Skip to main content

Effect of intravenous oxycodone on the physiologic responses to extubation following general anesthesia

Abstract

Background

Endotracheal intubation and extubation may cause undesirable hemodynamic changes. Intravenous oxycodone has recently been introduced and used for relieving hemodynamic alterations in response to intubation, but there is insufficient information regarding its application in stabilizing hemodynamics during extubation in the patients emerging from general anesthesia.

Methods

One hundred patients, who had undergone assorted laparoscopic surgeries under general anesthesia, were randomly assigned to Control group (saline injection, 50 cases) and Study group (intravenous injection of 0.08 mg/kg oxycodone immediately after completion of the surgical procedure, 50 cases). Blood pressure, heart rate, blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) as well as blood concentrations of epinephrine, norepinephrine, and cortisol were recorded or measured immediately before extubation (T0), during extubation (T1), as well as one minute (T2), 5 min (T3), and 10 min after extubation (T4). In addition, coughing and restlessness, time of eye-opening, and duration from completing surgery to extubation as well as Ramsay Sedation Scale were analyzed.

Results

Blood pressure and heart rate as well as blood concentrations of epinephrine, norepinephrine, and cortisol were significantly higher in the Control group compared with the Study group at the time of extubation as well as 1, 5, and 10 min after extubation (P < 0.05). When the patients emerged from general anesthesia, 70 % of the Control group had cough, which was significantly higher than that of Study group (40 %, P < 0.05). Significantly higher number of patients manifested restlessness in the Control group before (40 %) and after extubation (20 %) compared with that in the Study group (20 and 2 %, respectively, P < 0.05). In addition, patients of Control group had lower Ramsay score at extubation (1.7 ± 0.7) as well as 30 min after extubation (2.4 ± 0.9) compared to that of the patients of Study group (2.2 ± 0.9, and 3.0 ± 0.8, respectively, P = 0.003 and 0.001).

Conclusions

Intravenous oxycodone attenuated alterations of hemodynamics and blood hormones associated with extubation during emergence from general anesthesia.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2000040370 (registration date: 11-28-2020) “‘retrospectively registered”.

Peer Review reports

Background

Intubation and extubation may cause adverse stimulation that results in undesirable hemodynamic alterations such as increased blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate [1, 2]. Unstable hemodynamics can lead to perioperative complications such as cerebral hemorrhage, cardiac arrhythmia or failure in patients with pre-conditions of cardiac or cerebral disease [3]. Therefore, pharmaceutical intervention has been used and studied to attenuate hemodynamic alterations during and after intubation and extubation [4]. In this regard, opioids including oxycodone have been used for suppressing the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation [5,6,7].

Oxycodone (14-hydroxy-7,8-dihydrocodeinone) is a semisynthetic opioid and exerts its biologic effect through the µ, κ and δ opioid receptors [8, 9]. Because oxycodone exerts its effect within 5 min after intravenous injection and lasts at least for 4 h [10, 11], intravenous oxycodone has been used and studied for relieving acute postoperative pain [5], as well as for attenuating hemodynamic alterations in response to endotracheal intubation [5, 6, 12]. The effect of oxycodone on hemodynamics during extubation in the emergence from general anesthesia, however, has not been studied. The current study was designed to evaluate effect of oxycodone on the physiologic changes associated with extubation during emergence from general anesthesia.

Methods

Patients

Patients, who had undergone laparoscopic surgeries under general anesthesia from March 2018 through December 2019 in our hospital, were prospectively enrolled into this study. The protocol of this study was approved by the Ethic Committee of The Ninth People’s Hospital of Wuxi City (No. KT2020026) and a signed consent was obtained from each participant or legal guardian.

Inclusion criteria

Patients with Class I or II of the American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) Physical Status and Classification System, and received laparoscopic surgeries including cholecystectomy, hernia repair, and removal of the uterine and uterine appendages under general anesthesia.

Exclusion criteria

Patients who had contraindication for general anesthesia; severe heart, liver or kidney diseases; mental disorder or history of over-dose using opioid analgesics.

General anesthesia

Propofol (2 mg/kg), fentanyl (3 µg/kg), and cis-atracurium (0.2 mg/kg) were used for general anesthesia induction. After the induction, patients received oxygenation and denitrogenation through face mask for 3 min (100 % FiO2 and 6 L/min) followed by endotracheal intubation. For maintenance of general anesthesia, the following medicines were given by infusion pump: propofol 4–12 mg/kg/h, remifentanil 0.0-0.2 µg/kg/min, continuous inhalation of 1.5–2.5 % sevoflurane, and intermittent cis-atracurium. Propofol, remifentanil, and sevoflurane were discontinued 5–10 min prior to skin closure.

