Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research Article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Effect of intraoperative blood transfusion on Treg and FOXP3 in patients with digestive tract malignancies and different ABO blood types

BMC Anesthesiology volume 21, Article number: 110 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Blood transfusion can cause immunosuppression and lead to worse outcomes in patients with digestive tract malignancies; however, the specific mechanism behind this is not completely understood. One theory is that increased numbers of regulatory CD3+CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ T cells (Tregs) and forkhead box protein-3 mRNA (FOXP3) expression in the blood after transfusion contribute to these outcomes. The effect of blood transfusion on immune function in patients with different ABO blood types is variable. This study investigates the effect of intraoperative blood transfusion on the number of Tregs and the expression of FOXP3 in the blood of patients with different ABO blood types and digestive tract malignancies.

Methods

Patients with digestive tract malignancies who underwent radical resection and received intraoperative blood transfusion were divided into four groups according to their blood types:blood group A, blood group B, blood group O and blood group AB (n = 20 for each group). Blood was collected from all patients before surgery, immediately after transfusion, 1 day after transfusion, and 5 days after transfusion. The number of Tregs was measured by flow cytometry. The expression of FOXP3 was detected by real time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).

Results

There was no significant difference in the number of Tregs or expression of FOXP3 mRNA among patients with different blood types before surgery. However, the number of Tregs and the expression of FOXP3 increased after blood transfusion in all blood type groups. This increase was especially evident and statistically significant on the first day after blood transfusion when compared with measures obtained before the surgery. Measures returned to the preoperative level five days after surgery. There were significant differences in the increase of Tregs and expression of FOXP3 among patients with different blood types. The greatest increase was seen in patients with blood group B and the least in blood group A.

Conclusions

Intraoperative blood transfusion can lead to an increase in blood Tregs and FOXP3 expression in patients with digestive tract malignancies. Increases were greatest on the first day after surgery and differed among patients with different blood types. Increases were greatest in blood type B and least in blood type A.

Peer Review reports

Background

Patients with malignant tumors of the digestive tract often have anemia because of tumor-associated bleeding, malnutrition, bone marrow suppression due to radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and intraoperative blood loss [1, 2]. Anemia not only affects the quality of life in these patients, but is also an independent risk factor for death [3]. Perioperative blood transfusion is commonly utilized to improve tissue oxygen delivery and perfusion, but transfusion also carries the risk of adverse effects [4]. Blood transfusion has been shown to induce immunosuppression in patients with cancer, expecially digestive tract cancer, then increase the risk of postoperative infections including lung and anastomotic infections, meanwhile increase early recurrence of malignancy and cancer-specific deaths, and reduce survival rates [5,6,7,8]. The complications can negatively affect patients’ prognosis. Previous studies have found that an increase in regulatory T cells (Tregs) and expression of their specific marker forkhead box protein-3 (FOXP3) after allogenic blood transfusion may be one of the mechanisms of immunosuppression [9]. However, the effect of blood transfusion on Tregs and FOXP3 in patients with digestive tract malignancies is unclear.

Treg generally refers to regulatory CD3+CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ T cells. These cells can have immunosuppressive effects through activation and expression of a variety of immune cells by cell-cell contact and cytokine-mediated mechanisms [10, 11]. FOXP3 is the specific marker of Tregs and is the key to their development, activation, and function [12, 13]. Deletion of FOXP3 can lead to the loss of Treg suppressive function on autoreactive T cells in scurfy (sf) mice. This has been shown to cause severe autoimmune reactions and death [14]. However, since it is an intracellular protein, the FOXP3/scurfin protein is not easy to detect. CD127 expression is inversely correlated with FOXP3 [15]; it is specifically expressed at a low level on the surface of Tregs and can be used as a biomarker for detecting them. Human ABO blood group substances are abundantly expressed on the surface of red blood cells and in various tissues, organs and body fluids [16]. ABO blood groups are associated with various diseases including tumors of the digestive system [17,18,19,20,21]. There are also differences in the levels of inflammatory factors and the incidence of transfusion reactions due to erythrocyte concentrates in patients with different ABO blood types [22]. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of blood transfusion on Tregs and FOXP3 expression in patients with malignant tumors of the digestive tract and different ABO blood types.

