Skip to main content
Download PDF

Appropriate dose of dexmedetomidine for the prevention of emergence agitation after desflurane anesthesia for tonsillectomy or adenoidectomy in children: up and down sequential allocation

BMC Anesthesiology volume 15, Article number: 79 (2015) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Dexmedetomidine can be used for the prevention of emergence agitation (EA) in children. However, an inadequate dose of dexmedetomidine can induce prolonged sedation and cardiovascular complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effective dose of dexmedetomidine for the prevention of EA after desflurane anesthesia for patients undergoing a tonsillectomy or adenoidectomy.

Methods

We enrolled 21 unpremedicated children, between 2 and 12 years, undergoing either a tonsillectomy or an adenoidectomy. General anesthesia was induced using sevoflurane and oxygen, and dexmedetomidine was administered before surgery. Anesthesia was maintained using desflurane resulting in a BIS range of 40–60. In the postanesthetic care unit (PACU), EA (agitation measured at level 4 or more at least once) was assessed on arrival in the PACU,15 min later, and 30 min later. The dose of dexmedetomidine for consecutive patients was determined by the response of the previous patient, using an increment or decrement of 0.1 μg/kg.

Results

The 50 % effective dose of dexmedetomidine for prevention of EA was 0.25 μg/kg (95 % confidence limits, 0.17–0.33 μg/kg), and the 95 % effective dose was 0.38 μg/kg (95 % confidence limits, 0.29–0.39 μg/kg).

Conclusions

For prevention of EA after desflurane anesthesia for 50 % and 95 % of children undergoing tonsillectomies or adenoidectomies, 0.25 μg/kg or 0.38 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine is suggested. Further study is needed to validate the suggested dose of dexmedetomidine to prevent the EA that was identified in the present study.

Trial registration

Clinical Research Information Service KCT0000126.

Peer Review reports

Background

Emergence agitation (EA) is one of the most common complications of sevoflurane and desflurane anesthesia in children and requires proper management. The incidence of EA varies in the literature from 2–80 % depending on the anesthetic technique and scoring scale [1–3]. There were many trials conducted to manage or prevent EA in children. Dexmedetomidine, a selective α2 agonist, has recently been used with some success as a treatment for the prevention of EA [4]. Various doses (0.15–1.0 μg/kg) of dexmedetomidine have been reported to prevent EA in children undergoing sevoflurane anesthesia [5–10]. Due to respiratory irritation, desflurane is a less popular volatile agent for children than sevoflurane. Desflurane has been shown to induce a shorter duration of EA than sevoflurane [11]. Switching from sevoflurane to desflurane after the anesthetic induction may reduce the duration of EA without the risk of airway irritation. However, there has been insufficient research on the appropriate dosage of dexmedetomidine to prevent EA in children undergoing desflurane anesthesia. A sedative, dexmedetomidine, does not cause respiratory depression, but it does have cardiovascular effects, and therefore its use requires close monitoring, especially in children [12]. However, there was no definite dose of dexmedetomidine recommended to prevent EA while prolonged sedation and cardiovascular complications did not occur. The aim of this study was to identify the optimal dose of dexmedetomidine needed to prevent EA in children after a tonsillectomy or adenoidectomy under desflurane anesthesia without serious complications.

Methods

The present study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (World Medical Association). After obtaining institutional review board approval from Seoul National University Hospital and written informed consent from parents or guardians, patients eligible for inclusion in the study—those between 2 and 12 years of age, classified as ASA status I or II, and scheduled for either an adenoidectomy alone or both an adenoidectomy and tonsillectomy —were selected using Dixon’s up-and-down sequential method rather than random sequence. Patients with cardiac disease, abnormal upper airway, reactive airway diseases such as asthma, allergies to dexmedetomidine or a history of upper respiratory tract infection in the preceding 4 weeks were excluded. Patients receiving medications known to interact with dexmedetomidine such as lorazepam, diphenhydramine or furosemide were also excluded.

