Skip to main content
Download PDF

Risk factors associated with reintubations in children undergoing foreign body removal using flexible bronchoscopy: a single-center retrospective cross-sectional study

BMC Anesthesiology volume 22, Article number: 219 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Reintubation is a severe complication during foreign body (FB) removal that uses flexible bronchoscopy.

Objective

To investigate the incidence and risk factors for reintubations in children undergoing FB extraction by flexible bronchoscopy in a single center.

Design

A retrospective cross-sectional study.

Setting

All children with foreign body aspiration at Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University from January 2015 to December 2020.

Patients

Children with FB removal using a flexible bronchoscopy were enrolled in the trial according to the inclusion criteria.

Measurements

Both multivariable and logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the association between characteristic data and reintubations. The results were presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

In total, 244 patients met with the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Among those participants, 28 children (11.5%) underwent reintubations after FB removal by flexible bronchoscopy. Independent factors associated with reintubations were identified as operative time ≥ 60 min [OR: 3.68, 95% CI (1.64–8.82)] and ASA ≥ III [OR: 5.7, 95% CI (1.23–26.4)].

Conclusions

Children undergoing FB removal by a flexible bronchoscopy may encounter with a high incidence of postoperative reintubations. Both long operative duration and a severe physical status cause a growing risk of reintubations.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Foreign body (FB) aspiration usually results in an asphyxiation and even accidental death in children younger than 4 years [1]. The morbidity ranges from 0.3 to 23% in children undergoing FB removal by a bronchoscopy [1,2,3]. Flexible bronchoscopy is becoming a more popular than rigid bronchoscopy to remove FBs [4, 5]. Reintubation is a severe complication occurring in both flexible bronchoscopy and rigid bronchoscopy [6]. Reintubations lead to prolonged mechanical ventilator support, increased postoperative ICU admission, and a higher cost [6]. Identifying and focusing on children with higher risks of reintubations are crucial.

A large scale of investigation has reported that there’re risks correlated with reintubations, including age younger than 1 year, patients with a higher American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status, and a longer operative duration [7]. Age less than 1 year is proved to be an independent risk factor for reintubations in the early postoperative stage [8]. A long operative duration is revealed to be a greater risk factor for intubations, ranging from 180 min to more than 6 h [8,9,10]. However, the risk factors for reintubations in children with FB removal using a flexible bronchoscopy remain unclear. The mean age of children with FB removal was reported as 3.7 years [8], the mean operative duration was published to be 27.4 min [2]. Thus, whether a younger age and a longer procedure time are higher risk factors for FB removal must be determined. Both a younger age and a longer operative duration likely cause tissue edema. In addition, different FB types may lead to distinctive airway tissue trauma or inflammation.

We hypothesized that risk factors for reintubations in children with FB removal were similar to those of reintubations with an early postoperative duration, including age and operative duration. The study was designed to determine the risk factors for reintubations with FB removal among children. Thus, we reviewed patients who had undergone FB removal surgery at our hospital in the last six years, in order to perform a retrospectively analyze eligible cases with reported clinical factors.

Methods

Study design and data resources

The study was designed as a single-center retrospective cross-sectional study and was approved by the Research Committee of Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University (2021KLR09069). Participants were longitudinally surveyed from the anesthesia information management system in our hospital from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2020.

The inclusion criteria were children who had undergone FB removal using a flexible bronchoscope under general anesthesia with LMA (LTLAN; Funia Medical Equipment Co., Ltd. Zhuhai, China). The exclusion criteria were as follows: children with preoperative mechanical ventilation and children who had undergone bronchoscopy procedures twice during hospital residency.