Methods

This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. The study selected patients at the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University from July 2018 to May 2019. Patients were divided into four groups according to their blood types, namely blood group A, blood group B, blood group O and blood group AB. The first 20 patients of each blood type who met selection criteria were assigned to each group. Peripheral venous blood was collected in EDTA anticoagulant tubes before surgery (T0), immediately after transfusion (T1), 1 day after transfusion (T2), and 5 days after transfusion (T3). The number of CD3+CD4+CD25+CD127low Tregs and the expression of FOXP3 mRNA in the blood were detected.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: (1) Patients diagnosed with a malignant tumor of the digestive tract by gastroscopy and needed radical resection (2) Preoperative hemoglobin < 100 g/L; (3) Aged 40–65 years old; (4) American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class II or III; (5) Body Mass Index (BMI) 18.5–24.9 kg/m2; (6) Rh blood group positive.

Exclusion criteria: (1) Severe lung or heart disease; (2) Presence of immune disease or recent use of immunosuppressive agents; (3) White blood cell count < 2 × 10 9/L or platelet count < 80 × 10 9/L; (4) Prothrombin time more than 3 s longer than normal control or activated partial thromboplastin time more than 10s longer than normal control; (5) Patients with a history of blood transfusion before surgery; no intraoperative blood transfusion was given; massive transfusion (transfusion of more than 4 units red blood cells within 1 h or 50% of total blood volume within 3 h) required during surgery or postoperative blood transfusion given. (6) patients with ABO non-identical transfusions in the perioperative period.

Anesthetic technique

All patients received combined epidural and general anesthesia technique [23]. For the general anesthesia, anesthesia was induced by infusing sufentanil, etomidate and rocuronium and maintained by continuous infusing propofol, remifentanil and cisatracurium. For the epidural anesthesia, the patient was in the lateral decubitus position and the epidural intervertebral space was selected according to the surgical site. Once an epidural catheter was positioned, lidocaine 2% 5 ml was administered as a test dose and ropivacaine 0.25% 5 ml was supplemented every 40 min through the epidural catheter during the surgery. At the end of surgery, ramosetron 3 mg was intravenously administered. Postoperative analgesia was performed with patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA).

Blood transfusion method

All patients had a preoperative type and cross performed. According to the ASA “Practice Guidelines for Perioperative Blood Management” [24] and Chinese “Technical Specifications for Clinical Transfusion” [25], transfusion is not indicated when the hemoglobin concentration is above 10 g/dL, is indicated when the hemoglobin concentration is less than 7 g/dL, and should be guided by symptoms for patients with hemoglobin concentrations between 7 and 10 g/dL. The anesthesiologist determined the amount of blood transfused based on a comprehensive evaluation of the patient’s anemia, blood volume, blood loss, severity of shock, cardiopulmonary status and hemodynamic indicators.

CD3+CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg detection

Fifty μL of anticoagulated whole blood was thoroughly mixed in a test tube with 10 μL each of CD4-FITC/FL1-A (BD340133), CD25-APC/FL4-H (BD340938), CD127-PE/FL2-H (BD561028) monoclonal antibodies. The mixture was protected from light and maintained at room temperature for 15 min. Subsequently, 2 mL of a 1: 10 diluted FACS Lysing solution was added. The tube was incubated for 10 more minutes at room temperature while protected from light during lysis. The tube was centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 5 min and the supernatant removed. After adding 2 mL of phosphate buffer solution (PBS), the tube was again centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 5 min. The supernatant was removed and 500 μL PBS was added for detection. Detection was performed using a BD FACSCanto II flow cytometer, and analyzed by BD FACSDiva software to obtain the number of CD3+CD4+CD25+CD127low Tregs.

