Skip to main content

Table 2 Study results by laryngoscope blades in the NA scenario

From: A comparison of two hyperangulated video laryngoscope blades to direct laryngoscopy in a simulated infant airway: a bicentric, comparative, randomized manikin study

p-values of Pairwise Differences

Outcomes

MaB

DB

MiB

KV

DB vs. MaB

DB vs. MiB

KV vs. MaB

KV vs. MiB

KV vs. DB

Time a Sequences (s)

 TTBV

5.5 [5–7]

5 [4–6.5]

7 [5–8]

5 [3.5–6]

0.01

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

0.02

 TTP

10.25 [9–11.5]

10 [9–11.5]

12 [10–14.5]

9.5 [8.5–11]

0.85

< 0.001

0.02

< 0.001

0.002

 TTV

14.5 [13–16]

14.5 [13–16]

16 [14–19]

13 [12–15]

0.75

0.001

0.002

< 0.001

< 0.001

No. attemptsb

 1st

80/80 (100%)

79/80 (98%)

78/80 (97%)

80/80 (100%)

0.31

0.56

> 0.99

0.15

0.31

 2nd

0

1/80 (2%)

2/80 (3%)

0

 

0.56

   

 Failed

0

0

0

0

     

Glottic view

 C&L 1/2/3b

67/13/0

78/2/0

57/23/0

79/1/0

0.007

< 0.001

0.001

< 0.001

> 0.99

 POGO (%)a

90 [90–100]

100 [100]

95 [80–100]

100 [100]

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

0.84

 ELMb

5/80 (6%)

0/80 (0%)

11/80 (14%)

1/80 (1%)

0.02

< 0.001

0.09

0.002

0.32

 BURP

0

0

6/11 (54%)

1/1 (100%)

     

 Neck extension

5/5 (100%)

0

7/11 (63%)

0

     

 Degree of a difficulty (1–5)

1 [1–2]

1 [1–1]

1 [1–2]

1 [1–2]

0.44

< 0.001

< 0.001

0.9

< 0.001

  1. aMedians and [IQR] are shown. Pairwise differences among devices were evaluated using the signed-rank test
  2. bAbsolute numbers (proportion) are shown. Pairwise differences among devices were evaluated using the chi-square test