Procedures

Before anesthesia initiation, all the children were injected with atropine (0.01 mg/kg), dexamethasone (0.2 mg/kg), and 1% lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg) by venous injection. Anesthesia was induced by propofol (3–5 mg/kg), remifentanil (2 ug/kg), along with rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg) or mivacurium (0.2 mg/kg) or without muscle relaxants. After the induction, an adjusted LMA (the size of the mask depending on the child’s weight) (Fig. 1A) was inserted by hand. A flexible pediatric bronchoscope (Olympus flexible bronchoscope BF-P 290, Japan) was passed through the swivel connector (Fig. 1B), which was connected the LMA and anesthesia equipment (Fig. 1C). Grasping forceps was used to remove FB through a flexible bronchoscope. Anesthesia was maintained by the infusion of propofol (100–150 µg/kg/min) and remifentanil (0.3–0.4 µg/kg/min), with bolus doses of rocuronium (0.3 mg/kg) or mivacurium (0.1 mg/Kg) in accordance with clinical indications. Mechanical ventilation was set as the pressure control mode to control respiration during the procedure, and the parameters of respirator were adjusted based on the actual oxygen situation (SpO2) and the end-tidal carbon dioxide (PetCO2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Adjusted laryngeal mask airway (LMA) combined with flexible bronchoscopy. A The distal apertures of the LMA were excised using medical scissors. The LMA size was decided by the weight of participants. B The swivel connector. C Flexible bronchoscopy was inserted through both the swivel connector and LMA

Full size image

Clinical characteristics and outcome collection

Clinical documents were collected, such as characteristics regarding the patient (age, gender, and weight), FB (duration, type, size, and location), operation (operative time, intraoperative airway hemorrhage), and anesthesia (neuromuscular blockade agents and ASA classification). Additionally, other crucial information was also recorded, such as radiological findings (pneumonia, pulmonary emphysema, and atelectasis), perioperative adverse events including hypoxemia (pulse oxygen saturation below 90%), laryngospasm (stridor on inspiration with closure of vocal cord closure), pneumothorax, glottic edema, bronchial laceration, and reintubation.

The main outcome was reintubation. Reintubation was defined as the unplanned placement of the endotracheal tube after LMA removal not as a mid-procedure. Hypoxemia after LMA removal was referred to as postoperative pulse oximetric saturation (SpO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio falling below 201 [11]. Reintubation was performed if one child failed to reverse hypoxemia with a mask-manipulated ventilation supported by pure oxygen, who encountered with a severe glottic edema, pneumothorax, pneumorrhagia or other life-threatening complications. Reintubation was determined by a senior anesthesiology, evaluating the necessity and benefit of the performance.

Several variables were considered subvariables, such as age in years (divided into <1, 1–2, 2–3, ≥ 3), weight in kilograms (kg) (divided into < 10, 10–20, ≥ 20), duration of FB in terms of days (divided into < 5, 6–30, > 30), type of FB, location of FB, maximum dimension in FB according to millimeters (mm) (divided into < 5, 5–10, 10–15, ≥ 15), operative time in minutes (divided into < 60, ≥ 60), ASA classification, neuromuscular blockade agents, the development of airway hemorrhage, and radiological findings (pneumonia, emphysema, and atelectasis).

Statistical analyses

Selected characteristics was shown to be frequency distribution (categorical variable) in Table 1. As our primary analysis, we defined cases as those who accepted reintubations after FB removal. Multivariate logistic regression included sex, age, weight, FB information (including location, type, duration, and maximum dimension), ASA rank, muscle relaxant, operative time, airway hemorrhage, and radio findings. Cases or controls with preoperative ventilation or missing data were excluded. The enumeration data were documented as numbers or percentages. Pearson’s chi-squared test was used to analyze comparisons between subvariables. All the variables with a P value ≤ 0.2 in the single-factor analysis were considered for further multivariate analysis using a logistic regression. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to express results of the regression analysis data. Statistical significance was defined as a P value < 0.05. All the data were analyzed by IBM Corp. Released 2015. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

Table 1 The characteristics of all children and risk factors associated with reintubation
Full size table