FOXP3mRNA detection

RNA was extracted using Trizol. The optical density (OD)260/OD280 ratios were measured with a micro-spectrophotometer to assess the RNA quality. A ratio between 1.8 and 2.0 met the experimental requirements. The total RNA concentration (μg/μL) = OD260 × 40 × 10− 3. First strand cDNA synthesis was performed using 10 μM oligo (dT)18 primer and Hiscript reverse transcriptase. Reaction conditions were 5 min at 25 °C, 15 min at 50 °C, 5 min at 85 °C, and 10 min at 4 °C. The resulting cDNA was diluted twice before proceeding with the PCR reaction. The relative DNA amount of FOXP3 mRNA was determined using SYBR Green Master Mix, and the internal reference gene GAPDH was measured in each sample. The PCR reaction conditions were 40 cycles at 50 °C for 2 min, 95 °C for 10 min, 95 °C for 30 s, and 60 °C for 30 s. The primer sequences are as follows: FOXP3 upstream primer 5′-CATTCCCAGAGTTCCTCCACA-3′, downstream primer 5′-CATTGAGTGTCCGCTGCTTC-3′; the internal reference gene GAPDH upstream primer 5′-TCAAGAAGGTGGTGAGACAGG-3′, and downstream primer 5′- TCAAAGGTGGAGGAGTGGGT-3′. Triplicate wells were conducted for each specimen, and the final data was analyzed for changes in the relative expression level of FOXP3 mRNA using the 2-△△Ct method [26, 27].

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed by using SPSS18.0. Quantitative data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (\( \overline{x}\pm s \)), and discrete data were expressed as numbers. Comparison within groups at different time points was performed by repeated measures Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and comparison between different groups at the same time points was performed using the Bonferroni test. Discrete data were compared using chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Sample size

The formula \( \mathrm{n}=4\;{\left[\frac{Z_{a/2}+{Z}_{\beta }}{1\mathrm{n}\;\frac{\left(1+p\right)}{1-p}}\right]}^2+3 \) was used to estimate sample size based on the correlation coefficient test. The correlation coefficient of 0.7 was substituted into the formula; assuming two-sided α = 0.05, β = 0.10, then the sample size would be n ≈ 17. Therefore at least 17 cases were required for each group.

Results

Patient demographics

There were no significant differences among different blood groups with regard to age, sex, BMI, tumor type, treatment history, preoperative hemoglobin, operative time, operative technique or volume of intraoperative blood transfusion (P > 0.05). (Table 1).

Table 1 Patient demographics
Full size table

Flow cytometry assay comparison of CD3+CD4+CD25+CD127lowTregs at different time points for different blood types

Between-group and within-group ANOVA was performed on CD3+CD4+CD25+CD127low Tregs in the four groups of patients with different blood types (Table 2) (Fig. 1). The results showed that there was no significant difference in peripheral blood CD3+CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg numbers among patients with different blood types at T0 (P > 0.05). The number of Tregs increased at T1, but there was no statistically significant difference from T0 (P > 0.05). At T2 Treg numbers were significantly increased compared with T0 (P < 0.05). At T3 Treg numbers returned to preoperative levels, and there was no significant difference compared with T0 (P > 0.05). The degree of increase in CD3+CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg numbers after blood transfusion was different among patients with the four different blood types. The highest increase was seen in blood group B and the least in blood group A; This difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05) at T2. The results of CD3+CD4+CD25+CD127low Treg detection by flow cytometry are shown in Fig. 2.

Table 2 Comparison of CD3+CD4+CD25+CD127low Tregs at different time points in different blood types
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Comparison of CD3+CD4+CD25+CD127low Tregs at different time points in different blood types. A, blood group A; B, blood group B; O, blood group O; AB, blood group AB. T0, before surgery; T1, immediately after transfusion; T2, 1 day after transfusion; T3, 5 days after transfusion. Compared with T0, ★P < 0.05; compared with blood group B, O, AB, ▲P < 0.05; compared with blood group A, O, AB, △P < 0.05

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Flow cytometry image. Flow cytometric gating scheme for Treg: Starting from lymphocytes by FSC and SSC gating, cells were further gated on CD4+ and CD25+, then CD127low was used to define Treg population as CD4+CD25+CD127low T lymphocytes, gating of this marker was based on CD4+ T lymphocytes

Full size image

Comparison of FOXP3mRNA at different time points in different blood types

The FOXP3mRNA expression at T1, T2 and T3 relative to T0 in all patients was calculated by relative quantitative calculation using 2-△△Ct formula; the fold-change of absolute expression > 2 was considered to be statistically significant. The FOXP3mRNA expression at T0 among all patients with different blood types was 1. Between-group and within-group ANOVA was performed on FOXP3mRNA in the four groups of patients with different blood types (Table 3) (Fig. 3). Results showed that compared with T0, expression of FOXP3mRNA in the peripheral blood of patients with all four blood types began to increase at T1 (fold-change < 2), peaked at T2 (fold-change > 2) and then decreased to preoperative levels at T3 (fold-change < 2). The degree of increase in FOXP3mRNA expression was different after blood transfusion among patients within the four blood types. The highest increase was seen in blood group B and the lowest was seen in blood group A. This difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).

