Peer Review reports
From: Veno-venous ECMO: a synopsis of nine key potential challenges, considerations, and controversies
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sep 2013 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 11 Sep 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Papadimos |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 11 Sep 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 21 Oct 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel Chipman |
| 28 Oct 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Steven Lisco |
| 18 Feb 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Papadimos |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 18 Feb 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 20 Mar 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel Chipman |
| 1 Apr 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Steven Lisco |
| 15 May 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Papadimos |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 15 May 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 20 Jun 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Papadimos |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 20 Jun 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 30 Jul 2014 | Editorially accepted | |
| 6 Aug 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2253-14-65 |
You can find further information about peer review here.