Skip to main content
Download PDF

Association between intraoperative pulmonary artery pressure and cardiovascular complications after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a single-center observational study

BMC Anesthesiology volume 23, Article number: 114 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The impact of intraoperative pulmonary hemodynamics on prognosis after off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery remains unknown. In this study, we examined the association between intraoperative vital signs and the development of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) during hospitalization or within 30 days postoperatively.

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed data from a university hospital. The study cohort comprised consecutive patients who underwent isolated OPCAB surgery between November 2013 and July 2021. We calculated the mean and coefficient of variation of vital signs obtained from the intra-arterial catheter, pulmonary artery catheter, and pulse oximeter. The optimal cut-off was defined as the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) with the largest Youden index (Youden index = sensitivity + specificity – 1). Multivariate logistic regression analysis ROC curves were used to adjust all baseline characteristics that yielded P values of < 0.05.

Results

In total, 508 patients who underwent OPCAB surgery were analyzed. The mean patient age was 70.0 ± 9.7 years, and 399 (79%) were male. There were no patients with confirmed or suspected preoperative pulmonary hypertension. Postoperative MACE occurred in 32 patients (heart failure in 16, ischemic stroke in 16). The mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) was significantly higher in patients with than without MACE (19.3 ± 3.0 vs. 16.7 ± 3.4 mmHg, respectively; absolute difference, 2.6 mmHg; 95% confidence interval, 1.5 to 3.8). The area under the ROC curve of PAP for the prediction of MACE was 0.726 (95% confidence interval, 0.645 to 0.808). The optimal mean PAP cut-off was 18.8 mmHg, with a specificity of 75.8% and sensitivity of 62.5% for predicting MACE. After multivariate adjustments, high PAP remained an independent risk factor for MACE.

Conclusions

Our findings provide the first evidence that intraoperative borderline pulmonary hypertension may affect the prognosis of patients undergoing OPCAB surgery. Future large-scale prospective studies are needed to verify the present findings.

Peer Review reports

Background

Intraoperative hemodynamic perturbations are commonly caused by anesthetic management, surgical interventions, and medical comorbidities. There is increasing evidence that perturbations in routinely obtained vital signs predict the postoperative adverse outcomes. For example, intraoperative hypotension is related to postoperative kidney injury, myocardial injury, and death, depending on the degree and duration of hypotension in non-cardiac surgery [1]. Intraoperative blood pressure variability is also associated with postoperative mortality [2]. Moreover, high arterial oxygen partial pressure during cardiac surgery is reportedly associated with acute kidney injury [3, 4]. However, although the influence of vital signs derived from left heart function on postoperative complications is known, the importance of hemodynamic variables obtained from the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) remains unknown. We performed a retrospective observational study to evaluate the relationship between intraoperative vital signs, including pulmonary hemodynamics, and postoperative cardiovascular events in patients who underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery.

Methods

Study design and settings

This single-center, retrospective, observational study was performed at Toyama University Hospital, which is an academic, teaching, and tertiary care center that covers a population of 1 million in Japan. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Toyama University Hospital, Toyama, Japan (approval no. R2021079) on 7 September 2021, and adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The ethics committee waived the requirement for written informed consent because of the retrospective nature of the study. Instead, opt-out consent documents were presented on our hospital website for patients who did not wish to participate. This study was performed in accordance with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology guidelines [5].

Patients

We identified all isolated OPCAB surgeries that were performed at our hospital between November 2013 and July 2021. There was a single adult cardiac surgical team at our hospital during the study period, with one responsible surgeon (K.F.). Patients with incomplete data and those who were converted to on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery were excluded.

