Skip to main content

Development of a nomogram to predict negative postoperative behavioral changes based on a prospective cohort

Abstract

Background

It is believed that negative postoperative behavioral changes (NPOBC) is associated with negative perioperative outcomes in children. The importance of development of a predictive model of NPOBC was noted. This study aims to identify potential risk factors develop a nomogram to predict NPOBC on postoperative day 3 based on a prospective cohort.

Methods

A prospective observational study was conducted on children(American Society of Anesthesiologists I ~ III) aged 2 ~ 12 years who underwent selective surgery under general anesthesia between September 2022 and February 2023. The patient’s clinical data were analyzed. The method of measuring NPOBC is with the The Posthospital Behaviour Questionnaire (PHBQ), and all of children remained hospitalized at the time of assessment. The enrolled patients were categorized into the NPOBC group and the non-NPOBC group according to if children developed NPOBC on postoperative day 3. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors and develop the nomogram to predict NPOBC. Internal validation was performed using the parametric bootstrapping method.

Results

One hundred ninety-two patients were enrolled in the study, 44.8% (86/192 patients) of children developed NPOBC on postoperative day 3. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the Pediatric Anesthesia Behavior (PAB) score (OR: 1.23, 95%CI: 1.14–1.33), cerebral desaturation (OR: 1.16, 95%CI: 1.02–1.32), and postoperative pain score (OR: 1.07, 95%CI: 1.02–1.13) were independent predictors for NPOBC on postoperative day 3 (P < 0.05). They were used to develop the prediction model. The calibration curve demonstrated satisfied discrimination and calibration of the prediction model. The model presented with good discriminative ability (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.762 [95%CI: 0.691—0.833]). The decision curve analysis also revealed the great clinical utility of the nomogram.

Conclusion

Based on our prospective observational study, pre-anesthesia patients with higher PAB scores, presence of cerebral desaturation, and higher postoperative pain score were more likely to develop NPOBC on postoperative day 3. We established and validated a nomogram for predicting NPOBC, which could help assess patients individually, identify high-risk groups of NPOBC and improve patient prognosis.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR‐2,200,059,776. Registered 11 May 2022.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Based on the principle of personalized medicine, protecting children’s perioperative mental health is gradually being emphasized [1]. The perioperative period is a stressful process for children, complex processes are involved in predicting critical events during the perioperative period and are frequently followed by negative postoperative behavioral changes (NPOBC) [2]. The Posthospital Behaviour Questionnaire (PHBQ) is currently used as the standard measure for detecting NPOBC [3, 4]. NPOBC include general anxiety, nightmares, eating disorders, temper tantrums, and enuresis, with the prevalence ranging from 29.8% to 43% on postoperative day 14 and from 16 to 32% on postoperative day 30 [5,6,7,8]. Although previous studies demonstrated that risk factors such as younger age, female sex, type of surgery, ethnic variations, preoperative anxiety, and intraoperative decrease in cerebral regional oxygen saturation (rScO2) had been associated with NPOBC, its etiology remains unclear [9,10,11,12]. It is believed that NPOBC is associated with negative prognosis, which could affect children’s emotional and cognitive development [2]. As not all children will need routine pharmacological or behavioral intervention, it is important to develop a predictive model of NPOBC [11].

In the present study, we prospectively collected patients’ data, analyzed the characteristics of patients who developed NPOBC on postoperative day 3, sought independent risk factors, and developed a predictive model. We expect the nomogram can help clinicians assess patients individually, identify high-risk patients of NPOBC, give early intervention to decrease adverse effects, and improve patient prognosis.

Methods

Participants

This prospective observational study was conducted at the National Center for Children’s Health, Beijing Children’s Hospital, China, over 6 months between September 2022 and February 2023. The study was registered at the Chinese clinical trial registry (ChiCTR‐2,200,059,776). The Ethics Committee of Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University has approved the use of fully anonymized cohort data for research (ID: 2021-E-114-Y). All children's guardians provided written informed consent.

