Skip to main content

Table 2 Incidence of complications and block success rate in patients receiving a forearm IVRA

From: The analgesic efficacy of intravenous regional anesthesia with a forearm versus conventional upper arm tourniquet: a systematic review

 

Type of study

Patients with signs of local anesthetic systemic toxicity/total number of patients receiving forearm IVRA (%)

Local anesthetic + dosage

Success rate of forearm IVRA (%)

Studies using a full dose of la (type of study)

Chong et al., 2007

Prospective RCT

1/15 (6.7%)

Lidocaine 1% - 3 mg/kg made up to 40 ml of solution

15/15 (100%)

Studies using a lower dose of la (type of study)

Chan et al., 1987

Prospective study

No control group

0/55 (0%)

Lidocaine 0.5% - 2 mg/kg with a maximum volume of 20 ml

55/55 (100%)

Peng et al., 2002

Prospective RCT

0/40 (0%)

Lidocaine 0.5% or Ropivacaine 0.375% - 0.4 ml/kg with a maximum volume of 25 ml

40/40 (100%)

Karalezli et al., 2004

Prospective study

No control group

0/120 (0%)

Prilocaine – 1.5 mg/kg in 10 ml

119/120 (99.1%)

Arslanian et al., 2013

Retrospective study

0/105 (0%)

Lidocaine 0.5% - 25 ml

105/105 (100%)

Singh et al., 2010

Prospective RCT

0/20 (0%)

Lidocaine 0.5% - 1.5 mg/kg

19/20 (95%)

Chiao et al., 2013

Prospective RCT

0/28 (0%)

Lidocaine 2% - 8 ml (+  10 mg ketorolac)

28/28 (100%)

Total low dose forearm IVRA

0/368 (0%)

366/368 (99.4%)

Total all IVRA

1/383 (0.26%)

381/383 (99.5%)

  1. IVRA intravenous regional anesthesia, RCT randomized clinical trial, LA local anesthetic