Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Polymorphisms on PAI-1 and ACE genes in association with fibrinolytic bleeding after on-pump cardiac surgery

  • Agnese Ozolina1, 2,
  • Eva Strike1, 2,
  • Liene Nikitina-Zake3,
  • Inta Jaunalksne4,
  • Angelika Krumina5,
  • Romans Lacis1, 2,
  • Lars J. Bjertnaes6Email author and
  • Indulis Vanags2
Contributed equally
BMC Anesthesiology201515:122

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-015-0101-1

Received: 3 September 2014

Accepted: 26 August 2015

Published: 4 September 2015

Abstract

Background

Carriers of plasminogen activator inhibitor -1 (PAI-1) -675 genotype 5G/5G may be associated with lower preoperative PAI-1 plasma levels and higher blood loss after heart surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We speculate if polymorphisms of PAI-1 -844 A/G and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) intron 16 I/D also might promote fibrinolysis and increase postoperative bleeding.

Methods

We assessed PAI-1 -844 A/G, and ACE intron 16 I/D polymorphisms by polymerase chain reaction technique and direct sequencing of genomic DNA from 83 open heart surgery patients that we have presented earlier. As primary outcome, accumulated chest tube drainage (CTD) at 4 and 24 h were analyzed for association with genetic polymorphisms. As secondary outcome, differences in plasma levels of PAI-1, t-PA/PAI-1 complex and D-dimer were determined for each polymorphism. SPSS® was used for statistical evaluation.

Results

The lowest preoperative PAI-1 plasma levels were associated with PAI-1 -844 genotype G/G, and higher CTD, as compared with genotype A/A at 4 and 24 h after surgery. Correspondingly, 4 h after the surgery CTD was higher in carriers of ACE intron 16 genotype I/I, as compared with genotype D/D. PAI-1 plasma levels and t-PA/PAI-1 complex reached nadir in carriers of ACE intron 16 genotype I/I, in whom we also noticed the highest D-dimer levels immediately after surgery. Notably, carriers of PAI-1 -844 genotype G/G displayed higher D-dimer levels at 24 h after surgery as compared with those of genotype A/G.

Conclusions

Increased postoperative blood loss secondary to enhanced fibrinolysis was associated with carriers of PAI-1 -844 G/G and ACE Intron 16 I/I, suggesting that these genotypes might predict increased postoperative blood loss after cardiac surgery using CPB.

Background

Heart surgery by means of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) can impede hemostasis, thereby increasing postoperative bleeding and the need for blood transfusions [1, 2]. Recently, investigators reported that more than 40 % of the cases of excessive bleedings after this kind of surgery are due to coagulopathy [3]. The balance between bleeding, normal hemostasis and thrombosis is significantly influenced by platelet aggregation, rate of thrombin formation and activation of the fibrinolytic system. Recent evidence suggests that genetic variability might influence the activation of each of these pathways [4, 5].

During CPB, fibrinolytic activity increases 10 - to 100-fold because of augmented generation of plasmin, triggered by a rise in tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), ultimately resulting in enhanced plasma concentration of fibrin degradation products [6, 7]. Plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 (PAI-1), the main inhibitor of fibrinolysis, increases a 15-fold only 2 h (h) after cardiac surgery, as a part of the “fibrinolytic shut down” [1, 8]. In a previous study of patients, who underwent cardiac surgery on CPB, we found that lower plasma concentrations of PAI-1 preoperatively were associated with more bleeding, lower levels of t-PA/PAI-1 complex, and higher D-dimer concentrations postoperatively [9].

The PAI-1 gene contains more polymorphisms. The promoter regions 675 4Guanine/5Guanine (4G/5G) and −844 Adenosine/Guanine (A/G) polymorphisms, both affecting the fibrinolytic balance, are two of the most common. Reassessing blood from the latter study [9], we recently confirmed the findings of other investigators that in addition to decreased plasma levels of PAI-1, excessive bleeding after CPB was associated with PAI-1 -675 5G/5G polymorphism [5, 1014].

Although primarily an endocrine long-term regulator of blood pressure and extracellular volume, the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) also plays a pivotal role in the regulation of fibrinolysis. Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) influences PAI-1 plasma levels by converting angiotensin I to angiotensin II [15, 16]. Recent studies suggest that increased fibrinolysis is mainly related to inhibition of angiotensin II, which acts by reducing the plasma level of PAI-1 rather than increasing that of t-PA [17]. However, plasma concentrations of both PAI-1 and t-PA are characterized by wide inter-individual variations, most likely because of differences in ACE plasma concentrations [18, 19].