Patients between the ages of 2 and 12 years, with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I to III and scheduled for elective noncardiac surgery under general anesthesia for more than 60 min, with mechanical respiratory assistance, were included in the study. The exclusion criteria were: a. Children with previous neuropsychiatric disorders; b. Emergency surgery; c. Monitoring site with skin lesions or rash; d. Children who need to be transferred to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for further treatment after surgery, e. Refusal by the parents to participate.

Assessment

The primary outcome was the presence of NPOBC on postoperative day 3. NPOBC was assessed by the PHBQ (Supplemental Table 1), the five options, much less, less, same, more, and much more, were awarded scores of − 2, − 1, 0, 1, and 2, respectively. The total scores were obtained by summing the score of each item. we identified PHBQ scores ≥ 7 as substantial behavioral changes and defined to NPOBC [5]. Children’s behavior and mood state before the induction of anesthesia was evaluated by the Pediatric Anesthesia Behavior (PAB) score (Supplemental Table 2); the higher the score, the higher the level of anxiety [13]. The Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) score was used to assess whether a child was experiencing delirium after general anesthesia (Supplemental Table 3); the onset of emergence delirium (ED) was defined as the first evaluation for each patient with a PAED score ≥ 10 [1, 14]. The face, legs, activity, crying, and consolability (FLACC) behavioral scale was used to quantify the pain behavior of children ≤ 7-year-old. (Supplemental Table 4) [15]. The visual analog scale (VAS) was used for children older than 8-year-old. Children were asked to score their pain on a slide rule of 10 cm in length,.and the extreme 0 indicates ‘no pain’, 10 cm indicates the worst pain imaginable (Supplemental Table 5) [16]. Both postoperative pain scale score greater than 4 pts indicates the presence of pain [1]. We followed up the postoperative pain twice on the first and second days after surgery, and recorded the scores separately. The average score of the two days was taken for analysis.

Parents completed the PHBQ on postoperative day 3 in order to avoid the influence of first two days agitation, significant pain or nausea on questionnaire response. In addition, all of children remained hospitalized at the time of assessment, and the doctor visits the ward for postoperative follow-up, which can explain to parents how to fill out the questionnaire and discover adverse behavior in hospitalized children.

Anesthesia management

All patients will be hospitalized the day before surgery and undergo routine preoperative examinations. One day preoperatively, patients were identified through hospital surgical schedules. The routine preoperative checkup was performed, and written informed consent was obtained from the guardians of the patients. The standardized anesthesia protocol was provided by professional pediatric anesthesiologists. All children are fasted from solid food for six hours and from water two hours before surgery, and intravenous access was established in the ward.

The preoperative anxiety of children was measured upon entrance into the operation room and during induction by a trained pediatric anesthesiologist using the PAB Score. The medium sensor (FORE-SIGHT ELITE Cerebral Oxygen Saturation Monitor; NIRS, CAS Medical Systems Inc, Branford, CT) was attached to the clean and dry forehead above the eyebrows of the child before induction of anesthesia to get the baseline value of rScO2. The heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), rScO2, body temperature, and bispectral index (BIS) values of the children were continuously monitored. Anesthesia induction was performed with propofol 2 to 3 mg/kg, sufentanil 0.3 to 0.5 μg /kg, and cisatracurium 0.1 mg/kg to facilitate endotracheal intubation. After tracheal intubation, an anesthesia machine was connected to control the breathing. The tidal volume was 6 to 8 mL/kg, and the respiratory rate was 16 to 24 times/min. The above parameters were adjusted according to end-tidal carbon dioxide (PetCO2) at 35–45 mmHg during the operation, with an inhaled oxygen concentration of 50 to 70%. During the operation, the BIS value was controlled within 40 to 60 to ensure an appropriate depth of anesthesia. Propofol (6 to 10 mg/kg/h) and remifentanil (0.2 to 0.4 μg/kg/min) were used for anesthesia maintenance, with the dose adjusted to depth of anesthesia requirements (HR and systolic blood pressure [SBP] changed within 20% of baseline values). The body temperature was monitored using a nasopharynx thermometer and was kept between 36.0 and 37.5℃ using a warm air blanket. Surgical and anesthesia duration and adverse events were documented.