Intravenous accesses were secured on all children on the day before the surgery by experienced nurses. Premedication was not administered. Upon arrival in the operating room, the children were monitored with electrocardiography (ECG), pulse oximetry (SpO2), capnography, and noninvasive arterial blood pressure (NIBP) (Solar 8000, GE, Milwaukee, WI). In addition, the bispectral index (BIS: Vista™, Aspect Medical Systems Inc, Newton, MA) was checked. Anesthesia was induced with 6 mg/kg of sodium pentothal and 0.02 mg/kg of atropine sulfate. After loss of consciousness, children were ventilated with 8 vol. % of sevoflurane in oxygen via a pediatric circle system. They were fully relaxed with 0.6 mg/kg of rocuronium and intubated with an endotracheal tube. Anesthesia was maintained using 6–8 vol. % of desflurane in approximately 50 % oxygen in air with a total inflow of 2 L/min. The concentration of desflurane was adjusted to a BIS range of 40-60. Before the start of surgery on the first patient, 0.5 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine (Precedex inj™, 200 mcg/ml, Hospira Inc., Lake Forest, IL, USA) diluted in 10 ml of normal saline was slowly injected for 10 min and both the blood pressure and heart rate were checked at one minute intervals. Dexmedetomidine was prepared and injected by an anesthesiologist who did not participate in the assessment of EA. All tonsillectomies were performed using coblation to prevent postoperative complications including pain [13–15]. A 3 ml dose of 0.25 % bupivacaine and an epinephrine mixture (ratio of 1:200 000) were injected into the mucosa surrounding each tonsillar fossa. At the end of surgery, the desflurane was stopped and extubation was performed when the patients began breathing spontaneously and could open their eyes on command. Recovery times from the cessation of desflurane to the point at which patients’ eyes opened were recorded. The patients were transferred to the postanesthetic care unit (PACU) when fully awake. One parent was allowed to remain with the child. In the PACU, the ECG, NIBP, SpO2, and the respiratory rate were checked and recorded.

EA was evaluated using the agitation scale developed by Cole et al. (Table 1), [16] and the worst EA score observed during the previous period was recorded by a single anesthesiologist blinded to the sequence of inclusion of patients and to the dose of dexmedetomidine administered to each patient. Recordings were made on arrival at PACU (T = 0), and 15 and 30 min later (T = 15, T = 30, respectively). EA, defined as an agitation score of 4 or 5 occurring at least once during surgery, was treated with 0.1 μg/kg of nalbuphine.

Table 1 Emergence agitation scale
Full size table

The dosage of dexmedetomidine was determined by Dixon’s up–and -down sequential method [17]. If a child showed EA, the next one received a dose 0.1 μg/kg greater. If no EA was observed, the next dose of dexmedetomidine was decreased by 0.1 μg/kg. The pain score was measured using the Wong-Baker face pain rating scale during the EA evaluation [18]. Nalbuphine 0.1 μg/kg was used as a rescue medicine for patients with EA or pain scores > 8. Dixon’s method requires at least six failure-success pairs for statistical analysis, therefore recruitment continued until six crossover pairs had been observed. A 50 % and 95 % effective dose of dexmedetomidine along with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the isotonic regression method, [19] an adjusted response probability was obtained through use of the pooled adjacent-violators algorithm, and the CI was estimated using the bootstrapping approach [20, 21].

Demographic and recovery profile data between children with EA and those without EA were compared using Fisher’s exact test and the Mann–Whitney U test. Statistical analyses were performed using R − 2.15.2 for Windows and SPSS 19.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.

Results

Twenty one children were enrolled and completed this study; it is worth noting that no children dropped out, which allowed us to observe six crossover pairs (Fig. 1). Fig. 2 shows the sequences of dexmedetomidine dosages used. Neither bradycardia or hypotension occurred in any of the children following the administration of dexmedetomidine. Patient and operative characteristics were delineated in Table 2 and children with and without EA differed in demographic data or recovery profile only for the duration of their time in the PACU. The end-tidal desflurane concentration was recorded 15, 30 and 45 min after the administration of dexmedetomidine, and there was no significant difference in the mean of the end-tidal desflurane concentration between the children with and without EA. (Table 2) Nine patients developed EA in the PACU and were given nalbuphine 0.1 μg/kg, after which all had EA scores < 4. The 50 % effective dose of dexmedetomidine for the prevention of EA was 0.25 μg/kg (95 % confidence limit, 0.17–0.33 μg/kg), and the 95 % effective dose was 0.38 μg/kg (95 % confidence limit, 0.29–0.39 μg/kg). Pain scores were measured during the EA evaluation. Patients with EA had greater pain scores (median (IQR)) than those who felt relaxed (T = 0: 6.0 (5.0–9.5) vs. 4.0 (2.0–7.5), T =15: 6.0 (4.0–6.0) vs. 0 (0–2.0), and T = 30: 4.0 (3.0–5.0) vs. 2.0 (0.5–2.0), respectively). Five patients had pain scores > 8 at least once, for which they were given nalbuphine 0.1 μg/kg. The duration of patients’ PACU stay was significantly greater in those with EA than those without. No respiratory depression, hypotension or desaturation (<95 %) was observed in the PACU.

