Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of previous surveys

From: A survey of current practices, attitudes and demands of anaesthesiologists regarding the depth of anaesthesia monitoring in China

Authors

Journal

Publication year

Survey questions

Number of anaesthesiologists responding

Total number of anaesthesiologists

Response rate

Key results

Myles PS, et al. [22]

Anaesthesia

2003

22

186

220

85.0%

Many anaesthetists have had a patient who exhibited awareness under anaesthesia, but most rated awareness as only a moderate problem.

Lau K, et al. [21]

Eur J Anaesthesiol

2006

26

2170

4927

44.0%

Most anaesthetists accept that clinical signs are unreliable indicators of awareness; few believe that DoA monitors should be used for routine cases in the UK.

Ben-Menachem E, et al. [8]

Anesth Analg

2014

23

289

963

30.0%

The primary driver for the use of DoA monitoring in Australia is prevention of awareness.

Cheung YM, et al. [23]

BMC Anaesthesiol

2018

24

168

553

30.0%

Prevention of awareness is the most important reason to use DoA monitoring in children. The perceived lack of reliability of DoA monitoring in children is the most important reason not to use it.