After surgery, the children were transferred to the post anesthesia care unit (PACU). The child was scored by the same trained observer using the PAED form and was escorted back to the ward for further observation after the child’s status stabilized.

Data collection

Data were routinely collected using a standardized electronic anesthesia system (Docare, MedicalSystem Company). Information collected included demographic data including age, sex, weight, operation time, and operation type (scoliosis, fracture, abdominal tumor, hypospadias, hydronephrosis, and biliary tract). Preoperative data including the PAB score, pre-anesthesia HR, pre-anesthesia SBP, pre-anesthesia diastolic blood pressure (DBP), pre-anesthesia MAP, and pre-anesthesia rScO2. Intraoperative data including hemorrhage, intraoperative urine, intraoperative input, mean PetCO2, anesthesia duration and extubation duration, and cerebral saturation value. Postoperative data including the PAED score (the incidence of ED), the FLACC behavioral scale or VAS score (degree and incidence of postoperative pain). The rScO2 values of the right and left frontal monitors were recorded. The pooled value of rScO2 (mean value of the left and right sides) was used for analysis. Cerebral desaturation was defined as a decrease in rScO2 of 10% or more from the basal value for at least 3 min in children [17]. The PHBQ was completed by parents on postoperative day 3. Patients were divided into the NPOBC group and the non-NPOBC group according to if children developed NPOBC on postoperative day 3.

Construction and validation of the nomogram

The primary outcome of the study is the presence of NPOBC on postoperative day 3. The risk factors for the presence of NPOBC on postoperative day 3 were identified using univariate logistic regression, and varibles with P < 0.05 were included in the multivariate logistic analysis. A total score was calculated by analyzing the scores corresponding to each predictor variable in the nomogram, and a probability of NPOBC was calculated. Different methods were used to evaluate and validate the poformance of the prediction model. The calibration curve were drawn to reveal the reliability of the prediction model [18]. Nomograms were internally validated using parametric bootstrapping (B = 2000). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate discrimination. The decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to assess the clinical utility of the nomogram [19].

Statistical analyses

The sample size was estimated using PASS software (version 15.0). We assumed three or four independent risk factors would be used to predict NPOBC, and each factor requires at least 10 to 15 cases of primary outcomes to ensure the reliability of the estimation. Based on our previous results, assuming the incidence of NPOBC is between 22 and 52%. We accepted an α error of 0.05 and a β error of 0.2 in a bilateral contrast, and the sample size of 136 (30/0.22) was targeted. Assuming a 15% of possible withdrawals and loss of follow‐up, the calculated sample size was 170.

Statistical analyses in the present study were performed using R software (version 4.0.3, http://www.r-project.org). The normality was assessed by Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Continuous variables are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation or median [interquartile interval, IQR]. The t-test was used for normally distributed continuous variables to assess the differences between the two groups, and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for continuous variables with non-normal distribution. For categorical variables, Fisher's exact test and χ2 test were used. The regression analysis results were presented as odd ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). All statistical results were reported as two-tailed P-values, and < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

We assessed 200 children for eligibility and enrolled 192 children for our study. Reasons for exclusion were: Lost contact with parents during follow-up (n = 2), and parents could not understand the scale (n = 6). Finally, 192 children included the study. Table 1 summarizes the enrollment data and demographic characteristics of the 192 patients. The incidence of NPOBC on postoperative day 3 was 44.8% (86 cases). There were no significant statistical differences in age, gender, weight, operation time, operation type between the two groups. Patients in the NPOBC group have the higher PAB score than the non-NPOBC group (P < 0.001). For pre-anesthesia variables, there were no significant statistical differences in HR, SBP, DBP, MAP, and rScO2 (P > 0.05). As for intraoperative variables, there were no significant statistical differences in intraoperative urine, intraoperative input, mean PetCO2, anesthesia duration, and extubation duration (P > 0.05). However, the incidence of cerebral desaturation in the NPOBC group was 58.1% (50 cases), significantly higher than in the non-NPOBC group (38 cases, 35.8%, P = 0.003). Postoperatively, the higher PAED scores in the NPOBC group were observed than that in the non-NPOBC group, but there was no statistical significance (7.00 [3.00;10.0] vs. 6.00 [3.00;8.00], P = 0.105). The incidence of emergence delirium in the NPOBC group was higher than in the non-NPOBC group (39.5% vs. 23.6%, P = 0.026). The higher postoperative pain score was shown in the NPOBC group than that in the non-NPOBC group (3.50 [2.00;4.00] vs. 2.50 [1.50;3.00], P < 0.001), and the incidence of postoperative pain in the NPOBC group was higher than the non-NPOBC group (44.2% vs. 18.9%, P < 0.001).

