Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the patients

From: Efficacy of continuous epidural infusion with epidural electric stimulation compared to that of conventional continuous epidural infusion for acute herpes zoster management: a retrospective study

 

Acute HZ (≤ 30 days)

P value

Contrast group (n = 57)

Stimulation group (n = 57)

Age (years)

67.0 ± 10.3

66.2 ± 11.7

P = 0.72

Sex (M/F)

25/32

16/41

P = 0.12

Site of HZ infection

C: 14

C: 13

P = 0.52

T: 36

T: 33

L: 7

L: 11

HTN

26 (46% [33, 58%])

21 (37% [26, 50%])

P = 0.45

DM

11 (19% [11, 31%])

16 (28% [18, 41%])

P = 0.38

Asthma

3 (5% [2, 14%])

1 (2% [0, 9%])

P = 0.62

Hepatic disease

5 (9% [4, 19%])

3 (5% [2, 14%])

P = 0.72

Kidney disease

2 (4% [1, 12%])

3 (5% [2, 14%])

P = 1.0

Avg. amount of ropivacaine in the infusion device (ml)

37.7 ± 3.8

37.5 ± 4.0

P = 0.79

Baseline pain scorea

8 (7–8)

8 (7–8)

P = 0.22

  1. Data are represented as mean ± standard deviation, median (interquartile range), or number (% [95% confidence interval])
  2. HZ herpes zoster, HTN hypertension, DM diabetes mellitus, Avg average, aPain score on an 11-point (0–10) numerical rating scale, C cervical, T thoracic, L lumbar