Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of participants’ data between the conventional and hybrid groups

From: A novel algorithm-driven hybrid simulation learning method to improve acquisition of endotracheal intubation skills: a randomized controlled study

Gender n (%)

Conventional group (n = 34)

HybridLab group (n = 43)

p

Gender (female/male)

(percentages)

23/11

(67/33%)

31/12

(72/28%)

0.803

Age (years)

22 (3)

22 (3)

0.526

Students/residents

(percentages)

25/9

(74/26%)

30/13

(70/30%)

0.802