Skip to main content
Fig. 6 | BMC Anesthesiology

Fig. 6

From: Impact of a positive end-expiratory pressure strategy on oxygenation, respiratory compliance, and hemodynamics during laparoscopic surgery in non-obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Fig. 6

Forest plot for MAP comparing different PEEP strategy groups: (a) LPEEP vs. MPEEP; (b) LPEEP vs. HPEEP; (c) MPEEP vs. HPEEP; (d) MPEEP vs. iPEEP. Data are presented as mean differences and 95% confidence intervals. The vertical line represents no effect with the value of 0. The diamond represents the pooled mean effect estimate with 95% CI. It provides an overall measure of the difference in MAP values between different PEEP strategy groups. Abbreviations: CI: confidence interval; SD: standard deviation; I2: the ratio of excess dispersion to total dispersion; Тau2: the variance of the true effect sizes; Chi2: observed weighted sum of squares; df: degrees of freedom; MAP: mean arterial pressure; LPEEP: low positive end-expiratory pressure; MPEEP: moderate positive end-expiratory pressure; HPEEP: high positive end-expiratory pressure group; iPEEP: individualized positive end-expiratory pressure group

Back to article page

BMC Anesthesiology

ISSN: 1471-2253

Contact us