Surgical procedure

OPCAB surgeries were performed during the study period through a median sternotomy as described previously [6]. Briefly, the heart was displaced by applying traction to the pericardium with a supporting thread. An Octopus IV cardiac stabilizer (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) was used to fix the coronary artery. A Starfish heart positioner (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) was used to expose the circumflex, right coronary, and posterior descending arteries. Heparin sodium (200 units/kg) was administrated intravenously before the arterial conduits were divided. During anastomosis of the anterior descending artery, distal coronary flow was maintained using an external shunt tube, whereas during anastomosis of the circumflex artery or right coronary artery, coronary flow was transiently occluded by simple clamping. After anastomosis, protamine sulfate (2 mg/kg) was administered intravenously.

Data collection

We retrieved patients’ characteristics, surgical records, and postoperative complications from the electronic medical records. From the anesthesia record (Clinical Network System CAP-2000; Nihon Kohden, Tokyo, Japan), we extracted the data measured every minute after induction of general anesthesia using an intra-arterial catheter, central line, PAC, and pulse oximeter. Vital signs were recorded until the patient left the operating theatre. As mean values, arterial blood pressure of 0 to 200 mmHg, pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) of 0 to 40 mmHg, and central venous pressure (CVP) of − 5 to 25 mmHg were considered for analysis; other values were considered outliers.

Outcome

The primary outcome of this study was the development of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, heart failure, stroke, and other cardiovascular events requiring further interventions) during hospitalization or within 30 days after OPCAB surgery [7]. Cardiovascular death was defined as death due to myocardial or cerebral infarction or sudden cardiac death. Myocardial infarction was defined as electrocardiographic changes or elevated troponin concentrations consistent with clinical signs (chest pain or discomfort). Unstable angina was defined based on the Braunwald criteria [8]. Heart failure was defined based on radiographic findings (pulmonary congestion) and the need for further interventions by cardiologists. Stroke was defined as a new focal neurological deficit, including transient ischemic attack. Stroke was further classified as being the result of intracranial hemorrhage, ischemia (if computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging results were available), or an uncertain cause. Other cardiovascular events include peripheral artery diseases, dissecting aneurysm of the aorta, and increased size of the aortic aneurysm.

Time-series clustering

Clustering is the division of a set of classification objects into subsets so that internal cohesion and external isolation are achieved, providing insight into the differences in patients’ phenotypes, independent of existing diagnoses (unsupervised learning) [9]. Time-series clustering, one of the clustering methods, is an unsupervised data mining technique for time series data and is employed as a standard tool in data science for anomaly detection, character recognition, pattern discovery, and visualization of time series. In this study, time-series clustering was applied to statistically significant variables using Python 3.9.0 and tslearn 0.5.2 (https://tslearn.readthedocs.io/en/stable/). We performed time-series clustering using dynamic time warping (DTW) because the anesthetic time differed among the individual patients. DTW is a method used to measure the distance and similarity between time-series data. DTW finds the distance (absolute value of the error) between each point of two time-series data by brute force, and finds the path that is the shortest between the two time-series data after comparing all distances. The similarity can be calculated even if the lengths and periods of the time series are different [10]. The number of clusters was determined by considering the highest silhouette scores [11]. The silhouette score is a metric used to calculate the goodness of fit of a clustering technique. Its value ranges from -1 to 1. Silhouette coefficient values near + 1 indicate that the sample is far away from the neighboring clusters. A value of 0 indicates that the sample is on or very close to the decision boundary between two neighboring clusters, and negative values indicate that those samples might have been assigned to the wrong cluster. We determined the number of clusters with the biggest silhouette score.

Statistical analysis

Given the observational nature of the study, sample size was not calculated a priori. Continuous values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range [IQR]). The coefficient of variation was calculated by dividing the standard deviation by the mean. Statistical comparisons were performed using an unpaired two-tailed t-test and the Mann–Whitney U test or Fisher’s exact test. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Multivariate analyses adjusted all baseline characteristics and vital signs that yielded P values of < 0.05 in the univariate analyses. The optimal cut-off was defined as the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve with the largest Youden index (Youden index = sensitivity + specificity – 1). The discrimination performances were assessed with the DeLong test, net reclassification improvement, and integrated discrimination improvement. All statistical analyses were performed using EZR, which is a graphical user interface for R (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) [12].