Lately, very long half-life PAI-1 seems to represent a promising treatment option for genetically predisposed individuals with low levels of PAI-1 [20]. PAI-1 gene −844 A/G polymorphism has been associated with both coronary heart disease [21, 22], and venous thrombosis resulting from decreased fibrinolysis [22, 23]. However, to our knowledge, no previous investigation has documented association between PAI-1 -844 A/G polymorphism and increased blood loss due to increased fibrinolysis after cardiac surgery employing CPB.

Intron 16 Insertion/Deletion (I/D) polymorphism of the ACE gene influences concentration of circulating ACE, thereby affecting endogenously generated inhibitor of fibrinolysis. The insertion allele is believed to steer approximately one half of the plasma levels of ACE and PAI-1, and might potentially increase fibrinolytic activity [24]. Several studies have revealed that ACE intron 16 I/D polymorphism is accompanied by a wide range of cardiovascular diseases. Genotype D/D is associated both with increased plasma concentration and higher activity of PAI-1 [2528]. However, the ACE Intron 16 I/D polymorphism has been sparsely studied, as a potential cause of postoperative bleeding, and with controversial results [25, 29, 30]. Consequently, by examining the same patient cohort as referred to above [14], our primary end-point was to address the associations between PAI-1 -844 A/G and ACE Intron 16 I/D polymorphisms and fibrinolytic bleeding after cardiac surgery using CPB.

Methods

Methods has been presented previously in this journal [9] and will only be shortly described. A more extensive version is available, see Additional file 1. The protocol and the informed consent form, including the request to donate genetic material, were approved by the Ethics Committee of Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, Riga, Latvia. All patients provided written informed content.

In short, 90 consecutive adult patients were admitted to the hospital to undergo cardiac surgery with CPB, whereof 7 were excluded at the reoperation because of surgical bleeding. Postoperative bleeding volumes were recorded as chest tube drainage (CTD) in mL at 4 and 24 h after the surgery [9]. Inclusion and exclusion criteria, as well as perioperative management, postoperative bleeding and demographic and laboratory data were the same as published before [9] and genomic DNA was extracted as reported by Ozolina et al. [14]. Here, we only describe the methods used for analysis of PAI-1 -844 A/G and ACE Intron 16 I/D polymorphisms.

PAI-1 -844 A/G and ACE Intron 16 I/D

Genomic DNA from whole blood of every patient was diluted in 1 ml of water and stored on minus 70 °C until analyzed. The region harboring the PAI-1 -844 A/G gene polymorphism was amplified using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The primers had the following sequences: 5′-ATCCCTTTTCCCCTTGTGTC-3′ and 5′-AACCTCCATCAAAACGTGGA-3′. The PCR products were then purified using Sap/Exo I (Thermo Scientific® Fermentas, Lithuania) and sequenced on an ABI Prizm 3130xl genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems®, Life Technologies, USA).

For determination of ACE Intron16 I/D polymorphism, we used the method published by Tomita et al. [31]. Insertion and deletion alleles were identified by using PCR amplification of the respective fragments from Intron 16. Fragment size was determined by agarose gel electrophoresis. The deletion allele was visualized at 191 base pairs (bp), and an insertion allele at 478 bp. For patients with /D genotype additional PCR was performed to verify the result of amplification.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed with SPSS (SPSS® version 20.0, Chicago, IL). Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and categorical variables as percentages (%). The data of the study groups were checked by an appropriate analytic test according to the data distribution. Comparisons between genotype groups were performed with Kruskal-Wallis H test for non-parametric variables, and with ANOVA for parametric variables. Chi-square test was used to analyze categorical data. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.

Results

Clinical course

Out of totally, 90 consecutive patients scheduled for first time cardiac surgery, 83 patients, 42 men and 41 women, who met inclusion criteria were subjected to further analysis (Table 1). Patients were classified with their PAI-1-844 A/G and ACE Intron 16 I/D characteristics and subdivided into 3 groups, according to the genotype of each polymorphism. The genotype results of PAI-1 -844 A/G and ACE Intron 16 I/D polymorphisms were all in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. We noticed no significant differences between CPB priming - and cardioplegia volumes in relation to the different genotypes. We found no associations between PAI-1 -844 A/G genotype and demographic characteristics, preoperative parameters and surgical variables (Table 1). ACE of genotypes I/D and D/D were significantly more represented among males (P < 0.05) and in patients undergoing mixed type of surgery (P < 0.05).
Table 1

Perioperative characteristics of patients scheduled for on-pump cardiac surgery

Characteristics

PAI-1 -844 A/G

ACE Intron 16 I/D

Genotype

G/G

A/G

A/A

I/I

I/D

D/D

Number of patients, n

22

387

23

22

42

19

Demographic data

 Age, yr

61 ± 11

68 ± 10

67 ± 11

68 ± 10

66 ± 10

63 ± 14

 Male sex, n (%)

