Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Intubation of non-difficult airways using video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscope: a randomized, parallel-group study

Original Submission
11 Nov 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
14 Dec 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mohamed Ismail
17 Dec 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hassan Ahmed
25 Jan 2019 Author responded Author comments - De-Xing Liu
Resubmission - Version 2
25 Jan 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Feb 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ahmed Abdelaal Ahmed Mahmoud
14 Feb 2019 Author responded Author comments - De-Xing Liu
Resubmission - Version 3
14 Feb 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
6 Mar 2019 Author responded Author comments - De-Xing Liu
Resubmission - Version 4
6 Mar 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
27 Mar 2019 Author responded Author comments - De-Xing Liu
Resubmission - Version 5
27 Mar 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 5
12 Apr 2019 Author responded Author comments - De-Xing Liu
Resubmission - Version 6
12 Apr 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 6
15 Apr 2019 Author responded Author comments - De-Xing Liu
Resubmission - Version 7
15 Apr 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
18 Apr 2019 Editorially accepted
15 May 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12871-019-0737-3

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page