Table 4 Summary of the questionnaire results
Theme/Items | Disagree n(%) | Neutral n(%) | Agree n(%) |
|---|---|---|---|
Evaluation of the morphine PFS system for N/PCA; n (%) | |||
Set up time is quicker (5–9 min) | 1 (0.8) | 11 (8.8) | 113 (90.4) |
New paperwork easier to use | 2 (1.6) | 26 (20.8) | 97 (77.6) |
If PFS out-of-stock; easier to prepare standard concentration than previous system (prepare individual syringe based on patient weight) | 6 (4.8) | 42 (33.6) | 77 (61.6) |
Little impact of distraction when setting up PFS compared to previous system | 27 (21.6) | 36 (28.8) | 62 (49.6) |
Satisfied with using morphine PFS on daily practice | 1 (0.8) | 11 (8.8) | 113 (90.4) |
Quality of the morphine PFS system | |||
Less time spend in setting up PFS is beneficial | 0 | 5 (4.0) | 120 (96) |
Using PFS avoid waste of morphine ampoules | 2 (1.6) | 15 (12.0) | 105 (84) |
Prefer using aseptically prepared standard concentration to individualized preparation (mg/kg) | 0 | 16 (12.8) | 109 (87.2) |
the morphine PFS system helped in making the process of administering N/PCA infusion safer | 4 (3.2) | 10 (8.0) | 111 (88.8) |
The morphine PFS system help to provide better quality of care to paediatric patients | 2 (1.6) | 35 (28.0) | 88 (70.4) |
Using PFS help in reducing incidents of injury might result from breaking ampoules | 1 (0.8) | 27 (21.6) | 97 (77.6) |
The morphine PFS system provide more accurate dosing | 4 (3.2) | 35 (28.0) | 86 (68.8) |
Impact of the morphine PFS system on patient safety | |||
Overall the morphine PFS system help to improve patient safety | 0 | 6 (4.8) | 119 (95.2) |