15 (68)

16 (42)

11 (48)

9 (41)*

23 (55)* **

10 (53)**

 BMI, kg/m2

28 ± 5

28 ± 8

27 ± 5

27 ± 5

28 ± 5

27 ± 4

 EF, (%)

57 ± 8

55 ± 8

56 ± 7

58 ± 6

55 ± 9

55 ± 7

Type of surgery, n (%)

 CABG, n (%)

11 (50)

15 (40)

8 (35)

8 (36)

18 (43)

8 (42)

 Valve, n (%)

8 (36)

13 (34)

10 (43)

9 (41)

13 (31)

9 (47)

 Mixed, n (%)

3 (14)

10 (26)

5 (22)

5 (23)*

11 (26)* **

2(11)**

Surgical variables

 CPB duration (min)

110 ± 42

106 ± 42

99 ± 37

101 ± 47

105 ± 39

109 ± 37

 Aorta oclusion time (min)

69 ± 30

65 ± 25

63 ± 11

64 ± 27

65 ± 27

69 ± 29

 Reperfusion time (min)

33 ± 12

33 ± 15

33 ± 16

29 ± 13

36 ± 17

33 ± 9

 CPB priming volume, ml

1864 ± 543

1509 ± 516

1329 ± 440

1379 ± 462

1548 ± 556

1544 ± 482

 Cardioplegia, ml

1872 ± 587

1673 ± 516

1886 ± 674

1647 ± 523

1833 ± 655

1836 ± 478

Preoperative parameters

 Hemoglobin, g/dL

136 ± 15

139 ± 13

131 ± 18

132 ± 17

137 ± 16

138 ± 12

 Platelet count, × 109/L

221 ± 67

215 ± 50

215 ± 63

211 ± 45

218 ± 65

220 ± 58

 Prothrombin time, %

84 ± 15

90 ± 14

92 ± 12

94 ± 15

89 ± 13

85 ± 14

 Fibrinogen, g/L

4.4 ± 1.3

4.6 ± 1.2

4.7 ± 1.5

4.5 ± 1.2

4.6 ± 1.2

4.7 ± 3.7

Data presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean

PAI-1 Plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1, A Adenosine, G Guanine, ACE Angiotensin converting enzyme, I Insertion, D Deletion, n Number of patients, BMI Body mass index, EF Ejection fraction, CABG Coronary artery bypass grafting, CPB Cardiopulmonary bypass. *P < 0.05 between ACE Intron 16 I/I and I/D genotypes;

**P < 0.05 between ACE Intron 16 D/D andI/D genotypes

Relationships between PAI-1 -844 A/G and ACE Intron 16 I/D polymorphisms and postoperative bleeding

Table 2 shows preoperative PAI-1, postoperative t-PA/PAI-1 complex and D-dimer plasma levels in relation to PAI-1-844 A/G and ACE Intron 16 I/D polymorphisms. Mean PAI-1 plasma concentration was lower in carriers of genotype G/G, as compared to A/A (P = 0.004), but no significant difference existed between genotypes A/A and A/G. Mean plasma concentrations of t-PA/PAI-1 complex determined 24 h postoperatively displayed no significant differences between the PAI-1-844 genotype groups. In contrast, D-dimer levels differed significantly between carriers of genotypes G/G and A/G (P = 0.04) at 24 h (Table 2). As depicted in Fig. 1, carriers of PAI-1-844 genotype G/G displayed the greatest blood loss at 4 and 24 h postoperatively, as compared with carriers of genotype A/A (P = 0.0001, P = 0.03, respectively).
Table 2

PAI-1 -844 A/G and ACE Intron 16 I/D gene polymorphisms related to markers of fibrinolysis. Plasma concentrations of PAI-1 preoperatively – and of t-PA/PAI-1 complex and D-dimer postoperatively after on-pump cardiac surgery

Genetic polymorphism

n

PAI-1, ng/mL, preoperatively

t-PA/PAI-1, ng/mL, 24 h postoperatively

D-dimer, ng/mL 0 h

D-dimer, ng/mL 6 h

D-dimer, ng/mL 24 h

PAI-1 -844 A/G

 A/A

23

28 ± 12*

3.8 ± 1.8

251 ± 170

289 ± 210

234 ± 187

 A/G

38

24 ± 13

3.6 ± 2.1

312 ± 213

312 ± 200

184 ± 129*

 G/G

22

18 ± 12*

3.4 ± 2.4

287 ± 255

255 ± 203

267 ± 168*

P value

 