Grouping and treatment

Patients were randomly and double-blindly assigned into the Control group or Study group by a Random Number Table. Control group was injected with normal saline, and Study group was intravenously injected with oxycodone hydrochloride (0.08 mg/kg) immediately after completion of the surgery.

Parameters for outcome evaluation

Blood pressure, heart rate, and blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) were recorded or measured immediately before extubation (T0), at extubation (T1), one minute after extubation (T2), 5 min after extubation (T3), and 10 min after extubation (T4). Blood samples were collected at the aforementioned time points from the arm that was not on intravenous infusion. Concentrations of blood hormones including epinephrine, norepinephrine, and cortisol were measured by ELISA using commercially available kit (IBL, Germany) and ELISA plate reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA). In addition, coughing and restlessness, duration from completing surgery to eye-opening, and duration from completing surgery to extubation were recorded blindly by two experienced nurses. Restlessness was defined as the patient was unable to follow instruction and cooperate within 30 min following extubation. Coughing was scored as following: 0 = no cough; 1 = mild cough; 2 = multiple coughing but lasted shorter than 5 s; 3 = multiple coughing and lasted longer than 5 s. Ramsay Sedation Scale was assessed at extubation (T1) as well as 30 min after extubation and scored as following: 1 = restless; 2 = co-operative and oriented; 3 = could response to commands; 4 = calm and easy to be awakened; 5 = hard to be awakened; 6 =. Sleeping and could not be awakened.

Statistical analysis

Discrete variables were expressed by frequency (%) and analyzed by Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Shapiro-Wilk test was used to test normality of the continuous variables followed by Student’s t test for normally distributed data, and Wilcoxon rank sum test was for comparison of the data that were not normally distributed. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with replicate measures were used for comparison between groups at various time points. SPSS 19.0 software was used to perform all analysis and P value < 0.05 was considered as significant.

Results

Demographic information indicated that there were no significant differences between the Control group and Study group in terms of gender ratio, age, height, weight, and amount of the medicines used for general anesthesia (Table 1).

Table 1 Demographic information of the patients

While blood pressure (both systolic and diastolic blood pressure) and heart rate were not significantly different in the two groups before extubation, they were significantly higher in the Control group compared to the patients treated with oxycodone hydrochloride (Study group) at the time of extubation (T1) and all subsequent measurement time points (P < 0.05, Table 2).

Table 2 Comparison of blood pressure, heart rate and oxygen saturation

Similarly, there was no significant difference in the blood levels of epinephrine, norepinephrine, and cortisol between the two groups before extubation. However, they were significantly lower in the patients treated with oxycodone hydrochloride at extubation and afterwards (P < 0.05, Table 3).

Table 3 Comparison of hormone levels in response to the stimulation

Next, we compared the coughing and restlessness in the two groups. As shown in the Table 4, during the emergence from general anesthesia, majority (70 %) of the patients in the Control group had cough while 40 % patients of the Study group had cough (P < 0.05); at extubation, 20 % patients in the Control group had cough and it was significantly higher than that of the Study group (10 %, P < 0.05). Similarly, at extubation, majority (80 %) of the patients in the Control group had “coughing score 3”, which was significantly higher than that of the patients in the Study group (20 %, P < 0.05). In addition, significantly higher number of the patients manifested restlessness in the Control group before (40 %) and after extubation (20 %) compared to that in the Study group (20 and 2 % before and after, respectively, P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the emergence from general anesthesia for the patients in either group in terms of eye-opening time as well as the duration between emergence from general anesthesia and extubation (P > 0.05).

Table 4 Comparison of coughing and restlessness between the two groups

Comparison of Ramsay score between the two groups revealed that patients in the Control group had lower Ramsay score at extubation (1.7 ± 0.7) as well as 30 min after extubation (2.4 ± 0.9) compared to that of the patients in the Study group (2.2 ± 0.9, and 3.0 ± 0.8, respectively, P = 0.003 at extubation and P = 0.001 30 min after extubation).

Discussion

In the current study, we demonstrated that oxycodone hydrochloride could significantly attenuate blood pressure (both systolic and diastolic) and heart rate at the time of extubation as well as at 1, 5 and 10 min after extubation in the patients who emerged from general anesthesia. Furthermore, oxycodone hydrochloride could decrease blood levels of epinephrine, norepinephrine, and cortisol at extubation as well as at 1, 5, and 10 min after extubation, respectively. Oxycodone could also significantly reduce incidence of coughing and restlessness before and after extubation. However, Ramsay score was higher in the patients treated with oxycodone. These findings suggested that oxycodone could stabilize hemodynamics presumably through reducing epinephrine, norepinephrine and cortisol, but have sedative effect on the patients.

