Skip to main content

Table 4 ProSeal LMA insertion parameters and incidence of postoperative sore throat

From: Techniques for the insertion of the proseal laryngeal mask airway: comparison of the foley airway stylet tool with the introducer tool in a prospective, randomized study

 

FAST group

IT group

P value

Insertion time

17.4 ± 6.1

12.6 ± 4.7

<0.001***

Insertion condition

   

  Smooth

62 (89.9%)

67 (89.4%)

 

  Mild resistance

2 (2.9%)

1 (1.3%)

0.413

  Two attempts

2 (2.9%)

6 (8.0%)

 

  Failed insertion#

3 (4.3%)

1 (1.3%)

 

Viewing glottic field

   

   1

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0.201

   2

4 (6.1%)

2 (2.7%)

 

   3

42 (63.6%)

57 (77.0%)

 

   4

20 (30.3%)

15 (20.3%)

 

   5

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

 

Viewing esophagus

   

   A

59 (89.4%)

69 (93.2%)

0.435

   B

6 (9.1%)

3 (4.1%)

 

   C

1 (1.5%)

2 (2.7%)

 

Sore throat in PACU

   

  None

44 (66.7%)

56 (75.7%)

0.377

  Mild

20 (30.1.1%)

18 (24.3%)

 

  Moderate

1 (1.5%)

0 (0%)

 

  Severe

1 (1.5%)

0 (0%)

 

Sore throat on the first

   

Postoperative morning

   

  None

52 (78.8%)

69 (93.2%)

0.035*

  Mild

11 (16.7%)

3 (4.1%)

 

  Moderate

3 (4.5%)

2 (2.7%)

 

  Severe

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

 
  1. PACU, post-anesthesia care unit; #: Due to failed insertion, ProSeal LMA post-insertion assessments were excluded. *: P< 0.05; ***: P< 0.001.