Skip to main content
Download PDF

Transesophageal echocardiographic imaging of the coronary sinus: a retrospective analysis of mid-esophageal views and a novel transgastric view

BMC Anesthesiology volume 22, Article number: 326 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Transesophageal echocardiographic imaging plays an important role in assessing coronary sinus anatomy prior to placement of a retrograde cardioplegia cannula. The coronary sinus can be imaged in the long axis by advancing the TEE probe from the mid-esophageal 4-chamber view or using a modified mid-esophageal bicaval view, while a short axis view can be obtained in the mid-esophageal 2-chamber view. While use of a transgastric view is only briefly mentioned in the literature as an alternative to mid-esophageal views, the authors commonly include it in our comprehensive transesophageal echocardiographic exam of the coronary sinus. This study examines the various imaging strategies. We hypothesize that the transgastric view offers comparable coronary sinus imaging to the mid-esophageal views.

Methods

After approval by our institutional review board, the intraoperative transesophageal echocardiographic exams for 50 consecutive elective cardiac surgical patients with a comprehensive echocardiographic assessment of the coronary sinus were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed to evaluate imaging of the coronary sinus in the various views. For each view, we noted and recorded if the coronary sinus and coronary sinus cannula were visualized. Statistical analysis required pairwise comparisons between each of the 4 views. P values were calculated using McNemar’s Exact test.

Results

Both the coronary sinus and coronary sinus cannula were visualized a majority of the time for each view. There was no statistically significant difference between each view in its ability to visualize the coronary sinus, nor was there a statistically significant difference between each view in its ability to visualize the coronary sinus cannula.

Conclusions

Use of a transgastric window provides the echocardiographer with an effective alternate modality for imaging the coronary sinus when mid-esophageal views are limited.

Peer Review reports

Background

Cannulation of the coronary sinus (CS) is performed to administer retrograde cardioplegia for cardiac surgeries. Whether performed by the surgeon via median sternotomy or percutaneously by an anesthesiologist, transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) imaging plays an important role in assessing CS anatomy and then guiding and confirming placement of the CS cardioplegia cannula [1,2,3,4,5,6,7].

The CS can be imaged from mid- and lower-esophageal windows. A long axis view of the CS can be obtained by advancing the TEE probe from the mid-esophageal (ME) 4-chamber view (ME4C) (Fig. 1) [8,9,10], while a short axis view can be obtained in the ME 2-chamber view (ME2C) (Fig. 2) [8, 9]. The CS can also be visualized in the long axis using a modified ME bicaval view (110–130 degrees) (Fig. 3) [4,5,6, 9, 10].

Fig. 1
figure 1

ME 4C view of the coronary sinus with and without a coronary sinus catheter, CS = coronary sinus, RA = right atrium, TV = tricuspid valve, RV = right ventricle, LV = left ventricle

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

ME 2C view of the coronary sinus with and without a coronary sinus catheter. CS = coronary sinus, LA = left atrium, MV = mitral valve, LV = left ventricle

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Modified bicaval view of the coronary sinus with and without a coronary sinus catheter. CS = coronary sinus, RA = right atrium, LA = left atrium, IAS = interatrial septum, SVC = superior vena cava, TV = tricuspid valve, RV = right ventricle

Full size image

This study examines the various CS imaging strategies, including a transgastric view (TG) of the CS (TG-CS) [Fig. 4]. Though this TG-CS view is only briefly mentioned in the literature [9] as an alternative to ME views, the authors commonly include it in our comprehensive TEE assessment of the CS. We hypothesize that the TG-CS view offers comparable CS imaging to the ME views.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Transgastric view of the coronary sinus with and without a coronary sinus catheter. CS = coronary sinus, RA = right atrium, LA = left atrium, SVC = superior vena cava, IVC = inferior vena cava, TV = tricuspid valve, RV = right ventricle, Ao = aorta, PA = pulmonary artery

Full size image

Methods

After approval by our institutional review board, the intraoperative echocardiographic exams for 50 consecutive elective cardiac surgical patients with a comprehensive TEE assessment of the coronary sinus were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed to evaluate imaging of the CS.

