Skip to main content
Download PDF

Trajectory of worst pain within the first two weeks following pelvic and sacral tumor surgery and long-term outcome: a pilot observational prospective cohort study

BMC Anesthesiology volume 23, Article number: 73 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Pain management after pelvic and sacral tumor surgery is challenging and requires a multidisciplinary and multimodal approach. Few data on postoperative pain trajectories have been reported after pelvic and sacral tumor surgery. The aim of this pilot study was to determine pain trajectories within the first 2 weeks after surgery and explore the impact on long-term pain outcomes.

Methods

Patients scheduled for pelvic and sacral tumor surgery were prospectively recruited. Worst/average pain scores were evaluated postoperatively using questions adapted from the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) until pain resolution was reached or up to 6 months after surgery. Pain trajectories over the first 2 weeks were compared using the k-means clustering algorithm. Whether pain trajectories were associated with long-term pain resolution and opioid cessation was assessed using Cox regression analysis.

Results

A total of 59 patients were included. Two distinct groups of trajectories for worst and average pain scores over the first 2 weeks were generated. The median pain duration in the high vs low pain group was 120.0 (95% CI [25.0, 215.0]) days vs 60.0 (95% CI [38.6, 81.4]) days (log rank p = 0.037). The median time to opioid cessation in the high vs low pain group was 60.0 (95% CI [30.0, 90.0]) days vs 7.0 (95% CI [4.7, 9.3]) days (log rank p < 0.001). After adjusting for patient and surgical factors, the high pain group was independently associated with prolonged opioid cessation (hazard ratio [HR] 2.423, 95% CI [1.254, 4.681], p = 0.008) but not pain resolution (HR 1.557, 95% CI [0.748, 3.243], p = 0.237).

Conclusions

Postoperative pain is a significant problem among patients undergoing pelvic and sacral tumor surgery. High pain trajectories during the first 2 weeks after surgery were associated with delayed opioid cessation. Research is needed to explore interventions targeting pain trajectories and long-term pain outcomes.

Trial registration

The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03926858, 25/04/2019).

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Pelvic and sacral tumors are difficult to diagnose due to their deep location and lack of typical symptom presentation at the early stage [1]. The growing tumor can cause intense mechanical and neuropathic pain by mass effect and infiltration into nearby structures. Surgery is the most important treatment [2, 3]; however, it is also challenging due to the enlarged tumor and the complicated anatomy of the pelvis and sacrum. Surgical procedures usually take hours and may be accompanied by massive hemorrhage [2, 4, 5].

Pain after pelvic and sacral tumor surgeries is a significant problem and is usually undertreated [4]. Inadequately managed acute pain can lead to physiological and psychological consequences, a prolonged hospital stay and an increased financial burden. In addition, it may increase the risk of developing chronic postsurgical pain [6], thus leading to a poorer health-related quality of life [7].

To date, no study has comprehensively examined postoperative pain after pelvic and sacral tumor surgeries. We are unclear how severe acute pain can be and the extent to which severe acute pain may impact long-term outcomes such as the time to pain resolution and opioid cessation. Persistent postsurgical pain after surgery is a common issue [8], and the overall incidence is approximately 20–30% for all types of surgery [9]. Whether chronic pain is a greater concern for this specific group is unclear.

In this pilot study, we examined pain trajectories in patients who underwent sacral and pelvic tumor surgery over the first 6 months after surgery. We proposed pain trajectories within the first 2 weeks following surgery associated with long-term pain resolution and opioid cessation.

Methods

This analysis was a substudy of a multicenter prospective study of pain and health-related quality of life after surgery and was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03926858, 25/04/2019). This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University People’s Hospital (2018PHB229–02) and conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Enrollment was initiated after registration and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. This study was reported following Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines.

Participants

Hospitalized patients aged 18 years or older with pelvic or sacral tumors who were scheduled for sacrectomy or pelvic resection were screened from the operation list. Exclusion criteria were existing diagnoses of major psychiatric disorders, surgery cancellation, an anticipated postoperative intubation longer than 24 hours, inability to read or write, or inability to give informed consent. All patients underwent surgery under general anesthesia at Peking University People’s Hospital between January 2020 and July 2021.

