Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Effect of sex differences in remifentanil requirements for inhibiting the response to a CO2 pneumoperitoneum during propofol anesthesia: an up-and-down sequential allocation trial

BMC Anesthesiology volume 20, Article number: 35 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

A CO2 pneumoperitoneum during a laparoscopic procedure causes violent hemodynamic changes. However, the remifentanil required to inhibit the cardiovascular response to a CO2 pneumoperitoneum combined with propofol remains unknown. Moreover, the sex of the patient may influence the response to opioids, which can affect this requirement. The main objective of this study was to compare the required median effective concentration (EC50) of remifentanil for inhibiting the cardiovascular response to a CO2 pneumoperitoneum between female and male patients during propofol anesthesia.

Methods

The current study is an up-and-down sequential allocation trial. Forty-six patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II, a body mass index 18 to 30 kg/m2, aged 20 to 60 years, and scheduled for laparoscopic surgery were enrolled. Induction of anesthesia was performed by target-controlled infusion. The effective effect-site concentration (Ce) of propofol was 4 μg/ml. The Ce of remifentanil was initially 4 ng/ml and then adjusted to a predetermined level after I-gel laryngeal mask airway insertion. The Ce of remifentanil for each patient was determined by the response of the previous patient using the modified Dixon “up-and-down” method. The first patient received remifentanil at 5.0 ng/ml Ce, and the step size between patients was 0.5 ng/ml.

Results

Patients characteristics including age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, type of surgery and surgery duration, were comparable between male and female patients. The EC50 of remifentanil required to inhibit the response to a CO2 pneumoperitoneum based on the Dixon “up-and-down” method in women (4.17 ± 0.38 ng/ml) was significantly lower than that in men (5.00 ± 0.52 ng/ml) during propofol anesthesia (P = 0.01).

Conclusions

The EC50 of remifentanil required to inhibit the response to a CO2 pneumoperitoneum was lower in women than in men during propofol anesthesia.

Trial registration

The study was registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR-IOR-17011906, 8th, July, 2017).

Peer Review reports

Background

Currently, laparoscopic surgery is widely used due to its minimal invasiveness, low postoperative pain, short length of hospitalization and rapid postoperative recovery [1, 2]. However, a CO2 pneumoperitoneum during a laparoscopic procedure causes violent hemodynamic changes [3, 4]. Zou et al. [5] demonstrated that the response to a CO2 pneumoperitoneum was even stronger than that to the surgical incision.

A combination of remifentanil and propofol is commonly used for total intravenous anesthesia. Remifentanil has a very short infusion time-related half-life and is suitable for continuous infusion [6]. Moreover, it can inhibit the stress reaction effectively. The onset and recovery time of propofol are rapid, making sedation easy to control [7, 8]. Although there have been several studies investigating the median effective concentration (EC50) of remifentanil during propofol anesthesia in different situations [9,10,11], the remifentanil required to inhibit the cardiovascular response to a CO2 pneumoperitoneum combined with propofol remains unknown.

Moreover, the sex of the patient may influence the response to analgesic treatment with opioids, which can affect these requirements [12,13,14]. Men seem to need more opioids to achieve the same effect than women [15]. A recent study showed that the remifentanil requirements for the insertion of a laryngeal mask airway were higher in men than in women [16]. Accordingly, we hypothesized that the sex of the patient may affect the remifentanil required to inhibit the cardiovascular response to a CO2 pneumoperitoneum.

The main objective of this study was to compare the EC50 of remifentanil required to inhibit the cardiovascular response to a CO2 pneumoperitoneum between female and male patients during propofol anesthesia.

Methods

The current study is an up-and-down sequential allocation trial. This study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Anhui Provincial Hospital (2016–110) and registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR-IOR-17011906). Written informed consent was obtained from 46 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery. The inclusion criteria were an age between 20 and 60 years old, an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II and a body mass index (BMI) 18 to 30 kg/m2. The exclusion criteria included a history of cardiac, pulmonary, renal or liver diseases, alcohol or drug abuse, current use of vasoactive drugs, and recent use of any drugs known to affect the sympathetic adrenergic response.

