Peer Review reports
From: The Perioperative Surgical Home: how can it make the case so everyone wins?
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 30 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Angela Bader |
| 11 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rupert Pearse |
| 21 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Francois Clergue |
| 28 Jan 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Vetter |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 28 Jan 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 6 Feb 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Vetter |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 6 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 13 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rupert Pearse |
| 22 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Francois Clergue |
| 2 Mar 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Angela Bader |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 8 Mar 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
| 14 Mar 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2253-13-6 |
You can find further information about peer review here.