Results

Patient and surgical characteristics

In total, 511 isolated OPCAB surgeries were performed during the study period (Fig. 1). After excluding one patient with incomplete vital sign data and two patients who were converted to on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery, we analyzed the remaining 508 patients (Table 1). The mean patient age was 70.0 ± 9.7 years, and 399 (79%) were male. The mean preoperative left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) was 57.5 ± 12.7%, and the median New York Heart Association (NYHA) cardiac function classification was 2 (IQR, 1–2). OPCAB involved 3.0 ± 1.0 vessel anastomoses, an operative time of 208 ± 47 min, and blood loss of 908 mL (IQR, 619–1266). There were three patients with rheumatoid arthritis without interstitial pneumonia, but no patients with other connective tissue diseases. In all patients, anesthesia was induced with midazolam and maintained with sevoflurane after intubation. A PAC was inserted after induction of anesthesia in all OPCAB procedures.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart of study enrolment

Full size image
Table 1 Preoperative patient demographics and surgical characteristics
Full size table

MACE occurred in 32 patients (heart failure in 16, ischemic stroke in 16) during hospitalization or within 30 days postoperatively. The cases of stroke included one hemorrhagic stroke on postoperative day 2 and one case of common carotid artery occlusion on postoperative day 9, which resulted in death on postoperative day 28. None of the patients developed angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, or other cardiovascular events.

Impact of patient and surgical characteristics on postoperative MACE

Next, we compared the characteristics of patients who did and did not develop MACE. As shown in Table 2, we found that an NYHA classification of 3 or 4, preoperative beta blocker use, reduced LVEF, emergency surgery, and intra-aortic balloon pump use were significantly associated with postoperative MACE. The volumes of intravenous fluids, transfusion, and vasopressor doses were similar between the two groups (Supplementary Table 1).

Table 2 Impact of patient and surgical characteristics on development of postoperative MACE
Full size table

Impact of intra-anesthetic vital signs on postoperative MACE

To determine the effect of vital signs on the development of MACE, we compared the mean and coefficient of variation of each parameter after the induction of anesthesia between patients who did and did not develop MACE. As shown in Table 3, the mean intra-anesthetic PAP was significantly higher in patients with than without MACE (absolute difference, 2.6 mmHg; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5 to 3.8). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the mean intra-anesthetic PAP for the prediction of MACE was 0.726 (95% CI, 0.645 to 0.808). The optimal mean PAP cut-off was 18.8 mmHg, with a specificity of 75.8% and a sensitivity of 62.5% for predicting MACE (Fig. 2A). The mean CVP was also significantly higher in patients with than without MACE. The AUC of the mean intra-anesthetic CVP for the prediction of MACE was 0.616 (95% CI, 0.523 to 0.708). The optimal mean CVP cut-off was 7.5 mmHg, with a specificity of 46.8% and a sensitivity of 75.0% for predicting MACE (Fig. 2B).

Table 3 Impact of vital signs on development of postoperative MACE
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

ROC curve analyses for the development of postoperative MACE. The mean PAP (A) and mean CVP (B) predicted development of postoperative MACE with moderate (AUC 0.726; 95% CI, 0.645 to 0.808) and low accuracy (AUC 0.616; 95% CI, 0.523 to 0.708), respectively. C. A multivariate ROC curve analysis was performed using mean PAP and model 1 (NYHA class, preoperative beta-blocker use, left ventricular ejection fraction, emergency surgery, intra-aortic balloon pump use, mean CVP). The solid line shows model 1, while the dashed line shows the addition of mean PAP to model 1. A multivariate ROC curve analysis showed that adding the mean PAP [mmHg] to model 1 achieved a better predictive value than model 1 alone in predicting MACE, with an AUC of 0.794, which is an increase of 0.059 (P = 0.036). The continuous net reclassification improvement and integrated discrimination improvement were 0.510 (95% CI, 0.169 to 0.851; P = 0.003) and 0.0071 (95% CI, -0.020 to 0.034; P = 0.603), respectively. AUC Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, CI Confidence interval, CVP Central venous pressure, MACE Major adverse cardiovascular events, NYHA New York Heart Association, PAP Pulmonary artery pressure, ROC Receiver operating characteristic