All patients fasted routinely before surgery and received no premedication. Electrocardiograms, pulse oxygen saturation, end-tidal CO2 concentrations (EtCO2), and invasive radial arterial pressures were monitored. A bispectral index (BIS) monitor (BIS VISTATM monitor, Aspect Medical Systems, Norwood, MA) was used to monitor the depth of anesthesia.

Before anesthesia, 15 kg/ml lactated Ringer’s solution was administered and then maintained at a rate of 10 ml/kg/h. Patients were preoxygenated with 100% oxygen for 3 min. Induction of anesthesia was performed by a target-controlled infusion (TCI) pump (CP-730TCI; Inc., Beijing SLGO, China). The effective effect-site concentrations (Ce) of propofol (Marsh pharmacokinetic model) and remifentanil (Minto pharmacokinetic model) were 4 μg/ml and 4 ng/ml respectively. After loss of consciousness, 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium was injected intravenously, and then an I-gel laryngeal mask airway (LMA, size 3 for women, size 4 for men) was inserted. Mechanical ventilation was controlled with a tidal volume of 6–8 ml/kg and respiratory rate of 12–14 breaths per minute, maintaining the PETCO2 within 35–45 mmHg. Three minutes after LMA insertion, the Ce of remifentanil was adjusted to a predetermined level. After maintaining the predetermined target Ce of remifentanil for at least 10 min, a CO2 pneumoperitoneum was established with a Veress insufflation needle. The pneumoperitoneum pressure of the machine (Inc., Stryker, America) was maintained at 14 mmHg, and the CO2 flow rate was 20 l per minute.

The Ce of remifentanil for each patient was determined by the response of the previous patient using the modified Dixon “up-and-down” method [17]. The first patient in each group received remifentanil at 5.0 ng/ml Ce, and the step size was 0.5 ng/ml. The response of patients to the CO2 pneumoperitoneum was determined by another anesthesiologist blinded to the remifentanil concentrations as either positive or negative. If the increase in the mean arterial pressure (MAP) or heart rate (HR) was more than 20% of its baseline, the response was defined as positive. In contrast, a negative response was defined as an increase in the MAP or HR of less than 20% of its baseline [5]. Patients’ MAP, HR and BIS values were recorded before induction, at baseline (defined as the average of 3 and 1 min measured values before the CO2 pneumoperitoneum) and 1 and 3 min after a stable pneumoperitoneum pressure was maintained. The increase in the MAP or HR was the difference between the average of the 1 and 3 min measured values after CO2 pneumoperitoneum and its baseline value. During this study, when the patient’s HR was less than 50 beats per minute, 0.5 mg atropine was injected intravenously. A bolus of 6–10 mg ephedrine was administered intravenously if the MAP was less than 50 mmHg. These patients were excluded from our study. The study was continued until 6 negative/positive crossover pairs had occurred. After finishing this study, intravenous administration of propofol and remifentanil was used to maintain the BIS between 40 and 60, and to ensure that the change in the MAP and HR did not exceed 20% of their baseline values. A TOF monitor (Veryark-TOF, Guangxi, China) was used to determine neuromuscular blockade. Rocuronium (0.15 mg/kg) was intravenously injected to maintain muscle relaxation when T1 twitch height reached 25% of the control.

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 13.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Data are expressed as the means ± standard deviations for continuous variables or the number (percentage) of patients. The EC50 of the remifentanil required to inhibit the cardiovascular response to a CO2 pneumoperitoneum in each group was determined by calculating the average of the midpoint dose of each pair of patients after 6 negative/positive crossover points were obtained. The “up-and-down” data were also analyzed by probit analysis [18, 19], deriving the EC50 and the 95% effective effect-site concentration (EC95) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A t test was used to compare the EC50 values. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to compare MAP, HR and BIS changes. All P values < 0.05 indicated significant differences.

Results

Twenty-three male and 23 female patients were enrolled in this study. One female patient was excluded due to a MAP < 50 mmHg. One male patient was excluded due to an HR < 50 beats/min. Finally, 44 patients (22 male, 22 female) completed the study. The patients characteristics are shown in Table 1. Age, BMI, ASA physical status, type of surgery and surgery duration were comparable between the males and females. However, height and weight were significantly lower in the females.

