Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Validity and reliability of quality of recovery-35 Thai version: a prospective questionnaire-based study

Original Submission
6 Nov 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
3 Dec 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gianluca Cappelleri
16 Dec 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Giovanni Cucchiaro
17 Dec 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hanan Khafagy
30 Jan 2016 Author responded Author comments - Siriporn Pitimana-aree
Resubmission - Version 2
30 Jan 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
1 Mar 2016 Author responded Author comments - Siriporn Pitimana-aree
Resubmission - Version 3
1 Mar 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
19 Mar 2016 Author responded Author comments - Siriporn Pitimana-aree
Resubmission - Version 4
19 Mar 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
4 Jul 2016 Author responded Author comments - Siriporn Pitimana-aree
Resubmission - Version 5
4 Jul 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 5
11 Jul 2016 Author responded Author comments - Siriporn Pitimana-aree
Resubmission - Version 6
11 Jul 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 6
25 Jul 2016 Author responded Author comments - Siriporn Pitimana-aree
Resubmission - Version 7
25 Jul 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
6 Aug 2016 Editorially accepted
18 Aug 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12871-016-0229-7

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page