0.004

NS

NS

NS

0.04

ACE intron 16 I/D

 D/D

19

27 ± 13*

3.6 ± 2

234 ± 161*

244 ± 182

208 ± 173

 I/D

42

24 ± 13

4 ± 2.3*

294 ± 238

291 ± 204

247 ± 165

 I/I

22

18 ± 11*

2.8 ± 1.7*

376 ± 203*

331 ± 218

274 ± 167

P value

 

0.02

0.02

0.03

NS

NS

Data presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean

PAI-1 Plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1, A Adenosine, G Guanine, ACE Angiotensin converting enzyme, I Insertion, D Deletion, n Number of patients, t-PA Tissue plasminogen activator, 0 h Immediately after surgery, 6, 24 h 6 and 24 h postoperatively. *P < 0.05 between genotypes

Fig. 1

PAI-1-844 A/G polymorphism and blood loss after open heart surgery. Relationship between PAI-1 -844 A/G polymorphism and accumulated postoperative blood loss after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Data presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean. PAI-1, Plasminogen activator inhibitor type −1; A, adenosine; G, guanine; mL, milliliters; h, hours. *P < 0.05 4 h blood loss between PAI-1 -844 of genotypes G/G and A/A; † P < 0.05 between 24 h blood loss associated with genotypes G/G and A/A of PAI-1 -844; & P < 0.05 between 24 h blood loss associated with PAI-1 -844 of genotypes A/G and A/A

Carriers of ACE Intron 16 genotype I/I presented with significantly lower preoperative plasma concentrations of PAI-1, as compared with carriers of genotype D/D (P = 0.02), but not as compared with carriers of genotype I/D (Table 2). Concerning t-PA/PAI-1 complex determined 24 h after the surgery (Table 2), we found higher plasma concentrations in carriers of genotypes I/D as compared with I/I (P = 0.02). Postoperatively, patients with ACE Intron 16 genotype I/I displayed higher plasma concentrations of D-dimer at all three time points. The difference reached significance immediately after the surgery (Table 2) in carriers of genotype I/I in comparison with genotype D/D (P = 0.03). Correspondingly, as shown in Fig. 2, carriers of genotype I/I also presented with significantly higher blood loss 4 h after surgery, in comparison with genotypes I/D (P = 0.02) and D/D (P = 0.04).
Fig. 2

ACE Intron 16 I/D polymorphism and blood loss after open heart surgery. Relationship between ACE Intron 16 I/D polymorphism and accumulated postoperative blood loss after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Data presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean. ACE, Angiotensin Converting Enzyme; I, insertion; D, deletion; mL, milliliters; h, hours. # P < 0.05 between 4 h blood loss associated with ACE Intron 16 of genotypes I/I and D/D; ‡ P < 0.05 between 4 h blood loss associated with ACE Intron 16 of genotypes I/I and I/D

Discussion

This study revealed that blood loss after cardiac surgery with extracorporeal circulation is larger in carriers of PAI-1 -844 genotype G/G and ACE intron 16 genotype I/I as compared with their respective genotypes A/A and D/D. We also noticed the lowest preoperative plasma concentrations of PAI-1 and the highest D-dimer levels 24 h after the surgery in carriers of PAI-1-844 genotype G/G. Correspondingly, in carriers of ACE intron 16 genotype I/I, D-dimer plasma concentration peaked transiently immediately after the surgery and t-PA/PAI-1 complex reached nadir at 24 h postoperatively.

PAI-1 and t-PA forming t-PA/PAI-1 complex, are supposed to be the main regulators of fibrinolysis in human. According to a recent study, patients with myocardial infarction presented with higher PAI-1 and lower t-PA plasma concentrations as compared with healthy controls [21]. Notably, regression analysis confirmed an independent association between myocardial infarction and genotype -844 A/A in concert with pronounced elevation of PAI-1 [22]. Consistent with the increased anti-fibrinolytic activity associated with myocardial infarction, our findings indicate that genotype A/A rather protects against fibrinolysis, as assessed by a lower accumulated blood loss 24 h postoperatively in carriers of that genotype.