Table 1 Patient Characteristics
Full size table

The sequences for negative and positive responses to the CO2 pneumoperitoneum in the 2 groups are shown in Fig. 1. The EC50 of remifentanil required to inhibit a CO2 pneumoperitoneum based on the Dixon “up-and-down” method in women (4.17 ± 0.38 ng/ml) was significantly lower than that in men (5.00 ± 0.52 ng/ml) during propofol anesthesia (P = 0.01).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Assessment of negative or positive responses to inhibit a CO2 pneumoperitoneum under a predetermined Ce of remifentanil using the Dixon “up-and-down” method in 22 consecutive male patients (a) and 22 consecutive female patients (b). Horizontal bars represent crossover midpoints (negative to positive). The EC50 values of remifentanil required to inhibit the CO2 pneumoperitoneum in the male group and the female group were 5.00 ± 0.52 ng/ml and 4.17 ± 0.38 ng/ml, respectively. EC50, median effective concentration

Full size image

From the probit analysis, the EC50 and EC95 of remifentanil (95% confidence interval [CI]) were 4.30 (3.49–4.82) ng/ml and 5.27 (4.78–10.22) ng/ml in women and 5.16 (4.64–5.58) ng/ml and 6.19 (5.70–8.99) ng/ml in men, respectively (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Effect-site concentration and response curves from the probit analysis in male (○) and female (●) patients. The EC50 and EC95 of remifentanil (95% confidence interval) required to inhibit the CO2 pneumoperitoneum were 4.30 (3.49–4.82) ng/ml and 5.27 (4.78–10.22) ng/ml in women and 5.16 (4.64–5.58) ng/ml and 6.19 (5.70–8.99) ng/ml in men, respectively. CP, CO2 pneumoperitoneum; EC50, median effective concentration; EC95, 95% effective effect-site concentration

Full size image

The MAP, HR and BIS values over time are shown in Table 2. The hemodynamic and BIS data were not significantly different between the sexes.

Table 2 Hemodynamic profiles and BISs during the CO2 pneumoperitoneum
Full size table

Discussion

The present study demonstrated that the EC50 of remifentanil required to inhibit the cardiovascular response to a CO2 pneumoperitoneum in women (4.17 ± 0.38 ng/ml) was lower than that in men (5.00 ± 0.52 ng/ml) during propofol anesthesia.

The hemodynamic change induced by a CO2 pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic surgery is a challenge to anesthesiologists [3, 20]. Remifentanil intravenously combined with general anesthesia provides stable hemodynamics during laparoscopic surgery [21]. Moreover, remifentanil effectively decreases the sevoflurane concentration to block the sympathetic adrenergic response to the CO2 pneumoperitoneum [5]. In this study, we were interested in exploring the EC50 of remifentanil required to inhibit the cardiovascular response to a CO2 pneumoperitoneum stimulus in both sexes during propofol anesthesia.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the EC50 of remifentanil required to inhibit the cardiovascular response to a CO2 pneumoperitoneum during propofol anesthesia. The EC50 of remifentanil required was higher than that measured by Albertin et al. (2.1 ng/ml) [9] or Wang et al. (3.09 ng/ml) [22]. The reason may be that a skin incision, which induces pain to the body surface and disappears fast, was used in their studies. This is consistent with Zou’s experiment [5]. The influence of CO2 pneumoperitoneum on the circulatory system is more complicated than that caused by a surgical incision. The increase in intra-abdominal pressure causes blood vessels to compress and reduces venous return, leading to a decrease in cardiac output. However, the increase in the partial pressure of CO2 in arterial blood, which may cause hypercapnia, can induce a sympathetic adrenergic response. As a result, the CO2 pneumoperitoneum causes an increase in blood pressure and heart rate [23, 24]. Furthermore, a continuous CO2 pneumoperitoneum distends the peritoneum and elicits a much stronger response than a skin incision. Accordingly, the required EC50 of remifentanil would be increased.