Fig. 1
figure 1

CONSORT diagram showing the flow of participants in present study

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Assessment of success or failure for preventing emergence agitation (EA) in the postanesthetic care unit with dexmedetomidine by the use of Dixon’s up-and-down method. Crossover pairs from success (black circle) to failure (white circle) in preventing emergence agitation

Full size image
Table 2 Comparisons between children without EA and those with EA
Full size table

Discussion

Inhaled anesthetic agents with low blood-gas solubility such as sevoflurane and desflurane have clinical advantages in allowing rapid induction and emergence. Sevoflurane is widely used as an inhalation anesthetic in children to avoid the airway irritation that desflurane causes during the anesthetic induction period. Sevoflurane anesthesia, however, is associated with a higher incidence of EA in children when compared with other volatile anesthetics or propofol whereas [22–25] desflurane is also associated with EA in children with a similar incidence but shorter duration of EA [11, 26, 27]. Desflurane may have the clinical advantage of reducing the duration of EA in children, therefore, there was a need to evaluate the optimal dose of dexmedetomidine to prevent EA in children under desflurane anesthesia. In our study of children undergoing either a tonsillectomy or adenoidectomy under desflurane anesthesia, 0.25 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine prevented EA in 50 % of children, and 0.38 μg/kg prevented EA in 95 %.

For the prevention of EA in children, various doses of a single bolus of dexmedetomidine (0.15–1.0 μg/kg) or timings of the single bolus of dexmedetomidine (immediately after anesthesia induction or 5 min before the end of surgery) have been recommended [5, 7, 28]. Continuous infusion also decreases the incidence and frequency of EA in children with sevoflurane anesthesia [9, 29]. Although these previous studies focused on whether dexmedetomidine reduces the incidence of EA in children, there has been little research into what dosage of dexmedetomidine induces prolonged sedation or cardiovascular instability. The 50 % and 95 % effective doses of dexmedetomidine for the prevention of EA (0.25 μg/kg and 0.38 μg/kg, respectively) determined using Dixon’s up–and-down sequential method in the present study are relatively low when compared to those reported in previous studies. These effective doses can serve as appropriate guidelines for not only preventing EA but also reducing the risk of complications related to dexmedetomidine overdose.

Even with the relatively high doses of dexmedetomidine (0.4 μg/kg or 0.5 μg/kg) used in this study, we did not observe complications of dexmedetomidine such as bradycardia, hypotension or prolonged recovery time. The reason may be that the doses of dexmedetomidine used in the present study were not high enough to induce these complications [30]. The timing of dexmedetomidine administration may also have prevented complications. A bolus of dexmedetomidine was given immediately after anesthesia induction. Stimulus by tracheal intubation and 0.02 mg/kg of atropine sulfate given before anesthesia induction might also prevent such hemodynamic changes. Considering the short half-life (2 h) of dexmedetomidine, it can be metabolized after being administered, thus preventing a prolonged recovery time.

There are several agitation scales, such as the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium, which are used to evaluate EA in children. The present study used an agitation scale that was employed in previous studies reporting a preventive effect of dexmedetomidine on EA in children [7–9]. The dose of dexmedetomidine (0.5 mcg/kg) administered to the first child in our study was based on the results of these previous studies. We hypothesized that using the same scale to evaluate EA would be appropriate for determining the effective dose of dexmedetomidine to prevent it and for comparison to previous studies. However, a single EA scale was used to define it in the present study. The evaluation of EA could have been more reliable if an additional EA scale had been used in conjunction. After all, caution should be exercised when applying the results of the present study to patients while using different scales and definitions of EA for the assessment of EA.

Postoperative pain was more severe in patients with EA than in those without EA in the present study. This is for two reasons: first, postoperative pain can be a cause of EA, and secondly, the EA scale and Wong-Baker face pain rating scale have several common features. The EA evaluation should have been conducted when children were in a pain-free state to rule out the effect of postoperative pain. However, the aim of the study was to determine the effective dose of dexmedetomidine necessary to prevent EA in children undergoing tonsillectomies or adenoidectomies, and several methods, were performed to reduce postoperative pain, such as a surgical technique which uses coblation and the mucosal injection of local anesthetics surrounding the tonsillar fossa. In addition, dexmedetomidine has been reported to reduce postoperative opioid requirements after a tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy [29]. As a result, despite the absence of an analgesic administration before emergence, the incidence of postoperative pain was lower in patients the present study than in those who had received acetaminophen in previous studies [7].

