Skip to main content

Epidural analgesia information sessions provided by anesthetic nurses: impact on satisfaction and anxiety of parturient women a prospective sequential study

Abstract

Background

Information on epidural analgesia delivered to parturient women is frequently incomplete, making it difficult for expectant mothers to make an appropriate choice for their delivery. We assessed the impact of a multimodal information session on epidural analgesia delegated to anesthetic nurses on new-mothers’ satisfaction.

Methods

We performed a prospective sequential study including parturient women who gave birth with epidural analgesia. During the first period, information on epidural analgesia was delivered by anesthetists during the scheduled anesthesia consultation, according to French standard-of-care. Then, a dedicated information session about epidural analgesia provided by anesthetic nurses was implemented. The primary endpoint was the satisfaction of women with the quality of information received. Main secondary endpoints were knowledge of women about epidural analgesia, anxiety before epidural catheter placement, and satisfaction with delivery.

Results

259 and 298 women were included during the first and second periods respectively, among whom 178 and 188 were analyzed. Information on epidural analgesia delivered by anesthetic nurses was associated with improvement of new-mothers’ satisfaction with information received (9 (8–10) vs. 10 (9–10) – p < 0.001). Moreover, information delivered by anesthetic nurses was associated with decreased anxiety before epidural catheter placement (4 (1–8) vs. 3 (1–6) – p = 0.006) and increased satisfaction with delivery (8 (7–10) vs. 9 (8–10) – p = 0.01). Women’s knowledge on epidural analgesia was durably increased when information was delivered by anesthetic nurses compared to conventional information by anesthetists. After adjustment, the only variable associated with both new mothers’ satisfaction with information and delivery was the information session taught by anesthetic nurses.

Conclusions

Information sessions on epidural analgesia delivered by anesthetic nurses was associated with improved satisfaction of women with their delivery. Such information sessions may be used in maternity wards to improve new-mothers’ childbirth experience.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Epidural analgesia was introduced to decrease the pain associated with labor in the late 1940’s [1]. Indeed, for most women labor causes severe pain, which affects the expectant mother, father and child. Labor-related pain induces neuropsychological disorders in parturient women and may increase incidence of post-partum depression and post-traumatic stress disorder [2]. Severe labor pain may also impact the level of anxiety and stress felt by future fathers, and their support to women during delivery [3]. Thus, in the absence of contraindications, maternal request is a sufficient medical indication for pain relief during labor [4]. For this purpose, epidural analgesia offers many advantages over systemic analgesia, in particular over systemic opioids [5]. However, several maternal side-effects associated with epidural analgesia have been reported such as hypotension, urinary retention, delayed second stage of labor and risk of dural puncture and subsequent headache [6]. Epidural analgesia has also been associated with more frequent category II and III fetal heart rate tracing during labor and lower umbilical cord blood pH at birth, even if the incidence of severe child adverse outcomes is similar to that observed in the absence of epidural analgesia [7, 8]. It is therefore the responsibility of the anesthetic staff to correctly inform parturient women about advantages and proven side effects of epidural analgesia, so that expectant mothers can make an appropriate choice for their delivery. This is one of the main goals of the anesthesia consultation, which must take place during the third trimester of pregnancy according to French health authorities’ recommendations [9]. However, several constraints may impact the quality of this information, in particular the relatively short time dedicated to the anesthesia consultation before delivery that predominantly targets healthy young women with an ASA 1 class. Consequently, practical information on epidural analgesia remains frequently incomplete, notably in terms of explanations about risks [10, 11].

The main aims of this study were to assess the impact of a dedicated information session on epidural analgesia delegated to anesthetic nurses on 1) new mothers’ satisfaction with information received at hospital about epidural analgesia, 2) acquired knowledge about epidural analgesia assessed by an objective test, and 3) global satisfaction with their childbirth.

Methods

This manuscript adheres to the STROBE guidelines. STROBE checklist is provided in the online additional material (Additional file 1).

Patient population

All parturient women over 18 years were screened for eligibility before their anesthesia consultation, scheduled during the 8th month of pregnancy according to French health authorities recommendations [9]. Then, all women who did not meet non-inclusion criteria were included.

Exclusion criteria

Parturient women whose understanding of French language was insufficient to be correctly informed were not included, as well as women who declined to participate. Parturient women who had premature delivery before their scheduled anesthesia consultation and thus received information during the emergency anesthesia consultation just before their delivery were not included. In addition, women with planned caesarean section were not included, as they would not have epidural analgesia. Finally, women who gave birth without epidural analgesia were excluded from the final analysis.