Increasing numbers of studies have focused on the sex differences in the response to anesthetics, especially opioids [12, 15, 16, 25]. In our study, the EC50 of remifentanil required to inhibit the cardiovascular response to a CO2 pneumoperitoneum was lower in women than in men during propofol anesthesia. There are some possible explanations for this result. First, Zubieta et al. demonstrated that premenopausal females have significantly higher mu-receptor binding potential than males in the cortical and subcortical areas [26]. Females may have a significantly greater response to mu opioid-receptor agonists than males [15, 27]. However, some studies have reported no sex differences in the analgesic responses to mu opioid- receptor agonists [28, 29]. Differences in the opioids, drug doses or pain models used may contribute to the different results. Second, previous studies have demonstrated that men have higher cortisol responses than women after exposure to acute real-life psychological stress or controlled laboratory stress tasks [30, 31]. However, sex differences in the hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal axis responses to stress remain controversial [32, 33]. Moreover, whether sex differences exist in response to a CO2 pneumoperitoneum is unknown. Third, there is a sex difference in the activity of nonspecific esterase [34], which is responsible for metabolizing remifentanil. However, the specific esterase action on remifentanil remains unknown, and more research is needed.

According to a previous study, the EC95 (95%CI) of remifentanil required for successful LMA insertion in women and men was 3.38 (3.0–3.48) ng/ml and 3.94 (3.80–3.98) ng/ml, respectively, during propofol (Ce 3.5 μg/ml) anesthesia [16]. Therefore, the Ce of remifentanil was set at 4.0 ng/ml for LMA insertion. Furthermore, in our study, the heights and weights of the men were greater than those of the women. However, the influence of the differences in demographic data on our results may be small, as the Ce of remifentanil was calculated and adjusted by these covariates in the Minto model.

There are some limitations in our study. First, we did not take patients’ blood samples to measure the actual Ce of remifentanil. Instead, we calculated the remifentanil Ce using the Minto pharmacokinetic model, which has been widely used with acceptable levels of inaccuracy and bias in clinical settings [35]. Second, we did not perform arterial blood gas analysis to determine whether hypercarbia existed during the period of the CO2 pneumoperitoneum, which may have led to a sympathetic adrenergic response if the increased ventilation failed to compensate for the absorbed CO2. However, a previous study demonstrated that for changes in the PETCO2 above 43 and below 26 mmHg, the mean arterial pressure increased and decreased, respectively [36]. In our study, we maintained the PETCO2 within 35–45 mmHg to minimize the impact on blood pressure. Third, for safety considerations, we excluded patients with low MAPs and HRs, which may have resulted in an overestimation of the EC50 of remifentanil because these patients were possibly more sensitive to the drugs given. Lastly, the EC95 of remifentanil calculated by the “up-and-down” method may not be a reliable value [37], and further research may be needed for clinical practice.

Conclusions

The EC50 of remifentanil required to inhibit the cardiovascular response to a CO2 pneumoperitoneum was lower in women than in men during propofol anesthesia using the modified Dixon “up-and-down” method. Patient sex should be taken into consideration for appropriate dosing when using remifentanil for laparoscopic surgery.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to institutional restrictions but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ASA:

American society of anesthesiologists

BIS:

Bispectral index

BMI:

Body mass index

Ce:

Effect-site concentration

CP:

CO2 pneumoperitoneum

EC50 :

Median effective concentration

EC95 :

95% effective effect-site concentration

HR:

Heart rate

LA:

Laparoscopic appendectomy

LC:

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

LMA:

Laryngeal mask airway

MAP:

