Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: A discrete event simulation model of clinical and operating room efficiency outcomes of sugammadex versus neostigmine for neuromuscular block reversal in Canada

Original Submission
10 Sep 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
1 Feb 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ashraf Dahaba
21 Mar 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dr. Guy Warman
11 Apr 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ashish Sinha
20 May 2016 Author responded Author comments - Ralph Insinga
Resubmission - Version 2
20 May 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 May 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dr. Guy Warman
25 May 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ashraf Dahaba
25 Jun 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ashish Sinha
11 Jul 2016 Author responded Author comments - Ralph Insinga
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Jul 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
6 Sep 2016 Author responded Author comments - Ralph Insinga
6 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ashraf Dahaba
Resubmission - Version 4
6 Sep 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
15 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ashraf Dahaba
3 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Ralph Insinga
Resubmission - Version 5
3 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 5
4 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Ralph Insinga
Resubmission - Version 6
4 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
8 Nov 2016 Editorially accepted
16 Nov 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12871-016-0281-3

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page