Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Role of tube size and intranasal compression of the nasotracheal tube in respiratory pressure loss during nasotracheal intubation: a laboratory study

Original Submission
6 Sep 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shalini Raj Lawrence
2 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Manabu Hashimoto
3 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alexander Kuo
11 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Koichi Futagawa
Resubmission - Version 2
11 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alexander Kuo
16 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Manabu Hashimoto
3 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Koichi Futagawa
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alexander Kuo
1 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Koichi Futagawa
Resubmission - Version 4
1 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
17 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yasuko Nagasaka
24 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Koichi Futagawa
Resubmission - Version 5
24 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
15 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Koichi Futagawa
Resubmission - Version 6
15 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 6
26 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Koichi Futagawa
Resubmission - Version 7
26 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 7
12 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alexander Kuo
18 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Koichi Futagawa
Resubmission - Version 8
18 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 8
17 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yasuko Nagasaka
24 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Koichi Futagawa
Resubmission - Version 9
24 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 9
13 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yasuko Nagasaka
24 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kiyoyuki Miyasaka
14 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Koichi Futagawa
Resubmission - Version 10
14 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 10
Publishing
3 Oct 2017 Editorially accepted
17 Oct 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12871-017-0432-1

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page