This study had certain limitations which make it difficult to draw comparisons to previous studies. First, EA can be influenced by many factors (pain, hunger, post-operative nausea and vomiting, and fear of strangers) during the perioperative period. Furthermore, though Dixon’s up-and-down sequential method was used, the sample size of the present study was relatively small. Further clinical research to validate the suggested dose of dexmedetomidine to prevent EA should be performed in the future. Second, the ages of the children in the present study were intended to range from 2 to 12 years old. However, in practice, the age range of the children enrolled was 3–7 years old, and the influence of age on the dose of dexmedetomidine may be not significant. Finally, children in the present study did not receive any premedication so as to avoid additional variability of responses. The effective dose of dexmedetomidine to prevent EA may have been different if children had received premedication to relieve their anxiety before the anesthetic induction.

Conclusions

In conclusion, to prevent EA in 50 % or 95 % of children undergoing tonsillectomies or adenoidectomies following desflurane anesthesia, a single bolus of 0.25 or 0.38 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine is suggested. Further clinical trials need to be conducted in order to validate the suggested dose of dexmedetomidine to prevent the incidence of EA that was identified in the present study.

Abbreviations

EA:

Emergence agitation

ECG:

Electrocardiography

SpO2:

Pulse oximetry

NIBP:

Noninvasive arterial blood pressure

BIS:

Bispectral index

PACU:

Postanesthetic care unit

CIs:

Confidence intervals.

