Skip to main content

Table 5 Effects of Dexmedetomidine on Patient and Surgeon Satisfaction

From: Perioperative Dexmedetomidine for outpatient cataract surgery: a systematic review

Study

Other Treatment Group(s)

Patient Satisfaction

Surgeon Satisfaction

Abdalla [23]

saline

–

–

Alhashemi [12]

midazolam

Increased satisfaction with sedation [median 7-point Likert-like verbal rating scale (IQR): 6 (6–7) vs 6 (5–7), P < 0.05]

No statistically significant difference (7-point Likert-like verbal rating scale)

Altiparmak [24]

remifentanil

–

–

Apan [11]

midazolam and saline

No statistical analyses of patient comments regarding satisfaction and effectiveness of sedation

No statistically significant difference (4-point scale)

Ayoglu [21]

no sedation

Increased NRSa scores [data not reported, P = 0.001]

No statistically significant difference (NRS)

Dogan [13]

midazolam-fentanyl with topical analgesia or peribulbar block

Decreased [mean patient satisfaction on 5-point scale: 3.60 and 3.65 for patients receiving midazolam, fentanyl, and topical or peribulbar block, respectively; compared to 3.15 and 2.90 for patients receiving dexmedetomidine and topical or peribulbar block, respectively; P < 0.05]

Decreased [mean surgeon satisfaction on 5-point scale: 3.75 and 3.70 for patients receiving midazolam, fentanyl, and topical or peribulbar block, respectively; compared to 3.25 and 3.25 for patients receiving dexmedetomidine and topical or peribulbar block, respectively; P < 0.05]

Erdurmus [14]

saline

Increased score on 5-point scale [no data reported, P = 0.042]

Increased [mean surgeon satisfaction score on 5-point scale (SDb): 3.41 (0.80) vs 2.36 (1.26), P = 0.003]

Ghodki [15]

saline

Increased [mean patient satisfaction score on 10-point scale (range): 9 (8–10) vs 7 (5–8), P = 0.0001]

Increased [surgeon satisfaction score (excellent/good): 26/4 vs 13/17, P = 0.0001]

Kermany [10]

remifentanil

–

–

Muttu [16]

midazolam

–

No statistically significant difference on 4-point scaled

Na [17]

propofol-alfentanil

Increased [ISASc (SD): 50.3 (6.2) vs 42.7 (8.7), P < 0.001; and median ISAS (IQR): 50 (48–55) vs 45.0 (39–49)]

–

Park [22]

remifentanil

No statistically significant difference in 7-point Likert-like verbal rating scale

Decreased [mean 7-point Likert-like verbal rating scale (range): 6.05 (4–7) vs 6.35 (3–7), P < 0.05]

Virkilla [19]

placebo

–

–

Virkilla [20]

midazolam and placebo

–

–

Yagan [18]

ketofole

No statistically significant difference in 7-point Likert-like verbal rating scale

No statistically significant difference in 7-point Likert-like verbal rating scale

  1. aNRS numeric rating scale, bSD standard deviation, cISAS Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale, d4-point scale poor, acceptable, good, or excellent, eketofol ketamine and propofol