Study protocol

All patients were consecutively recruited on the day before surgery. After written informed consent was obtained, baseline questionnaires were completed. Follow-ups after surgery for pain evaluation were performed on postoperative days (POD) 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, and 30 and monthly thereafter until pain resolution was reached or up to 6 months after surgery; the sessions were conducted by face-to-face interviews during the hospital stay or telephone interviews after discharge. Loss to follow-up was defined as the patient not being contacted during two consecutive follow-ups.

A standard perioperative pain management protocol was performed. Multimodal analgesia during surgery included the following: 1) corticosteroids, such as intravenous injection of methylprednisolone 40–80 mg before induction; 2) continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine at a rate of 0.4–0.6 μg/kg/h until incision closure; 3) short-acting opioids, including intermittent intravenous injection of sufentanil with a total dose of 0.5–1.0 μg/kg and continuous infusion of remifentanil 0.1–0.2 μg/kg/min until the end of surgery; and 4) flurbiprofen 100 mg or parecoxib 40 mg intravenously administered before the end of surgery when no contraindication presented. At the end of surgery, patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) with sufentanil was provided to each patient for at least 72 hours. The PCIA device was initially set to deliver sufentanil at a rate of 2 μg/hour (solution 1 μg/ml) and a bolus of sufentanil 3 μg on request with a lockout time of 15 minutes. Background infusion was stopped if the worst pain score was <= 3 or opioid-related side effects (such as nausea and vomiting and dizziness) were reported during follow-ups. If severe opioid-related side effects persisted despite pharmacological treatment, PCIA was stopped at the request of the patient.

In wards, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or COX-2 inhibitors were used as needed based on the surgeons’ preference. If patients reported pain with neuropathic characteristics, such as numbness and burning, gabapentin was added. Immediate-release oxycodone (5 mg) or tramadol (100 mg) was administered orally for rescue analgesia. Oral sustained-release oxycodone (5 mg every 12 hours) or a transdermal fentanyl patch (25 μg/hour for 72 hours) was provided for persistent severe pain after cessation of PCIA. Pain consultations were held when necessary.

Data collection

Before surgery, demographic information was collected through a patient-reported questionnaire. Preoperative anxiety and depressed mood were assessed using a 0 (not anxious or depressed) to 10 (extremely anxious or depressed) scale. The Chinese version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) [10] was used to evaluate rumination, magnification, and helplessness associated with pain. Preoperative chronic pain (lasting for at least 3 months) was evaluated using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form [11]. Preoperative health-related quality of life was evaluated using the validated Chinese version of EuroQol five-dimensional-5 levels (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire [12]. Postoperative pain was assessed using part of the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) [13]. Specifically, patients reported the worst, average and lowest pain scores over the last 24 hours and the current pain scores related to the surgery at the time of interview. Pain resolution was defined as two consecutive reports of no pain, with no analgesics or pain control therapies needed.

The patients’ medical records were reviewed to obtain the Charlson Comorbidity Index and surgery and analgesia information. Data on surgical complications were obtained from medical records during the hospital stay and patient self-reports after discharge. Major complications were defined as complications of grade III or higher according to the Clavien–Dindo Classification [14]. Because of the various types and routes of opioids that were prescribed, all opioids were converted to oral morphine equivalents (MEQs) using standard formulas [15].

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 23.0, IBM Corp, New York, USA) and the R programming language (version 4.1.1). Data are expressed using means ± (standard deviation, SD), medians (interquartile range, IQR) or frequencies (percentages). Each patient had two distinct pain trajectories for worst pain scores and average pain scores. The R package kml (K-means for longitudinal data) was used to cluster each pain trajectory category. The Euclidean distance between values at each time point was measured for clustering. Calinski–Harabasz scores were used to evaluate intergroup distinctness and intragroup variation, and the optimal number of groups corresponded to the value of k that maximized the Calinski–Harabasz scores [16]. Patients were divided into different pain trajectory groups generated by the k-means algorithm according to pain scores over the first 2 weeks after surgery.

The median time to pain resolution and opioid cessation was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and log rank statistics. Cox regression analysis was used to assess the correlation of the pain trajectory group with long-term outcomes, adjusting for potential patient- and surgery-related factors. Factors with p < 0.10 in the univariate analysis were entered into the multivariable Cox regression analysis.

