Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of DSCVmax1, DSCV-CI1, DSCVmax2, DSCV-CI2, ΔDSCV between the two groups

From: Pre-anesthesia ultrasound monitoring of subclavian vein diameter changes induced by modified passive leg raising can predict the occurrence of hypotension after general anesthesia: a prospective observational study

Parameter

All patients

Group N

Group H

P-value

DSCVmax1,cm

0.77 ± 0.19

0.78 ± 0.19

0.75 ± 0.17

0.57a

DSCV-CI1,%

40.05 ± 17.81

39.29 ± 18.76

42.32 ± 14.75

0.45a

DSCVmax2,cm

0.91 ± 0.17

0.90 ± 0.19

0.94 ± 0.11

0.34a

DSCV-CI2,%

27.76 ± 15.45

26.73 ± 15.15

30.80 ± 16.22

0.24a

ΔDSCV,%

8.24(5.17,13.3)

7.27(4.27, 11.61)

16.16(6.45, 24.21)

 < 0.001b

  1. Data are presented as the mean (standard deviation) or median (interquartile range)
  2. a Independent-sample t test
  3. b Mann–Whitney U test(ΔDSCV parameters did not meet the homogeneity of variances)
  4. DSCVmax maximum value of Subclavian Vein Diameter, DSCV-CI Collapsibility Index of Subclavian Vein Diameter
  5. DSCVmax1,DSCV-CI1 DSCVmax,DSCV-CI in supine,
  6. DSCVmax2,DSCV-CI2 DSCVmax,DSCV-CI in Passive leg raising test(PLR),
  7. ΔDSCV Subclavian Vein Diameter changes induced by PLR