Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Comparison of accuracy between augmented reality/mixed reality techniques and conventional techniques for epidural anesthesia using a practice phantom model kit

Original Submission
19 Oct 2022 Submitted Original manuscript
2 Nov 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
10 Mar 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
25 Mar 2023 Author responded Author comments - Tatsuya Hayasaka
Resubmission - Version 2
25 Mar 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Mar 2023 Author responded Author comments - Tatsuya Hayasaka
Resubmission - Version 3
27 Mar 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 3
7 Apr 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
17 Apr 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
28 Apr 2023 Author responded Author comments - Tatsuya Hayasaka
Resubmission - Version 4
28 Apr 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 4
2 May 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
10 May 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
10 May 2023 Editorially accepted
20 May 2023 Article published 10.1186/s12871-023-02133-w

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page