Results

Of 252 children who had undergone FB removal using a flexible bronchoscopy between 2015 and 2020, 8 participants were excluded because of FB removal failure, a preoperative mechanical ventilation, pneumonia before FB aspiration, two bronchoscopy procedures during hospitalization, and censored data. All of 244 patients were included in the analysis. Among the participants, 28 children had undergone reintubations (11.5%) (Fig. 2). The characteristics of all the patients are summarized in Table 1. The ages of the patients ranged from 9 months to 11 years, and most of the children (93.8%) were younger than 3 years. A total of 164 (67.2%) patients were male. FB aspiration was observed in the right bronchus of 118 children (48.4%), the left bronchus of 111 (45.5%) children, the trachea of 13 (5.3%) children, and more than one site in 2 (0.8%) children. Most of the FBs (87.7%) were organic and 12.3% were inorganic. More than half of the children (60.6%) had undergone intervention within 5 days of the aspiration event or onset of symptoms, 76 children (31.2%) had an intervention between 6 and 30 days and 20 (8.2%) children had been treated for more than 30 days. Half of the children inhaled FBs with a max dimension from 5 to 10 mm, 56 (23.0%) children with < 5 mm, 54 (22.1%) children from 10 to 15 mm, and the remainder had the max dimension of > 15 mm. Except 1 child with an X-ray, all the participants were scanned to identify aspiration of FB using CT. Thus, 4 children were excluded without FB aspiration. The mean operative time was 47.3 min, and 22.1% of patients had a mean operative time > 60 min. Flexible bronchoscopy was conducted without any muscle relaxants in 20 (8.2%) children, with mivacurium in 84 (34.4%) children, with rocuronium in 140 (57.4%) children. Hypoxemia was observed in 38 (15.6%) children, laryngospasm in 54 (22.1%) children, and glottic edema in 71 (29.1%) children.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Flow chart of the participants, events, and inclusion analyses

Full size image

Risk factors associated with reintubation

Risk factors associated with reintubation (with P value ≤ 0.2) were FB in the right bronchus [OR 0.34, 95% CI (0.08–1.43)], an FB duration of 6–30 days [OR: 2.34; 95% CI (0.98–5.58)], an FB duration > 30 days [OR: 4.15; 95% CI (1.27–13.56)], ASA ≥ III [OR: 7.18; 95% CI (2.09–24.6)], pneumonia [OR: 2.59; 95% CI (0.26–1.33)], atelectasis [OR: 4.06; 95% CI (0.71–23.25)], an operative duration ≥ 60 min [OR: 8.8; 95% CI (3.68–21.08)], and intraoperative emphysema [OR; 3.02; 95% CI, 1.33–6.85)] (Table 1).

Multivariate logistic regression analysis

Independent predictors of reintubations were an operative time of ≥ 60 min [OR: 3.8; 95% CI (1.64–8.82)] and ASA ≥ III (OR; 5.70; 95% CI, 1.23–26.40)], in accordance with the results of logistic regression analysis (Table 2).

Table 2 Multivariate analysis of factors associated with reintubation
Full size table

Discussion

In the present study, we revealed that a longer operative duration (not less than 60 min) and ASA ≥ III are independent predictors of reintubations in children undergoing FB removal using a flexible bronchoscopy. These findings suggested that it is essential to take preventive and pretreatment measures must be adopted to manage reintubations occurring in this subgroup of children, like intrabronchial epinephrine.

Reintubation is regarded as a severe complication of numerous surgical procedures. Regardless of adhering to the authorized extubation criteria of extubate, we retrospectively observed 28 (11.5%) children undergoing reintubations, a number higher than that associated with general surgery (0.14-6.9%) [10, 12, 13]. Consistent with previous studies, we identified several independent risk factors implicated in reintubations, such as a long operative duration and ASA ≥ III [8]. Unlike general surgery, other risk factors were associated with reintubations after FB removal in this trial, including an age < 1 year, emergency cases, and neuromuscular blocking agents [8]. In line with the epidemiologic and demographic data from published reports [12, 14], children aged from 1 to 3 years accounted for 86.1% (217 cases) of all the participants, indicating that an age younger than 1 year is a risk factor. An age less than 1 year is a risk factor for reintubations, because of the anatomical and physical characteristics, lower functional reserve capacity, and higher oxygen consumption [15]. Thus, caution must be applied to younger (1 year) children undergoing FB removal in the clinical practice.

Both an operative time > 3 h and surgeon experience are well-established risk factors for reintubation during early general postoperative procedures [8]. An operative time ≥ 60 min, but not > 3 h, was identified as a risk factor for reintubation [12]. The difference can be explained by children with FB being usually complicated with pulmonary complications and the deteriorative trachea and glottis resulting from the procedure of flexible bronchoscopy. In the present investigation, FBs were extracted primarily by fibrotic bronchoscopy under general anesthesia using a first-generation laryngeal mask, eliciting an operative time of most cases less than 60 min in most cases. Despite rigid bronchoscopy using a high frequency jet ventilator was considered the gold standard for FB removal, being flexibility, visibility, and little trauma contributed to the widespread usage of flexible bronchoscopy for FB extraction [16]. Additionally, flexible bronchoscopy improved the success rate ranging from 75 to 100% [12]. This finding renders it suitable to shorten the operative time of FB removal, in addition to its greater rate.

