Skip to main content

Response to letter for critiques on our published article: Effect of tracheal tube cuff inflation with alkalinized lidocaine versus air on hemodynamic responses during extubation and post-operative airway morbidities in children: prospective observational cohort study, Ethiopia

A Comment to this article was published on 14 June 2023

A Research to this article was published on 04 November 2022

Abstract

Endotracheal tube with an inflated cuff was used to manage and maintain the airway during general anesthesia in children. When the lateral pressure exerted by an inflated Endotracheal tube cuff on tracheal mucosa exceeds capillary perfusion pressure, patients may complain of cough, sore throat, and hoarseness in the postoperative period.

Peer Review reports

First of all, we would like to thank you for your email.

This research is done in a resource-limited setting, where getting advanced anesthesia equipment are challenging; but we anesthetist and researchers are always striving to do our best with what we have at hand and doing research to contribute to the scientific community.

As it is the first research in the study setting, this research help as a baseline for future researcher.

We answer the raised questions as follows:

  1. 1.

    The answer to the first question.

In our study setting pre-anesthesia evaluation and airway assessment were done a day before surgery for all pediatric patients who underwent elective surgery and, all patients were also visited in the morning before surgery. In this study, an airway assessment was performed and no difficult airway was noticed. Moreover, patients with a difficult airway, especially pediatric patients with a difficult airway, are usually not included in prospective studies.

In the methods part, under the procedure section, we already describe direct Laryngoscopy was performed and the trachea was intubated with a standard cuffed endotracheal tube, which is a Murphy, white PVC ETT. A video laryngoscope is not available in our environment.

In this study, stylets were used for each intubation, and there was one intubation attempt for all study participants.

  1. 2.

    The answer to the second question.

In this study, extubation followed common criteria for awake extubation in children: facial grimace, eye-opening, end-tidal isoflurane concentration less than 0.15%, spontaneous tidal volume greater than 5ml/kg, conjugate gaze, purposeful movement, movement other than coughing, positive laryngeal stimulation test, and oxygen saturation greater than 97% [1].

In this study, suctioning was performed before and during extubation for all study participants. It was difficult to measure the pressure of suction because our suction devices are not advanced and are not equipped with a precise pressure gauge to detect small pressure differences.

In the Methods chapter, under the operational definition section, we already operationalize sore throat as a constant pain or discomfort in the throat independent of swallowing. The degree of postoperative sore throat or other postoperative airway morbidities was not described because they were neither the primary nor the secondary objective of our study. This study focused on hemodynamic responses during extubation and the incidence of postoperative airway morbidities. The Authors can answer your question about the severity of sore throat that study participants graded the severity of a sore throat using the FLACC score [2] for ages 3–7 and VAS score [3] for ages 8–13. In all case, if there is any pain or discomfort, our data collector report to the attending nurses to take further action accordingly.

  1. 3.

    The answer to the third question.

Opioids used during anesthesia and extubation may indeed reduce hemodynamic fluctuation and cough response. In this study, an identical analgesia protocol was used for both groups of patients, so the influence of the type and amount of analgesics on the results of the study was avoided.

Sufentanil and remifentanil are not available in our study setting. we use Fentanyl as an induction opioid and analgesia was maintained with IV paracetamol. All study participant takes IV fentanyl 2 µg/kg during induction and 15 mg/kg IV paracetamol for maintenance, since the protocol was identical in the studied groups, we did not report this.

  1. 4.

    The answer to the fourth question.

Patient satisfaction and postoperative QoR-15 are undoubtedly important parts of anesthesiology practice. However, this was neither the primary nor the secondary goal of this study, which is why it was not presented. During the 24 h of data collection, your data assessors had a conversation with the study participants about their satisfaction and comfort after surgery. Almost all study participants and their parents stated they were satisfied and comfortable.

Data Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Templeton TW, Goenaga-Díaz EJ, Downard MG, McLouth CJ, Smith TE, Templeton LB, Pecorella SH, Hammon DE, O’Brien JJ, McLaughlin DH, Lawrence AE, Tennant PR, Ririe DG. Assessment of Common Criteria for Awake Extubation in Infants and Young Children. Anesthesiology. 2019;131(4):801–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000002870.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Merkel S, Voepel-Lewis T, Shayevitz JR, Malviya S. The FLACC: a behavioural scale for scoring postoperative pain in young children. Pediatr Nurs. 1997;23(3):293–797.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Carol A, Bodian G, Freedman S, Hossain JB, Eisenkraft. Yaakov Beilin. The visual Analog Scale for Pain: clinical significance in postoperative patients. Anesthesiology. 2001;95:1356–61.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Biniam Assefa, Hirbo Samuel, Fissiha Fentie, and Tenbite Daniel: Carefully read the critique and give an appropriate answer for the raised questions, and Draft the Response letter. Assefa Hika, Bacha Aberra, and Belete Alemu: Carefully read the critique and give an appropriate answer for the raised questions, and incorporates the response. Hirbo Samuel: Carefully read and revised the response letter and is the corresponding author. All the aforementioned authors read and approved the final version of the response letter.

This response letter has been approved by all authors and all persons entitled to authorship have been so agreed.

We are hopeful that you will consider our response letter.

If there are any further questions or concerns, please feel free to contact directly the corresponding author samuelhirbo1@gmail.com.

Thank you for your consideration.

Best wishes,

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hirbo Samuel.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Assefa, B., Samuel, H., Fentie, F. et al. Response to letter for critiques on our published article: Effect of tracheal tube cuff inflation with alkalinized lidocaine versus air on hemodynamic responses during extubation and post-operative airway morbidities in children: prospective observational cohort study, Ethiopia. BMC Anesthesiol 23, 136 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02085-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02085-1

Keywords