Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparisons of cervical spine movement during videolaryngoscopic intubation between direct and indirect epiglottis elevation groups

From: Direct versus indirect epiglottis elevation in cervical spine movement during videolaryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line stabilization: a randomized controlled trial

Variable

Direct epiglottis elevation group

(n = 51)

Indirect epiglottis elevation group

(n = 51)

Difference in means

(98.33% CI)

P value

Cervical spine movement during videolaryngoscopic intubation (°)

    

Occiput–C1

3.9a (4.0)

5.8 (3.4)

−1.9 (− 3.5, − 0.3)

0.011

C1–C2

3.8a (4.3)

3.9 (4.1)

−0.1 (− 1.9, 1.8)

0.930

C2–C5

−1.1a (5.0)

0.2 (5.6)

−1.4 (− 3.7, 1.0)

0.198

Cervical spine angle before videolaryngoscopic intubation (°)

    

Occiput–C1

28.2 (6.3)

26.9 (5.9)

1.3 (− 1.4, 4.0)

0.280

C1–C2

14.5 (5.4)

15.2 (6.3)

−0.7 (− 3.3, 1.9)

0.564

C2–C5

10.5 (6.5)

10.3 (7.6)

0.2 (− 3.0, 3.3)

0.902

Cervical spine angle during videolaryngoscopic intubation (°)

    

Occiput–C1

32.0 (6.8)

32.7 (5.7)

−0.7 (− 3.5, 2.1)

0.573

C1–C2

18.4 (5.8)

19.1 (6.1)

−0.7 (− 3.4, 1.9)

0.527

C2–C5

9.5 (6.2)

10.5 (6.9)

−1.0 (− 4.0, 1.9)

0.426

  1. Values are mean (standard deviation). a: the difference of 0.1 from the computed cervical spine movement between cervical spine angles before and during videolaryngoscopic intubation in this table is due to rounding to two decimal places. CI, confidence interval