Most of the FBs (87.7%) were identified as organic materials, particularly nuts (e.g., peanuts) and seeds (e.g., sunflower and watermelon seeds). Organic materials can absorb fluid and swell, and the oils from nuts can cause localized inflammation and mechanical obstruction [17]. However, our findings are insufficient to support the correlation between organic FBs and increased reintubation, similar to the study reported by Charlotte K [18]. Similar to the FB duration, the FB size is not a risk factor for FB removal, a finding that may seem unreasonable. Previous studies have proposed that a long FB duration may cause airway edema, granulation tissue, and infection [19]. In addition to the FB, cylindrical and spherical items can occlude the airway or tend to slip as they cross the glottic chink, prolonging the operative time [19]. In contrast to an ASA greater than III, available data have demonstrated that there is no significant difference among preoperative complications including pneumonia, airway hemorrhage, and atelectasis. We believe that a large sample size and a prospective controlled trial will reveal the relationship among these susceptibility factors and reintubation.

The present study has several limitations. First, our data cannot avoid some bias because the study was designed as a retrospective, single-center, cross-sectional investigation. Second, it seems likely to incorrectly eliminate actual risk factors, particularly severe glottic edema, and severe airway spasms. Third, some confounding factors are difficult to be ruled out, including the growth in the experience of anesthesiologists and surgeons. Finally, children with preoperative mechanical ventilation were removed before decreasing the relationship between ASA and reintubation.

Conclusions

Taken together, children undergoing FB removal by a flexible bronchoscopy have a higher risk of postoperative reintubations. Our findings suggested that children are susceptible to reintubations given both long operative duration and ASA ≥ III.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Fidkowski CW, Zheng H, Firth PG. The anesthetic considerations of tracheobronchial foreign bodies in children: a literature review of 12,979 cases. Anesth Analg. 2010;111(4):1016–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Roberts CA, Carr MM. Morbidity and mortality in children undergoing bronchoscopy for foreign body removal. Laryngoscope. 2018;128(5):1226–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Williams A, George C, Atul PS, Sam S, Shukla S. An audit of morbidity and mortality associated with foreign body aspiration in children from a tertiary level hospital in Northern India. Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2014;11(4):287–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Golan-Tripto I, Mezan DW, Tsaregorodtsev S, Stiler-Timor L, Dizitzer Y, Goldbart A, Aviram M. From rigid to flexible bronchoscopy: a tertiary center experience in removal of inhaled foreign bodies in children. Eur J Pediatr. 2021;180(5):1443–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tenenbaum T, Kahler G, Janke C, Schroten H, Demirakca S. Management of foreign body removal in children by flexible bronchoscopy. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2017;24(1):21–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. da Silva PSL, Reis ME, Fonseca TSM, Fonseca MCM. Predicting reintubation after unplanned extubations in children: art or science? J Intensive Care Med. 2018;33(8):467–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tillquist MN, Gabriel RA, Dutton RP, Urman RD. Incidence and risk factors for early postoperative reintubations. J Clin Anesth. 2016;31:80–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rujirojindakul P, Geater AF, McNeil EB, Vasinanukorn P, Prathep S, Asim W, Naklongdee J. Risk factors for reintubation in the post-anaesthetic care unit: a case-control study. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109(4):636–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. De la Garza Ramos R, Nakhla J, Nasser R, Jada A, Purvis TE, Sciubba DM, Kinon M, Yassari R. Factors associated with prolonged ventilation and reintubation in adult spinal deformity surgery. J Clin Neurosci. 2017;43:188–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nandyala SV, Marquez-Lara A, Park DK, Hassanzadeh H, Sankaranarayanan S, Noureldin M, Singh K. Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of postoperative airway management after cervical spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(9):E557–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferguson ND, Fan E, Camporota L, Antonelli M, Anzueto A, Beale R, Brochard L, Brower R, Esteban A, Gattinoni L, et al. The Berlin definition of ARDS: an expanded rationale, justification, and supplementary material. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38(10):1573–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Salih AM, Alfaki M, Alam-Elhuda DM. Airway foreign bodies: a critical review for a common pediatric emergency. World J Emerg Med. 2016;7(1):5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ma W, Hu J, Yang M, Yang Y, Xu M. Application of flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the removal of adult airway foreign bodies. BMC Surg. 2020;20(1):165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ozdemir S, Surmelioglu O, Tarkan O, Tuncer U, Kiroglu M, Dagkiran M. The utility of endoscope-assisted rigid bronchoscopy in pediatric airway foreign body removals. J Craniofac Surg. 2020;31(2):e217–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fontela PS, Piva JP, Garcia PC, Bered PL, Zilles K. Risk factors for extubation failure in mechanically ventilated pediatric patients. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005;6(2):166–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Suzen A, Karakus SC, Erturk N. The role of flexible bronchoscopy accomplished through a laryngeal mask airway in the treatment of tracheobronchial foreign bodies in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;117:194–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Montana A, Salerno M, Feola A, Asmundo A, Di Nunno N, Casella F, Manno E, Colosimo F, Serra R, Di Mizio G. Risk management andrecommendations for the prevention of fatal foreign body aspiration: four casesaged 1.5 to 3 years and mini-review of the literature. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(13):4700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hughes CK, Christensen CL, Maturo SC, O’Connor PR, Dion GR. Organic vs. inorganic tracheobronchial airway foreign body aspiration: does type/duration matter? Laryngoscope. 2021;131(3):490–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Martin A, van der Meer G, Blair D, Mahadevan M, Neeff M, Barber C, Mills N, Salkeld L, Gruber M. Long-standing inhaled foreign bodies in children: characteristics and outcome. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;90:49–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank all the staff of the anesthesiology department of Fujian Children’s Hospital for helping to conduct this study.

