Skip to main content
Fig. 7 | BMC Anesthesiology

Fig. 7

From: Impact of a positive end-expiratory pressure strategy on oxygenation, respiratory compliance, and hemodynamics during laparoscopic surgery in non-obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Fig. 7

Forest plot for HR comparing different PEEP strategy groups: (a) LPEEP vs. MPEEP; (b) LPEEP vs. HPEEP; (c) MPEEP vs. HPEEP; (d) MPEEP vs. iPEEP. Data are presented as mean differences and 95% confidence intervals. The vertical line represents no effect with the value of 0. The diamond represents the pooled mean effect estimate with 95% CI. It provides an overall measure of the difference in HR values between different PEEP strategy groups. Abbreviations: CI: confidence interval; SD: standard deviation; I2: the ratio of excess dispersion to total dispersion; Тau2: the variance of the true effect sizes; Chi2: observed weighted sum of squares; df: degreeы of freedom; HR: heart rate; LPEEP: low positive end-expiratory pressure group; MPEEP: moderate positive end-expiratory pressure group; HPEEP: high positive end-expiratory pressure group; iPEEP: individualized positive end-expiratory pressure group

Back to article page

BMC Anesthesiology

ISSN: 1471-2253

Contact us