Skip to main content

Table 1 Selected studies and the technology used for hemodynamic monitoring

From: Impact of perioperative hemodynamic optimization therapies in surgical patients: economic study and meta-analysis

Author-year (ref)

Objective

Technology

Bonazzi et al., 2002 [20]

Evaluation of the impact of hemodynamic optimization using a pulmonary artery catheter on the outcome of patients undergoing vascular surgery.

Pulmonary artery catheter

Venn et al., 2002 [21]

Evaluation of hemodynamic optimization therapy in patients undergoing hip surgery.

Transesophageal Doppler

Conway et al., 2002 [22]

Randomized study to evaluate the influence of fluid titration using transesophageal Doppler during intestinal surgeries.

Transesophageal Doppler

Gan et al., 2002 [23]

Evaluation of the impact of hemodynamic optimization therapy on the reduced hospital stay after major surgeries.

Transesophageal Doppler

Sandham et al., 2003 [24]

Randomized study evaluating the use of pulmonary artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients.

Pulmonary artery catheter

Wakeling et al., 2005 [25]

Evaluation of transesophageal echocardiography-guided hemodynamic optimization therapy for the reduced hospital stay during the postoperative period of major abdominal surgeries.

Transesophageal Doppler

Pearse et al., 2005 [26]

Evaluation of the use of GDT in highly complex surgeries to reduce perioperative complications and the length of hospital stay.

LiDCO monitoring system

Lobo et al., 2006 [27]

Investigation of the effects of the optimization of oxygen delivery in elective surgeries for high-risk patients.

Pulmonary artery catheter

Noblett et al., 2006 [28]

Evaluation of transesophageal echocardiography-guided hemodynamic optimization therapy in terms of the outcomes of patients undergoing colectomy.

Transesophageal Doppler

Harten et al., 2008 [29]

Randomized study evaluating the effect of hemodynamic optimization on renal function in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy.

FloTrac Vigileo system

Kapoor et al., 2008 [30]

Evaluation of GDT in patients undergoing moderate- to high-risk cardiac surgery.

FloTrac Vigileo system

Mayer et al., 2010 [31]

Evaluation of GDT based on the monitoring of the blood pressure wave in high-risk surgical patients.

FloTrac Vigileo system

Benes et al., 2010 [32]

Evaluation of hemodynamic optimization by fluid loading based on data obtained by Vigileo.

FloTrac Vigileo system

Cecconi et al., 2011 [11]

Evaluation of hemodynamic optimization therapy for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty under regional anesthesia.

FloTrac Vigileo system

Lobo et al., 2011 [33]

Evaluation of restrictive or conventional strategies for crystalloid administration during GDT in high-risk surgical patients.

LiDCO monitoring system

Salzwedel et al., 2013 [34]

Randomized study evaluating GDT based on the variation in the radial arterial pulse and the cardiac index and the effects of GDT on the postoperative complications of major abdominal surgeries.

FloTrac Vigileo system

van Beest et al., 2014 [35]

Evaluation of the effect of the tissue oxygenation optimization-based protocol on perioperative complication rates.

FloTrac Vigileo system

Pearse et al., 2014 [36]

Evaluation of the clinical effectiveness of the perioperative use of the cardiac output-guided hemodynamic therapy algorithm.

LiDCO monitoring system

Cannesson et al., 2015 [37]

Evaluation of the effects of the systematic implementation of GDT on the length of hospital stay and the incidence of complications after high-risk abdominal surgeries.

EV 1000 (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA)

Kumar et al., 2015 [38]

Randomized study evaluating the impact of GDT on the cardiac index and O2 extraction rate in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.

FloTrac Vigileo system

Calvo-Vecino et al., 2018 [39]

Randomized study evaluating the impact of GDT on the outcome in patients undergoing major surgeries compared to controls.

Transesophageal Doppler

  1. GDT Goal-directed therapy, O2 Oxygen