Skip to main content

Table 3 Quality assessment of observational studies

From: Safety of intraoperative hypothermia for patients: meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials and observational studies

Items

Yamada 2019

Williams 2018

Henriksen 2016

Frisch 2016

Williams2018

Frisch 2017

Tsuchida 2015

Billeter 2014

Jeyadoss 2013

Kebria 2012

Title and Abstract

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Background/rationale

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Objectives

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

×

Study design

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Setting

√

√

√

√

×

√

√

×

√

√

Participants

√

×

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Variables

×

×

×

×

×

×

×

×

×

×

Data sources / measurement

√

×

√

√

×

√

√

√

√

√

Bias

√

×

×

×

×

×

×

×

×

×

Study size

×

×

×

×

×

×

×

×

×

×

Quantitative variables

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Statistical methods

×

×

×

×

×

×

×

×

×

×

Participants

√

×

√

√

√

√

√

×

√

√

Descriptive data

√

×

√

√

×

×

×

×

×

×

Outcome data

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Main results

√

×

√

×

×

√

×

×

×

×

Other analyses

√

√

×

×

×

√

√

√

√

×

Key results

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Limitations

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

×

Interpretation

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Generalisability

√

√

√

√

√

√

×

√

√

√

Funding

√

×

√

×

×

×

√

×

×

×

Percentage

86·36%

54·55%

77·27%

68·18%

54·55%

72·72%

68·18%

59·09%

68·18%

54·54%

Median

68·18%