Mean arterial pressure

References

  1. Khorgami Z, Shoar S, Anbara T, Soroush A, Nasiri S, Movafegh A, Aminian A. A randomized clinical trial comparing 4-port, 3-port, and single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Invest Surg : Official J Acad Surg Res. 2014;27(3):147–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Grace PA, Quereshi A, Coleman J, Keane R, McEntee G, Broe P, Osborne H, Bouchier-Hayes D. Reduced postoperative hospitalization after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 1991;78(2):160–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mann C, Boccara G, Pouzeratte Y, Eliet J, Serradel-Le Gal C, Vergnes C, Bichet DG, Guillon G, Fabre JM, Colson P. The relationship among carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum, vasopressin release, and hemodynamic changes. Anesth Analg. 1999;89(2):278–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Akca O. Optimizing the intraoperative management of carbon dioxide concentration. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2006;19(1):19–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zou ZY, Zhao YL, Yang XL, Zhang GY, Zhou HG. Effects of different remifentanil target concentrations on MAC BAR of sevoflurane in gynaecological patients with CO2 pneumoperitoneum stimulus. Br J Anaesth, 4. 2014;114:634–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Glass PS, Gan TJ, Howell S. A review of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. Anesth Analg. 1999;89(4 Suppl):S7–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sieg A, Beck S, Scholl SG, Heil FJ, Gotthardt DN, Stremmel W, Rex DK, Friedrich K. Safety analysis of endoscopist-directed propofol sedation: a prospective, national multicenter study of 24 441 patients in German outpatient practices. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;29(3):517–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Khan HA, Umar M, Tul-Bushra H, Nisar G, Bilal M, Umar S. Safety of non-anaesthesiologist-administered propofol sedation in ERCP. Arab J Gastroenterol : Official Publication Pan-Arab Assoc Gastroenterol. 2014;15(1):32–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Albertin A, Casati A, Federica L, Roberto V, Travaglini V, Bergonzi P, Torri G. The effect-site concentration of remifentanil blunting cardiovascular responses to tracheal intubation and skin incision during bispectral index-guided propofol anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2005;101(1):125–30 table of contents.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu Z, Wang F, Wang W, Luo Y. Median effective concentration of remifentanil for the inhibition of laryngoscope-induced cardiovascular responses. Exp Ther Med. 2016;12(1):457–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yoo JY, Kwak HJ, Lee KC, Kim GW, Kim JY. Predicted EC (5)(0) and EC (9)(5) of Remifentanil for smooth removal of a laryngeal mask airway under Propofol anesthesia. Yonsei Med J. 2015;56(4):1128–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fillingim RB, Gear RW. Sex differences in opioid analgesia: clinical and experimental findings. Eur J Pain. 2004;8(5):413–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Craft RM. Sex differences in opioid analgesia: "from mouse to man". Clin J Pain. 2003;19(3):175–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dahan A, Kest B, Waxman AR, Sarton E. Sex-specific responses to opiates: animal and human studies. Anesth Analg. 2008;107(1):83–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sarton E, Olofsen E, Romberg R, den Hartigh J, Kest B, Nieuwenhuijs D, Burm A, Teppema L, Dahan A. Sex differences in morphine analgesia: an experimental study in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiol. 2000;93(5):1245–54 discussion 1246A.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Joe HB, Kim JY, Kwak HJ, Oh SE, Lee SY, Park SY. Effect of sex differences in remifentanil requirements for the insertion of a laryngeal mask airway during propofol anesthesia: a prospective randomized trial. Medicine. 2016;95(39):e5032.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dixon WJ. Staircase bioassay: the up-and-down method. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1991;15(1):47–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Han MM, Xue FS, Kang F, Huang X, Li J. Male requires a higher median target effect-site concentration of propofol for I-gel placement when combined with dexmedetomidine. Anaesth, Crit Care Pain Med. 2019;38(1):57–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mustola S, Toivonen J. Effect-site concentration of remifentanil attenuating surgical stress index responses to intubation of the trachea. Anaesth. 2010;65(6):581–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Joris JL, Noirot DP, Legrand MJ, Jacquet NJ, Lamy ML. Hemodynamic changes during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg. 1993;76(5):1067–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Watanabe K, Kashiwagi K, Kamiyama T, Yamamoto M, Fukunaga M, Inada E, Kamiyama Y. High-dose remifentanil suppresses stress response associated with pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic colectomy. J Anesth. 2014;28(3):334–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang JF, Xu XP, Yu XY, Li JB, Wu X, Chen JC, Hu XW, Deng XM. Remifentanil requirement for inhibiting responses to tracheal intubation and skin incision is reduced in patients with Parkinson's disease undergoing deep brain stimulator implantation. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2016;28(4):303–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Junghans T, Bohm B, Grundel K, Schwenk W. Effects of pneumoperitoneum with carbon dioxide, argon, or helium on hemodynamic and respiratory function. Arch Surg (Chicago, Ill : 1960). 1997;132(3):272–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mas A, Saura P, Joseph D, Blanch L, Baigorri F, Artigas A, Fernandez R. Effect of acute moderate changes in PaCO2 on global hemodynamics and gastric perfusion. Crit Care Med. 2000;28(2):360–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Soh S, Park WK, Kang SW, Lee BR, Lee JR. Sex differences in remifentanil requirements for preventing cough during anesthetic emergence. Yonsei Med J. 2014;55(3):807–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zubieta JK, Dannals RF, Frost JJ. Gender and age influences on human brain mu-opioid receptor binding measured by PET. Am J Psychiatry. 1999;156(6):842–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Pud D, Yarnitsky D, Sprecher E, Rogowski Z, Adler R, Eisenberg E. Can personality traits and gender predict the response to morphine? An experimental cold pain study. Eur J Pain. 2006;10(2):103–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Romberg R, Olofsen E, Sarton E, den Hartigh J, Taschner PE, Dahan A. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of morphine-6-glucuronide-induced analgesia in healthy volunteers: absence of sex differences. Anesthesiol. 2004;100(1):120–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Olofsen E, Romberg R, Bijl H, Mooren R, Engbers F, Kest B, Dahan A. Alfentanil and placebo analgesia: no sex differences detected in models of experimental pain. Anesthesiol. 2005;103(1):130–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kirschbaum C, Wust S, Hellhammer D. Consistent sex differences in cortisol responses to psychological stress. Psychosom Med. 1992;54(6):648–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Stroud LR, Salovey P, Epel ES. Sex differences in stress responses: social rejection versus achievement stress. Biol Psychiatry. 2002;52(4):318–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kirschbaum C, Wust S, Faig HG, Hellhammer DH. Heritability of cortisol responses to human corticotropin-releasing hormone, ergometry, and psychological stress in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1992;75(6):1526–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Back SE, Waldrop AE, Saladin ME, Yeatts SD, Simpson A, McRae AL, Upadhyaya HP, Contini Sisson R, Spratt EG, Allen J, et al. Effects of gender and cigarette smoking on reactivity to psychological and pharmacological stress provocation. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2008;33(5):560–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ciccone GK, Holdcroft A. Drugs and sex differences: a review of drugs relating to anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1999;82(2):255–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Mertens MJ, Engbers FH, Burm AG, Vuyk J. Predictive performance of computer-controlled infusion of remifentanil during propofol/remifentanil anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2003;90(2):132–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kuznetsova DV, Kulikov VP. Cerebrovascular and systemic hemodynamic response to carbon dioxide in humans. Blood Press Monit. 2014;19(2):81–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pace NL, Stylianou MP. Advances in and limitations of up-and-down methodology: a precis of clinical use, study design, and dose estimation in anesthesia research. Anesthesiol. 2007;107(1):144–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province of China (Grant No. 1908085MH251).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Chengwei Yang and Yuanyuan Feng contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230036, China

    Chengwei Yang, Sheng Wang, Mingming Han, Song Wang, Fang Kang, Xiang Huang & Juan Li

  2. Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230031, China

    Yuanyuan Feng

Authors
  1. Chengwei Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuanyuan Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sheng Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mingming Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Song Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Fang Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xiang Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Juan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CY and JL designed the study. SW1 (Sheng Wang), MH and FK recruited patients. SW2 (Song Wang) performed statistical processing. YF wrote the manuscript. XH and JL revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript in its final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Anhui Provincial Hospital (2016–110). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients enrolled in this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, C., Feng, Y., Wang, S. et al. Effect of sex differences in remifentanil requirements for inhibiting the response to a CO2 pneumoperitoneum during propofol anesthesia: an up-and-down sequential allocation trial. BMC Anesthesiol 20, 35 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-0951-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-0951-z

Keywords

BMC Anesthesiology

ISSN: 1471-2253

Contact us