Table 1 Characteristics of participants with or without NPOBC on postoperative day 3

Development and validation of the prediction model for NPOBC on postoperative day 3

The characteristics of patients were used to fit the univariate logistic regression model, and the variables with P < 0.05 were identified: gender (male/female), PAB score (1pts/2pts/3pts), cerebral desaturation (N/Y), postoperative pain score (pts) (Table 2). The multivariate logistic regression model included these four variables. As shown in Table 2 and Fig. 1, PAB score (OR: 1.23, 95%CI: 1.14–1.33), cerebral desaturation (OR: 1.16, 95%CI: 1.02–1.32), postoperative pain score (OR: 1.07, 95%CI: 1.02–1.13) were independent predictors (P < 0.05) for NPOBC on postoperative day 3. Furthermore, these three predictors were used for developing the prediction model and for constructing the nomogram (Fig. 2A).

Table 2 Logistic regression analysis on variables for the prediction of NPOBC on postoperative day 3
Fig. 1
figure 1

Logistic regression analysis on variables for the prediction of NPOBC on postoperative day 3. NPOBC, negative postoperative behavioral changes; PAB, pediatric anesthesia behavior; OR, odd ratios; CI confidence intervals

Fig. 2
figure 2

Development and validation of the nomogram predicting NPOBC on postoperative day 3. Development and validation of the nomogram predicting NPOBC on postoperative day 3. A Nomogram predicting NPOBC on postoperative day 3. The nomogram was constructed with three factors (Cerebral desaturation, PAB score, and postoperative pain score) identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. B Calibration curve of the prognostic nomogram model. The Y-axis scale represents the actual value probability of NPOBC on postoperative day 3 and the X-axis scale represents the predicted value calculated by the model. The dotted grey line represents an ideal model while the red line represents the nomogram’s prediction performance. C Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the prognostic nomogram model, the area under the curve (AUC) value reflected the discrimination performance of the model. D The decision curve analysis (DCA) curve of the model calculating the net benefit at different threshold probabilities. NPOBC, negative postoperative behavioral changes; PAB, pediatric anesthesia behavior

The prediction model was validated by the 2000 repetitions of bootstrap sample corrections. According to the calibration curve of the nomogram, the predicted and observed probabilities of NPOBC are highly consistent (Fig. 2B). The AUC of the nomogram was 0.762 (95%CI: 0.691—0.833) for the prediction of NPOBC (Fig. 2C), indicating great discrimination of the prediction model. Furthermore, the DCA curve of the nomogram illustrated the strong clinical utility of the predictive model (Fig. 2D).

Discussion

Children in critical stages of development are particularly vulnerable. Surgical stress response, intraoperative blood transfusion, a decrease in rScO2, and other factors may cause negative changes in the perioperative period [20]. According to previous research, the incidence of NPOBC in the early postoperative period has been reported to vary from 24 to 80% [21]. The heterogeneity of the NPOBC incidence is perhaps due to the limited sample size, different diagnostic methods of NPOBC, or variations in the time that the behavior was assessed [7, 22]. A prospective study involving 198 children indicated that 38.8% children developed NPOBC on postoperative day 7 [9]. In Kain et al.'s study, 67%, 45%, and 23% of patients showed NPOBC on day 1, day 2, and two weeks after surgery [22]. The current study was conducted on a more general pediatric population, including children with ASA I and II undergoing non outpatient operations such as scoliosis, fractures, abdominal tumors, etc. In accordance with previous research, 44.8% of the children diagnosed with NPOBC during the third postoperative day used the 27-item validated PHBQ to diagnose the disease. NPOBC is detrimental to the treatment and recovery of the disease and can affect the emotional and cognitive development of the child, causing depression and anxiety in severe cases and threatening life and health [23]. Since the neurological system of pediatric patients is not well developed, they are more vulnerable to external influences. Therefore, it is important to establish an accurate and effective prediction model in pediatric patients to predict the occurrence of NPOBC individually.