Full size image

A post hoc analysis found that the AUCs of the mean PAP for predicting heart failure and ischemic stroke were 0.731 (95% CI, 0.606 to 0.855) and 0.707 (95% CI, 0.602 to 0.812), respectively (Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2). However, the AUC of the mean CVP did not predict the development of heart failure and ischemic stroke.

Impact of PAP on postoperative MACE

Multivariate logistic analysis of the incidence of MACE with a mean PAP of > 18.8 mmHg, a mean CVP of > 7.5 mmHg, and significant baseline characteristics in Table 2 as explanatory variables showed that PAP (odds ratio [OR], 3.77; 95% CI, 1.52 to 9.35) and an NYHA classification of 3 or 4 (OR, 3.50; 95% CI, 1.32 to 9.26) were significantly associated with the development of MACE (Table 4). The presence of mitral regurgitation (MR), anastomoses in the left circumflex artery (LCX), and end-stage renal disease remained potential contributors to pulmonary congestion [13]. However, these characteristics did not yield a P value of < 0.05 in Table 2. A sensitivity analysis that added these factors to model 1 found that a mean PAP of > 18.8 mmHg was an independent risk factor for MACE development (Supplementary Table 2).

Table 4 Logistic regression analysis on the development of MACE
Full size table

A multivariate ROC curve analysis showed that adding the mean PAP [mmHg] to model 1 (NYHA class, preoperative beta blocker use, LVEF [%], emergency surgery, intra-aortic balloon pump use, mean CVP [mmHg]) achieved a better predictive value than model 1 alone in predicting MACE, with an AUC of 0.794, which is an increase of 0.059 (P = 0.036) (Fig. 2C). Furthermore, a multivariate ROC analysis was performed for model 1 with the addition of the presence of MR, the number of anastomoses in the LCX, and the estimated glomerular filtration rate (mL/min/1.73m2) (model 2). Supplementary Fig. 3 shows a significant increase in the AUC when pulmonary artery pressure was added to model 2 compared with model 2 alone (0.814 versus 0.760, P = 0.028).

Impact of pre-incision and post-incision PAP on MACE

We could not investigate which surgical manipulations were associated with elevated PAP because the data on PAP did not correspond to the surgical manipulations. Instead, we investigated the PAP before and after the start of the surgical procedure to determine whether the high PAP was due to the surgery. A 2 × 2 contingency table was prepared before and after the surgical incision and with and without MACE (Table 5). The results showed that the PAP was significantly higher in the MACE group before and after the skin incision than in the group without MACE (Table 5). These observations suggest that preoperative PAP elevation is associated with the development of MACE.

Table 5 Effect of pre- and post-incision PAP on MACE
Full size table

Time-series clustering of mean PAP

As a sensitivity analysis, we applied time-series clustering to the mean PAP using artificial intelligence. As shown in Fig. 3, artificial intelligence divided all samples into a high PAP group (n = 197) and a low PAP group (n = 311), with a silhouette score of 0.7066. Twenty-two (11.2%) and 10 (3.2%) patients developed MACE in the high and low PAP groups, respectively, indicating a significantly higher percentage of MACE in the high PAP group (P = 0.0005; OR, 3.77; 95% CI, 1.67 to 9.14).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Time-series clustering with artificial intelligence for PAP. We applied time-series clustering to statistically significant variables using Python 3.9.0 and tslearn 0.5.2 (https://tslearn.readthedocs.io/en/stable/). The whole time-series changes in (A) PAP and (B) the barycentres are shown. The artificial intelligence divided the patients into a high PAP group (blue line, n = 197) and low PAP group (red line, n = 311), with a silhouette score of 0.7066. PAP Pulmonary artery pressure

Full size image

Discussion

In this retrospective study, we analyzed the association between intraoperative vital sign variability and postoperative complications after OPCAB surgery. Thirty-two patients in this study developed postoperative MACE. The mean PAP was significantly higher in patients with than without MACE. ROC analysis showed that the mean PAP could predict the occurrence of MACE after OPCAB with moderate accuracy, with an optimal cut-off PAP value of 18.8 mmHg. Time-series clustering as a sensitivity analysis also showed a significantly higher incidence of MACE in the high than low PAP group.