Conduct of the study

This study is a monocentric prospective sequential study, performed at Tenon University Hospital, Paris, France, between February and September 2019. During the first period (February-April 2019), parturient women were informed about epidural analgesia by the anesthetist during the planned anesthesia consultation. In our center, this information is based on standardized oral information focusing on 3 points: benefits of epidural analgesia for vaginal delivery and in case of emergency cesarean section, main side-effects of epidural analgesia during placement and use, and how and when the epidural catheter will be removed in the postpartum period.

A dedicated collective information session on epidural analgesia organized into groups of 6 women and given by anesthetic nurses just before the anesthesia consultation was then implemented in our establishment on 9 May 2019. This information session was designed by the anesthetic staff, based on a preliminary assessment of content preferences collected from 50 parturient women just after their anesthesia consultation on January 2019. In its final version, this free 40-min information session included a digital presentation covering the same 3 aspects previously explained by the anesthetists, followed by a discussion with the participants and a presentation of the equipment used by the anesthetist for epidural catheter placement and by parturient women for patient-controlled epidural analgesia. Thus, during the second study period, information on epidural analgesia was delivered collectively by anesthetic nurses, while discussions on the indications, contraindications and choice of expectant mothers were still conducted individually by the anesthetist according to French law.

Measurements and data handling

A knowledge test, made of 4 multiple-choice questions investigating four different fields related to epidural analgesia (Additional file 2), was performed on all parturient women: 1) just before the anesthesia consultation (first period) or collective information session (second period); 2) just after the anesthesia consultation; and 3) just before epidural catheter placement the day women came to the hospital for their delivery. Correct answers were not given to women, so that there was no learning and score progression attributable to taking the test. The rating for each question, made of 5 propositions, was quoted according to the principle of discordance (no discordance: 1 point; 1 discordance: 0.5 point; 2 discordances: 0.2 point; ≥ 3 discordances: 0 point). Then, ratings for the 4 questions were added up to obtain a global knowledge score on epidural analgesia on 4 points for each woman, at each time-point. The knowledge test was validated prior to its use in the study, on 50 pregnant women before and just after their anesthesia consultation on January 2019 to ensure that propositions were clear and appropriately understood, and that it was sensitive to detecting an improvement in knowledge.

In addition, satisfaction of the anesthetic physicians with the course of the anesthesia consultation was collected just after the consultation.

Then, the day after they gave birth, new mothers were asked to quote using a 10-level numeric scale: 1) satisfaction with the information received at the hospital during their pregnancy regarding epidural analgesia; 2) satisfaction with epidural analgesia efficacy; 3) global satisfaction with their delivery; and 4) anxiety felt before epidural catheter placement.

General demographic data (age, number of previous pregnancies and uses of epidural analgesia, current profession) and data on the current pregnancy (whether the parturient took childbirth preparation classes, searched for other information sources, etc.) and delivery (complicated vaginal delivery, conversion to caesarean section, etc.) were also collected.

Primary and secondary endpoints

The primary endpoint was the satisfaction of new mothers with information received at hospital about epidural analgesia, collected on the first day post-partum.

Secondary endpoints were: global satisfaction with childbirth, satisfaction with epidural analgesia efficacy, anxiety felt before epidural catheter placement, knowledge of parturient women about epidural analgesia, and satisfaction of anesthetists with the anesthesia consultation course.

Sample size calculation

A sample size calculation was made prior to the beginning of the study. During the preliminary phase of the study in January 2019 (assessment of the preferences on the content of an extended information session and validation of the knowledge test on 50 parturient women), satisfaction with the information received about epidural analgesia in the standard-of-care including information entirely given by the anesthetist was rated at 8/10 ± 3/10. Then, 190 parturient women in each group were required to show a difference of ± 1 point with the dedicated information session delegated to anesthetic nurses, with α = 5% and power (1-β) = 90%.

