Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10 Oct 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 3 Dec 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniel Sessler |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 3 Dec 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 15 Dec 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Philip Peyton |
| 2 Jan 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Kranke |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| 14 Jan 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniel Sessler |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 14 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 14 Jan 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniel Sessler |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 14 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 19 Jan 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Daniel Sessler |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 19 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 3 Feb 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
| 3 Feb 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2253-9-1 |
You can find further information about peer review here.