Skip to main content

Table 4 Predictive performance of STOP-Bang screening tools at difference BMI cutoff against perioperative complications

From: Modified STOP-Bang for predicting perioperative adverse events in the Thai population

BMI cutoff

Sensitivity

Specificity

PPV

NPV

AUC

P-value

Modified BMI 25 kg/m2

69.9 (58.0, 80.1)

48.9 (43.4, 54.5)

23.4 (17.9, 29.6)

87.9 (82.3, 92.3)

0.59 (0.53, 0.65)

0.340

Modified BMI 27 kg/m2

67.1 (55.1, 77.7)

53.5 (47.9, 59.0)

24.4 (18.6, 30.9)

87.9 (82.6, 92.1)

0.60 (0.54, 0.66)

Modified BMI 27.5 kg/m2

63.0 (50.9, 74.0)

54.4 (48.9, 59.9)

23.6 (17.8, 30.2)

86.8 (81.4, 91.1)

0.59 (0.53, 0.65)

Modified BMI 30 kg/m2

60.3 (48.1, 71.5)

55.4 (49.8, 60.8)

23.2 (17.4, 29.8)

86.2 (80.8, 90.6)

0.58 (0.52, 0.62)

Original BMI 35 kg/m2

56.2 (44.1, 67.8)

56.9 (51.3, 67.8)

22.5 (16.7, 29.3)

85.3 (79.9, 89.7)

0.57 (0.50, 0.63)

  1. AUC Area under ROC curve, BMI Body mass index, PPV Positive predictive value, NPV Negative predictive value, ROC Receiver operating characteristics curve statistics