Peer Review reports
From: The problem with dichotomizing quality improvement measures
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 31 Mar 2022 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 28 Apr 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 8 Jun 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 30 Jun 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - James Harvey Jones |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 30 Jun 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 6 Jul 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 11 Jul 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 2 Aug 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - James Harvey Jones |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 2 Aug 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 9 Aug 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 21 Aug 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - James Harvey Jones |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 21 Aug 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 31 Aug 2022 | Editorially accepted | |
| 19 Sep 2022 | Article published | 10.1186/s12871-022-01833-z |
You can find further information about peer review here.