Table 3 Comparison of FOXP3mRNA at different time points in different blood types
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

Comparison of FOXP3mRNA at different time points in different blood types. A, blood group A; B, blood group B; O, blood group O; AB, blood group AB. T0, before surgery; T1, immediately after transfusion; T2, 1 day after transfusion; T3, 5 days after transfusion. Compared with T0, ★fold-change > 2; compared with blood group B, O, AB, ▲P < 0.05; compared with blood group A, O, AB, △P < 0.05

Full size image

Discussion

Our results found that intraoperative blood transfusion may lead to an increase in Treg and FOXP3 in the blood of patients with digestive tract malignancies. For the patients with different ABO blood types, there was increase in Treg and FOXP3, but differed in degree. The patients with blood type B had the highest increase and those with blood type A showed the lowest increase.

The immune system plays a key role in the body’s defense against malignancy. While immune function in patients with malignant tumors is often impaired, the specific mechanism is not clear. Numerous studies have demonstrated that Tregs and FOXP3 are increased in the peripheral blood and tumors of patients with digestive tract malignancies and are positively correlated with tumor stage [28, 29]. In addition, increases of Tregs and FOXP3 in patients with digestive tract malignancies are associated with a poor prognosis because of an association with tumor immune escape [30]. Tregs are mainly produced by the thymus (tTregs), but can also be produced in the periphery (pTregs) or induced in cell culture (iTregs) [31]. Tregs can directly or indirectly inhibit the activation of natural killer (NK) cells, cytotoxic T lymphocytes, monocytes, B cells, inhibit the expression of macrophages, and regulate the expression of T helper type 1 (Th1) and type 2 (Th2) cells. This occurs through direct cell-to-cell contact [10], secretion of multiple inhibitory cytokines such as transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), interleukin (IL)-10, and through inhibiting the production of interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) [15]. These actions cumulatively exert an immunosuppressive effect on the body’s defenses [11]. FOXP3 is a member of the forkhead/winged-helix transcription factor family. It is specifically expressed on Treg without being affected by activation status and is distinct from other molecular markers of Tregs such as CD25, CD45RB, cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4), and glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor (GITR). FOXP3 is the key to the development, activation and function of Tregs [12, 13]. FOXP3 may also participate in the regulation of Tregs through the dual roles of transcription repressor and activator [10]. Only changes in FOXP3 on thymus Tregs can affect Treg numbers in peripheral blood [32].

Patients with digestive tract malignancies often have pre-existing anemia and require intraoperative blood transfusion [2]. Blood transfusion can increase the risk of metastasis and recurrence, as well as the incidence of complications such as local infection, pneumonia, and sepsis [5, 6]. Factors such as autologous and allogeneic blood transfusion [33, 34], use of different blood products and blood storage times [35], have been commonly studied with regard to immunosuppression. However, the mechanism of immunosuppression from blood transfusion remains uncertain [9, 36]. Proposed mechanisms include: enhanced secretion of cytokines such as prostaglandins, thromboxane, growth factors, nonpolar lipids and pro-inflammatory lysophosphatidylcholines [37,38,39]; down-regulated expression of Th1 type cytokines (IL-2, IL-12, IFN-γ and TNF-γ); up-regulated expression of Th2 type cytokines (IL-4, IL-5, IL-6 and IL-10) [38]; increases in the population of Tregs [39] and formation of microparticles [40] among others. At present, few studies have explored the mechanism of blood transfusion induced immunosuppression in patients with digestive tract malignancies. Transfusion-induced up-regulation of Tregs and FOXP3 may be an important mechanisms of immunosuppression after blood transfusion in patients with digestive tract malignancies [9]. The present study shows that intraoperative blood transfusion may temporarily increase the number of Tregs and the expression of FOXP3 in this patient population. This was especially evident on postoperative day 1 and resolved by postoperative day 5. Given the known role of Tregs in modulating immune function, our finding supports that increased blood levels of Treg and FOXP3 may play an important role in the immunosuppression seen with blood transfusion. Since, the observation time of this study was short and the sample size was relatively small, these results still need further investigation to confirm.