NPOBC is associated with multiple risk factors, including young age, type of surgery, preoperative and induction anxiety in the preoperative periods, and method of inhalation anesthetic agent used [12, 24, 25]. In the current study, patients who developed NPOBC on postoperative day 3 have a higher PAB score, higher incidence of cerebral desaturation, higher incidence of emergence delirium, and higher incidence of postoperative pain than those in the non-NPOBC group (P < 0.05). After univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, the PAB score (OR: 1.23, 95%CI: 1.14–1.33), cerebral desaturation (OR: 1.16, 95%CI: 1.02–1.32), and The postoperative pain score (OR: 1.07, 95%CI: 1.02–1.13) were independent predictors for NPOBC on postoperative day 3 (P < 0.05), which are consistent with the previous studies [7, 26, 27].

NPOBC has previously been associated with preoperative anxiety in children [28, 29]. A prospective observational study was conducted by Beringer et al. on 102 children undergoing elective dental extractions under general anesthesia, demonstrating that distress during anesthesia induction was associated with NPOBC on postoperative days 1 and 7 [28]. In the present study, pre-anesthesia behavior and mood of the children were evaluated by the PAB score. Patients in the NPOBC group have a higher PAB score than the non-NPOBC group (P < 0.001). After univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, the PAB score was the independent risk factor for NPOBC on postoperative day 3(OR: 1.23, 95%CI: 1.14–1.33). Besides, patients in the NPOBC group have a higher postoperative pain score than that in the non-NPOBC group (3.50 [2.00;4.00] vs. 2.50 [1.50;3.00], P < 0.001), and higher incidence of postoperative pain was observed than those in the non-NPOBC group (P < 0.05), accordingly. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses demonstrated that the The postoperative pain score (OR: 1.07, 95%CI: 1.02–1.13) was independent predictor for NPOBC on postoperative day 3 (P < 0.05). Our results are consistent with the findings of Luo et al. [10], Kain et al. [7], and Stargatt et al. [27], but inconsistent with the research of Kotiniemi et al. [30] and Power et al. [5]. According to Luo et al., the inconsistent results may be caused by the different pain assessment measures and different assessment times. For example, by using the FLACC scale, researchers may overestimate the pain severity due to the difficulty in distinguishing between pain [10].

Another independent risk factor for NPOBC on postoperative day 3 is the presence of cerebral desaturation (OR: 1.16, 95%CI: 1.02–1.32). There is no standardized, general absolute to define pathological brain region desaturation in children, perhaps partially attributable to the wide baseline variation of rScO2 in children, the presence of comorbidities, and the children’s immature, vulnerable brain was more vulnerable to the effects of the anesthetic [31, 32]. It is commonly acknowledged that intraoperative decreases in basal rScO2 values of 20% or more are harmful and are associated with postoperative cognitive dysfunction in adults [23]. However, children's regional cerebral oxygen saturation may reflect the balance between the consumption and the supply of oxygen of not only a local area under the forehead but of most of the brain due to a more immature self-regulating cerebral system [33, 34]. Previous studies demonstrated that even a decrease in rScO2 of less than 20% from baseline values might reflect high intraoperative bleeding or postoperative behavioral changes in children [35]. We speculate the reason is that the brain of children is immaturity and in the development stage and has different tolerance and regulation of hypoxia than adults. Thus, we referred to the standard of previous studies on children and defined rScO2 desaturation as more than 10% below baseline values for at least 3 min in the present study [17]. The rScO2 is believed to be affected by cerebral perfusion index, systemic oxygenation, and cerebral metabolism, which are possibly influenced by anesthesia [32, 36]. In the present study, patients were less likely to suffer from impaired cerebral oxygen extraction because their underlying physical condition was generally good, while they maintained sufficient oxygen saturation (SpO2 > 98%) and adequate body temperature and hemodynamics during general anesthesia.