Our institutional standard for TEE imaging of the CS includes four standard views. Starting from the ME4C view, slight probe advancement reveals the CS in its long axis just above the attachment of the tricuspid valve (TV) septal leaflet to the interventricular septum (Fig. 1) [8,9,10]. In the ME2C view, the CS is seen in its short axis immediately above the basal inferior left ventricular (LV) segment (Fig. 2) [8, 9]. The ME modified bicaval view visualizes the CS in its long axis with its ostium adjacent to the TV septal leaflet (Fig. 3) [4,5,6, 9, 10]. Finally, from the TG LV long axis window (TG LV LAX) with an omniplane angle of 80–100 degrees, the TEE probe is rotated slightly to the right to obtain the TG-CS view (Fig. 4).

All patients received a balanced general endotracheal anesthetic with propofol, rocuronium, and isoflurane and standard non-invasive American Society of Anesthesiology monitoring. Additional invasive monitoring included arterial and central venous catheters. The use of a pulmonary artery catheter as well as patient specific hemodynamic management and medication dosing were left to the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist and conformed to institutional protocols.

All TEE exams were performed after the induction of general anesthesia, prior to cardiopulmonary bypass during stable hemodynamic periods. They were performed with either a Philips Epiq ultrasound system with a X7-2 T probe (Philips Medical Systems, Andover, MA), a Philips IE33 ultrasound system with a X7-2 T probe (Philips Medical Systems, Andover, MA), or a GE Vivid E95 with a multiplane probe (GE, Chicago, IL).

The data was collected and analyzed by two experienced and certified (National Board of Echocardiography) echocardiographers (THC, AM). Specific attention was directed towards imaging of the CS in the ME4C, ME2C, modified ME bicaval, and TG-CS views (Figs. 1, 2, 3 and 4). Views of the CS in the ME4C, ME2C, and modified ME bicaval views were achieved by following available guidelines [4,5,6, 8,9,10]. The TG-CS view is achieved by obtaining a TG LV LAX view with the omniplane angle at 80–100 degrees and turning the probe slightly to the right.

For each view, the following was noted and recorded:

  1. 1.

    Was the CS visualized?

  2. 2.

    Was the CS cannula, placed either percutaneously by the anesthesiologist or via median sternotomy by the surgeon, visualized following placement?

Statistical analysis required pairwise comparisons between each of the 4 views. P values were calculated using McNemar’s Exact test for the binary variables “CS visible? Yes or No” and “CS cannula visible? Yes or No”.

Results

The surgeries that the study patients underwent included coronary artery bypass grafting with or without valve repair or replacement, valve repair or replacement, pericardiectomy, and mediastinal exploration and are described in Table 1.

Table 1 Surgical procedures performed
Full size table

A comparative analysis of the four views of the CS used in this study is summarized in Table 2. The CS was visible in at least 2 views for every patient and was visible in all 4 views in 45 patients (90%).

Table 2 Descriptive statistics and comparative analysis of the four views of the coronary sinus (CS) used in this study. Data are presented as occurrence (%)
Full size table

The CS was visible 98% of the time from the ME4C view (49/50 patients), 96% of the time from the ME2C view (48/50 patients), 94% of the time from the modified bicaval view (47/50 patients), and 98% of the time from the TG-CS view (49/50 patients).

For the 29 exams which attempted to image the CS cannula after placement, the cannula was visualized 100% (29/29 patients) of the time in the ME4C view, 93% (27/29 patients) of the time in the ME2C view, 86% (25/29 patients) of the time in the modified bicaval view, and 93% (27/29 patients) of the time in the TG-CS view.

There was not a statistically significant difference between each view in its ability to visualize the CS, nor was there a statistically significant difference between each view in its ability to visualize the CS cannula.

Discussion

The CS is responsible for most of the venous drainage of the heart, receiving coronary venous blood from a number of tributaries including the small, middle, great, and oblique cardiac veins as well as the left marginal vein and the left posterior vein. It travels along the posterior atrioventricular groove of the heart and empties into the right atrium between the inferior vena cava inlet and the septal leaflet of the TV.

Retrograde cardioplegia alone or as an adjunct to antegrade cardioplegia is commonly used in cardiac surgery. Administration of retrograde cardioplegia in patients with coronary artery disease improves cooling of the myocardium distal to the coronary obstructions and may confer long-term benefits for LV systolic function [11]. In patients with aortic insufficiency, retrograde cardioplegia is important to provide adequate myocardial protection without causing LV distention [12]. Cannulation of the CS for retrograde cardioplegia delivery is also critical in minimally invasive cardiac surgery, where the CS cannula is placed percutaneously by the anesthesiologist using TEE guidance [1,2,3,4,5,6,7].