Statistical analyses

Distributions are reported as median (25th-75th percentile) for continuous variables and counts (proportions) for qualitative ones. Distributions were compared between the two periods using Mann–Whitney-Wilcoxon tests, and chi-square or Fisher exact tests – as appropriate – for continuous and qualitative variables, respectively. To identify factors associated with satisfaction on information received and global satisfaction with delivery, all covariates deemed clinically relevant were included in a multivariable linear regression model. All tests were two-tailed and p values below 0.05 were considered significant. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 8.4.3 (San Diego, CA, USA) and R version 4.0.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

Results

Inclusions and women’s characteristics

During the first and second periods, 362 and 404 women were screened, of whom 259 and 298 were included before the anesthesia consultation, 195 and 212 fulfilled the knowledge test on the day of their delivery, and 178 and 188 had complete data about the main judgment criterion and were finally analyzed (Fig. 1). The main reasons for exclusion were the absence of epidural catheter placement and lost to follow-up due to delivery in another center (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart of the study

Demographic characteristics of parturient women are presented in Table 1. Median ages of women were 31.6 (29.0–35.0) and 32.2 (28.1–35.2) years during the first and second periods, respectively. Eighty-six (48%) and 88 (47%) were multiparous, among which 72 (84%) and 79 (90%) had previous epidural analgesia and were mainly satisfied with it. The main socio-professional categories represented were non-workers, employees and middle-class professions with no difference between groups. Nearly half of women took childbirth preparation classes, which are taught by self-employed midwives during the second trimester of pregnancy for women who want it, with the aim to prepare expectant mothers for delivery, in French healthcare organization.

Table 1 Characteristics of parturient women included in the study

Knowledge of parturient women about epidural analgesia

Median knowledge scores before information, either delivered by anesthetists during the first period or anesthetic nurses during the second period, were low and similar between the 2 groups (1.4 (0.9–2.1) and 1.5 (1.0–2.2) – p = 0.11) (Fig. 2). Information delivered either during the anesthesia consultation, or the collective session animated by nurses, both significantly increased immediate knowledge of parturient women on epidural analgesia (+ 0.3 (-0.2- + 0.8) point and + 1.5 (+ 0.8- + 2.3) points, respectively – Table 2). However, knowledge was much improved by the dedicated information delivered by anesthetic nurses (3.5 (2.7–4.0) vs. 1.7 (1.2–2.5) – p < 0.001) (Fig. 2 and Table 2). Results of the knowledge test slightly decreased several weeks later on the day of delivery during the second period, but persistent level of knowledge remained better following the information delivered by anesthetic nurses (3.0 (2.2–3.5) vs. 2.2 (1.5–2.5) – p < 0.001) (Table 2). Consultation of sources of information other than that received at the hospital was halved between the first and second period (22.5% vs. 11.7%—p = 0.008) (Table 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Progression of knowledge of parturient women on epidural analgesia either informed by the anesthetist during the anesthesia consultation (left) or anesthetic nurses during the dedicated information session (right), from before any information delivered at the hospital (upper line), to after information has been delivered (middle line) and before epidural catheter placement on the day of delivery (lower line)

Table 2 Results on main and secondary judgment criteria

Women satisfaction

The information delivered by anesthetic nurses was associated with higher satisfaction with the information about epidural analgesia received at the hospital (9 (8–10) vs. 10 (9–10) – p < 0.001). In addition, global satisfaction of women with their delivery was also increased during the second period (8 (7–10) vs. 9 (8–10) – p = 0.01). Satisfaction with epidural analgesia efficacy was identical between the 2 periods (10 (8–10) vs. 10 (8–10) – p = 0.21). Finally, the level of anxiety felt by parturient women just before epidural catheter placement was decreased during the second period compared to the first (4 (1–8) vs. 3 (1–6) – p = 0.006).

Anesthetic point-of-view

After the implementation of the information session given by anesthetic nurses, duration of the anesthesia consultation significantly decreased from 10 (8–12) to 8 (6–10) minutes (p < 0.001). At the same time, global satisfaction of anesthetists with the consultation course increased from 7 (6–8) to 8 (7–9) (p < 0.001) (Table 2).

Factors associated with new mothers’ satisfaction

After adjustment, the only variable positively associated with new mothers’ satisfaction with information about epidural analgesia was information delivered by anesthetic nurses (+ 0.76 (0.48–1.04) point – p < 0.001), while increasing age was negatively associated with satisfaction with information received (-0.04 (-0.07 – -0.01) point per one-year increase – p = 0.005) (Table 3). Accordingly, information delivered by anesthetic nurses was the only variable positively associated with global satisfaction with delivery (+ 0.5 (0.2–0.8) point – p = 0.004), while the occurrence of a post-partum hemorrhage was negatively associated with this outcome (-1.0 (-1.7 – -0.2) point – p = 0.01) (Table 4). The other variables, notably including age, multipara, socio-professional grade or childbirth preparation classes, were not associated with satisfaction of new mothers with either information received or childbirth experience (Tables 3 and 4).