PAI-1-844 A/G polymorphisms

We believe that increased fibrinolysis, as assessed by lower plasma concentrations of PAI-1 and t-PA/PAI-1 complex can explain the augmented blood loss in carriers of PAI-1-844 genotype G/G. As compared with heterozygotes and carriers of PAI-1 -844 A/A, those of genotype G/G presented with significantly larger blood loss and the significantly highest D-dimer plasma concentrations at 24 h. The latter genotype also demonstrated a 36 % reduction in preoperative PAI-1 plasma concentration, as compared with carriers of genotype A/A. This is consistent with observations made by previous investigators in healthy volunteers [32]. Studying PAI-1-844 A/G and PAI-1 -675 (4G/5G) polymorphisms, the latter workers showed that carriers of genotype G-5G had significantly lower plasma concentrations of PAI-1. They also noticed that the plasma level of PAI-1 depends more on body mass index than on PAI-1 promoter variations, a contention we could not confirm in the present study. In carriers of genotype G/G, we also were unable to demonstrate increased fibrinolysis at 0 and 6 h postoperatively, despite the fact that this genotype displayed the significantly highest plasma level of D-dimer 24 h after surgery. We interpret this result as a of lower inhibitory fibrinolytic potential, which is consistent with the “fibrinolytic shut down”, that might occur in parallel with maximum D-dimer levels 24 h after the operation [33].

ACE Intron 16 I/D polymorphisms

Several investigators have focused on a potential association between ACE Intron 16 I/D polymorphism and increased postoperative bleeding after cardiac surgery [25, 2830, 34]. Prior to surgery, we observed 33 % significantly higher preoperative plasma concentrations of PAI-1 in carriers of ACE Intron 16 of genotype D/D, as compared with genotype I/I. The latter genotype also displayed significantly lower plasma levels of t-PA/PAI-1 complex and higher levels of D-dimer postoperatively, as compared with genotype I/D. The finding that those with the D-allele displayed the highest plasma levels of PAI-1 agrees with a report evaluating the association between plasma PAI-1 levels and ACE Intron 16 I/D polymorphism in healthy volunteers [18]. Despite we observed more blood loss 4 h after the surgery in carriers of genotype I/I, we found no significant differences between the three genotypes 24 h postoperatively. Most likely, the increased blood loss was caused by fibrinolysis. According to previous investigators, plasma concentration of PAI-1 does not rise earlier than 2–3 h after the surgery [1]. The fact that carriers of genotype I/I had the lowest postoperative levels of t-PA/PAI-1 complex (Table 2) strengthens the assumption of an increased fibrinolytic tendency in association with that particular genotype. Other investigators also have reported significant associations between ACE 16 I/D polymorphism and postoperative blood loss 12 and 24 h after open heart surgery [28, 29]. In one investigation, the D allele was associated with decreased bleeding consistent with our finding [28]. In contrast, other investigators found larger blood loss 24 h postoperatively in carriers of ACE Intron 16 genotype I/I [30].

In carriers of ACE Intron 16 genotype D/D undergoing non-cardiac surgery, researchers observed decreased bleeding tendency in association with higher plasma concentrations of ACE [28]. Investigators studying the influence of ACE polymorphism on intra – and postoperative bleeding in patients undergoing total hip replacement showed that carriers of D/D and I/D genotypes had the highest total blood losses [25]. In contrast to our findings, these workers suggest that the D allele should be considered as a risk factor of increased bleeding. In their work, patients of genotype I/I displayed higher D-dimer concentrations, suggesting that more efficient activation of coagulation had taken place, consistent with the higher D-dimer levels observed immediately after surgery in the present study. However, the latter investigators did not determine the PAI-1 and t-PA/PAI-1 plasma concentrations that corresponded with the ACE 16 I/D polymorphism. Possibly, higher plasma levels of ACE, PAI-1 and t-PA/PAI-1 complex, combined with angiotensin-II-induced increase in vasoconstrictor tone, could explain these findings. Thus, although no general agreement has been reached, we and other investigators support the idea that a greater bleeding tendency might occur in carriers of ACE Intron 16 of genotype I/I [29, 30, 34].

Limitations

Firstly, we admit that the sample size was too low to reach significant difference with, at least 80 % power, and 5 % significance level for analysis of every genetic polymorphism. We compared t-PA/PAI-1 complex plasma concentrations of 22 and 23 patients of genotypes G/G and A/A, respectively, and found that sample sizes of at least 159 patients in each group would be required to reach significant differences between the genotypes (Table 2). We wondered whether simultaneous occurrence of PAI-1 -844 G/G and ACE Intron 16 I/I would give rise to excessive blood loss, or that PAI-1 -844 A/A and ACE Intron 16 D/D would result in less blood loss postoperatively, but sample sizes were too low for such analysis. We also admit as a weakness that we did not include a group of healthy volunteers.