Funding

This study was supported by Excellence Program of Fujian Children’s Hospital (YCXZ202204) and Medical innovation Foundation of Fujian Health Commission (2019-CX-8).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Su-Jing Zhang and Hong-Bin Gu contributed equally to this work.

  2. Min Zhou, Xiu-Ying Chen and Guo-Lin Lu contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China

    Su-Jing Zhang, Min Zhou, Long-Xin Zhang, Xiu-Ying Chen & Guo-Lin Lu

  2. Department of Anesthesiology, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fujian Branch of Shanghai Children’s Medical Center Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Fujian Children’s Hospital, Fuzhou, China

    Su-Jing Zhang, Hong-Bin Gu, Min Zhou, Min-Yi Lin & Guo-Lin Lu

  3. Fujian Key Laboratory of Women and Children’s Critical Diseases Research, Fuzhou, China

    Su-Jing Zhang, Min Zhou, Min-Yi Lin, Long-Xin Zhang, Xiu-Ying Chen & Guo-Lin Lu

  4. Department of anesthesia, Shanghai Children’s Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 1678 Dongfang Road, Shanghai, China

    Hong-Bin Gu

Authors
  1. Su-Jing Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hong-Bin Gu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Min Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Min-Yi Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Long-Xin Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xiu-Ying Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Guo-Lin Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Study design: Xiu-Ying Chen, Guo-Lin Lu. Writing the first draft: Su-Jing Zhang. Data interpretation, discussion and preparation of the final manuscript: Hong-Bin Gu, Min Zhou, Min-Yi Lin, Long-Xin Zhang, Guo-Lin Lu. All authors have read and approved the manuscript to be published.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guo-Lin Lu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children’s Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University (Grant No: 2021KLR09069). The written informed consent was obtained from legal guardians of all subjects. The study was conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice guidelines and principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and abided by STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology) guidelines.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, SJ., Gu, HB., Zhou, M. et al. Risk factors associated with reintubations in children undergoing foreign body removal using flexible bronchoscopy: a single-center retrospective cross-sectional study. BMC Anesthesiol 22, 219 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01756-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01756-9

Keywords

BMC Anesthesiology

ISSN: 1471-2253

Contact us