Skip to main content

Table 1 Respondents’ baseline characteristics

From: Use, applicability and reliability of depth of hypnosis monitors in children - a survey among members of the European Society for Paediatric Anaesthesiology

 

Users (N = 68)

Non-users (N = 70)

P-value

Professional title

  

0.366a

 Anaesthesiologist

67 (99%)

66 (94%)

 

 Anaesthesiologist in training (resident)

1 (1%)

4 (6%)

 

Practicing in

  

n/a

 Europe

57 (84%)

58 (83%)

 

 Middle East

6 (9%)

4 (6%)

 

 East Asia

1 (1%)

2 (3%)

 

 Australia

1 (1%)

3 (4%)

 

 South Americas

2 (3%)

1 (1%)

 

 North Americas

1 (1%)

2 (3%)

 

Works in

  

0.064a

 (university) children hospital

41 (60%)

31 (44%)

 

 non-children’s hospital

27 (40%)

39 (56%)

 

Years of practice

  

0.898b

  < 10 years

17 (25%)

20 (29%)

 

 11–20 years

27 (40%)

24 (34%)

 

  > 20 years

24 (35%)

26 (37%)

 

Age

  

0.908b

  < 40 years

20 (29%)

20 (29%)

 

 41–50 years

25 (37%)

28 (40%)

 

  > 51 years

23 (34%)

22 (31%)

 
  1. Comparison of baseline characteristics of respondents either using (Users) or not using (Non-users) depth of hypnosis monitoring in children
  2. aFisher’s Exact test
  3. bMantel-Haenszel test