Our nomogram included all three independent risk factors described above. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to build the nomogram with preoperative factors based on a prospective cohort of 192 patients and quantify the probability of NPONC individually. Parametric bootstrapping internally validated the established nomogram, which demonstrated good generalization and predictive performance. According to the calibration plot, the predicted and observed consequences were in agreement. ROC analysis revealed excellent discrimination between the nomogram and the NPOBC on postoperative day 3 (AUC = 0.762, 95%CI: 0.691—0.833). As the incidence of NPOBC in the early postoperative period reported in previous studies ranged from 24 to 80% [21]. In the present study, the incidence of NPOBC on postoperative day 3 was 44.8% (86 cases), DCA curves lay above none and all lines, demonstrating that the predictive model was clinically useful. We believe the nomogram is the first step toward an objective, individualized prediction of NPOBC in the early postoperative period. By identifying high-risk children of NPOBC, clinicians can improve prognosis of children.

The prospective design of this study may exclude some confounding factors. However, it is important to note that our study has some limitations. First, PHBQ is designed for assessing children’s posthospitalization and postoperative new onset behavioral changes and has a good profile of reliability and validity [37]. PHBQ used as the standard measure for detecting NPOBC, but it is typically used to evaluate children who are post-hospitalization, or have been discharged from the hospital. In this study, the children are on the hospital ward during assessment, which may lead to a high rate of NPOBC. NPOBC can prolong hospital stay [37], and we also hope to establish a predictive model for NPOBC during hospitalization in children to reduce incidence and shorten hospital stay. However, we have not found a more suitable evaluation method. Second, we did not attempt to control anesthetic regimen in this observational study, and this included a single center regional database, and the selection bias and the management of the perioperative period may likely be associated with NPOBC. Third, in the present study, we conducted on a more general pediatric population, including scoliosis, fracture, abdominal tumor, hypospadias, hydronephrosis, and biliary tract. Some of these procedures may have produced more pain than others. As postoperative pain has been demonstrated as the predictor of NPOBC, we will focus on the specific surgery type in our future study. Last, patients were unable to use self-assessment methods for postoperative pain assessment under 7 years old, we may have overestimated the pain severity due to the difficulty in distinguishing between discomfort and pain, by using the FLACC scale.

Conclusion

In our prospective observational study, 44.8% of children (86/192 patients) developed NPOBC on postoperative day 3. Patients with higher PAB scores, presence of cerebral desaturation, and higher postoperative pain score were more likely to develop NPOBC on postoperative day 3. We innovatively established and validated a nomogram for predicting NPOBC. By using the nomogram, clinicians can make customized assessments of patients, identify patients at higher risk of NPOBC early on, and provide them with the care and support they need, thereby minimizing the likelihood of negative outcomes after surgery.

Availability of data and materials

The key data are contained in the figures, tables, and additional files. The datasets used and/or analyzed during this study can be further obtained from the corresponding author, Jianmin Zhang, on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

NPOBC:

Negative postoperative behavioral change

PHBQ:

Posthospital Behaviour Questionnaire

rScO2 :

Cerebral regional oxygen saturation

ASA:

American Society of Anesthesiologists

ICU:

Intensive Care Unit

PAB:

Pediatric Anesthesia Behavior

PAED:

Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium

ED:

Emergence delirium

FLACC:

Face, legs, activity, crying, and consolability

VAS:

Visual analog scale

HR:

Heart rate

MAP:

Mean arterial pressure

BIS:

Bispectral index

PetCO2 :

End-tidal carbon dioxide pressure

PACU:

Post anesthesia care unit

SBP:

Systolic blood pressure

DBP:

Diastolic blood pressure

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

DCA:

Decision curve analysis

IQR:

Interquartile interval

OR:

Odd ratios

CI:

Confidence intervals

References

  1. Shi M, Miao S, Gu T, Wang D, Zhang H, Liu J. Dexmedetomidine for the prevention of emergence delirium and postoperative behavioral changes in pediatric patients with sevoflurane anesthesia: a double-blind, randomized trial. Drug Des Dev Ther. 2019;13:897–905.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kain ZN, Mayes LC, Caldwell-Andrews AA, Karas DE, McClain BC. Preoperative anxiety, postoperative pain, and behavioral recovery in young children undergoing surgery. Pediatrics. 2006;118:651–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Karling M, Stenlund H, Hägglöf B. Child behaviour after anaesthesia: associated risk factors. Acta Paediatr (Oslo, Norway : 1992). 2007;96:740–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Vernon DT, Schulman JL, Foley JM. Changes in children’s behavior after hospitalization. some dimensions of response and their correlates. Am J Dis Child (1960). 1966;111:581–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Power NM, Howard RF, Wade AM, Franck LS. Pain and behaviour changes in children following surgery. Arch Dis Child. 2012;97:879–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fortier MA, Del Rosario AM, Rosenbaum A, Kain ZN. Beyond pain: predictors of postoperative maladaptive behavior change in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2010;20:445–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stargatt R, Davidson AJ, Huang GH, Czarnecki C, Gibson MA, Stewart SA, Jamsen K. A cohort study of the incidence and risk factors for negative behavior changes in children after general anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth. 2006;16:846–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Glatz P, Sandin RH, Pedersen NL, Bonamy A-K, Eriksson LI, Granath F. Association of anesthesia and surgery during childhood with long-term academic performance. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171: e163470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gómez-Pesquera E, Poves-Alvarez R, Martinez-Rafael B, Liu P, Alvarez J, Lorenzo-López M, Fierro I, Gómez-Sánchez E, Heredia-Rodriguez M, Gómez-Herreras JI, Tamayo E. Cerebral oxygen saturation and negative postoperative behavioral changes in pediatric surgery: a prospective observational study. J Pediatr. 2019;208:207-213.e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Luo R, Zuo Y, Liu HB, Pan Y. Postoperative behavioral changes in Chinese children undergoing hypospadias repair surgery: a prospective cohort study. Paediatr Anaesth. 2019;29:144–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stipic SS, Carev M, Kardum G, Roje Z, Litre DM, Elezovic N. Are postoperative behavioural changes after adenotonsillectomy in children influenced by the type of anaesthesia?: a randomised clinical study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015;32:311–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Faulk DJ, Twite MD, Zuk J, Pan Z, Wallen B, Friesen RH. Hypnotic depth and the incidence of emergence agitation and negative postoperative behavioral changes. Paediatr Anaesth. 2010;20:72–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Beringer RM, Greenwood R, Kilpatrick N. Development and validation of the Pediatric Anesthesia Behavior score–an objective measure of behavior during induction of anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth. 2014;24:196–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim J, Byun SH, Kim JW, Kim J-Y, Kim YJ, Choi N, Lee BS, Yu S, Kim E. Behavioral changes after hospital discharge in preschool children experiencing emergence delirium after general anesthesia: a prospective observational study. Paediatr Anaesth. 2021;31:1056–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Merkel SI, Voepel-Lewis T, Shayevitz JR, Malviya S. The FLACC: a behavioral scale for scoring postoperative pain in young children. Pediatr Nurs. 1997;23:293–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Williamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs. 2005;14:798–804.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Olbrecht VA, Skowno J, Marchesini V, Ding L, Jiang Y, Ward CG, Yu G, Liu H, Schurink B, Vutskits L, de Graaff JC, McGowan FX Jr, von Ungern-Sternberg BS, Kurth CD, Davidson A. An international, multicenter, observational study of cerebral oxygenation during infant and neonatal anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2018;128:85–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nattino G, Finazzi S, Bertolini G. A new test and graphical tool to assess the goodness of fit of logistic regression models. Stat Med. 2016;35:709–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Balachandran VP, Gonen M, Smith JJ, DeMatteo RP. Nomograms in oncology: more than meets the eye. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:e173–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kain ZN, Caldwell-Andrews AA, Maranets I, McClain B, Gaal D, Mayes LC, Feng R, Zhang H. Preoperative anxiety and emergence delirium and postoperative maladaptive behaviors. Anesth Analg. 2004;99:1648–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Uhl K, Cravero JP. Measuring behavioral and emotional changes in children following hospitalization: Limitations and future directions. Paediatr Anaesth. 