Skip to main content

Table 1 Test results for comparisons between groups (Student Newman Keuls)

From: Efficiency of different flows for apneic oxygenation when using high flow nasal oxygen application – a technical simulation

Comparison

Diff of Ranks

q

P

High Flow 10 vs Control

114,000

5791

< 0,001

High Flow 10 vs High Flow 80

89,000

5408

0,001

High Flow 10 vs High Flow 60

64,000

4838

0,003

High Flow 10 vs High Flow 40

38,500

3850

0,018

High Flow 10 vs High Flow 20

3500

0,517

0,715

High Flow 20 vs Control

110,500

6714

< 0,001

High Flow 20 vs High Flow 80

85,500

6463

< 0,001

High Flow 20 vs High Flow 60

60,500

6050

< 0,001

High Flow 20 vs High Flow 40

35,000

5170

< 0,001

High Flow 40 vs Control

75,500

5707

< 0,001

High Flow 40 vs High Flow 80

50,500

5050

0,001

High Flow 40 vs High Flow 60

25,500

3767

0,008

High Flow 60 vs Control

50,000

5000

0,001

High Flow 60 vs High Flow 80

25,000

3693

0,009

High Flow 80 vs Control

25,000

3693

0,009