Table 3 Multivariable analysis of factors associated with new mothers’ satisfaction with information received at the hospital on epidural analgesia
Table 4 Multivariable analysis of factors associated with new mothers’ satisfaction with their delivery

Discussion

Our main results may be summarized as follows: a session dedicated to information on epidural analgesia given by anesthetic nurses was associated with 1) improved satisfaction of new mothers with information received on epidural analgesia; 2) better immediate and medium-term knowledge about epidural analgesia; 3) decreased anxiety related to epidural catheter placement; 4) improved satisfaction of new mothers with their delivery.

Complete and objective information is mandatory so that patients can make appropriate choices regarding their health and become truly active players in their medical care. Anesthetic practice, and notably epidural analgesia for labor, seems to be particularly concerned by this ethical and regulatory obligation. Extensive information is a strong wish of parturient women [12], which should cover the technical aspect and benefits and risks of epidural analgesia, in addition to all the other usual tasks of anesthetic consultation regarding the collection of patients' histories, treatments, etc. This objective may seem incompatible with daily practice, in which the time devoted to a consultation is generally insufficient to fully accomplish all these tasks. Consequently, anesthetists mainly deliver information summarized on the points they consider important [13], sometimes in the form of a pre-established monologue, which can be a source of frustration for both anesthetists and expectant mothers, and may be quickly forgotten [14].

Previous teams have implemented alternative methods to inform about epidural analgesia. Written information, notably in the form of illustrated booklets has been associated with improvement of women’s knowledge [15, 16]. Despite their practicality and ease of implementation, written brochures have important limitations, such as not being adapted to the pre-existing individual knowledge and expectations of patients, or of being poorly read [17]. Others have assessed the impact of videos, with mitigated results on satisfaction and anxiety [18,19,20,21]. More recently, numerous websites have emerged, providing very accessible information, but often of very imperfect quality and relevance [22]. Thus, parturient women often have confused and preconceived ideas about epidural analgesia, which may cause inappropriate choices such as delaying epidural catheter placement for fear of slowing their labor or increasing the risk of caesarean section [23]. Reliable and complete information delivered by healthcare professionals might be the best solution [24]. In this work, the delegation of such information to anesthetic nurses made it possible to dedicate more time to women, which improved both parturient and anesthetist satisfaction; while duration of the anesthesia consultation and recourse of expectant mothers to other sources of information were reduced. This session was based on a multimodal approach to information combining computer presentation, oral discussion, presentation of material and a written leaflet to take home, which helped to reach a maximum of participants. Thus, improving knowledge and better understanding the benefit-risk balance of epidural analgesia, probably helped women better manage the analgesia provided for their labor and placed them at the center of the decision-making process, which has been recognized as improving satisfaction with childbirth [25,26,27]. In addition, information received from nurses decreased women’s anxiety before epidural catheter placement, which may have contributed to increased satisfaction [28]. Finally, having been informed by anesthetic nurses was the only factor that positively impacted satisfaction after adjustment, overriding the influences of age, socioeconomic status, or occurrence of complications during delivery when new mothers evaluated their childbirth experience.

Our study present limitations. First, the clinical significance of a 1-point increase in the satisfaction score may be discussed. While it appears modest at first glance, it should be emphasized that satisfaction in the conventional group was already high (9/10 and 8/10 for information and experience of delivery, respectively), which makes it more difficult to detect an important effect related to the new information modality. It could be hypothesized that the magnitude of this effect may be even higher in other centers in which satisfaction with information received is currently lower. However, beyond this slight increase of maternal satisfaction, the intervention was significantly associated with other positive endpoints for new mothers (improvement of knowledge, decreased anxiety), but also for anesthetists, anesthetic nurses, and even obstetricians and midwives. This was evidenced by the unpleasant feeling of going backwards expressed by all the staff of our maternity, when these information sessions were interrupted because of the first COVID-19 epidemic wave. We acknowledge that the design of our study does not allow determining which component of our intervention (i.e. delegation to anesthetic nurses, diversification of presentation media, and extension of information time) had the most beneficial impact. Nevertheless, we believe that improving new mothers’ satisfaction with their childbirth thanks to better information regarding a stressful procedure, is a relevant goal to achieve whatever its magnitude, notably as bad experience of childbirth has been identified as a risk factor for developing post-partum psychological disorders [29, 30].