References

  1. Johr M. Postanaesthesia excitation. Paediatr Anaesth. 2002;12(4):293–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Voepel-Lewis T, Malviya S, Tait AR. A prospective cohort study of emergence agitation in the pediatric postanesthesia care unit. Anesth Analg. 2003;96(6):1625–30. table of contents.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Johr M, Berger TM. Paediatric anaesthesia and inhalation agents. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2005;19(3):501–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang C, Hu J, Liu X, Yan J. Effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine on emergence agitation in children under sevoflurane anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e99718.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Sato M, Shirakami G, Tazuke-Nishimura M, Matsuura S, Tanimoto K, Fukuda K. Effect of single-dose dexmedetomidine on emergence agitation and recovery profiles after sevoflurane anesthesia in pediatric ambulatory surgery. J Anesth. 2010;24(5):675–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Erdil F, Demirbilek S, Begec Z, Ozturk E, Ulger MH, Ersoy MO. The effects of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl on emergence characteristics after adenoidectomy in children. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009;37(4):571–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Guler G, Akin A, Tosun Z, Ors S, Esmaoglu A, Boyaci A. Single-dose dexmedetomidine reduces agitation and provides smooth extubation after pediatric adenotonsillectomy. Paediatr Anaesth. 2005;15(9):762–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Isik B, Arslan M, Tunga AD, Kurtipek O. Dexmedetomidine decreases emergence agitation in pediatric patients after sevoflurane anesthesia without surgery. Paediatr Anaesth. 2006;16(7):748–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shukry M, Clyde MC, Kalarickal PL, Ramadhyani U. Does dexmedetomidine prevent emergence delirium in children after sevoflurane-based general anesthesia? Paediatr Anaesth. 2005;15(12):1098–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim NY, Kim SY, Yoon HJ, Kil HK. Effect of dexmedetomidine on sevoflurane requirements and emergence agitation in children undergoing ambulatory surgery. Yonsei Med J. 2014;55(1):209–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Locatelli BG, Ingelmo PM, Emre S, Meroni V, Minardi C, Frawley G, et al. Emergence delirium in children: a comparison of sevoflurane and desflurane anesthesia using the paediatric anesthesia emergence delirium scale. Paediatr Anaesth. 2013;23(4):301–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Buck ML. Dexmedetomidine use in pediatric intensive care and procedural sedation. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2010;15(1):17–29.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Stoker KE, Don DM, Kang DR, Haupert MS, Magit A, Madgy DN. Pediatric total tonsillectomy using coblation compared to conventional electrosurgery: a prospective, controlled single-blind study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130(6):666–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Parker NP, Walner DL. Post-operative pain following coblation or monopolar electrocautery tonsillectomy in children: a prospective, single-blinded, randomised comparison. Clin Otolaryngol. 2011;36(5):468–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Paramasivan VK, Arumugam SV, Kameswaran M. Randomised comparative study of adenotonsillectomy by conventional and coblation method for children with obstructive sleep apnoea. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;76(6):816–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cole JW, Murray DJ, McAllister JD, Hirshberg GE. Emergence behaviour in children: defining the incidence of excitement and agitation following anaesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth. 2002;12(5):442–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dixon WJ. Staircase bioassay: the up-and-down method. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1991;15(1):47–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wong D, Hockenberry-Eaton M, Wilson D, Winkelstein ML, Schwartz P. Wong’s essentials of pediatric nursing. 6th ed. 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stylianou M, Flournoy N. Dose finding using the biased coin up-and-down design and isotonic regression. Biometrics. 2002;58(1):171–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dilleen M, Heimann G, Hirsch I. Non-parametric estimators of a monotonic dose-response curve and bootstrap confidence intervals. Stat Med. 2003;22(6):869–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pace NL, Stylianou MP. Advances in and limitations of up-and-down methodology: a precis of clinical use, study design, and dose estimation in anesthesia research. Anesthesiology. 2007;107(1):144–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lerman J, Davis PJ, Welborn LG, Orr RJ, Rabb M, Carpenter R, et al. Induction, recovery, and safety characteristics of sevoflurane in children undergoing ambulatory surgery. A comparison with halothane. Anesthesiology. 1996;84(6):1332–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Welborn LG, Hannallah RS, Norden JM, Ruttimann UE, Callan CM. Comparison of emergence and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane, desflurane, and halothane in pediatric ambulatory patients. Anesth Analg. 1996;83(5):917–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Picard V, Dumont L, Pellegrini M. Quality of recovery in children: sevoflurane versus propofol. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2000;44(3):307–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Uezono S, Goto T, Terui K, Ichinose F, Ishguro Y, Nakata Y, et al. Emergence agitation after sevoflurane versus propofol in pediatric patients. Anesth Analg. 2000;91(3):563–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Davis PJ, Cohen IT, McGowan Jr FX, Latta K. Recovery characteristics of desflurane versus halothane for maintenance of anesthesia in pediatric ambulatory patients. Anesthesiology. 1994;80(2):298–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Grundmann U, Uth M, Eichner A, Wilhelm W, Larsen R. Total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil in paediatric patients: a comparison with a desflurane-nitrous oxide inhalation anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998;42(7):845–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ibacache ME, Munoz HR, Brandes V, Morales AL. Single-dose dexmedetomidine reduces agitation after sevoflurane anesthesia in children. Anesth Analg. 2004;98(1):60–3. table of contents.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Patel A, Davidson M, Tran MC, Quraishi H, Schoenberg C, Sant M, et al. Dexmedetomidine infusion for analgesia and prevention of emergence agitation in children with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome undergoing tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy. Anesth Analg. 2010;111(4):1004–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mason KP, Zgleszewski S, Forman RE, Stark C, DiNardo JA. An exaggerated hypertensive response to glycopyrrolate therapy for bradycardia associated with high-dose dexmedetomidine. Anesth Analg. 2009;108(3):906–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Dieter Knowles who provided medical writing services.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, 101 daehang-ro, jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea

    Hee-Soo Kim, Ji-Hyun Lee & Jin-Tae Kim

  2. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1, Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, 120-752, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Hyo-Jin Byon

  3. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Inha University, 7-206, 3-ga, Sinheung-dong, Jung-gu, Incheon, 400-711, Republic of Korea

    Jong-Eun Kim

  4. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, 102, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, 156-755, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Yong-Hee Park

Authors
  1. Hee-Soo Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hyo-Jin Byon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jong-Eun Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yong-Hee Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ji-Hyun Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jin-Tae Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyo-Jin Byon.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

HJB designed the experiment and wrote the manuscript. JEK wrote the manuscript. YHP summarized and analyzed the data. JHL performed the experiment. JTK edited the manuscript. HSK designed the experiment. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, HS., Byon, HJ., Kim, JE. et al. Appropriate dose of dexmedetomidine for the prevention of emergence agitation after desflurane anesthesia for tonsillectomy or adenoidectomy in children: up and down sequential allocation. BMC Anesthesiol 15, 79 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-015-0059-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-015-0059-z

Keywords

BMC Anesthesiology

ISSN: 1471-2253

Contact us