Skip to main content

Table 2 Intraoperative hemodynamic parameters and end-tidal CO2

From: Effects of low versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum on renal syndecan-1 shedding and VEGF receptor-2 expression in living-donor nephrectomy: a randomized controlled study

Parameters

Mean (CI 95%)

p

Mean Difference

CI 95%

p

12 mmHg

8 mmHg

1. Cardiac index (L/minute/m2)

 a. baseline

2.84 (2.49–3.23)

2.76 (2.48–3.07)

0.7

1.028 (0.872–1.211)

 

 b. at 2 h of pneumoperitoneum

3.20 (2.78–3.70)

3.35 (2.98–3.77)

0.6

0.957 (0.800–1.146)

0.6

 c. 2 h after desufflation

3.24 (2.85–3.69)

3.39 (3.08–3.73)

0.6

0.957 (0.818–1.119)

 

2. Stroke volume index (mL/m2)

 a. baseline

36.84 (32.77–41.67)

34.70 (31.05–38.47)

0.5

0.690 (0.240–1.980)

 

 b. at 2 h of pneumoperitoneum

33.70 (28.98–38.550

37.20 (32.34–42.06)

0.1

0.33 (0.10–1.03)

0.5

 c. 2 h after desufflation

32.12 (28.57–35.77)

37.64 (32.6–42.77)

0.1

0.35 (0.11–1.10)

 

3. End-tidal CO2 (mmHg)

 a. baseline

35.59 (33.89–37.29)

34.86 (33.47–36.25)

0.5

0.727 (−1.41–2.86)

 

 b. at 2 h of pneumoperitoneum

37.77 (36.36–39.18)

38.00 (36.79–39.21)

0.8

− 0.23 (− 2.03–1.57)

0.3

 c. 2 h after desufflation

37,14 (35.46–38.81)

38.32 (37.06–39.58)

0.3

− 1.182 (− 3.22–0.85)

 

4. Mean arterial pressure (mmHg)

 a. baseline

77.92 (72.75–83.10)

78.30 (72.85–83.76)

0.9

−0.38 (−7.68–6.92)

 

 b. at 2 h of pneumoperitoneum

80.05 (75.72–84.37)

82.31 (77.59–87.15)

0.5

−2.26 (− 8.47–3.95)

0.5

 c. 2 h after desufflation

85.77 (80.48–91.07)

83.06 (78.79–87.31)

0.4

2.73 (−3.87–9.32)

 

5. Heart rate (beats/minute)

 a. baseline

76.82 (72.34–81.56)

65.69 (61.56–70.10)

0.1

1.17 (0.07–1.27)

 

 b. at 2 h of pneumoperitoneum

86.98 (82.62–91.56)

74.10 (69.41–79.10)

<  0.001

1.18 (1.08–1.27)

0.033

 c. 2 h after desufflation

95.39 (89.62–101.53)

77.66 (72.23–83.52)

<  0.001

1.23 (1.12–1.35)

 
  1. Data are presented as percentage (%) or geometric mean and confidence interval 95% (minimum–maximum), p < 0.05 is significant. The two groups were compared with unpaired t-test and a general linear model