Skip to main content
Fig. 1 | BMC Anesthesiology

Fig. 1

From: Thromboelastometry versus free-oscillation rheometry and enoxaparin versus tinzaparin: an in-vitro study comparing two viscoelastic haemostatic tests’ dose-responses to two low molecular weight heparins at the time of withdrawing epidural catheters from ten patients after major surgery

Fig. 1

Diagram showing the parameters recorded from rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) and free oscillation rheometry (FOR, ReoRox). (a) ROTEM. (b) ReoRox. A brief explanation of the parameters follows: measures of clot initiation: ROTEM-CT (clot time) and FOR-COT1 and -COT2. Measures of clot propagation: ROTEM-CFT and –alpha angle; and FOR-(COT2-COT1) and –Slope. Measures of clot structure: ROTEM-MCF and FOR-G’max. Measures of fibrinolysis: ROTEM-ML and FOR-Clot SR

Back to article page

BMC Anesthesiology

ISSN: 1471-2253

Contact us