Stable hemodynamic status (blood pressure and heart rate changes were less than 20 % of the baseline) is a basic requirement for general anesthesia not only during the operation, but also after the operation. However, blood pressure and heart rate were sensitive to stimulations such as intubation and extubation. It has been reported that oxycodone could efficiently prevent tracheal intubation-related hemodynamic instability [13]. In the current study, several patients had hemodynamic changes (blood pressure and/or heart rate) that exceeded 20 % of the baseline after 1 or 5 min extubation. However, incidence of the 20 % or more changes in hemodynamics from baseline was significantly higher in the Control group compared to that of Study group (data not shown), suggesting that oxycodone administration through intravenous injection immediately after completion of a surgical procedure could significantly stabilize blood pressure and heart rate at extubation as well as at 1, 5, and 10 min after extubation. In addition, it has been reported that administration of oxycodone could result in significantly higher incidence of oxygen desaturation compared with that of fentanyl in patients without pre-oxygenation [5]. In the current study, however, there was no significant alteration in oxygen saturation in the patients treated with either oxycodone or saline, suggesting oxycodone injection (5 mg) do not affect oxygen saturation in the patients emerging from general anesthesia.

It has been reported that as high as 0.269 mg/kg oxycodone might be used in order to completely prevent endotracheal intubation-related hemodynamic alteration in the patients [12]. However, adverse effects including hypotension, bradycardia, and respiratory depression could occur at this higher dose of oxycodone [12]. Thus, appropriate concentration of oxycodone and speed of intravenous injection must be carefully selected. In this regard, it has also been reported that the predictive intravenous oxycodone ED95 was 0.091 mg/kg in male patients [12]. In the current study, we used 0.08 mg/kg oxycodone in the Study group, which was very close to the aforementioned concentration of oxycodone ED95. Under this concentration of oxycodone, patients in the current study not only had less incidence of coughing, but also less occurrence of restlessness before, during, and after extubation. In addition, side effects of oxycodone such as nausea and vomiting, which are common adverse events with oxycodone [14], were not analyzed in this study.

Similar to other opioid, oxycodone might also cause sedation. It has been reported that oxycodone (0.2 mg/kg) caused the patients to wake up later than those in the group of patients treated with fentanyl (2 µg/kg) by approximately 85 s in average in a study by Lee et al. [5]. However, none of these patients experienced any problems in terms of delayed awakening during 24 h postoperative observation [5]. In the current study, it was found that oxycodone did not prolong the awakening time for the patients as assessed by either eye-opening time or duration between emergence from general anesthesia and extubation. However, Ramsay scores at and after extubation were significantly lower in the Control group compared with that of Study group. These findings further suggested that oxycodone concentration used in the current study was safe and appropriate, but may have significant sedative effect.

It is known that oxycodone has lower intrinsic activity of binding µ-type receptor, but a stronger analgesic effect than morphine [15, 16]. This is because oxycodone can stimulate the peripheral and central opioid receptors of the µ and κ types, and κ receptors play a crucial role in mediating the analgesic activity of oxycodone [15]. In addition, oxycodone has a better effect of inhibiting visceral pain [17], which may contribute to its effect of stabilizing hemodynamics. In the current study, we demonstrated that oxycodone significantly suppressed blood levels of epinephrine, norepinephrine and cortisol at extubation as well as at 1, 5, and 10 min after extubation, suggesting oxycodone might stabilize heart rate and blood pressure through preventing aforementioned hormones from increasing in response to uncomfortable stimulation such as endotracheal intubation and extubation.

There were several limitations in the current study. First, this study explored oxycodone as the sole opioid in stabilizing hemodynamic status during and after extubation in the patients emerging from general anesthesia. A comparison of oxycodone with other opioids that are normally used for the purpose will be further meaningful information for clinical application of oxycodone for stabilizing hemodynamics during extubation. Second, although we observed adverse effects of oxycodone, the time was short (up to 10 min after extubation), which may not be sufficient to observe all adverse events associated with oxycodone such as nausea and vomiting, because intravenous oxycodone exerts its effect in 3–5 min and lasts for 4 h [11, 18]. Third, while the Ramsay scores at extubation and 30 min after extubation were statistically different between the two groups, the differences were minimal and may not be clinically significant. Finally, we did not evaluate intraoperative hemodynamics, which may have impact on postoperative requirement for opioids. Therefore, results of this study require further cohort studies and discussion in the future to further evaluate the feasibility of oxycodone in stabilizing hemodynamics in response to extubation.