Logistic regression was used to examine preoperative factors associated with the high pain trajectory group. Factors were compared between clusters by Student’s t tests, Mann–Whitney U tests, and chi-squared or Fisher’s exact tests, as appropriate. Factors with p < 0.10 were considered for inclusion in the final model with pain trajectory group assignment as the outcome. A 2-sided p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

As a substudy of a multicenter study, the sample size was determined by available data from patients enrolled in the main study, and no statistical power was calculated before analysis.

Results

A total of 68 patients were screened. Five patients refused to participate, 2 patients were excluded for inability to read or write, and 2 patients were excluded for surgery cancellation. Finally, 59 patients were included. The study flowchart is shown in Fig. 1. All patients completed preoperative questionnaires, and 53 patients (89.8%) completed follow-ups until pain resolution was reached or up to 6 months after surgery. Imputation using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) approach was used to complete the pain trajectories for patients who completed follow-ups.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study flowchart of the patients enrolled in the study. POD, postoperative day

Full size image

Patient characteristics

Demographic and clinical variables are summarized in Table 1. Twenty patients (33.9%) reported chronic pain before surgery, and 15 patients (25.4%) required opioids with a median daily dose (MEQ) of 10 (10, 20) mg. Persistent postoperative pain was reported by 35.8% (19/53) of the patients at 3 months and 28.3% (15/53) at 6 months. The percentage of patients who required opioids was 9.4% (5/53) at 3 months and 7.5% (4/53) at 6 months. The overall incidence of major complications after surgery was 18.6% (11/59), and all complications occurred during the hospital stay. Nine patients experienced wound healing problems and underwent debridement under local anesthesia (7 patients) or general anesthesia (2 patients). Two patients experienced cerebrospinal fluid leakage and underwent surgery under general anesthesia. No major complications were reported after discharge. No cases of tumor recurrence were reported at 6 months after surgery.

Table 1 Summary
Full size table

Pain trajectory group analysis

Each patient had two distinct pain trajectories representing the worst and average pain scores. Two groups of trajectories for both average and worst pain over the first 2 weeks were generated from k-means clustering analysis (Fig. 2). The high pain group of average pain trajectories comprised 10 patients, all of whom were also categorized into the high pain group of worst pain trajectories. Thus, further analyses were performed using groups for the worst pain trajectories, including a high pain group with 22 patients (37.3%, 22/59) and a low pain group with 37 patients (62.7%, 37/59).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Acute pain trajectories for average pain and worst pain scores over the first two weeks after surgery. Each line describes an individual patient’s pain trajectory, and the solid Lines A and B represent the overall low and high pain groups, respectively

Full size image

After surgery, the median length of stay was 15.0 (10.8, 20.3) days in the high pain group in comparison with 10.0 (7.5, 16.0) days in the low pain group (p = 0.005). The rate of major complications was significantly increased to 36.5% (8/22) in the high pain group compared with 8.1% (3/37) in the low pain group (p = 0.013). The total median dosage of opioids administered during the hospital stay was 857 (625, 1365) mg (MEQ) in the high pain group compared with 505 (425, 632) mg (MEQ) in the low pain group (p < 0.001).

Figure 3 shows the Kaplan–Meier curves stratified by high vs low pain groups. A longer duration of pain and opioid use was observed in the high pain group than in the low pain group (median 120.0 (95% CI [25.0, 215.0]) days vs 60.0 (95% CI [38.6, 81.4]) days, log rank p = 0.037; 60.0 (95% CI [30.0, 90.0]) days vs 7.0 (95% CI [4.7, 9.3]) days, log rank p < 0.001, respectively).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Pain outcomes comparing high and low pain groups for the worst pain trajectories. A Kaplan–Meier curve for pain resolution; B Kaplan–Meier curve for opioid cessation

Full size image

Cox regression analysis

For pain resolution, pain trajectory group, age, major complications after surgery and surgery type were factors identified with p < 0.10 in univariate analysis. After adjustment, the pain trajectory group was not significantly associated with pain resolution (hazard ratio [HR] 1.557, 95% CI [0.748, 3.243], p = 0.237). For opioid cessation, pain trajectory group and surgery duration were factors identified with p < 0.10 in univariate analysis. The high pain group was independently associated with prolonged opioid cessation after adjustment (HR 2.423, 95% CI [1.254, 4.681], p = 0.008) (Table 2).