Although insertion of a CS cannula can be facilitated and confirmed using fluoroscopic guidance and pressure waveform analysis, perioperative real-time TEE has the benefit of providing continuous visualization of both the CS and CS cannula without the need for contrast or radiation exposure [7] and can both reduce the risk of CS injury [13] and detect complications related to cannulation [14, 15]. Prior to instrumentation of the CS, imaging allows for the identification of anatomic variants that may preclude the use of retrograde cardioplegia such as a persistent left superior vena cava, Thebesian valve [16, 17], atrial septal defect or sinus venosus defect [18], Chiari network [2], or anomalous great cardiac venous drainage [19, 20].

The ME modified bicaval view is the preferred initial window for CS cannulation because it permits complete visualization of cannula insertion and advancement [4,5,6, 9, 10]. Inclusion of additional windows, in particular the ME4C view, improves CS imaging and success of cannulation [2, 4,5,6,7]. Although the length of the CS is not assessed and its ostium is not visualized from the ME2C view, visualization of the CS cannula in this view confirms that the cannula has been advanced to the mid-to distal CS along the posterior and inferior left atrium [4].

Inclusion of the TG-CS view in the authors’ standard comprehensive TEE exam of the CS was prompted by its successful use in a minimally invasive case requiring percutaneous CS cannulation in which none of the ME views successfully imaged the CS. The TG window has previously been described as an option to to image the CS [9]. However, details regarding acquisition and utility of these views are not available. To obtain the TG-CS view, the probe is turned towards the right from the TG LV LAX view with the omniplane angle rotated to 80–100 degrees. Additional advancement of the omniplane angle would enable further visualization of the right heart and vena cavae.

In this study, we found that the CS was visualized in the TG-CS view in 98% of patients. It was visualized in all patients from at least one TEE view, and all four views in 90% of patients. After placement, the CS cannula could be seen in all patients from at least one view.

This retrospective study was limited by its relatively small number of patients. We also did not review our patients’ medical records and therefore may not have captured the subset of patients with variable anatomy and potentially challenging ME or TG coronary sinus imaging. Nevertheless, based on the results reported in this study, the TG-CS view provides an additional modality to image the CS and CS cannula and offers an effective alternative if ME views are limited.

Conclusion

Retrograde administration of cardioplegia via a CS cannula has become a mainstay of modern cardiac surgery. CS imaging is currently described using a variety of mid-esophageal windows. The TG-CS view offers an additional method of visualizing the CS with a high success rate comparable to ME views. Its inclusion in the assessment of the CS may improve CS imaging and the success of cannulation when ME views are limited.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated and/or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

CS:

Coronary sinus

TEE:

Transesophageal echocardiography

ME:

Mid-esophageal

ME4C:

Mid-esophageal 4-chamber

ME2C:

Mid-esophageal 2-chamber

TG:

Transgastric

TG-CS:

Transgastric coronary sinus

LV:

Left ventricle

TG LV LAX:

Transgastric left ventricular long axis

References

  1. Clements F, Wright SJ, de Bruijn N. Coronary sinus catheterization made easy for Port-Access miimally invasive cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1998;12(1):96–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1053-0770(98)90063-5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Coddens J, Deloof T, Hendrickx J, Vanermen H. Transesophageal echocardiography for port-access surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1999;13(5):614–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1053-0770(99)90018-6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hanada S, Sakamoto H, Swerczek M, Ueda K. Initial experience with percutaneous coronary sinus catheter placement in minimally invasive cardiac surgery in an academic center. BMC Anesthesiol. 2016;16(1):33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-016-0203-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Labriola C, Greco F, Braccio M, Dambruoso PP, Labriola G, Paparella D. Percutaneous Coronary Sinus Catheterization With the ProPlege Catheter Under Transesophageal Echocardiography and Pressure Guidance. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015;29(3):598–604. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2015.01.035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Labriola C, Paparella D, Labriola G, Dambruoso P, Cassese M, Speziale G. Reliability of Percutaneous Pulmonary Vent and Coronary Sinus Cardioplegia in the Setting of Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement: A Single-Center Experience. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2017;31(4):1203–9. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2016.10.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lebon JS, Couture P, Rochon AG, Laliberté E, Harvey J, Aubé N, Cossette M, Bouchard D, Jeanmart H, Pellerin M. The endovascular coronary sinus catheter in minimally invasive mitral and tricuspid valve surgery: a case series. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010;24(5):746–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Plotkin IM, Collard CD, Aranki SF, Rizzo RJ, Shernan SK. Percutaneous coronary sinus cannulation guided by transesophageal echocardiography. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66(6):2085–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(98)01068-6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hahn RT, Abraham T, Adams MS, Bruce CJ, Glas KE, Lang RM, Reeves ST, Shanewise JS, Siu SC, Stewart W, Picard MH. Guidelines for performing a comprehensive transesophageal echocardiographic examination: recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013;26(9):921–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2013.07.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kapoor PM, Muralidhar K, Nanda NC, Mehta Y, Shastry N, Irpachi K, Baloria A. An update on transesophageal echocardiography views 2016: 2D versus 3D tee views. Ann Card Anaesth. 2016;19(Supplement):S56–72. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-9784.192624.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kothavale AA, Yeon SB, Manning WJ. A systematic approach to performing a comprehensive transesophageal echocardiogram. A call to order. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2009;9:18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-9-18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ehrenberg J, Intonti M, Owall A, Brodin LA, Ivert T, Lindblom D. Retrograde crystalloid cardioplegia preserves left ventricular systolic function better than antegrade cardioplegia in patients with occluded coronary arteries. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2000;14(4):383–7. https://doi.org/10.1053/jcan.2000.7923.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Manecke GR Jr, Coletta JM, Pretorius V, Ahn Y, Bowdle A, Mokadam NA, Mittnacht A, Fischer GW. Case 3–2013: Maldistribution of cardioplegia detected by transesophageal echocardiography during minimally invasive cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013;27(3):614–9. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2012.11.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Orihashi K, Miyashita K, Tashiro M, Kihara K, Kondo N, Yamamoto M, Hirose N, Fukutomi T, Nishimori H. Avoidance of coronary sinus injury during retrograde cardioplegia. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102(6):e583–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.06.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Krishnan S, Papworth DP, Farivar RS, Ueda K. Identification of coronary sinus injury by transesophageal echocardiography during placement of a retrograde cardioplegia catheter for minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 2013;116(3):560–2. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e31827bc352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Poirier NC, Ugolini P, Pellerin M, Petitclerc R, Tardif JC. Transesophageal echocardiographic evaluation of perioperative coronary sinus trauma. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66(2):573–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(98)00537-2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kuroda M, Takahashi T, Mita N, Kagaya S, Miyoshi S, Saito S. Difficult cannulation of the coronary sinus due to a large Thebesian valve. Anesth Analg. 2013;116(3):563–6. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e31827bc77e.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Raut MS, Maheshwari A, Shad S. Know the guard of coronary sinus before cannulation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016;30(6):e60–1. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2016.05.041.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Herman CR, Sundaram B, Goldhammer JE. Misadventures of a retrograde cardioplegia catheter. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016;30(6):1614–7. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2016.01.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bardia A, Owais K, Khabbaz KR, O’Gara B, Mahmood F. Coronary sinus and another sinus: which one to cannulate? J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015;29(3):824–6. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2015.02.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Olearczyk BM, Menzies DJ, McNulty PH. Anomalous great cardiac vein. J Card Surg. 2008;23(4):408–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8191.2007.00546.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital / Lifespan, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI, 02903, USA

    Tzonghuei Chen, Geoffrey Hayward, Patricia Apruzzese & Andrew Maslow

  2. East Greenwich, USA

    Tzonghuei Chen

Authors
  1. Tzonghuei Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Geoffrey Hayward
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Patricia Apruzzese
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andrew Maslow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

THC collected the data, analyzed it with the help of our statistician, and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. GH was a contributor in writing the manuscript. PA performed the statistical analysis for the study. AM helped formulate the idea for the study, collected data and was a contributor in writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tzonghuei Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Rhode Island Hospital/Lifespan Institutional Review Board. The requirement of informed consent was waived by Rhode Island Hospital/Lifespan IRB because it was a retrospective chart review. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable—the figures and tables in this submission were created by the submitting author.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, T., Hayward, G., Apruzzese, P. et al. Transesophageal echocardiographic imaging of the coronary sinus: a retrospective analysis of mid-esophageal views and a novel transgastric view. BMC Anesthesiol 22, 326 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01873-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01873-5

Keywords

BMC Anesthesiology

ISSN: 1471-2253

Contact us