Cardiogenic pulmonary edema is most often a result of LV systolic and/or diastolic impairment [14]. Valve abnormalities, such as MR, also contribute to the development of pulmonary congestion, and cardiac positioning during LCX anastomosis in OPCAB surgery often causes a transient MR [13]. In the present study, high PAP remained predictive of the development of postoperative complications after adjusting for LV systolic function, renal function, MR, and the number of LCX anastomoses (Supplementary Table 2 and Supplementary Fig. 1). However, the present study could not evaluate LV diastolic function due to a lack of available data. Patients with pulmonary hypertension are classified into five groups based upon etiology and mechanism: group 1 (pulmonary arterial hypertension), group 2 (due to left-sided heart disease), group 3 (due to chronic lung disorders and hypoxemia), group 4 (due to pulmonary artery obstructions), and group 5 (due to unknown mechanisms) [15]. The most common etiology of pulmonary hypertension is secondary to left-sided heart disease (group 2) [14]. Furthermore, a meta-analysis showed that preoperative diastolic dysfunction is an independent risk factor for postoperative heart failure [16]. Therefore, the lack of data regarding diastolic function is one of the important limitations of the present study. However, because there are many different methods and cut-offs for diagnosing diastolic dysfunction [16, 17], studies are warranted to determine the optimal method of assessing LV diastolic function for predicting the development of postoperative complications.

Pulmonary hypertension, defined as a mean PAP of ≥ 25 mmHg at rest, is associated with stroke development [18]. According to a database analysis, pulmonary hypertension is a risk factor for stroke development after non-cardiac surgery [19]. However, the present study included no patients with confirmed or suspected preoperative pulmonary hypertension (Table 1). One research group recently proposed defining pulmonary hypertension as more than 20 mmHg, which is twice the standard deviation from the mean PAP in healthy individuals [20]. Furthermore, two large cohort studies revealed that borderline pulmonary hypertension with a mean PAP of > 19 mmHg is associated with death and hospitalization [21, 22]. Thus, evidence is accumulating that high pulmonary hypertension within a range that does not meet the definition of typical pulmonary hypertension is a cardiovascular event. As spontaneous and mechanical ventilation reportedly result in differences in pulmonary arterial pressure [23], our results cannot be directly extrapolated to conditions under spontaneous ventilation. However, because our findings are the first evidence that intraoperative borderline pulmonary hypertension may affect the prognosis of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, the validity of these findings requires verification in future prospective, large-scale studies.

The mechanism underlying the association between high PAP and the development of ischemic stroke is unknown. Some observational studies have demonstrated an association between pulmonary hypertension and ischemic stroke but have not provided reasonable explanations for this association [18, 24]. The association between pulmonary hypertension and ischemic stroke occurs in certain pathological conditions, such as sickle cell disease [25], hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia [26], HIV infection [27], and methamphetamine use [28]. However, these conditions are rare in Japan, and the patients in our cohort did not have these diseases. The present study revealed that borderline pulmonary hypertension influences the development of postoperative complications. Therefore, accumulating PAP data may provide insights into the association between pulmonary hypertension and postoperative cerebral infarction.

