

  24. Hu J, Huang D, Li M, Wu C, Zhang J. Effects of a single dose of preoperative pregabalin and gabapentin for acute postoperative pain: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J pain Res. 2018;11:2633.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Chaghazardi S, Hedari M, Bazargan-Hejazi S, Mohammadi R, Ahmadi A. Comparing the Effect of Gabapentin, Ketamine, Dexmedetomidine, and Entonox on Pain Control in Burn Wound Dressing. J Burn Care Res. 2020;41(1):151–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Emons W, Habibović M, Pedersen SJQoLR. Prevalence of anxiety in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: measurement equivalence of the HADS-A and the STAI-S. 2019;28(11):3107–16.

  27. Zawaideh JP, Sala E, Pantelidou M, Shaida N, Koo B, Caglic I, et al. Comparison of Likert and PI-RADS version 2 MRI scoring systems for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. 2020;93(1112):20200298.

  28. Andersen L, Rosenberg J, Gögenur I. III. Perioperative melatonin: not ready for prime time. Oxford University Press; 2014.

  29. Andersen L, Werner M, Rosenberg J, Gögenur I. A systematic review of peri-operative melatonin. Anaesthesia. 2014;69(10):1163–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Madsen MT, Isbrand A, Andersen UO, Andersen LJ, Taskiran M, Simonsen E, et al. The effect of MElatonin on Depressive symptoms, Anxiety, CIrcadian and Sleep disturbances in patients after acute coronary syndrome (MEDACIS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2017;18(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Khezri M-B, Oladi M-R, Atlasbaf A. Effect of melatonin and gabapentin on anxiety and pain associated with retrobulbar eye block for cataract surgery: a randomized double-blind study. Indian J Pharmacol. 2013;45(6):581.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lim YP, Yahya N, Izaham A, Kamaruzaman E, Zainuddin MZ, MAT WRW, et al. The comparison between propofol and dexmedetomidine infusion on perioperative anxiety during regional anesthesia. Turk J Med Sci. 2018;48(6):1219–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Nesioonpour S, Behaeen K, Dehghani Firoozabadi M, Javaher Forooshzadeh F, Dadkhah M, Olapour A, et al. Effects of gabapentin on acute pain after nasal septoplasty. 2014;30:65–9.

  34. Chang CY, Challa CK, Shah J, Eloy JD. Gabapentin in acute postoperative pain management. BioMed research international. 2014;2014.

  35. Zhang X, Bai X. New therapeutic uses for an alpha2 adrenergic receptor agonist–dexmedetomidine in pain management. Neurosci Lett. 2014;561:7–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Clarke H, Kirkham KR, Orser BA, Katznelson R, Mitsakakis N, Ko R, et al. Gabapentin reduces preoperative anxiety and pain catastrophizing in highly anxious patients prior to major surgery: a blinded randomized placebo-controlled trial. Can J Anesthesia/Journal canadien d’anesthésie. 2013;60(5):432–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hah J, Mackey SC, Schmidt P, McCue R, Humphreys K, Trafton J, et al. Effect of perioperative gabapentin on postoperative pain resolution and opioid cessation in a mixed surgical cohort: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(4):303–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Borazan H, Tuncer S, Yalcin N, Erol A, Otelcioglu S. Effects of preoperative oral melatonin medication on postoperative analgesia, sleep quality, and sedation in patients undergoing elective prostatectomy: a randomized clinical trial. J Anesth. 2010;24(2):155–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Caumo W, Torres F, Moreira NL, Auzani JA, Monteiro CA, Londero G, et al. The clinical impact of preoperative melatonin on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. Anesth Analgesia. 2007;105(5):1263–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Emet M, Ozcan H, Ozel L, Yayla M, Halici Z, Hacimuftuoglu A. A review of melatonin, its receptors and drugs. Eurasian J Med. 2015;48(2):135–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Caumo W, Levandovski R, Hidalgo MPL. Preoperative anxiolytic effect of melatonin and clonidine on postoperative pain and morphine consumption in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. J Pain. 2009;10(1):100–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Lu L, Zuo-Xia Z, Zhi-Yu Y, Cui -EL, Yi-Shan L, Rao S, et al. Dexmedetomidine Alleviates Presurgical Anxiety-Induced Persistent Postsurgical Pain via Decreasing the Expression of Glucocorticoid Receptor. J Anesth Perioperative Med (JAPM). 2018;5(1):8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Maze M, Virtanen R, Daunt D, Banks S, Stover EP, Feldman D. Effects of dexmedetomidine, a novel imidazole sedative-anesthetic agent, on adrenal steroidogenesis: in vivo and in vitro studies. Anesth Analg. 1991;73(2):204–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Kwak H, Chang YJ, Lee KC, Jung WS, Kwon S, Jo YY. Antiemetic efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus dexmedetomidine-dexamethasone combination in patients undergoing breast surgery. J Int Med Res. 2019;47(10):5060–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Seely D, Wu P, Fritz H, Kennedy DA, Tsui T, Seely AJ, et al. Melatonin as adjuvant cancer care with and without chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Integr cancer Ther. 2012;11(4):293–303.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. The authors would like to thank the patients who participated in this trial.

Funding

This article was financially supported by Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. The authors declare that they have no other relevant financial interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Anesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

    Reza Jouybar, Somayeh Kazemifar, Naeimehossadat Asmarian, Ali Karami & Saeed Khademi

Authors
  1. Reza Jouybar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Somayeh Kazemifar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Naeimehossadat Asmarian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ali Karami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Saeed Khademi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

R.J. participated in the study conception, proposal writing, data analysis, and the article draft and manuscript revision. S.K. contributed to proposal preparation and the primary draft. A.K. contributed to the study conception, proposal writing, and final draft. S.Kh. contributed to the proposal writing, editing, and final draft. N.A. participated in study design and data analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naeimehossadat Asmarian.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines and approved by the Ethics Committee of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. Written informed consent was taken from all the patients. This study was registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (No. IRCT20141009019470N82, 29.06.2019) where the trial protocol could be accessed.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Data Access and responsibility

The principal investigator, Reza Jouybar, had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jouybar, R., Kazemifar, S., Asmarian, N. et al. Comparison of the effect of melatonin, dexmedetomidine, and gabapentin on reduction of postoperative pain and anxiety following laminectomy: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Anesthesiol 22, 318 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01851-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01851-x

Keywords

BMC Anesthesiology

ISSN: 1471-2253

Contact us