The ABO blood group antigen system was discovered a century ago. Human ABO blood group system consists of three alleles (A, B, O) and four phenotypes. Studies have shown that ABO blood groups are associated with various diseases such as cardiovascular disease [20] diabetes [21], and malignant tumors including those of the digestive tract [17,18,19]. The incidence of transfusion reactions and levels of inflammatory cytokines also differs among patients with different ABO blood groups [22]. However, the biological and functional role of the ABO blood group antigen system remains a mystery [41]. This study showed that the degree of increase in Tregs and FOXP3 after blood transfusion was different in patients with different ABO blood types. This increase was highest among patients with blood type B and least in patients with blood type A. This finding suggests that the degree of immunosuppression in patients with digestive tract malignancies and different ABO blood types may also vary. Further studies with larger numbers of patients are still needed to confirm this finding. We speculate that the increase in the number of Tregs and FOXP3 expression in these patients with blood type B may be related to the lack of the A antigen on erythrocytes and the increase of anti A antibodies in the plasma, but this study has not found the same trend in patients with blood type O, so the mechanisms should be further studied in future. The correlation between different ABO blood types and immunosuppression after blood transfusion might has significant implications in clinical blood use. For example, patients with blood type B and a high risk of requiring perioperative transfusion may benefit from a comprehensive, individualized blood management protocol to reduce the need for blood transfusion as much as possible.

Limitations

Our study documented an excessive of plasma, which was different from many transfusion practice. First, the usage of colloids was strictly limited by our hospital. Second, the patients in our study received epidural anesthesia combined with general anesthesia, this anesthesia method always lead to hypotension during the intraoperative period. Therefore, fresh frozen plasma was used as a common therapy for these patients to maintain intraoperative hemodynamic stability in our center. Furthermore, we just tested the biomarkers and found that there were significant differences between the ABO blood groups. In future, we should follow up the patients and observe whether the incidence of complications and reoccurrence rate are different between the ABO blood groups.

In conclusion, these findings suggest that the degree of immunosuppression after blood transfusion in patients with digestive tract malignancies and different ABO blood types might be different as well. While these findings still need to be confirmed by larger trials, such investigations may lead to individualized blood management for patients with different ABO blood types. Our findings suggest that the degree of immunosuppression after blood transfusion in patients with digestive tract malignancies and different ABO blood types might be different as well. While these findings still need to be confirmed by larger trials, such investigations may lead to individualized blood management for patients with different ABO blood types.

Conclusions

Intraoperative blood transfusion can lead to an increase in blood Tregs and FOXP3 expression in patients with digestive tract malignancies. Increases were greatest on the first day after surgery and differed among patients with different blood types. Increases were greatest in blood type B and least in blood type A.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

Tregs:

Regulatory CD3 + CD4 + CD25 + FOXP3+ T cells

FOXP3:

Forkhead box protein-3

RT-PCR:

Real time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

ASA:

American Society of Anesthesiologists

BMI:

Body Mass Index

GA:

General anesthesia

PETCO2 :

End-tidal carbon dioxide tension

PCEA:

Patient-controlled epidural analgesia

PBS:

Phosphate buffer solution

OD:

Optical density

ANOVA:

Analysis of Variance

NK cells:

natural killer cells

Th1:

T helper type 1

Th2:

T helper type 2

TGF-β:

Transforming growth factor-β

IL:

Interleukin

IFN-γ:

Interferon-γ

TNF-α:

Tumor necrosis factor-α

CTLA-4:

Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4

GITR:

Glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor

References

  1. Calleja JL, Delgado S, del Val A, Hervás A, Larraona JL, Terán Á, et al. Ferric carboxymaltose reduces transfusions and hospital stay in patients with colon cancer and anemia. Int J Color Dis. 2016;31(3):543–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2461-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hou D, Dai J, Deng Z, Yan D. Effects of hemoglobin level and perioperative blood transfusion on prognosis of patients with clon cancer. Modern Oncol. 2018;26(07):1070–4.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ceanga AI, Ceanga M, Eveslage M, Herrmann E, Fischer D, Haferkamp A, et al. Preoperative anemia and extensive transfusion during stay-in-hospital are critical for patient's mortality: a retrospective multicenter cohort study of oncological patients undergoing radical cystectomy [J]. Transf Apheresis Sci. 2018;57(6):739–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ness PM, Triulzi DJ, Carson JL. Adverse effects of red-cell transfusion [J]. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(1):97–8. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1714159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Aquina CT, Blumberg N, Becerra AZ, Boscoe FP, Schymura MJ, Noyes K, et al. Association among blood transfusion, Sepsis, and decreased long-term survival after Colon Cancer resection [J]. Ann Surg. 2017;266(2):311–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001990.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hart S, Cserti-Gazdewich CM, McCluskey SA. Red cell transfusion and the immune system. Anaesthesia. 2015;70(s1):38–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.12892.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu X, Ma M, Huang H, Wang Y. Effect of perioperative blood transfusion on prognosis of patients with gastric cancer: a retrospective analysis of a single center database. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):649. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4574-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Pang Q, An R, Liu H. Perioperative transfusion and the prognosis of colorectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. World J Surg Oncol. 2019;17(1):7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-018-1551-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Cata JP, Wang H, Gottumukkala V, Reuben J, Sessler DI. Inflammatory response, immunosuppression, and cancer recurrence after perioperative blood transfusions. Br J Anaesth. 2013;110(5):690–701. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aet068.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Shevach EM. Mechanisms of foxp3+ T regulatory cell-mediated suppression. Immunity. 2009;30(5):636–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2009.04.010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pereira LMS, Gomes STM, Ishak R, Vallinoto ACR. Regulatory T cell and Forkhead box protein 3 as modulators of immune homeostasis [J]. Front Immunol. 2017;8:605. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00605.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Torgerson TR, Ochs HD. Immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked: Forkhead box protein 3 mutations and lack of regulatory T cells. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;120(4):744–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2007.08.044.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tao J, Cheng M, Tang J, Liu Q, Pan F, Li X. Foxp3, regulatory T cell, and autoimmune diseases. Inflammation. 2017;40(1):328–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10753-016-0470-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fontenot JD, Gavin MA, Rudensky AY. Foxp3 programs the development and function of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. Nat Immunol. 2003;4(4):330–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni904.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu W, Putnam AL, Xu-Yu Z, Szot GL, Lee MR, Zhu S, et al. CD127 expression inversely correlates with FoxP3 and suppressive function of human CD4+ T reg cells. J Exp Med. 2006;203(7):1701–11. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20060772.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Watkins WM. The ABO blood group system: historical background. Transfus Med. 2010;11(4):243–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang Z, Liu L, Ji J, Zhang J, Yan M, Zhang J, et al. ABO blood group system and gastric Cancer: a case-control study and meta-analysis. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13(10):13308–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms131013308.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Iodice S, Maisonneuve P, Botteri E, Sandri MT, Lowenfels AB. ABO blood group and cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46(18):3345–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2010.08.009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang B, He N, Huang Y, Song F, Chen K. ABO blood groups and risk of Cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prevent. 2014;15(11):4643–50. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.11.4643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Franchini M, Lippi G. The intriguing relationship between the ABO blood group, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. BMC Med. 2015;13(1):7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-014-0250-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Fagherazzi G, Gusto G, Clavel-Chapelon F, Balkau B, Bonnet F. ABO and rhesus blood groups and risk of type 2 diabetes: evidence from the large E3N cohort study. Diabetologia. 2015;58(3):519–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-014-3472-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yu J, Xie Y, Yiri D, Shi H, Chen D, Han Z. Effects of ABO blood group factors on erythrocyte suspension transfusion reactions. Chin J Anesthesiol. 2015;12:1425–7.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shi H, Xuejiang D, Wu F, Hu Y, Xv Z, Mi W. Dexmedetomidine improves early postoperative neurocognitive disorder in elderly male patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy [J]. Exp Ther Med. 2020;20(4):3868–77. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.9113.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative Blood Management. Practice guidelines for perioperative blood management: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative Blood Management*. Anesthesiology. 2015;122(2):241–75.

