Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of hemodynamic and echocardiographic parameters between two groups before and after fluid challenge test in mechanically ventilation patients

From: The diagnostic accuracy of inferior vena cava respiratory variation in predicting volume responsiveness in patients under different breathing status following abdominal surgery

Parameters

Group R (n = 33)

Group NR (n = 23)

T1

T2

T1

T2

  IVCmax (cm)

1.56 ± 0.31*

1.60 ± 0.33

1.74 ± 0.34

1.84 ± 0.32†

  IVCmin (cm)

1.20 ± 0.29*

1.24 ± 0.34

1.46 ± 0.36

1.54 ± 0.34†

  ΔIVC (cm)

0.35 (0.31–0.41)*

0.35 ± 0.12

0.27 (0.21–0.31)

0.30 ± 0.11

  cIVC1 (%)

24.02 ± 5.93*

21.51 (17.68–26.89)

15.12 (12.57–19.46)

16.69 ± 6.65

  CVP (cmH2O)

5 (2–6)

5 ± 3

5 ± 3

5 ± 3

  MAP (mmHg)

95 ± 12

96 ± 11

95 ± 12

94 ± 11

  HR (beats min−1)

60 (54–67)

64 ± 8†

62 (55–67)

61 (56–67)

  VTI (cm)

24.5 ± 3.4

27.6 ± 4.3†

26.4 ± 4.0

27.7 ± 4.0†

  CO (L min−1)

4.54 ± 0.98

5.41 ± 1.18†

5.10 ± 1.19

5.38 ± 1.26†

  CI (L min−1 m−2)

2.78 ± 0.57*

3.31 ± 0.69†

3.23 ± 0.82

3.41 ± 0.85†

  1. T1 5 min stabilization after patient entering AICU under mechanical ventilation, T2 following the first fluid challenge test, IVC inferior vena cava, IVCmax maximum diameter of IVC, IVCmin minimum diameter of IVC, ΔIVC the difference of the maximum and minimum IVC diameter, cIVC1 collapsibility of IVC in mechanically ventilated patients, HR heart rate, VTI velocity time integral, CI cardiac index, CVP central venous pressure, MAP mean arterial pressure, CO cardiac output
  2. * P < 0.05 versus group NR
  3. P < 0.05 versus before fluid challenge test