Second, our study was non-randomized. However, randomization of parturient women would have generated organizational difficulties. Indeed, the information session must take place before the anesthesia consultation, so that the anesthetist can individually validate epidural analgesia indication with women. Consequently, randomization should have been done prior to the consultation, whereas it represents the first contact of parturient women with the anesthetic team during uncomplicated pregnancy in French organization. In addition, information about the two arms before patient’s consent would have introduced a bias and probably high rate of refusal or consent withdrawal as expectant mothers randomized in the “conventional information” group would have been informed of the possibility of receiving extended multimodal information. Thus, we preferred conducting a prospective sequential study with the precaution of including a number of women based on an a priori sample size calculation, and in a short period of time to minimize the risk of any other practice changes between the two periods.

Finally, we acknowledge that the exclusion of women who gave birth without epidural analgesia, imposed by organizational constraints and limited resources that made it difficult to screen daily all parturient women admitted for unplanned deliveries to identify women included in the study, may have introduced a selection bias.

In conclusion, an extended multimodal information session on epidural analgesia delegated to anesthetic nurses is associated with improved parturient women’s satisfaction, while durably increasing their knowledge and reducing their anxiety. Such information modality may be incorporated into maternity wards to improve new mothers’ childbirth experience.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to preservation of the individual’s privacy under the European General Data Protection Regulation but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Flowers CE, Hellman LM, Hingson RA. Continuous peridural anesthesia and analgesia for labor, delivery and cesarean section. Curr Res Anesth Analg. 1949;28:181–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu Z-H, He S-T, Deng C-M, Ding T, Xu M-J, Wang L, et al. Neuraxial labour analgesia is associated with a reduced risk of maternal depression at 2 years after childbirth: a multicentre, prospective, longitudinal study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2019;36:745–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Capogna G, Camorcia M, Stirparo S. Expectant fathers’ experience during labor with or without epidural analgesia. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2007;16:110–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 209: obstetric analgesia and anesthesia. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:e208–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RM, Cyna AM, Cuthbert A. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;5:CD000331.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hawkins JL. Epidural analgesia for labor and delivery. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1503–10.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang Q, Zheng S-X, Ni Y-F, Lu Y-Y, Zhang B, Lian Q-Q, et al. The effect of labor epidural analgesia on maternal-fetal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018;298:89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zeng H, Guo F, Lin B, Liu L, Wei W, He P, et al. The effects of epidural analgesia using low-concentration local anesthetic during the entire labor on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a prospective group study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020;301:1153–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Haute Autorité en Santé (French Health Autority). Follow-up and orientation of pregnant women according to identified risk situations. 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Middle JV, Wee MYK. Informed consent for epidural analgesia in labour: a survey of UK practice. Anaesthesia. 2009;64:161–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Trumble J, Lee J, Slater PM, Sellors J, Cyna AM. Consent for labour epidural analgesia: an observational study in a single institution. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2015;43:323–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jackson A, Henry R, Avery N, VanDenKerkhof E, Milne B. Informed consent for labour epidurals: what labouring women want to know. Can J Anaesth J Can Anesth. 2000;47:1068–73.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Black JDB, Cyna AM. Issues of consent for regional analgesia in labour: a survey of obstetric anaesthetists. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2006;34:254–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jackson GNB, Robinson PN, Lucas DN, Natarajan A, Gough K, Woolnough M, et al. What mothers know, and want to know, about the complications of general anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56:585–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. White LA, Gorton P, Wee MYK, Mandal N. Written information about epidural analgesia for women in labour: did it improve knowledge? Int J Obstet Anesth. 2003;12:93–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Munro SB, Hui A, Gemmell EA, Torabi N, Johnston AS, Janssen PA. Evaluation of an information pamphlet for women considering epidural analgesia in labour. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018;40:171–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rosique I, Pérez-Cárceles MD, Romero-Martín M, Osuna E, Luna A. The use and usefulness of information for patients undergoing anaesthesia. Med Law. 2006;25:715–27.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Salzwedel C, Petersen C, Blanc I, Koch U, Goetz AE, Schuster M. The effect of detailed, video-assisted anesthesia risk education on patient anxiety and the duration of the preanesthetic interview: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:202–9 table of contents.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kakinuma A, Nagatani H, Otake H, Mizuno J, Nakata Y. The effects of short interactive animation video information on preanesthetic anxiety, knowledge, and interview time: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2011;112:1314–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Eley VA, Searles T, Donovan K, Walters E. Effect of an anaesthesia information video on preoperative maternal anxiety and postoperative satisfaction in elective caesarean section: a prospective randomised trial. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2013;41:774–81.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Che Y-J, Gao Y-L, Jing J, Kuang Y, Zhang M. Effects of an informational video about anesthesia on pre- and post-elective cesarean section anxiety and recovery: a randomized controlled trial. Med Sci Monit Int Med J Exp Clin Res. 2020;26:e920428.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Espitalier F, De Lamer S, Barbaz M, Laffon M, Remérand F. Evaluation and comparison of epidural analgesia in labour related information on French and English-speaking websites. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2018;37:423–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Echevarria GC, Grant GJ, Chung Y, Lax J. Survey of nulliparous parturients’ attitudes regarding timing of epidural analgesia initiation. J Clin Anesth. 2017;41:106–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Togioka BM, Seligman KM, Werntz MK, Yanez ND, Noles LM, Treggiari MM. Education program regarding labor epidurals increases utilization by hispanic medicaid beneficiaries: a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2019;131:840–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hodnett ED. Pain and women’s satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(5 Suppl Nature):S160-172.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Goodman P, Mackey MC, Tavakoli AS. Factors related to childbirth satisfaction. J Adv Nurs. 2004;46:212–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fair CD, Morrison TE. The relationship between prenatal control, expectations, experienced control, and birth satisfaction among primiparous women. Midwifery. 2012;28:39–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lemmens SMP, van Montfort P, Meertens LJE, Spaanderman MEA, Smits LJM, de Vries RG, et al. Perinatal factors related to pregnancy and childbirth satisfaction: a prospective cohort study. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;42(3):181–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sentilhes L, Maillard F, Brun S, Madar H, Merlot B, Goffinet F, et al. Risk factors for chronic post-traumatic stress disorder development one year after vaginal delivery: a prospective, observational study. Sci Rep. 2017;7:8724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. MacKinnon AL, Yang L, Feeley N, Gold I, Hayton B, Zelkowitz P. Birth setting, labour experience, and postpartum psychological distress. Midwifery. 2017;50:110–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge all the parturient women who consented to participate in this study. In addition, the authors acknowledge all the staff of the Tenon Hospital maternity ward, in particular the midwives and nurses from the delivery room, and the staff of the anesthesia and obstetrical consultations. The authors particularly acknowledge Zohra Zatar, chief-nurse of the obstetrical consultation for her help with patients’ files.

