Skip to main content

Table 4 Potential data sources assessed for feasibility, credibility, comparability and understandability on a 5-point scale (1 to 5)

From: Identifying appropriate outcomes to help evaluate the impact of the Canadian Guideline for Safe and Effective Use of Opioids for Non-Cancer Pain

Outcome

Potential Data Source

Feasible*a

Credible*b

Comparable*c

Understandable*d

1. Effects of CNCP and taking opioids for CNCP on quality of life

Chart review

3

3

3

4

Self-report

5

4

4

5

2. Assessment of patient’s risk of addiction before starting opioid therapy by prescribers, such as use of tools.

Chart review

2

4

5

4

Self-report

5

2

5

4

3. Monitoring patients on opioid therapy for aberrant drug-related behaviour

Chart review

1

2

2

2

Self-report

4

2

3

3

4. Prescribing of opioids at or greater than the watchful dose (200 mg of morphine equivalent per day) for CNCP

Administrative database

5

5

5

5

5. Mortality rates associated with prescription opioid overdose

Administrative database

5

4

4

5

6. Prevalence and incidence of prescription opioid addiction

Chart review

1

2

2

2

Self-report

5

2

5

5

Administrative database

2

3

3

4

7. Discontinuation or tapering in patients experiencing adverse effects or insufficient opioid effectiveness

Chart review

1

2

2

2

Self-report

4

2

3

3

Administrative database

4

3

2

4

8. Assessment of pain using a validated pain scale or another validated method

Chart review

2

4

5

4

Self-report

5

2

5

4

9. Use of treatment agreements with patients before starting opioid therapy for CNCP

Chart review

2

4

5

4

Self -report

5

2

5

4

10. Use of patient information from prescription monitoring programs to monitor patients on opioid therapy for aberrant drug-related behaviours, where available

Prescription monitoring program(s)

5

5

3

5

11. Emergency room visit rates associated with prescription opioid overdose

Administrative database

5

4

4

5

12. Concomitant prescribing of benzodiazepines and opioids

Chart review

2

4

5

5

Self-report

5

2

5

5

Administrative database

4

4

5

5

13. Amount of weak and strong opioids prescribed by jurisdiction and per patient with CNCP

Chart review

4

4

4

5

Self-report

5

3

4

5

Administrative database

5

5

4

5

14. Acute and urgent health-care facilities’ use of policies to provide guidance on opioid prescribing

Facilities’ policies

4

4

5

5

15. Types and amounts of adjunctive medications prescribed for CNCP patients taking opioids

Chart review

3

4

4

5

Self-report

5

3

4

5

Administrative database

3

3

3

5

16. Safe initiation of fentanyl during an opioid trial using the “stepped approach” for CNCP

Chart review

2

4

5

5

Self-report

5

2

5

5

Administrative database

4

4

5

5

  1. Chronic Non-Cancer Pain (CNCP)
  2. *Scale from 1 to 5 where a point of 1 means “least” and a point of 5 means “most”
  3. aAdapted study definition: Data to measure outcome should be easily accessible
  4. bAdapted study definition: Should be valid and reliable,
  5. cAdapted study definition: Could be used to compare across geographic areas and across time,
  6. dAdapted study definition: Should be easy to interpret with no ambiguity as to whether performance has improved or deteriorated