Skip to main content

Table 2 Results of intubation via SaCoVLM™ or i-gel

From: Comparison of SaCoVLM™ video laryngeal mask-guided intubation and i-gel combined with flexible bronchoscopy-guided intubation in airway management during general anesthesia: a non-inferiority study

 

SaCoVLM™ (n = 60)

i-gel (n = 59)

P value

Mean(95%Cl)

difference

Successful SAD placement

 First attempt

59(98%)

58(98%)

  

 Second attempt

1(2%)

1(2%)

P = 0.99

SAD placement time (s)

14.6 ± 3.5

10.9 ± 3.2

p < 0.001

3.7(2.5 to 4.9)

Successful ETT insertion

 First attempt

55(92%)

56(93%)

P = 0.74

 

 Second attempt

4(6%)

3(5%)

 

 Third attempt

1(2%)

0(0)

 

 Fail

0(0)

1(2%)

 

Intubation time (s)

16.3 ± 8.7

47.2 ± 15.7

p < 0.001

-30.9(-35.5 to -26.3)

total intubation time (s)

30.8 ± 9.7

57.4 ± 16.6

p < 0.001

-26.6(-31.5 to -21.7)

Pre-intubation SpO2(%)

97.8 ± 1.3

98.1 ± 1.2

p = 0.22

 

Post-intubation SpO2(%)

97.8 ± 1.2a

97.7 ± 1.1a

p = 0.70

  1. Total ETT insertion time include SAD placement time and ETT insertion time
  2. SAD supraglottic airway device, s second, ETT endotracheal tube time, SpO2 peripheral oxygen saturation
  3. aThere was no significant difference in SpO2 between the two groups before and after intubation