Skip to main content

Table 4 Handling characteristics. Subjective assessment by corresponding operators

From: A comparison of first-attempt cannulation success of peripheral venous catheter systems with and without wings and injection ports in surgical patients—a randomized trial

Handling Characteristics

Total

Introcan

Vasofix

Pchi

N (all)

N

Perc

N (all)

N

Perc

N (all)

N

Perc

Was backflow clearly/quickly visible?

2293

        

 < .001

  Yes

 

2150

93.8%

1126

1025

91.0%

1167

1125

96.4%

 

  No

 

143

6.2%

 

101

9.0%

 

42

3.6%

 

Was there blood spillage during placement?

2275

        

 < .001

  Yes

 

285

12.5%

1113

185

16.6%

1162

100

8.6%

 

  No

 

1990

87.5%

 

928

83.4%

 

1062

91.4%

 

Dressing status

2216

        

 < .001

  Clean, dry

 

2131

96.2%

1068

1002

93.8%

1148

1129

98.3%

 

  Soiled by blood

 

33

1.5%

 

26

2.4%

 

7

0.6%

 

  Soiled by other fluids

 

44

2.0%

 

34

3.2%

 

10

0.9%

 

  Soiled by blood and other fluids

 

8

0.4%

 

6

0.6%

 

2

0.2%

 

Did the port or wings influence catheterization?

  No

      

1138

846

74.3%

-

  Yes, the port

       

71

6.2%

 

  Yes, the wings

       

81

7.1%

 

  Yes, the port and wings

       

140

12.3%

 

Overall Assessment

2302

        

 < .001

  Very good

 

572

24.8%

1133

41

3.6%

1169

531

45.4%

 

  Good

 

671

29.1%

 

195

17.2%

 

476

40.7%

 

  Satisfactory

 

404

17.5%

 

303

26.7%

 

101

8.6%

 

  Sufficient

 

312

13.6%

 

268

23.7%

 

44

3.8%

 

  Poor

 

240

10.4%

 

228

20.1%

 

12

1.0%

 

  Unsatisfactory

 

103

4.5%

 

98

8.6%

 

5

0.4%