Table 2 Univariate and multivariable analyses of factors associated with remote pain resolution and opioid cessation after surgery
Full size table

Factors associated with high vs low pain trajectory groups

We further examined risk factors for pain trajectory group assignment using binary logistic regression (Table 3). Surgery duration and preoperative chronic pain were entered into the final model. A cutoff value for surgery duration was identified as 261 min using the Youden index. A surgery duration longer than 261 min was an independent risk factor for categorization into the high pain group after surgery (odds ratio [OR] 3.754, 95% CI [1.151, 12.240], p = 0.028). Moreover, preoperative chronic pain was not independently associated with pain trajectory group assignment (OR 3.332, 95% CI [0.992, 11.194], p = 0.052).

Table 3 Univariate analysis comparing patient characteristics and surgical factors between the high and low pain groups
Full size table

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate pain trajectories in patients undergoing pelvic and sacral tumor surgery. Two distinct groups (high vs low pain) of worst and average pain trajectories in the first 2 weeks following surgery were identified. After adjustment, the high pain group of worst pain trajectories was independently associated with prolonged opioid use, indicating relevance to long-term pain outcome. A longer surgical duration was independently associated with assignment to the high pain group, whereas patient-specific characteristics were not.

Different patterns of acute pain trajectories after various surgical procedures have been reported [17, 18]. In our study, we analyzed the pain trajectories of the first 2 weeks after surgery, which is a crucial period during which the patients experienced the most pain. Compared with a traditional one-time pain measurement analysis, a pain trajectory analysis may provide more insight into the time course of pain, including pain persistence and resolution, which may better represent patients’ experiences over the healing process after surgery. In this study, a model of high vs low pain trajectory groups was generated. Compared with the low pain group, the high pain group showed a similar trend but a higher pain level.

We found that the high pain group of worst pain trajectories had delayed pain resolution and opioid cessation. For oncologic surgeries, we should be aware of the possibility of tumor recurrence when patients report persistent pain. Fortunately, no recurrence occurred in this study. Previous studies found that a high pain trajectory increased 30-day readmissions [19] and led to pain persistence and longer opioid use after surgery [20]. Our study adds to existing evidence and highlights the importance of pain control early after surgery. An observational study found that postoperative complications were associated with persistent postsurgical pain [21]; however, this association was not observed in this study. Our results indicated that high pain trajectory was independently associated with prolonged opioid use. Long-term opioid use is a major public crisis [22] and may increase the risk of all-cause mortality [23]. Tracking early pain trajectories can help clinicians identify high-risk patients and provide multidisciplinary pain recourses targeting pain trajectories and reducing opioid prescriptions.

Risk factors associated with categorization into the high pain trajectory group were also investigated. Preoperative opioid use is commonly correlated with postoperative pain outcome, but this correlation was not observed in this study. Similarly, some previous studies also reported no correlation between opioid agents or doses and pain outcomes [17, 24]. One cohort study involving a mixed surgery group reported that patient characteristics, such as age, sex and psychological factors, but not surgical factors, were associated with early pain trajectories [17]. However, in this study, patient factors were not associated with pain outcomes. After multivariable adjustment, only surgical duration was independently associated with pain trajectory group assignment. Orthopedic surgery is associated with the most severe acute pain [25, 26], and pelvic and sacral tumor surgery is the most invasive. It is rational that a longer surgical time indicates more extensive and invasive intervention, thus leading to worse pain outcomes. We speculated that the surgical procedure was a strong risk factor and might weaken the impact of patient factors. Consistently, Tai Y-H et al. found that a longer anesthesia time was related to higher pain intensity and slower pain resolution [27]. Clinicians should be aware of the risk of a high pain trajectory when the surgical duration lasts more than 4 hours and should pay more attention to pain management.

Strengths and limitations

The key strengths of this study include its prospective design, long-term observation and application of validated questionnaires. The results of repeated pain measurements are superior to previous findings from single measurements at predetermined time intervals (for example, 6 months or 12 months) with regard to reliability [28]. All patients were consecutively included and completed thorough assessments, and the rate of follow-up was high. However, there are several limitations to be discussed.