  25. Ministry of Health. Technical specifications for clinical blood transfusion. Chin Hosp. 2000;4(6):1–11.

  26. Yuan JS, Reed A, Chen F, Stewart CN Jr. Statistical analysis of real-time PCR data. BMC Bioinform. 2006;7(1):85. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Geng Y, Wang H, Lu C, Li Q, Xu B, Jiang J, et al. Expression of costimulatory molecules B7-H1, B7-H4 and Foxp3+Tregs in gastric cancer and its clinical significance. Int J Clin Oncol. 2015;20(2):273–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-014-0701-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ganapathi SK, Beggs AD, Hodgson SV, Kumar D. Expression and DNA methylation of TNF, IFNG and FOXP3 in colorectal cancer and their prognostic significance. Br J Cancer. 2014;111(8):1581–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.477.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Wolf D, Sopper S, Pircher A, Gastl G, Wolf AM. Treg(s) in Cancer: friends or foe? J Cell Physiol. 2015;230(11):2598–605. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.25016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Shevach EM, Thornton AM. tTregs, pTregs, and iTregs: similarities and differences. Immunol Rev. 2014;259(1):88–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12160.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen W, Jin W, Hardegen N, Lei KJ, Li L, Marinos N, et al. Conversion of peripheral CD4+CD25- naive T cells to CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells by TGF-β induction of transcription factor foxp3. J Exp Med. 2003;198(12):1875–86. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20030152.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Bower MR, Ellis SF, Scoggins CR, McMasters KM, Martin RC. Phase II comparison study of intraoperative autotransfusion for major oncologic procedures. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(1):166–73. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1228-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Amico F, Briggs G, Balogh ZJ. Transfused trauma patients have better outcomes when transfused with blood components from young donors. Med Hypotheses. 2019;122:141–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2018.11.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mouw TJ, Lu J, Woody-Fowler M, Ashcraft J, Valentino J, DiPasco P, et al. Morbidity and mortality of synchronous hepatectomy with cytoreductive surgery/hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC)[J]. J Gastroin Oncol. 2018;9(5):828–32. https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo.2018.06.04.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Landers DF, Hill GE, Wong KC, Fox IJ. Blood transfusion-induced immunomodulation. Anesth Analg. 1996;82(1):187–204. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-199601000-00035.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Youssef LA, Spitalnik SL. Transfusion-related immunomodulation: a reappraisal. Curr Opin Hematol. 2017;24(6):551–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOH.0000000000000376.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Sahu S, Hemlata H, Verma A. Adverse events related to blood transfusion. Indian J Anaesth. 2014;58(5):543–51. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.144650.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Cata JP, Gottumukkala V. Blood transfusion practices in cancer surgery. Indian J Anaesth. 2014;58(5):637–42. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.144675.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Danesh A, Inglis HC, Jackman RP, Wu S, Deng X, Muench MO, et al. Exosomes from red blood cell units bind to monocytes and induce proinflammatory cytokines, boosting T-cell responses in vitro. Blood. 2013;123(5):687–96. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2013-10-530469.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Greenwell P. Blood group antigens: molecules seeking a function? Glycoconj J. 1997;14(2):159–73. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018581503164.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Ruixia Liu, Inner Mongolia Yuwei Medical Devices Co, Ltd., hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China, for flow cytometry detection.

Funding

None.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yajun Liu and Junzhi Sun These authors contributed equally to this study and should be regarded as co-first authors.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China

    Yajun Liu, Junzhi Sun & Jianshe Yu

  2. Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA

    Yun Xia & Michael R. Lyaker

Authors
  1. Yajun Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Junzhi Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yun Xia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michael R. Lyaker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jianshe Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JSY initiated the study, participated in its design and coordination, performed the statistical analysis. YJL carried out the study, and drafted the manuscript. JZS helped to carried out the study and drafted the manuscript. YX helped conduct the study, analyze the data and prepare the manuscript. MRL helped analyze the data, write and edit the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianshe Yu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Sun, J., Xia, Y. et al. Effect of intraoperative blood transfusion on Treg and FOXP3 in patients with digestive tract malignancies and different ABO blood types. BMC Anesthesiol 21, 110 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01330-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01330-9

Keywords

BMC Anesthesiology

ISSN: 1471-2253

Contact us