In non-cardiac surgery, PAC insertion should be considered only in select patients with hemodynamic instability [29]. The use of PACs in non-cardiac surgery has markedly declined because of non-negligible fatal complications [30]; similarly, in coronary artery bypass grafting, the use of PACs is reportedly neither beneficial nor associated with increased mortality and has a higher risk of severe end-organ complications [31, 32]. Importantly, however, no studies have provided a standardized method to determine the specific data that should be retrieved from the PAC to make decisions. PAC insertion is still frequently performed in OPCAB [33], which may mean that cardiac surgeons and anesthesiologists are empirically aware of the importance of PACs. The present study showed that a PAP cut-off of 18.8 mmHg under general anesthesia is moderately predictive of the development of MACE. A clear target PAP cut-off may enable the accurate prediction of complications. Although waveforms are now widely analyzed using time-series clustering, such as for electroencephalography [34] and electrocardiography [35], no previous reports have described the use of time-series clustering for detecting a trend in the mean PAP during cardiac surgery (Fig. 3). In addition, the prediction of complications may improve if absolute values or waveforms can be analyzed mechanically using artificial intelligence.

A recent study reported no difference in early-term outcomes after OPCAB surgery between pulmonary hypertension and non-hypertension groups [36]. However, Table 2 suggests that preoperative NYHA, beta blocker use, and emergency surgery are important confounding factors in the development of postoperative MACE. The difference in analysis methods between studies may account for the difference in our results regarding the impact of borderline pulmonary hypertension on the prognosis after OPCAB surgery.

The present study had several limitations. First, we did not assess LV diastolic function or other indicators of cardiac function, such as the pulmonary artery wedge pressure and preoperative B-type natriuretic peptide concentration. Second, this study did not clarify when elevated PAP was associated with prognosis. Third, this was an observational study based on a review of medical records. Therefore, the exact causal relationship between PAP elevation and the development of ischemic stroke is unknown. Fourth, other data obtained from the PAC, such as cardiac output and mixed venous oxyhemoglobin saturation, were not analyzed because they were not recorded as continuous electronic data. Sixth, the depth of anesthesia [37] and ventilatory conditions, such as airway pressure, were not assessed. Seventh, this was a single-center analysis that included a small number of events, although the patient characteristics shown in Table 1 were comparable to those in a previous Japanese database study [38]. Eighth, although our definition of MACE included a wide range of diseases, only heart failure and ischemic stroke occurred in the present cohort. Each event was shown to be associated with borderline pulmonary hypertension (Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2), but the relationship between PAP and each pathology warrants further investigation.

Conclusion

In this retrospective study of OPCAB surgery, a significant association was found between elevated mean PAP, even if the PAP did not meet diagnostic criteria for pulmonary hypertension, and the development of postoperative MACE. This study provided a PAP cut-off value of 18.8 mmHg in anesthetized patients for the prediction of postoperative MACE. Future prospective studies are needed to clarify the clinical significance of intraoperative borderline pulmonary hypertension.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AUC:

Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve

CI:

Confidence interval

CVP:

Central venous pressure

IQR:

Interquartile range

LCX:

Left circumflex artery

LV:

Left ventricular

LVEF:

Left ventricular ejection fraction

MACE:

Major adverse cardiovascular events

MR:

Mitral regurgitation

NYHA:

New York Heart Association

OPCAB:

Off-pump coronary artery bypass

OR:

Odds ratio

PAC:

Pulmonary artery catheter

PAP:

Pulmonary artery pressure

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

References

  1. Wesselink EM, Kappen TH, Torn HM, Slooter AJC, van Klei WA. Intraoperative hypotension and the risk of postoperative adverse outcomes: a systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 2018;121:706–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jinadasa SP, Mueller A, Prasad V, Subramaniam K, Heldt T, Novack V, et al. Blood Pressure Coefficient of Variation and Its Association With Cardiac Surgical Outcomes. Anesth Analg. 2018;127:832–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bae J, Kim J, Lee S, Ju JW, Cho YJ, Kim TK, et al. Association Between Intraoperative Hyperoxia and Acute Kidney Injury After Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Observational Study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021;35:2405–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Oshita T, Hiraoka A, Nakajima K, Muraki R, Arimichi M, Chikazawa G, et al. A Better Predictor of Acute Kidney Injury After Cardiac Surgery: The Largest Area Under the Curve Below the Oxygen Delivery Threshold During Cardiopulmonary Bypass. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9: e015566.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, STROBE Initiative. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007;335:806–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kotoh K, Fukahara K, Doi T, Nagura S, Misaki T. Predictors of early postoperative cerebral infarction after isolated off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:1679–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kasanuki H, Hagiwara N, Hosoda S, Sumiyoshi T, Honda T, Haze K, et al. Angiotensin II receptor blocker-based vs. non-angiotensin II receptor blocker-based therapy in patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease and hypertension: the Heart Institute of Japan Candesartan Randomized Trial for Evaluation in Coronary Artery Disease (HIJ-CREATE). Eur Heart J. 2009;30:1203–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Braunwald E. Unstable angina. A classification. Circulation. 1989;80:410–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Katsuki M, Yamagishi C, Matsumori Y, Koh A, Kawamura S, Kashiwagi K, et al. Questionnaire-based survey on the prevalence of medication-overuse headache in Japanese one city-Itoigawa study. Neurol Sci. 2022;43:3811–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Cai B, Huang G, Samadiani N, Li G, Chi C-H. Efficient Time Series Clustering by Minimizing Dynamic Time Warping Utilization. IEEE Access. 2021;9:46589–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Peter J. Rousseeuw, Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. J Comput Appl Math. 1987;20:53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:452–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Akazawa T, Iizuka H, Aizawa M, Warabi K, Ohshima M, Amano A, et al. The degree of newly emerging mitral regurgitation during off-pump coronary artery bypass is predicted by preoperative left ventricular function. J Anesth. 2008;22:13–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rosenkranz S, Gibbs JS, Wachter R, De Marco T, Vonk-Noordegraaf A, Vachiéry JL. Left ventricular heart failure and pulmonary hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:942–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Frost A, Badesch D, Gibbs JSR, Gopalan D, Khanna D, Manes A, et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J. 2019;53:1801904.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Fayad A, Ansari MT, Yang H, Ruddy T, Wells GA. Perioperative Diastolic Dysfunction in Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery Is an Independent Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Anesthesiology. 2016;125:72–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ryu T, Song SY. Perioperative management of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and heart failure: an anesthesiologist’s perspective. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2017;70:3–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Shah TG, Sutaria JM, Vyas MV. The association between pulmonary hypertension and stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2019;295:21–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Smilowitz NR, Armanious A, Bangalore S, Ramakrishna H, Berger JS. Cardiovascular Outcomes of Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery. Am J Cardiol. 2019;123:1532–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Simonneau G, Montani D, Celermajer DS, Denton CP, Gatzoulis MA, Krowka M, et al. Haemodynamic definitions and updated clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J. 2019;53:1801913.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Maron BA, Hess E, Maddox TM, Opotowsky AR, Tedford RJ, Lahm T, et al. Association of Borderline Pulmonary Hypertension With Mortality and Hospitalization in a Large Patient Cohort: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program. Circulation. 2016;133:1240–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Assad TR, Maron BA, Robbins IM, Xu M, Huang S, Harrell FE, et al. Prognostic Effect and Longitudinal Hemodynamic Assessment of Borderline Pulmonary Hypertension. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2:1361–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Vuori A, Jalonen J, Laaksonen V. Continuous positive airway pressure during mechanical and spontaneous ventilation. Effects on central haemodynamics and oxygen transport. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1979;23:453–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pana TA, Dawson DK, Mohamed MO, Murray F, Fischman DL, Savage MP, et al. Sex Differences in Ischemic Stroke Outcomes in Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10: e019341.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Kato GJ, Steinberg MH, Gladwin MT. Intravascular hemolysis and the pathophysiology of sickle cell disease. J Clin Invest. 2017;127:750–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Chung MG. Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. Handb Clin Neurol. 2015;132:185–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-62702-5.00013-5. (PMID: 26564080).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Barnes RP, Lacson JC, Bahrami H. HIV Infection and Risk of Cardiovascular Diseases Beyond Coronary Artery Disease. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2017;19:20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Middlekauff HR, Cooper ZD, Strauss SB. Drugs of Misuse: Focus on Vascular Dysfunction. Can J Cardiol. 2022;38:1364–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fleisher LA, Fleischmann KE, Auerbach AD, Barnason SA, Beckman JA, Bozkurt B, et al. 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;130:2215–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ikuta K, Wang Y, Robinson A, Ahmad T, Krumholz HM, Desai NR. National Trends in Use and Outcomes of Pulmonary Artery Catheters Among Medicare Beneficiaries, 1999–2013. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2:908–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Xu F, Wang Q, Zhang H, Chen S, Ao H. Use of pulmonary artery catheter in coronary artery bypass graft. Costs and long-term outcomes PLoS One. 2015;10: e0117610.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Schwann NM, Hillel Z, Hoeft A, Barash P, Möhnle P, Miao Y, et al. Lack of effectiveness of the pulmonary artery catheter in cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 2011;113:994–1002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Judge O, Ji F, Fleming N, Liu H. Current use of the pulmonary artery catheter in cardiac surgery: a survey study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015;29:69–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Guo Z, Wu X, Liu J, Yao L, Hu B. Altered electroencephalography functional connectivity in depression during the emotional face-word Stroop task. J Neural Eng. 2018;15: 056014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tseng KK, Li J, Tang YJ, Yang CW, Lin FY. Healthcare knowledge of relationship between time series electrocardiogram and cigarette smoking using clinical records. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020;20(Suppl 3):127.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Velioglu Y, Yuksel A, Topal D, Korkmaz UTK, Donmez I, Badem S, et al. Does pulmonary hypertension affect early-term outcomes of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery? Rev Assoc Med Bras. 1992;2022(68):1747–52.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sidi A, Halimi P, Cotev S. Estimating anesthetic depth by electroencephalography during anesthetic induction and intubation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. J Clin Anesth. 1990;2:101–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Saito A, Hirahara N, Motomura N, Miyata H, Takamoto S. Current Status of cardiovascular surgery in Japan, 2015 and 2016: a report based on the Japan Cardiovascular Surgery Database. 2-Isolated coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;67:736–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Mr. Fujimori for providing support with the data acquisition. We also thank Kelly Zammit, BVSc, and Angela Morben, DVM, ELS, from Edanz (https://jp.edanz.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani, 930-0194, Toyama, Japan