First, we defined pain resolution as two consecutive reports of no pain without pain control therapies, and follow-ups were terminated when pain resolution was reported. It is not clear whether postsurgical pain recurs months later. Second, we used pain trajectories during the first 2 weeks for acute pain analysis. It is unclear whether earlier postoperative assessment would have similar predictive power. The critical period for the assessment of immediate postoperative pain should be determined in the future. Third, this pilot study involved a small sample size because pelvic and sacral tumors are rare pathologies [29, 30]. These results are preliminary, and larger trials are required to confirm these findings. However, given the strengths of this study, this sample may be representative of this population for determining pain trajectories.

Conclusions

Postoperative pain is a significant problem among patients undergoing pelvic and sacral tumor surgeries. Two distinct high vs low pain trajectory groups were identified, and the high pain trajectory group was associated with delayed recovery after surgery. Longer surgical duration was a risk factor for a high pain trajectory early after surgery. Further studies are necessary to examine pain interventions targeting postoperative pain trajectories and long-term outcomes.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

POD:

Postoperative day

PCS:

Pain Catastrophizing Scale

SD:

Standard deviation

IQR:

Interquartile range

HR:

Hazard ratio

OR:

Odds ratio

BMI:

Body mass index

APS-POQ-R:

Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire

EQ-5D-5L:

EuroQol five-dimensional-5 levels questionnaire

References

  1. Feldenzer JA, McGauley JL, McGillicuddy JE. Sacral and presacral tumors: problems in diagnosis and management. Neurosurgery. 1989;25:884–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sciubba DM, Petteys RJ, Garces-Ambrossi GL, Noggle JC, McGirt MJ, Wolinsky JP, et al. Diagnosis and management of sacral tumors. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009;10:244–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Li D, Guo W, Tang X, Ji T, Zhang Y. Surgical classification of different types of en bloc resection for primary malignant sacral tumors. Eur Spine J. 2011;20:2275–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson MR, Jeng CL, Wittig JC, Rosenblatt MA. Anesthesia for patients undergoing orthopedic oncologic surgeries. J Clin Anesth. 2010;22:565–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mayerson JL, Wooldridge AN, Scharschmidt TJ. Pelvic resection: current concepts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014;22:214–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lavand'homme P. The progression from acute to chronic pain. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011;24:545–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Guimarães-Pereira L, Farinha F, Azevedo L, Abelha F, Castro-Lopes J. Persistent postoperative pain after cardiac surgery: incidence, characterization, associated factors and its impact in quality of life. Eur J Pain. 2016;20:1433–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Macrae WA. Chronic pain after surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2001;87:88–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Simanski CJ, Althaus A, Hoederath S, Kreutz KW, Hoederath P, Lefering R, et al. Incidence of chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) after general surgery. Pain Med. 2014;15:1222–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yap JC, Lau J, Chen PP, Gin T, Wong T, Chan I, et al. Validation of the Chinese pain catastrophizing scale (HK-PCS) in patients with chronic pain. Pain Med. 2008;9:186–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Keller S, Bann CM, Dodd SL, Schein J, Mendoza TR, Cleeland CS. Validity of the brief pain inventory for use in documenting the outcomes of patients with noncancer pain. Clin J Pain. 2004;20:309–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Luo N, Li M, Liu GG, Lloyd A, de Charro F, Herdman M. Developing the Chinese version of the new 5-level EQ-5D descriptive system: the response scaling approach. Qual Life Res. 2013;22:885–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gordon DB, Polomano RC, Pellino TA, Turk DC, McCracken LM, Sherwood G, et al. Revised American pain society patient outcome questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) for quality improvement of pain management in hospitalized adults: preliminary psychometric evaluation. J Pain. 2010;11:1172–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Swarm RA, Paice JA, Anghelescu DL, Are M, Bruce JY, Buga S, et al. Adult Cancer pain, version 3.2019, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2019;17:977–1007.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Genolini CAX, Sentenac M, et al. Kml and kml3d: R packages to cluster longitudinal data. J Stat Softw. 2015;65:1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vasilopoulos T, Wardhan R, Rashidi P, Fillingim RB, Wallace MR, Crispen PL, et al. Patient and procedural determinants of postoperative pain trajectories. Anesthesiology. 2021;134:421–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ocay DD, Li MMJ, Ingelmo P, Ouellet JA, Pagé MG, Ferland CE. Predicting acute postoperative pain trajectories and long-term outcomes of adolescents after spinal fusion surgery. Pain Res Manag. 2020;2020:9874739.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Hernandez-Boussard T, Graham LA, Desai K, Wahl TS, Aucoin E, Richman JS, et al. The fifth vital sign: postoperative pain predicts 30-day readmissions and subsequent emergency department visits. Ann Surg. 2017;266:516–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hah JM, Cramer E, Hilmoe H, Schmidt P, McCue R, Trafton J, et al. Factors associated with acute pain estimation, postoperative pain resolution, opioid cessation, and recovery: secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2:e190168.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Willingham M, Rangrass G, Curcuru C, Ben Abdallah A, Wildes TS, McKinnon S, et al. Association between postoperative complications and lingering post-surgical pain: an observational cohort study. Br J Anaesth. 2020;124:214–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Trasolini NA, McKnight BM, Dorr LD. The opioid crisis and the orthopedic surgeon. J Arthroplast. 2018;33:3379–82.e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Häuser W, Schubert T, Vogelmann T, Maier C, Fitzcharles MA, Tölle T. All-cause mortality in patients with long-term opioid therapy compared with non-opioid analgesics for chronic non-cancer pain: a database study. BMC Med. 2020;18:162.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Xing B, Abd-Elsayed A. The effect of preoperative opioid dosage on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing knee surgery. Pain Phys. 2020;23:73–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gerbershagen HJ, Aduckathil S, van Wijck AJ, Peelen LM, Kalkman CJ, Meissner W. Pain intensity on the first day after surgery: a prospective cohort study comparing 179 surgical procedures. Anesthesiology. 2013;118:934–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ip HY, Abrishami A, Peng PW, Wong J, Chung F. Predictors of postoperative pain and analgesic consumption: a qualitative systematic review. Anesthesiology. 2009;111:657–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tai YH, Wu HL, Lin SP, Tsou MY, Chang KY. Influential factors of postoperative pain trajectories in patients receiving intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: a single-Centre cohort study in Taiwan. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e031936.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Althaus A, Arránz Becker O, Moser KH, Lux EA, Weber F, Neugebauer E, et al. Postoperative pain trajectories and pain chronification-an empirical typology of pain patients. Pain Med. 2018;19:2536–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Varga PP, Bors I, Lazary A. Sacral tumors and management. Orthop Clin North Am. 2009;40(105–23):vii.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Puchner SE, Funovics PT, Böhler C, Kaider A, Stihsen C, Hobusch GM, et al. Oncological and surgical outcome after treatment of pelvic sarcomas. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0172203.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Professor Wei Guo from the Musculoskeletal Tumor Centre of Peking University People’s Hospital for general support. We also thank Professor Yongpei Yu from Peking University Clinical Research Institute for assistance with data management. We acknowledge the writing assistance from AJE (https://www.aje.cn/).

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82000106) and Investigator Initiated Research by Pfizer (WI246149). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, 100044, China

    Qingfen Zhang, Yaqing Wu & Yi Feng

  2. National Institute of Health Data Science, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, China

    Shenda Hong

  3. Institute of Medical Technology, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, 100191, China

    Shenda Hong

Authors
  1. Qingfen Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yaqing Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shenda Hong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yi Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

QFZ helped with the study design, data collection and analysis, and manuscript preparation. YQW helped with data collection and manuscript preparation. SDH helped with data analysis and manuscript preparation. YF helped with the study design and manuscript review. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi Feng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This analysis is a substudy of a multicenter prospective study of pain and health-related quality of life after surgery registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03926858, 25/04/2019). This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China (2018PHB229–02, April 22, 2019; Chairperson Prof. Shuang Mu). All procedures were conducted at Peking University People’s Hospital in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants on the day before surgery.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Q., Wu, Y., Hong, S. et al. Trajectory of worst pain within the first two weeks following pelvic and sacral tumor surgery and long-term outcome: a pilot observational prospective cohort study. BMC Anesthesiol 23, 73 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02033-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02033-z

Keywords

BMC Anesthesiology

ISSN: 1471-2253

Contact us