Taken together, the current study demonstrated that intravenous administration of oxycodone immediately after completion of a surgery under general anesthesia had significant effect in stabilizing hemodynamics during and after extubation in the patients emerging from general anesthesia. Oxycodone could increase patients’ tolerance to uncomfortable stimulation of endotracheal extubation.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used or/and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

SpO2 :

Oxygen saturation

References

  1. Shribman AJ, Smith G, Achola KJ. Cardiovascular and catecholamine responses to laryngoscopy with and without tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth. 1987;59(3):295–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Edwards ND, Alford AM, Dobson PM, Peacock JE, Reilly CS. Myocardial ischaemia during tracheal intubation and extubation. Br J Anaesth. 1994;73(4):537–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Prys-Roberts C, Greene LT, Meloche R, Foex P. Studies of anaesthesia in relation to hypertension. II: Hemodynamic consequences of induction and endotracheal intubation. 1971. Br J Anaesth. 1998;80(1):106–22. discussion 104–105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Khan FA, Ullah H. Pharmacological agents for preventing morbidity associated with the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(7):CD004087. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004087.pub2.

  5. Lee YS, Baek CW, Kim DR, Kang H, Choi GJ, Park YH, et al. Comparison of hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation and postoperative pain in patients undergoing closed reduction of nasal bone fracture under general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial comparing fentanyl and oxycodone. BMC Anesthesiol. 2016;16(1):115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Park YH, Lee SH, Lee OH, Kang H, Shin HY, Baek CW, et al. Optimal dose of intravenous oxycodone for attenuating hemodynamic changes after endotracheal intubation in healthy patients: A randomized controlled trial. Med (Baltim). 2017;96(11):e6234.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kang XH, Bao FP, Zhang HG, Yu DJ, Ha K, Xie Q, et al. Gender Affects the Median Effective Dose and 95 % Effective Dose of Oxycodone for Blunting the Hemodynamic Response to Tracheal Intubation in Narcotic-Naive Adult Patients. Chin Med J (Engl). 2018;131(16):1958–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. King SJ, Reid C, Forbes K, Hanks G. A systematic review of oxycodone in the management of cancer pain. Palliat Med. 2011;25(5):454–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Riley J, Eisenberg E, Muller-Schwefe G, Drewes AM, Arendt-Nielsen L. Oxycodone: a review of its use in the management of pain. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008;24(1):175–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Silvasti M, Rosenberg P, Seppala T, Svartling N, Pitkanen M. Comparison of analgesic efficacy of oxycodone and morphine in postoperative intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998;42(5):576–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lugo RA, Kern SE. The pharmacokinetics of oxycodone. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2004;18(4):17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Koh GH, Jung KT, So KY, Seo JS, Kim SH. Effect of different doses of intravenous oxycodone and fentanyl on intubation-related hemodynamic responses: A prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial (CONSORT). Med (Baltim). 2019;98(18):e15509.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bao F, Xie Q, Zhang H, Zhu S, Kang X. Feasibility of using oxycodone as the sole opioid for induction and maintenance of general anaesthesia in minor/moderate surgery: a prospective, observational, descriptive study. J Int Med Res. 2020;48(10):300060520957500.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hwang BY, Kwon JY, Kim E, Lee DW, Kim TK, Kim HK. Oxycodone vs. fentanyl patient-controlled analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Int J Med Sci. 2014;11(7):658–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Narita M, Nakamura A, Ozaki M, Imai S, Miyoshi K, Suzuki M, et al. Comparative pharmacological profiles of morphine and oxycodone under a neuropathic pain-like state in mice: evidence for less sensitivity to morphine. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008;33(5):1097–112.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kalso E. How different is oxycodone from morphine? Pain. 2007;132(3):227–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kokki M, Broms S, Eskelinen M, Neuvonen PJ, Halonen T, Kokki H. The analgesic concentration of oxycodone with co-administration of paracetamol -- a dose-finding study in adult patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2012;111(6):391–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Leow KP, Cramond T, Smith MT. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oxycodone when given intravenously and rectally to adult patients with cancer pain. Anesth Analg. 1995;80(2):296–302.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ML J and ZQ L carried out the studies, participated in collecting data, and drafted the manuscript. JW J and X L performed the statistical analysis and participated in its design. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhenqing Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The protocol of this study was approved by the Ethic Committee of The Ninth People’s Hospital of Wuxi City (No. KT2020026) and a signed consent form was obtained from each participant or legal guardian.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, M., Ji, J., Li, X. et al. Effect of intravenous oxycodone on the physiologic responses to extubation following general anesthesia. BMC Anesthesiol 21, 146 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01350-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01350-5

Keywords