The authors also acknowledge the medical informatics department (DIM) of Sorbonne Université – Rive Droite, in particular Dr Marion Fages and Mrs Aurélia Retbi, for their help with management of data regarding delivery complications.

Finally, the authors want to thank Joanna Shore for English proofreading of the manuscript.

Funding

This work has not been funded by any external source.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Q. Cherel helped in conceptualization of the study, inclusion of patients, analysis of data, interpretation of data, and reviewing the manuscript for important intellectual content. J. Burey & J. Rousset helped in conceptualization of the study, interpretation of data, and reviewing the manuscript for important intellectual content. A. Picard & D. Mirza helped in conceptualization of the study, interpretation of data, reviewing the manuscript for important intellectual content. C. Dias, H. Jacquet, P. Mariani, N. Raffegeau, I. Saupin helped in conceptualization of the study, inclusion of patients, acquisition of data, analysis of data, and reviewing the manuscript. M. Bornes helped in reviewing the manuscript for important intellectual content. N. Lapidus helped in statistical analysis and reviewing the manuscript for important intellectual content. C. Quesnel helped in conceptualization of the study, supervision, and reviewing the manuscript for important intellectual content. M. Garnier helped in conceptualization of the study, analysis and interpretation of data, supervision, and writing the original draft and reviews. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc Garnier.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (Comité d’Ethique de la Recherche en Anesthésie-Réanimation – CERAR, ID-IRB 2019–173). According to French law and due to the non-interventional design of the study, parturient women’s consent was waived by the ethical committee. Thus, oral and written information was given to women, who could then decline inclusion in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

M. Garnier declares that he is an associate editor of BMC Anesthesiology. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

STROBE Statement—checklist of items that should be included in reports of observational studies

Additional file 2.

 

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cherel, Q., Burey, J., Rousset, J. et al. Epidural analgesia information sessions provided by anesthetic nurses: impact on satisfaction and anxiety of parturient women a prospective sequential study. BMC Anesthesiol 22, 105 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01647-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01647-z

Keywords

  • Epidural analgesia
  • Information
  • Anesthetic nurse
  • Satisfaction
  • Anxiety