1st author, Year | Study Design | Population | Surgery | Anesthetic procedure | Follow-up duration | Clinical Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | ||||||
RCT | ||||||
Galos, 2016 [36] | Monocenter | 36 | Distal radius fracture fixation | Group PNB Type: Infraclavicular nerve block Agents: Lidocaine 2% with 1:200,000 epinephrine (20 mL) and bupivacaine 0.25% (15 mL) If failed: N/A | 3 months | Functional recovery: DASH, SMFA No difference between PNB and GA group ROM: N/A Time frame from surgery to return to work: N/A Satisfaction regarding the anesthesia technique used: N/A Complications: N/A |
Group GA Regimen at the discretion of the anesthesiologist | ||||||
Rundgren, 2019 [39] | Monocenter | 90 | Distal radius fracture fixation | Group PNB Type: Supraclavicular nerve block Agents: Mepicavaine 1% (2/3 solution) and levobupivacaine 0.25% (1/3 solution) If failed: No intention to treat analysis was done | 6 months | Functional recovery: EQ/ED/3L, PWRE No difference between PNB and GA group (EQ-ED-3L p = 0.7; PRWE p = 0.7) ROM: NS difference (p = 0.7) Time frame from surgery to return to work: N/A Satisfaction regarding the anesthesia technique used: N/A Complications: N/A |
Group GA Induction: Propofol* Fentanyl* Maintenance: Sevoflurane* Fentanyl* End of surgery: Infiltration 10 mL levobupicavaine 0.5% *Dose at the discretion of the anesthesiologist | ||||||
Wong, 2020 [38] | Monocenter | 52 | Distal radius fracture fixation | Group PNB Type: Infraclavicular nerve block Agents: Lidocaine 2% 10 mL with 1:200,000 epinephrine and 10 mL of ropivacaine 0.75% If failed: No intention to treat analysis was done | 6 months | Functional recovery: QuickDASH, PRWE No difference between PNB and GA group ROM: N/A Time frame from surgery to return to work: N/A Satisfaction regarding the anesthesia technique used: N/A Complications: N/A |
Group GA Induction: Fentanyl (0.25-2mcg/kg) Propofol (1.5-3 mg/kg) Atracurium (0.5 mg/kg) Maintenance: Sevoflurane (MAC 0.7–1.5) Morphine (0.025–0.05 mg/kg) End of surgery: Infiltration levobupicavaine 0.5% 2 mg/kg | ||||||
Observational studies | ||||||
Egol, 2012 [34] | Retrospective | 187 | Distal radius fracture fixation | Group PNB Type: Infraclavicular nerve block Agents: N/A If failed: N/A | 12 months | Functional recovery: DASH No difference between PNB and GA group (p = 0.72) ROM: PNB is superior to GA group for: -wrist extension -wrist flexion -index finger total active movement -ring finger distal palmar crease Time frame from surgery to return to work: N/A Satisfaction regarding the anesthesia technique used: N/A Complications: N/A |
Group GA Regimen at the discretion of the anesthesiologist | ||||||
Egol 2014 [35] | Retrospective | 122 | Proximal humerus fracture repair | Group PNB Type: Interscalene Brachial plexus block Agents: N/A If failed: N/A | 12 months | Functional recovery: DASH PNB is superior to GA group (p = 0.003) ROM: PNB is superior to GA group for: -active forward elevation (p = 0.002) -passive forward elevation (p = 0.005) -external rotation (p = 0.002) Time frame from surgery to return to work: N/A Satisfaction regarding the anesthesia technique used: N/A Complications: N/A |
Group GA Regimen at the discretion of the anesthesiologist | ||||||
Doo, 2020 [37] | Prospective | 119 | Fracture correction Hand ware removal Arthroscopic surgery Tendon/ligament repair Carpal tunnel release Mass excision Other | Group PNB Type: Supraclavicular Agents: Lidocaine 1.5% with 1:200,000 epinephrine If failed: N/A | 7 days | Functional recovery: Global QoR-40 K No difference between PNB and GA group (p = 0.21) ROM: N/A Time frame from surgery to return to work: N/A Satisfaction regarding the anesthesia technique used: N/A Complications: N/A |
Group GA Induction: Propofol (1.5–2.5 mg/kg) Rocuronium (0.3–0.8 mg/kg) Maintenance: Sevoflurane (1–4%) Perfusion remifentanil (1.3 mcg/kg) End of surgery: N/A |