    Mitsuhiro Matsuo, Hisakatsu Ito & Mitsuaki Yamazaki

  2. First Department of Surgery, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan

    Toshio Doi, Kazuaki Fukahara & Naoki Yoshimura

  3. Department of Neurosurgery, Itoigawa General Hospital, Itoigawa, Japan

    Masahito Katsuki

  4. School of Engineering, Chukyo University, Nagoya, Japan

    Yuichiro Yoshimura

  5. Department of Anesthesiology, Toyama Nishi General Hospital, Toyama, Japan

    Mitsuaki Yamazaki

Authors
  1. Mitsuhiro Matsuo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Toshio Doi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Masahito Katsuki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yuichiro Yoshimura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hisakatsu Ito
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kazuaki Fukahara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Naoki Yoshimura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Mitsuaki Yamazaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.M. and T.D. wrote the main manuscript text. Y.Y. prepared Fig. 2, and M.K. prepared Fig. 3. All authors reviewed the manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitsuhiro Matsuo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the ethics committee of Toyama University Hospital (approval no. R2021079) on 7 September 2021, and adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The ethics committee waived the requirement for written informed consent because of the retrospective nature of the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matsuo, M., Doi, T., Katsuki, M. et al. Association between intraoperative pulmonary artery pressure and cardiovascular complications after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a single-center observational study. BMC Anesthesiol 23, 114 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02057-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02057-5

Keywords

BMC Anesthesiology

ISSN: 1471-2253

Contact us