2019;29:1083–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kain ZN, Wang SM, Mayes LC, Caramico LA, Hofstadter MB. Distress during the induction of anesthesia and postoperative behavioral outcomes. Anesth Analg. 1999;88:1042–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ghosh A, Elwell C, Smith M. Review article: cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy in adults: a work in progress. Anesth Analg. 2012;115:1373–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Foesel T, Reisch HJ. Postoperative behavioural changes in children: comparison between halothane and sevoflurane. Paediatr Anaesth. 2001;11:719–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Keaney A, Diviney D, Harte S, Lyons B. Postoperative behavioral changes following anesthesia with sevoflurane. Paediatr Anaesth. 2004;14:866–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Karling M, Hägglöf B. Child behaviour after anaesthesia: association of socioeconomic factors and child behaviour checklist to the Post-hospital behaviour questionnaire. Acta Paediatr (Oslo, Norway : 1992). 2007;96:418–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kain ZN, Mayes LC, O’Connor TZ, Cicchetti DV. Preoperative anxiety in children. predictors and outcomes. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996;150:1238–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Beringer RM, Segar P, Pearson A, Greamspet M, Kilpatrick N. Observational study of perioperative behavior changes in children having teeth extracted under general anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth. 2014;24:499–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cohen-Salmon D. Perioperative psychobehavioural changes in children. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2010;29:289–300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kotiniemi LH, Ryhänen PT, Moilanen IK. Behavioural changes in children following day-case surgery: a 4-week follow-up of 551 children. Anaesthesia. 1997;52:970–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Conforti A, Giliberti P, Mondi V, Valfré L, Sgro S, Picardo S, Bagolan P, Dotta A. Near infrared spectroscopy: experience on esophageal atresia infants. J Pediatr Surg. 2014;49:1064–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Razlevice I, Rugyte DC, Strumylaite L, Macas A. Assessment of risk factors for cerebral oxygen desaturation during neonatal and infant general anesthesia: an observational, prospective study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2016;16:107.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Jildenstål P, Widarsson Norbeck D, Snygg J, Ricksten S-E, Lannemyr L. Cerebral autoregulation in infants during sevoflurane anesthesia for craniofacial surgery. Paediatr Anaesth. 2021;31:563–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Vavilala MS, Lee LA, Lam AM. The lower limit of cerebral autoregulation in children during sevoflurane anesthesia. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2003;15:307–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Liu L, Qiang Z, Zhang J, Ren Y, Zhao X, Fu W, Xin Z, Xu Z, Wang F, Li L, Zou N, Zhang X, Feng L, Ma S. Effect of hemoglobin content on cerebral oxygen saturation during surgery for scoliosis in pediatric patients. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021;21:165.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Guo J-Y, Fang J-Y, Xu S-R, Wei M, Huang W-Q. Effects of propofol versus sevoflurane on cerebral oxygenation and cognitive outcome in patients with impaired cerebral oxygenation. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2016;12:81–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Yuki K, Daaboul DG. Postoperative maladaptive behavioral changes in children. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2011;21:183–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the reviewers for their careful review and critique, which helped us improve the manuscript considerably.

Sources of funding and support

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. Lijing Li designed and drafted the manuscript. Jianmin Zhang participated in designing and coordinating the study. Jiayi Li helped with the data analyses and interpretation. Yi Ren and Zhengzheng Gao helped with the study design, manuscript review. Jia Gao, Fuzhou Zhang, Fang Wang and Tiehua Zheng performed the clinical part of the study and acquired data. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianmin Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was established, according to the ethical guidelines of the Helsinki Declaration and the Ethics Committee of Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University has approved the use of fully anonymized cohort data for research (ID: 2021-E-114-Y). All children's guardians provided written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable, there are no details, images or videos on individuals within the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, L., Zhang, J., Li, J. et al. Development of a nomogram to predict negative postoperative behavioral changes based on a prospective cohort. BMC Anesthesiol 23, 261 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02228-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02228-4

Keywords