We correlated two gene polymorphisms with the plasma concentrations of individual fibrinolytic factors, but do admit that other confounding factors, like hypothermia, hemodilution, heparin re-bound and platelet damage also might have affected postoperative blood loss after surgery. Some investigators argue that reduction of body temperature lowers endogenous production of PAI-1, thereby giving rise to enhanced fibrinolysis and increased bleeding [35], whereas others refute this idea [36]. We rewarmed the patients to normal body temperature (36.6 °C) before transfer to the recovery rooms. Therefore, it is unlikely that hypothermia reduced the formation of t-PA/PAI-1 complex and increased postoperative bleeding in these patients.

Consumption of coagulation factors and hemodilution (Table 1) also might have contributed to increased blood loss postoperatively [37]. We do not deny, that t-PA/PAI-1 plasma levels occasionally decreased 24 h after the surgery due to the combination of hemodilution and decreased anti-fibrinolytic plasma proteins [6]. However, at 24 h postoperatively, we assume that patients had regained normovolemia because a negative net fluid balance was created upon admission to ICU.

It is hard to distinguish clinically changes in fibrinolysis from coagulation disturbances. We admit as a limitation, that neither euglobulin clot lysis time nor thromboelastography/thromboelastometry (TEG/ROTEM) were performed, although some studies predicate a limited role of the latter tests for detecting fibrinolysis [38, 39]. According to recent studies, TEG/ROTEM can only detect severe fibrinolysis in 5 % of cases as compared to 57 % of the cases of moderate fibrinolysis diagnosed with fibrinolytic markers, such as antiplasmin-plasmin complex [39]. Lower thresholds have been suggested for detecing 30-minute fibrinolysis (LY30) by TEG [38]. Despite the fact that our patients received tranexamic acid during CPB, fibrinolytic markers were analyzed only preoperatively and at 24 h postoperatively. At the latter time point, we assume that 90 % of the anti-fibrinolytic agents were excreted via the urine [40]. Nonetheless, after elimination of other possible causes of bleeding, we found a correlation between our commonly used markers of fibrinolysis and specific genotypes.

Conclusions

The present study demonstrates that increased postoperative blood loss in patients subjected to cardiac surgery with the use of CPB might be caused by increased fibrinolysis secondary to decreased plasma concentration of PAI-1 due to PAI-1 -844 G/G or ACE Intron 16 I/I polymorphisms. We suggest that screening for genetic polymorphisms might become part of future pre-operative routines in order to prevent risks for postoperative bleeding due to disorders in the coagulation – or the fibrinolytic systems.

Notes

Abbreviations

ACE 16 intron I/D: 

Angiotensin converting enzyme insertion/deletion gene polymorphism at 16-intron (rs4646994)

ACT: 

Activated coagulation time

BMI: 

Body mass index

CABG: 

Coronary artery bypass grafting

CPB: 

Cardiopulmonary bypass

CTD: 

Chest tube drainage

EuroSCORE: 

European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation

Hb: 

Hemoglobin

ICU: 

Intensive care unit

kg: 

Kilograms

LMWH: 

Low molecular weight heparin

PAI-1: 

Plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1

PAI-1-675 (4G5G): 

Plasminogen activator inhibitor −1 gene 4 Guanine/5Guanine polymorphism at position 675 (rs1799768)

PAI-1-844 A/G: 

Plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 Adenosine/Guanine polymorphism at position 844 (rs2227631)

PCR: 

Polymerase chain reaction

PLT: 

Platelets

RAAS: 

Renin angiotensin aldosteron system

SD: 

Standard deviation

s: 

Seconds

TEG/ROTEM: 

Thromboelastography/thromboelastometry

t-PA: 

Tissue plasminogen activator

t-PA/PAI-1: 

Complex of tissue plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1

0 h: 

Time point immediately after surgery

4 h: 

Time point 4 h after surgery

6 h: 

Time point 6 h after surgery

24 h: 

Time point 24 h after surgery

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Dr. Agnese Ozolina presented preliminary results from this study at the Best Abstracts Competition 2013, arranged by The European Society of Anesthesiology in Barcelona, Spain, and was awarded the third price (https://www.esahq.org/congresses/past-esa-congresses/euroanaesthesia-2013/best-abstract-prize-competition/). The study was supported by grant 2009/0147/ 1DP/1.1.2.1.2/09/IPIA/VIAA/009 from the European Social Fund and from University of Tromsø Publication Fund.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Cardiac surgery, Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital
(2)
Riga Stradins University
(3)
Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Center
(4)
Clinical Immunology Centre, Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital
(5)
Department of Infectology and Dermatology, Riga Stradins University
(6)
Anesthesia and Critical Care Research Group, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø

References

  1. Sniecinski RM, Chandler WL. Activation of the hemostatic system during cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesth Analg. 2011;113(6):1319–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182354b7e.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ranucci M, Baryshnikova E, Castelvecchio S, Pelissero G. Major bleeding, transfusions, and anemia: the deadly triad of cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.03.015.Google Scholar
  3. Kristensen KL, Rauer LJ, Mortensen PE, Kjeldsen BJ. Reoperation for bleeding in cardiac surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012;14(6):709–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivs050.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Welsby IJ, Podgoreanu MV, Phillips-Bute B, Morris R, Mathew JP, Smith PK, et al. Association of the 98T ELAM-1 polymorphism with increased bleeding after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010;24(3):427–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2009.10.030.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Sirgo G, Morales P, Rello J. PAI-1 gene: pharmacogenetic association of 4G/4G genotype with bleeding after cardiac surgery—pilot study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009;26(5):404–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283240412.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Yavari M, Becker RC. Coagulation and fibrinolytic protein kinetics in cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2009;27(1):95–104. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-007-0187-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chandler WL, Velan T. Estimating the rate of thrombin and fibrin generation in vivo during cardiopulmonary bypass. Blood. 2003;101(11):4355–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2002-08-2400.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chandler WL, Velan T. Plasmin generation and D-dimer formation during cardiopulmonary bypass. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2004;15(7):583–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ozolina A, Strike E, Jaunalksne I, Krumina A, Bjertnaes LJ, Vanags I. PAI-1 and t-PA/PAI-1 complex potential markers of fibrinolytic bleeding after cardiac surgery employing cardiopulmonary bypass. BMC Anesthesiol. 2012;12:27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-12-27.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Jimenez Rivera JJ, Iribarren JL, Raya JM, Nassar I, Lorente L, Perez R, et al. Factors associated with excessive bleeding in cardiopulmonary bypass patients: a nested case–control study. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007;2:17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-2-17.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Iribarren JL, Jimenez JJ, Hernandez D, Brouard M, Riverol D, Lorente L, et al. Postoperative bleeding in cardiac surgery: the role of tranexamic acid in patients homozygous for the 5G polymorphism of the plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 gene. Anesthesiology. 2008;108(4):596–602. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e318167aecc.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Duggan E, O’Dwyer MJ, Caraher E, Diviney D, McGovern E, Kelleher D, et al. Coagulopathy after cardiac surgery may be influenced by a functional plasminogen activator inhibitor polymorphism. Anesth Analg. 2007;104(6):1343–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000261267.28891.00. table of contents.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Burzotta F, Iacoviello L, Di Castelnuovo A, Zamparelli R, D’Orazio A, Amore C, et al. 4G/5G PAI-1 promoter polymorphism and acute-phase levels of PAI-1 following coronary bypass surgery: a prospective study. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2003;16(3):149–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/B%3ATHRO.0000024052.79415.62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ozolina A, Strike E, Jaunalksne I, Serova J, Romanova T, Zake LN, et al. Influence of PAI-1 gene promoter-675 (4G/5G) polymorphism on fibrinolytic activity after cardiac surgery employing cardiopulmonary bypass. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania). 2012;48(10):515–20.Google Scholar
  15. Kohler HP, Grant PJ. Plasminogen-activator inhibitor type 1 and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(24):1792–801. doi:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200006153422406.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Usalan C, Buyukhatipoglu H. A dynamic comparative study concerning the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and aldosterone receptor blockers on the fibrinolytic system. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2008;14(2):203–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1076029607303614.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Felmeden DC, Lip GY. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and fibrinolysis. J Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone Syst. 2000;1(3):240–4. doi:https://doi.org/10.3317/jraas.2000.036.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Alhenc-Gelas F, Richard J, Courbon D, Warnet JM, Corvol P. Distribution of plasma angiotensin I-converting enzyme levels in healthy men: relationship to environmental and hormonal parameters. J Lab Clin Med. 1991;117(1):33–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Chandler WL, Fitch JC, Wall MH, Verrier ED, Cochran RP, Soltow LO, et al. Individual variations in the fibrinolytic response during and after cardiopulmonary bypass. Thromb Haemost. 1995;74(5):1293–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Jankun J, Skrzypczak-Jankun E. Plasminogen activator inhibitor with very long half-life (VLHL PAI-1) can reduce bleeding in PAI-1-deficient patients. Cardiovasc Hematol Disord Drug Targets. 2013;13(2):144–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Haselbauer A, Haberbosch W, Tillmanns H, Gardemann A. The impact of the PAI-1 A((−844))G promoter polymorphism on the risk and extent of coronary heart disease. Thromb Haemost. 2002;88(4):697–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1267/th02100697.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Abboud N, Ghazouani L, Saidi S, Ben-Hadj-Khalifa S, Addad F, Almawi WY, et al. Association of PAI-1 4G/5G and -844G/A gene polymorphisms and changes in PAI-1/tissue plasminogen activator levels in myocardial infarction: a case–control study. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2010;14(1):23–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/gtmb.2009.0039.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Morange PE, Henry M, Tregouet D, Granel B, Aillaud MF, Alessi MC, et al. The A -844G polymorphism in the PAI-1 gene is associated with a higher risk of venous thrombosis in factor V Leiden carriers. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20(5):1387–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Moore JH, Smolkin ME, Lamb JM, Brown NJ, Vaughan DE. The relationship between plasma t-PA and PAI-1 levels is dependent on epistatic effects of the ACE I/D and PAI-1 4G/5G polymorphisms. Clin Genet. 2002;62(1):53–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Pola E, Gaetani E, Pola R, Papaleo P, Flex A, Aloi F, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme gene polymorphism may influence blood loss in a geriatric population undergoing total hip arthroplasty. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50(12):2025–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Della-Morte D, Guadagni F, Palmirotta R, Ferroni P, Rundek T. D allele of ACE gene insertion/deletion polymorphism: a marker for risk of ischemic stroke. Pharmacogenomics. 2013;14(1):16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhou L, Xi B, Wei Y, Shen W, Li Y. Meta-analysis of the association between the insertion/deletion polymorphism in ACE gene and coronary heart disease among the Chinese population. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2012;13(2):296–304. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1470320311434242.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Jackson A, Brown K, Langdown J, Luddington R, Baglin T. Effect of the angiotensin-converting enzyme gene deletion polymorphism on the risk of venous thromboembolism. Br J Haematol. 2000;111(2):562–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Welsby IJ, Podgoreanu MV, Phillips-Bute B, Mathew JP, Smith PK, Newman MF, et al. Genetic factors contribute to bleeding after cardiac surgery. J Thromb Haemost. 2005;3(6):1206–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2005.01337.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Iribarren Sarrias I, Jimenez Rivera J, Nassar I, Salido E, Garrido P, Lorente L, et al. Predictive genetic factors for bleeding in cardiac surgery patients with cardiopulmonary bypass. Crit Care. 2006;10 Suppl 1:225.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Tomita H, Ina Y, Sugiura Y, Sato S, Kawaguchi H, Morishita M, et al. Polymorphism in the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene and sarcoidosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;156(1):255–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Verschuur M, Jellema A, Bladbjerg EM, M Feskens EJ, Mensink RP, Moller L, et al. The plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) promoter haplotype is related to PAI-1 plasma concentrations in lean individuals. Atherosclerosis. 2005;181(2):275–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2005.01.036.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. D’Angelo A, Kluft C, Verheijen JH, Rijken DC, Mozzi E, Mannucci PM. Fibrinolytic shut-down after surgery: impairment of the balance between tissue-type plasminogen activator and its specific inhibitor. Eur J Clin Invest. 1985;15(6):308–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Matsubara Y, Hayakawa T, Tsuda T, Takeshita E, Watanabe G, Murata M, et al. Angiotensin converting enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphism is associated with plasma antigen levels of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in healthy Japanese population. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2000;11(2):115–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. DeLoughery TG. Coagulation defects in trauma patients: etiology, recognition, and therapy. Crit Care Clin. 2004;20(1):13–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Gaudino M, Zamparelli R, Andreotti F, Burzotta F, Iacoviello L, Glieca F, et al. Normothermia does not improve postoperative hemostasis nor does it reduce inflammatory activation in patients undergoing primary isolated coronary artery bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;123(6):1092–100.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Ternstrom L, Radulovic V, Karlsson M, Baghaei F, Hyllner M, Bylock A, et al. Plasma activity of individual coagulation factors, hemodilution and blood loss after cardiac surgery: a prospective observational study. Thromb Res. 2010;126(2):e128–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2010.05.028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Chapman MP, Moore EE, Ramos CR, Ghasabyan A, Harr JN, Chin TL, et al. Fibrinolysis greater than 3 % is the critical value for initiation of antifibrinolytic therapy. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;75(6):961–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3182aa9c9f. discussion 7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Ramos CR, Moore EE, Manco-Johnson ML, Silliman CC, Chapman MC, Banerjee A. The incidence and magnitude of fibrinolytic activation in trauma patients: a rebuttal. J Thromb Haemost. 2013;11(7):1435–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.12240.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Eriksson P, Kallin B, van’t Hooft FM, Bavenholm P, Hamsten A. Allele-specific increase in basal transcription of the plasminogen-activator inhibitor 1 gene is associated with myocardial infarction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92(6):1851–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Ozolina et al. 2015

Advertisement